KKKate "Ka-CHING" Middleton's Royal Cashing In

I sometimes wonder what is going on with European royalty these days. The minute Kate was seen cavorting with Richard Branson, William should have cut her out of his personal life. Second, Kate was leeching even then and it is clear that she was in fact not at Necker Island for any reputable business meetings or conferences. Second, since when does an art major become some kind of business tycoon capable of negotiating with seasoned senior executives.

Aside: Yachts, but you know what they are saying.

I think Kate is scheming and cold and might have a personality disorder. (Honestly. This last is not intended as a disparaging comment rather an honest opinion, though, of course, not diagnosis).

During and after all these years, notwithstanding her scheming, which I think she does a lot of, her brain seems frozen in a stunted, infantile, entitled, spoiled, bratty, primitive, pea brain state.

I read a psychiatrist's, as I recall, theory that people that constantly lie and try internally to deny reality and, through their deception, lies, scheming, manipulation and tantrums, force this denial of reality and false reality on everyone become stunted. Throughout many years, they do not evolve or mature because they never face reality, process reality or do the work coming face-to-face with one's mistakes, shortcomings and immaturity entails. This is what she reminds me of.

Her mental state does not seem that different than that of a spoiled toddler. Mentally she, her sister, her uncle and her mother seem the same and at the same level of immaturity continuously as decades ago through today.

She and Will remind me of Gollum and Gollum. G&G, like Charles and Camilla's C&C, except Charles and Camilla also remind me of G&G. Indeed, this whole family reminds me of a complete family of Gollums.

They, especially Will and Kate, made me realize what complete ridiculousness and how unwarranted a monarchy, its rules, the way monarchy works--any monarchy--and especially this monarchy is today. Clearly, this result, this complete family of Gollums, including child traffickers, controlling and suppressing urgent news disclosing Epstein's crimes proves this.

I remember this is really a German family named Gothe or a name beginning with G, though for me Gollum will do.

I am not a fan of Elizabeth for supporting Epstein Andrew or raising this complete family of Gollums though was reminded . . .

. . . It will end in tears -> (which led to, indeed) -> she made me cry! no, she made me cry! for this almost decade-long debacle . . .

. . . it isn't ended yet . . . . Please end this monarchy, please end the monarchy system, please cease the misery put out on the world by it and that the world must suffer from it . . . .

Here is the video of Amy Robach from ABC on hot mic.

www.newsweek.com/jeffrey-epstein-hot-mic-amy-robach-prince-william-kate-middleton-1857802

According to Harry, the "Palace" is his family: Elizabeth, Phillip, Charles, Camilla, Will, Kate . . . .

Robach said they were threatened in "a million different ways" and were afraid ABC would not be given access to interview Will and Kate if the press published the Epstein news with Virginia Roberts as source. Robach refers to this news story as on most likely the worst pedophile the U.S. has ever known.

Thus, was it Will and Kate themselves the press was afraid would not do an interview with it if it published it? Who besides Will and Kate could prevent themselves from being interviewed once publication of newsworthy, researched news about most likely the worst pedophile the U.S. has ever known was published, who would not prevent themselves from being interviewed if this news were not published? The article states Robach feared, once threatened by the family in a million different ways, Will and Kate would be so upset by the publication they would not do an interview.

Who made and what were these threats "in a million different ways"?

For the duration of this monarchy, we did not and it seems will not find out.

Who are all these blackmailed rich men that Robach 100% believes murdered Epstein? What about the additional "suicides" of those also involved in this type of trafficking and/or criminal impropriety toward children?

Why does the press fawn over Kate not ever putting a foot wrong when she/in this family/this family threatened the press in a million different ways and suppressed the Epstein news under looming refusal to interview while crimes were perpetrated against children and victims 3 more years?

What heartbreak for Virginia Roberts who had been in hiding for 12 years fearing for her life though mustered the courage to come forward without the resources of even 1 of these perpetrators.

I think there is merit in this perspective of the press' perception possibly though do not agree with this perception.

Robach was on a hot mic in August 2019 about the Epstein story suppression for at least about 3 years so at least since around 2016. This is almost a decade ago this could have been published, and there still were delays upon delays of release of information in recent years.

While this could describe the press' perspective, I think if Robach had released the Epstein news in 2016, the public, which has been the only ones consistently putting pressure on for a release of the Epstein list would have put more pressure on this instead of supporting the family's coercion or suppression of this news for the purpose of instead reading a Will and Kate interview, if this were the public's choice.

I think a British public, with whom I spent time, and who cheered each other and others up while facing very high taxes, hours delays in daily traffic, expensive cost of living, gray weather, disgusting at times public transportation conditions, difficult living conditions, bureaucracy and at times dirty and poor residential conditions, while these taxpayers funded extravagant royal waste, would pull together. I think the public being its own champion and working hard to survive was the case and this would be the effect, not this perception by the press. I didn't meet anyone that thought much of this family.

It would shift to a case of for the people by the people, as it ought to. It has been the people themselves sustaining the country and community, not this family.

Article about historic low monarchy approval rate among population:

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/apr/28/public-support-monarchy-historic-low-poll-reveals

Insightful statistics on % of population in Commonwealth countries in support of Republic and high number of such countries:

www.statista.com/chart/30904/commonwealth-countries-who-would-vote-to-become-a-republic/

The press ought to do the press' work and let the people decide. The people work hard and are not infantile, like this family the press is propping up. The people were and seemed realists and called it like it was.

It was a Brit that immediately, most bluntly opined disapproval of this family's waste of taxpayer funds while airing it's own dirty laundry complaining during Charles and Diana interviews, more than Americans.

I think the British public would do fine as would commonwealth public and rest of world. Sunlight is the best medicine.