Royal Surrogacy/Illegitimate children - Royal bastard Ed.

Admin Administrator (Empress) Posts: 14,089	Royal Surrogacy/Illegitimate children - Royal bastard Ed. Jul 18, 2024 13:05:59 GMT Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by Admin on Jul 18, 2024 13:05:59 GMT For all alleged surrogacy/illegitimate royal children/so-called "bastards" talk/discussion. Cambridge, Sussex, Middleton, etc, etc, etc. No holds barred. Admin
	Last Edit: Jul 18, 2024 13:09:47 GMT by Admin

Admin
Administrator (Empress)

Posts: 14,089

Royal Surrogacy/Illegitimate children - Royal bastard Ed. Jul 18, 2024 13:06:09 GMT

Quote

Post by Admin on Jul 18, 2024 13:06:09 GMT

He needs to be very careful nowing what the RF are like. If true they ought to acknowledge him, they would get far more respect.
Sent from my iPhone

On 9 Nov 2021, at 14:47, ************* <**********@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

Those fraudlings really need to be exposed soon

Sent from my iPhone

On 9 Nov 2021, at 14:36, ************ <**********@gmail.com> wrote:

In a court-ordered test, DNA sampling (either through swabs or blood) usually has rigorous controls. Labs are tightly controlled. But anything is possible. If sabotage is feared, you can always do a double-blind test in two or more different labs. Even send the DNA samples out of the country.
Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 9, 2021, at 1:42 AM, ********* <*************@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

I wouldn’t put it past the RF
to switch DNA samples. In some pics he has a similar cone head to Willy boy. It’s about time someone knocked dumb Willy boy off his perch
Sent from my iPhone

On 8 Nov 2021, at 22:50, ************@aol.com wrote:

I wonder if any of them acknowledge him? Bet they don't.

-----Original Message-----
From: ************** <*************@yahoo.co.uk>
To ****** <***********@shaw.ca>
Cc: **********
Sent: Mon, Nov 8, 2021 4:28 pm
Subject: Re: Need some info please
There is something about his face above his top lip and cheek formation which is just like Cam’s in one of the pics but as mentioned there is something of Tom P-B about him.
Sent from my iPhone

> On 8 Nov 2021, at 20:14, ****** <***********@shaw.ca> wrote:
>
> He looks like Chuck and Cam - a combo of them . Wow a teenage love baby. Lol
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: **************** <**************@yahoo.co.uk>
> To: ******* <*************@gmail.com>
> Cc: **************************
> Sent: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 12:35:56 -0700 (MST)
> Subject: Re: Need some info please
>> Reminds me a little of Tom Parker-Bowles
>> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 8 Nov 2021, at 19:11, ************** <************@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> <4daa202bcf81ad57a41aaf7b6a4e3b3f5c3d03b5-161x229-x0y83w1068h1519.jpg>
>>
>> Simon looks a lot like Charles for sure!
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>>> On Nov 8, 2021, at 1:03 PM, *************** <*************@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The issue depends a lot on the adoption’s legality. At common law, Adoption severs forever the parental rights of the biological parents. Look at the application— the “son” likely has gone all through this by now. He could determine much by getting DNA from any actual blood ancestor or descendant fro Queen Elizabeth or Prince Philip. Philip did provide his DNA in the case to discredit Anna Anderson as Princess Anastasia, so the DNA is out there. Not enough for a sure match, it enough for the “son” to know whether he’s in the ball park.
>>>
>>> **********
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>>> On Nov 8, 2021, at 12:15 PM, *********** <**************@shaw.ca> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Here's something - hes comparing a photo of his daughter whose mother is aboriginal next to Charlotte (thinking of anything it hammers home that Charlotte has far eastern blood) a half and half photo:
>>>>
>>>> 7news.com.au/lifestyle/prince-charles-and-camillas-aussie-son-shares-open-letter-with-the-queen-as-he-prepares-for-court-battle-c-4474325
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: *************** <*************@yahoo.co.uk>
>>>> To: ******* <*************@shaw.ca>
>>>> Cc: ********************
>>>> Sent: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 10:53:14 -0700 (MST)
>>>> Subject: Re: Need some info please
>>>>
>>>> I am fascinated and extremely curious
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>>>> On 8 Nov 2021, at 17:46, ************ <**************@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Makes me even more determined not to give up. Hope Chaz’s son proves real and as ********** says inherits the crown over dumb Willy
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 8 Nov 2021, at 14:14, ******* <************@shaw.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That may be a solution - I am sick and tired of having to constantly create new *************** accounts - you know that the Middletons banned me from the Daily Mail only a 100 times. Honestly.

