|
Post by Admin on Jan 13, 2022 16:27:29 GMT
I hate Lady Colin now. I hate the DM now. They aren't even worth your hate. Pathetic lying and corrupt no talent bottom feeders.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 13, 2022 16:28:53 GMT
She didn't sleep with him, she was trafficked and used and then shoved out.
They cloak crimes against women and children in such pathetic and abusive terms.
|
|
|
Post by romilly on Jan 13, 2022 18:27:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 13, 2022 18:37:03 GMT
Wow, that's a list. Perhaps the phony mother of the 3 fake royal Middletons will take them over? This may tip Andrew over to opening up what he and the Queen had been informed of - William and the fake mother betraying the Crown with false heirs?:Allegedly of course. And yes, going off topic but this and other events going on are beyond the pale. Strip ALL the so called heirs betraying the Crown and Commonwealth.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 13, 2022 18:40:51 GMT
Wow, that's a list. Perhaps the phony mother of the 3 f#ke royal Middletons will take them over? This may tip Andrew over to opening up what he and the Queen had been informed of - William and the f#ke mother betraying the Crown with false heirs?:Allegedly of course. And yes, going off topic but this and other events going on are beyond the pale. Strip ALL the so called heirs betraying the Crown and Commonwealth. Strip Andrew but how about the f#ke father Bill and the M@ddletons sh÷ting over your family's 1000 year old legacy?? Your father died an early death for duty and you want to replace that with f#ke royal M@ddleton nothings? Really, Betty?
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 14, 2022 14:08:56 GMT
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10397345/Prince-Andrews-accusers-lawyers-demand-unsealing-information-Epstein-MaxwellEXCLUSIVE: Eight very anxious men: Ghislaine Maxwell GIVES UP battle to keep identities of high-profile John Does named in civil lawsuit sealed after Prince Andrew accuser Virginia Giuffre demands they be made public Attorneys for Virginia Giuffre have asked a judge to unseal material from an earlier civil lawsuit she filed against Ghislaine Maxwell The documents are said to contain 'vast swathes of information' about Jeffrey Epstein and Maxwell's 'sex trafficking operation' and references eight John Does The individuals are identified in court documents only as 'Non-Parties 17, 53, 54, 55, 56, 73, 93 and 151' - it is not clear if one of them Prince Andrew Maxwell, 60, who last month was found guilty of procuring girls for the late pedophile, had previously opposed making the documents public But Maxwell's attorney on Wednesday told Judge Loretta Preska that her client does not wish to 'further address those objections' Should Judge Preska unseal the documents in her case they could shed new light on the Duke of York's alleged dealings with Maxwell and Epstein The request came on the day Judge Lewis Kaplan ruled that Giuffre's separate battery lawsuit against Prince Andrew can move forward By DANIEL BATES FOR DAILYMAIL.COM PUBLISHED: 02:12 EST, 13 January 2022 | UPDATED: 18:49 EST, 13 January 2022 Ghislaine Maxwell has given up on her battle to keep 'vast swathes of information' about her 'sex trafficking operation' with Jeffrey Epstein sealed after alleged victim Virginia Roberts Giuffre requested they be made public.
Attorneys for Giuffre, who has accused Prince Andrew of sexual abuse, asked Judge Loretta Preska Wednesday to unseal material from her 2015 civil lawsuit against Maxwell that includes references to eight anonymous John Does.
The individuals are identified in court documents only as 'Non-Parties 17, 53, 54, 55, 56, 73, 93 and 151'.
|
|
|
Post by romilly on Jan 14, 2022 14:18:02 GMT
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Jan 14, 2022 15:10:51 GMT
HM can't push the United States Government around and right now things between the UK/US must be very tense. As of now, the US Government has a lot on its plate and a call from HM would likely just p!ss officials off rather than intimidate them. Diplomats are dealing with a situation where a foreign government official has been caught out having repeatedly sexually violated American citizens, children and in this case, this level, this could be considered an act of war if officials were so inclined to view it that way and react accordingly. Diplomats are hired and paid to maintain the peace and royals are supposedly paid to maintain peace as well. I also think that she has reached a point where she (HM) can't impress anyone, much less intimidate them.
|
|
|
Post by romilly on Jan 14, 2022 21:49:29 GMT
It’s just been announced on UK TV that the City of York want to strip Andrew of his title Duke of York
|
|
|
Post by india on Jan 14, 2022 22:04:02 GMT
Good. I hope it happens. Disgusting Entitled Pervert.
|
|
|
Post by romilly on Jan 15, 2022 11:42:36 GMT
He has got away with being a nasty arrogant prig for too long and many negative comments against QE for enabling him
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Jan 16, 2022 1:17:54 GMT
It’s just been announced on UK TV that the City of York want to strip Andrew of his title Duke of York
He shouldn't even have that title anyway; Duke of York is always reserved for the brother of the Sovereign, not the son of the current Sovereign. I also would flip if this happened since ti would permanently destroy the sacred untouchability of the title. So go figure, Andrew is responsible for that new precedent. It's not like Andrew even spends time in York, they all spend their time in London or the plus countryside. They do not care about the places that their titles are named after.
|
|
|
Post by romilly on Jan 16, 2022 17:23:26 GMT
So true and what interest do the Cambs have in Cambridge either
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 16, 2022 17:27:21 GMT
It’s just been announced on UK TV that the City of York want to strip Andrew of his title Duke of York He shouldn't even have that title anyway; Duke of York is always reserved for the brother of the Sovereign, not the son of the current Sovereign. I also would flip if this happened since ti would permanently destroy the sacred untouchability of the title. So go figure, Andrew is responsible for that new precedent. It's not like Andrew even spends time in York, they all spend their time in London or the plus countryside. They do not care about the places that their titles are named after.
