|
Post by Admin on Dec 17, 2023 15:30:00 GMT
I've moved the posts relevant to Kate Middleton and Meghan Markle, their media "fighting", PR, alleged behind the scenes battles, whatever, etc, etc, etc, (and it always seems to be something, huh?) to a new thread: Kate Middleton &/or Meghan Markle - Media & PR/Fighting for a Crown GD Let's leave discussion of Counci Caro Middleton for this thread, as getting off topic (but, delightfully, I may add, so keep it up,folks!) Best, Admin
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 17, 2023 15:48:24 GMT
@canellelabelle - Here's a particularly stupid Cambridge stan. She cannot even spell "misogyny", right.
Misoginy? - sit down and shut up, fool.
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Dec 17, 2023 16:10:14 GMT
@canellelabelle - Here's a particularly stupid Cambridge stan. She cannot even spell "misogyny", right. Misoginy? - sit down and shut up, fool. My posts were about how both she and her mother were obsessed with pursuing him and her family profited monetarily through their not apparently as lucrative as implied business, though the TV show did not depict this or their timeline/relationship truthfully. It instead tried to turn it into a romance and a fairytale and the public is funding this polishing and whitewashing of the media, which is what insiders who live through this, including the other prince/brother-in-law says is what the Royal Family does singlemindedly. Meanwhile neither person in the couple works more than about a month a year altogether. It is not about the topic posted about.
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Dec 17, 2023 16:14:20 GMT
I've moved the posts relevant to Kate Middleton and Meghan Markle, their media "fighting", PR, alleged behind the scenes battles, whatever, etc, etc, etc, (and it always seems to be something, huh?) to a new thread: Kate Middleton &/or Meghan Markle - Media & PR/Fighting for a Crown GD Let's leave discussion of Counci Caro Middleton for this thread, as getting off topic (but, delightfully, I may add, so keep it up,folks!) Best, Admin I selected but saw my post included the incorrect quote. My posts were and were intended to be about the thread topic not about the topic of the new thread.They are about what she and her mother were obsessed about their and her entire lives and went through the timeline portrayed in the Crown, if you look at the dates of the articles and links and the inside information about what the Royal Family have been doing since Diana days at a minimum.
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Dec 17, 2023 16:27:44 GMT
My posts refer to "they" as the Crown so the posts don't make sense in the other thread topic and are not about this new thread topic, which didn't exist at the time these were posted. My posts are about the timeline and relationship depicted in The Crown and the true obsession by her and her mother, rather than instead a supposed singlemindedness by him in pursuing her from the start, as portrayed incorrectly in the Crown in a manner that I do not consider truthful. I do not consider it truthful or reflective of dates or material in the public, which the posts include links to. The posts are about her constant, lifelong showing herself without clothes particularly during the time frame they were in the same circles while she was trying to get him to glance her way and since. The links are to articles and material dated during the timeline portrayed in the Crown and predate the topic of the new thread. The posts do not make sense there.
To state what was disclosed at the time is not focused on the person that came along decades later, though information from insiders including his own family about that time frame and that they in the Royal Family polish the media constantly while taxpayers fund them is relevant to this whitewashing going on in the media and in the Crown. The "they" in the posts does not make sense in the new thread since "they" refers to the Crown and its portrayal of her mother and her mother's brother, Gary, and her and the obsession these pursued during that time.
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Dec 17, 2023 16:41:59 GMT
Harry has been saying for at least a year maybe more that "Never complain, never explain" as a motto has not once ever been true of the Royal Family, who simply ordinarily does not speak directly to the public in order to keep up appearances under the untrue motto, and does not ever acknowledge being, though IS, the source. His statements are that the Royal Family has been singlemindedly telling the media stories to whitewash each individual source themselves from the start the whole time he was in the Royal Family. (This includes, he stated, Camilla starting since the poor public perception of her through Diana.) Which relates to the time frame portrayed in the Crown. He said this himself in at least one interview personally. This inside perspective concurs Diana's statements to the public directly and statements on her disclosures to the media.
My posts simply included one link about how this has been going on from the start, including during the timeframe portrayed in The Crown and including during the media whitewashing I do not consider truthful about this mother, her daughter, her brother, Gary, her family and this couple, including William and the relationship and timeline, during the Crown time frame.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 17, 2023 16:52:24 GMT
I've moved the posts relevant to Kate Middleton and Meghan Markle, their media "fighting", PR, alleged behind the scenes battles, whatever, etc, etc, etc, (and it always seems to be something, huh?) to a new thread: Kate Middleton &/or Meghan Markle - Media & PR/Fighting for a Crown GD Let's leave discussion of Counci Caro Middleton for this thread, as getting off topic (but, delightfully, I may add, so keep it up,folks!) Best, Admin I selected but saw my post included the incorrect quote. My posts were and were intended to be about the thread topic not about the topic of the new thread.They are about what she and her mother were obsessed about their and her entire lives and went through the timeline portrayed in the Crown, if you look at the dates of the articles and links and the inside information about what the Royal Family have been doing since Diana days at a minimum. Fair enough - I will move them back. You have made a very convincing argument. The important thing is to please keep posting this information. It is MUCH needed! Best, Admin
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 17, 2023 17:08:17 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 17, 2023 17:09:13 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 17, 2023 17:10:06 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 17, 2023 17:49:39 GMT
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Dec 17, 2023 21:19:13 GMT
Kate brought nothing to her marriage and brought nothing to her nation. After all these years, she has done nothing. She has done nothing, she has brought nothing, and she has nothing to cushion her fall if William truly decides to end it. Carole was a groomer and Carole is a user and Carole has done nothing but mooch.