>>>>>>
>>>>>> We are getting SO close, friends - we have to keep going with the onslaught. If the Queen passes anytime soon, the Middletons are going to think they have an "in" because either isn't or hasn't done anything about them thus far.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Buckle your seat belts...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ***************
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: ******************" <****************@gmail.com>
>>>>>> To: ********** <**************@shaw.ca>
>>>>>> Cc: ***************
>>>>>> Sent: Monday, November 8, 2021 7:49:56 AM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: Need some info please
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why don't you also open up a ********** account , ********* ? A few people do it and link between ******** and **********- it's like the Wild West there.
>>>>>> You can put the really juicy stuff on ********* and tempt ********** followers to it but making sure you do it in a way so you don't get locked out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 13:17, ********** <************@shaw.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>> I got locked again on ***********, will have to create another account, AGAIN (they never get back to you about unlocking your accounts, etc)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hateful posts? lol Right...just a few sore sugars not liking the truth.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ***********
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: *********** <*************@yahoo.co.uk>
>>>>>>> To ************** <*************@shaw.ca>
>>>>>>> Cc: *************************
>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, November 8, 2021 3:09:05 AM
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Need some info please
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am sure that I read somewhere that it was drug related. Try her sister Samantha on ********.
>>>>>>> Are the old RG archives available anywhere as it was discussed on there. Perhaps Yooper knows?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 8 Nov 2021, at 07:37, ************** <*************@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Couldn’t agree more ***********. I think things are slowly changing however and maybe the promise books and interviews next year will contribute.
>>>>>>> Betty doesn’t look happy and so much for cutting carbon footprint,
>>>>>>> even the corgi had its own Land Rover!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10174307/BBC-bias-row-Amol-Rajan-documentary-Royal-family-despite-calling-monarchy-absurd.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 8 Nov 2021, at 03:26, ***********<************@shaw.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wouldn't even know where to look. Yes, things can be swept under the rug, removed, etc, rather easily. Too easily.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm just tired of all of it - I wonder how it's "racist" for Meghan and her mother to get their pasts scrubbed up, too? We know Uncle Gary and the whole Middleton clan got a load of help, too. All this - for what, really? Continue to fool and use the public?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, I'm going to bed...will chat about this more tomorrow.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers All,
>>>>>>> *************
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: *********** <**************@aol.com>
>>>>>>> To: ******** <***********@shaw.ca>, **************** <********@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> Cc: ****************************
>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, November 7, 2021 9:19:42 PM
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Need some info please
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It has totally been white washed. The RF absolutely has the power to do that easily. I remember all of it distinctly years ago. I've searched today and could find nothing concrete. This is disgusting. It was probably done around the time Harry got engaged to Meghan. I am so sick of the nasty members of the BRF who are really nothing but a bunch of inconsequential losers who are financed and propped up by the system.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: ********** <**************@shaw.ca>
>>>>>>> To: ********************** <**************@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> Cc: ********************
>>>>>>> Sent: Sun, Nov 7, 2021 7:42 pm
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Need some info please
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Something very fishy is up - hmm, traffic citation ? Vehicular homicide or what have you? Hmmm, I'm going to think about that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But at the very least I will say that is a fact (well, already been writing that) but I will NOT be called a liar, etc, for bringing up the word about Doria. I don't like it when her father gets bashed, yet Doria is held up to be some kind of saint.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Don't mind me if I drop some hints about this on ************.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for your input.