King George III's 2nd son was Frederick, Duke of York. Still, a royal dukedom is a privilege, not a right.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 16, 2022 18:18:06 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 16, 2022 21:50:36 GMT
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10406585/Charles-Anne-Edward-paved-way-Queen-exile-Duke-York-sex-abuse-lawsuit.htmlHow the Queen's children met to tackle 'the Andrew problem': Charles, Anne and Edward paved the way for Her Majesty to exile the Duke of York over his sex abuse lawsuit Prince Andrew's siblings had meetings before he was exiled from Royal duties Prince Charles asked the opinions of siblings Princess Anne and Prince Edward The Duke of York was stripped of all his Royal and military titles by the Queen Insiders said it was inevitable after his bid to dismiss sex claims in court failed By KATE MANSEY ASSISTANT EDITOR FOR THE MAIL ON SUNDAY
PUBLISHED: 17:02 EST, 15 January 2022 | UPDATED: 20:53 EST, 15 January 2022A series of meetings involving Prince Andrew's siblings paved the way for the Queen to exile him from official Royal duties.
Prince Charles canvassed the opinions of his sister Princess Anne and younger brother Prince Edward after calling them together to discuss 'the Andrew problem'.
A source said: 'The three siblings held several meetings, one of which included Prince Andrew. Some comments:woolstone, Rayleigh, United Kingdom, about 10 hours ago I feel sorry for the Queen she does not deserve this at her age. I hope the truth comes out and everyone involved can move on with their lives. ReplyNew Comment 32376Click to rate ThisYear, LONDON, United Kingdom, about 11 hours ago The monarchy comes first it seems, blood is not thicker than water ReplyNew Comment 43329Click to rate strangersinthe night, Dubai, UAE, about 11 hours ago No matter what, he is the son of the Queen. So he is Royal and should remain so because he cannot be kicked out of the Royal family. The only way to strip his HRH title is for the Queen to disown him. And that would be unimaginable. Charles' behaviour for many years did not do any good to the Royal family. Was he punished this way. I do not condone Andrew's behaviour at all. I think he should face the consequences of his behaviors. I am just raising the question about HRH title. ReplyNew Comment 437114Click to rate Jayne from Brmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom, about 10 hours ago He has been told he cannot use the HRH title in an official capacity, the same as Harry and Meghan. They are, effectively, private citizens. 7361Click to rate Im, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom, about 11 hours ago He has always come across as arrogant and he will do as he wants, unfortunately for him the Yanks threw our monarchy out over 200 years ago and have no respect for him. The Queen has always been seen to have a soft spot for him snd let him have his way so there undoubtedly is something else, a tape, photographs? ReplyNew Comment 23433Click to rate ALIA, Australia, about 11 hours ago People seem to confuse the notion of The Firm and the family. He should have been stood down a long time ago from all offical roles, how they choose to deal with him as a family member is entirely their own business. ReplyNew Comment 14441Click to rate ALIA, Australia, about 11 hours ago I do feel like Guiffre and whoever is backing her has an agenda to bring down the Monarchy, otherwise why not go after her whole client list. But on the strength of that disastrous interview alone Andrew should have been stood down from all titles and official roles. I feel very sad for the Queen and the country over this ReplyNew Comment 78435Click to rate Andy-roo-the-4th, In The Country, United Kingdom, about 11 hours ago My problem with Stripping Andrews' titles is that so far he is innocent of any charges until proven guilty, so far it's trial by media which is the NOT way we should be going. ReplyNew Comment 115221Click to rate Mrs Barnes, London, about 11 hours ago To even call this fiasco a scandal is a gift; human trafficking is a crime. Of course the palace was right to downgrade Andrew but it should have done so long ago and not ignored this situation while the prince did not cooperate with law enforcement investigations as he once promised. ReplyNew Comment 25285Click to rate Clairebuzz, LONDON, United Kingdom, about 11 hours ago Even though they have stripped him I'm sure in private they are doing what families do and will support him him until his case is proven . They are doing it for the monarchy in this case ReplyNew Comment 13206Click to rate liz-12, glasgow, United Kingdom, about 7 hours ago Exactly. They are told by aides how to react in public but in private nothing will change. 218Click to rate morpethian, krakow, Poland, about 12 hours ago Not been found guilty of anything yet or does that not matter? ReplyNew Comment 76185Clic
|
|
|
Post by romilly on Jan 16, 2022 21:53:59 GMT
Commenters don’t understand why the RPO’s aren’t being called as he will have had one with him every second of his life and it will all be documented. Their evidence will say exactly where he was, there would have been one actually in the nightclub too. The queen knows this too.
|
|
|
Post by Sue on Jan 17, 2022 9:29:47 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 17, 2022 13:58:28 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 17, 2022 14:14:16 GMT
|
|