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Dec 18, 2023 6:02:59 GMT
I selected but saw my post included the incorrect quote. My posts were and were intended to be about the thread topic not about the topic of the new thread.They are about what she and her mother were obsessed about their and her entire lives and went through the timeline portrayed in the Crown, if you look at the dates of the articles and links and the inside information about what the Royal Family have been doing since Diana days at a minimum. Fair enough - I will move them back. You have made a very convincing argument. The important thing is to please keep posting this information. It is MUCH needed! Best, Admin Thanks! I think the links I posted show either -she is inclined to show herself in public without clothes, going on for decades, starting in youth -she was obsessed with getting him to glance her way, -she, her mother and her uncle appeared to share this fixation with each using each's own individual technique together, in concert -she is deeply inclined to skirting work for decades, lifelong a combination of conceivably all of these, with each contributing maybe to the deepening of the other of the above elements While the Crown portrayed her mother's pursuit, I think it did whitewash this too, including with reference to research posted here before, regarding the money for Marlborough to get her in the same circles, and for the following gap year, schooling and goings on. Plus regarding Uncle Gary, money and funding. In the Crown, the mother encouraged her to show her legs and use her assets to get the object of pursuit to glance her way, incidentally. It is interesting that if she really wanted to be princess and sought the enthusiasm for Diana, seen at Concert for Diana, to be directed at her, she did in public the opposite of what would lead to this. She was not modest. She was not, as Diana said, keeping herself very proper and clean and, indeed, in the latter case a virgin. Instead, she got herself written up in the news as having the school-wide reputation as one desperate for getting male attention any way she could, as Middlebum. She did not work much. Diana was smitten with her students and loved her work. She said she was truly sad she had to leave it. Then Diana worked diligently and did well. In contrast, she has pretty much not worked, more or less her entire life, in the manner an adult works. Her children act like entitled, spoiled brats. The closeness and love between Diana and her children could be seen. I remember them behaving properly as young children could, as she lived. This suggests she really is inclined to take off her clothes and not work much, lifelong, and that, at a minimum, her family realized this, since she started this pretty young. She and her mother, uncle and family realized they must whitewash this since she still does both. This suggests if she could get him to glance her way by going in the direction Diana did, she might have saved herself the later trouble. Interviews on his first impression of her suggest she couldn't. The Crown reversed this. It also seems to portray her as a serious, diligent, industrious, promising student, which I remember reading of as being the opposite. It also whitewashes the attention,-getting ploys coupled with mind games ashe played. Since Diana has already announced--which Harry later concurred occurred, lifelong-- their own family sees the papers laid out at breakfast each morning and are the source, despite the public motto, she and her family realized, and most likely intended for the public to fund her public parading without clothes, media whitewashing, lack of work, mother's pursuits and whitewashing uncle's young girl prostitutes and drug offers. Which is what is happening starting many years ago. The Gary offering girls news stories disappeared from search. The public is funding this.
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Dec 18, 2023 7:51:12 GMT
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Dec 18, 2023 8:11:51 GMT
In my view, people have problems accepting that there is such a thing as 'better' rather than otherwise. William was a better catch than Kate and he had more to offer than she did. Kate was just another person, ordinary and mediocre and in my view, seriously disturbed. I think Kate was and has been a woman who was broken at a young age and functioned in a way that she had been trained in as socially acceptable. If it were accepted that Kate was lucky, it would undermine the misplaced sense of destiny that too many people have. We have too many basic young women who think that they are going to be more than they actually will. Kate got lucky that she was able to get into his bed and most men on campus likely checked Kate out mainly because she was in fact bad news and the men knew it. It's not like Kate was too the manor born and she had to really claw her way up and did it in all the worst ways. Willima likely checked her out after hearing about how easy and discreet she was.
Diana was born an aristocrat and was never without a title throughout her life. Kate was born common and it is clear that she refuses to make more of herself.
Diana was well behaved and was aware that messing around sexually was not a good idea and she was too young to be like that anyway. Kate was likely notorious on campus and it is clear that she was in fact too young to be notorious, but she was groomed and she somehow couldn't find it within her to break away.
Charles would NEVER have gotten away making Diana wait until her thirties. Kate was made to wait and put up with degrading dithering from William. She could have walked away, but for some reason wouldn't.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 19, 2023 20:24:09 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 21, 2023 14:18:32 GMT
Aside: Not surprised these idiots thrive on X - so deluded...
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 21, 2023 14:18:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 21, 2023 14:20:12 GMT
Save yourself Andy - just nod politely and slowly walk away from these deluded Cambridge stans. They know EVERYTHING.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 21, 2023 14:21:30 GMT
|
|