>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> **************

>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: ************** <**************@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> To: ************ <***********@yahoo.co.uk>
>>>>>>> Cc: **************************
>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, November 7, 2021 4:52:53 PM
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Need some info please
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I did indeed look into it a while back. It's not clear-- it appears as though Doria was charged with some kind of crime, but when I checked, I was told that it was a traffic citation of some kind. There is a public record of Doria being charged with a crime, but it appears to have been a traffic issue. However, there may be something more serious, but public records don't bear this out specifically. What I remember is that there was a "break," like an erasure, in the records I accessed. Sometimes, convictions are expunged, and not available in public records-- even if the person went to prison. Occasionally, an expunged conviction can be noticed by the space it leaves in the public record. However, what also indicates a possible prison sentence for Doria is the apparent separation where Meghan went to live with her dad, who appears to have gotten official custody for a number of years. But because those records would have involved a minor child, they would certainly be sealed. There were also other clues in the remarks of Meghan herself, although these were in her earlier website, which was erased from the internet once she became officially engaged to Prince Harry.
>>>>>>> Your best bet would be to find a friend or relative who knows what happened, and who might have some dates and know some facts. But other than that, I was not able to get very far.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ********************
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 7, 2021 at 1:22 PM *************** <***************@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>> There was a lot about it on the old RG but stuff on the internet was wiped. I think **************** knew something. I am out at my ************ bday party so will eee her later
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 7 Nov 2021, at 17:05, *********** <***************@shaw.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am trying to find some information re: Doria Ragland - there was a post here I'm sure about it being a fact she did time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't want to obsess about the fact, but I just want to shut up the angrier Sussex stans. Long story.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does anybody have the information as to why and for how long?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> **************
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>
>

Admin Administrator (Empress) Posts: 14,089	Royal Surrogacy/Illegitimate children - Royal bastard Ed. Jul 18, 2024 15:43:32 GMT via mobile Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by Admin on Jul 18, 2024 15:43:32 GMT 7news.com.au/lifestyle/aussie-man-claiming-to-be-charles-son-drops-new-prince-harry-dna-bombshell-c-13488374

kueifei
Code Lair (Prince/Princess)

Moderator

Posts: 5,650

Royal Surrogacy/Illegitimate children - Royal bastard Ed. Aug 5, 2024 14:00:37 GMT

Quote

Post by kueifei on Aug 5, 2024 14:00:37 GMT

It is time for illegitimate dynasts to stop trying to become public figures. Alexandre Coste is now trying to mooch off of an heiress and Jazmin continues to make small stuff that has no real place in entertainment despite eight years. Delphine is now demanding a public role and perks that go along with it and these people do not choose their birth, but I am sick of seeing legitimate heirs get intruded on by kids that come from a history that embodies the infidelity of their fathers. Delphine is a reminder to Philippe that his father for twelve years had a more sincere and close relationship with another woman other than his mother and had a better relationship with another child rather than him. That cuts deep and that is something that can't be fixed. Alexandre has a mother that is relentlessly demonizing the wife of his father and he has half siblings that are being caught up in this mess and I cannot imagine what she is filling Alexandre's head with. As for Jazmin, her mother did a great job in fighting for her daughter, but I will state that Jazmin is living a pretty aimless life. Posing in the Monaco palace was a bad idea and I frankly think that she is making the wrong choice in getting herself used to living in a palace that will never be legally hers. I sincerely think that Alexandre and Jazmin are not living good lives and unless Jazmin gets a sincere focus on her profession she will not thrive. The palace in Monaco is not her home and after her father goes, she will have no legal place and Charlene will not be obligated to give her any space there.