www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10891893/Inside-Lilibets-birthday-party-Photos-reveal-Meghan-Harrys-intimate-backyard-picnic.html#commentsSome more comments:GossipFun, Michigan, United States, 17 minutes ago
The number of people trolling a baby is appalling! You're all grasping at the crazy straws particularly desperately today. The child has no legs? Too many teeth? One photo reveals the entirety of the birthday party? It's a random baby, not their baby? Get a grip.
ReplyNew Comment
1030Click to rate
Mona the vampire, London, United Kingdom, 17 minutes ago
All the hateful comments from some w hite people! Is she w hite enough for you? You are all a disgrace to mankind! Wishing little Lillbet a wonderful 1st birthday! Prince A is not getting this much hate, I wonder why?
ReplyNew Comment
5722Click to rate
Lonnie D. , Cape Cor@l FL, United States, 17 minutes ago
Ironic, how such a recessive gene, red hair, is so prominent with one parent only having the gene. Seems odd
ReplyNew Comment
1438Click to rate
guesswho , east coast , United States, 15 minutes ago
There's no way she's Meghan's.
711Click to rate
Bernadette, Cork, 14 minutes ago
Meghan's father is a red head so both parents carry the gene.
79Click to rate
megbear, Sunshine City, United States, 17 minutes ago
Naming your child with royal names wont make you a royal again.
ReplyNew Comment
1747Click to rate
Mona the vampire, London, United Kingdom, 16 minutes ago
She is royal by blood, something you can never obtain, hater!
127Click to rate
Foggia27, Foggia Italy, United States, 18 minutes ago
It's bizarre why they don't show Archie at all??? what are they wanting the public not to see? Are they embarrassed of how he looks?
ReplyNew Comment
1637Click to rate
EslaVerdad, New York, 16 minutes ago
that they were protecting his privacy and not hers? doesn't makes any sense- other than they wanted to show lillibet since the queen would not give them the desired snap.
35Click to rate
Rock..Freebase, Gone from NYC, United States, 15 minutes ago
If he looks like Harry, they should be.
24Click to rate
Dolly Parton, Nashville, United States, 18 minutes ago
So they leaked their own photos the day after the jubilee? That's a whole new definition of thirsty.
ReplyNew Comment
848Click to rate
megbear, Sunshine City, United States, 18 minutes ago
Like mother like daughter
ReplyNew Comment
165Click to rate
milly19, united kingdom, United Kingdom, 19 minutes ago
Neither of the children have her hair colour or skin colour ver strange you would think that one of them would be like their mother, egg donor more like
ReplyNew Comment
3436Click to rate
Julz_V, Weinfelden, Switzerland, 16 minutes ago
Wow
05Click to rate
LadyDread67, plymouth, United Kingdom, 7 minutes ago
You don't always take after your mother just because she was the carrier, I'm female and look more like my farther there's nothing about me that looks anything like my mother, same with my sister, genetics doesn't work like that!
01Click to rate
good judge, kent England, 19 minutes ago
Maybe if the DM didn't keep printing stories and pictures about this self obsessed couple, The less we would know about them and the better we would all feel. Out of sight out of mind.
ReplyNew Comment
925Click to rate
Altiz, Newcastle, United Kingdom, 16 minutes ago
Idiot
00Click to rate
Bilinga, ParisBerlin, United States, 8 minutes ago
Those two = $$$ big bucks for the Daily (gossip) Rag.
01Click to rate
Sherry Gerald, Hattiesburg, United States, 19 minutes ago
Harry and Meghan haven't handled things very well, surely they could have gotten some privacy without causing such division! Lilibet - another Harry look alike.
ReplyNew Comment
420Click to rate
Sea Glass, Boston Massachusetts, United States, 19 minutes ago
It would have been nice to post a picture of Archie as well as the other children.
ReplyNew Comment
126Click to rate
Peter Al Saud, Hartlepool, United Kingdom, 19 minutes ago
Lovely name, lovely baby. Resembles her dad a lot. Piers Morgan must be unhappy at how she doesn't look anything like what he wanted.
ReplyNew Comment
4718Click to rate
Sporty004, Anywhere, Bahamas, 19 minutes ago
A child's birthday party is headline news? The media is obessesd with anything Harry and Meghan, then the call them self promoting. You can report it but it is not headline news and why report every story about Harry and Meghan with a negative twist?
ReplyNew Comment
1023Click to rate
2 of 3 repliesSee all replies
little old me, New England, United States, 15 minutes ago
PR drivel bought and paid for by the Queen of Chunga Chunga and Harryhandbag
21Click to rate
klf12987, West Monroe, United States, 14 minutes ago
Except they know what they're doing by having people release the photos on their behalf. They aren't obligated to release any pictures or statements yet they continue to do so. Meghan knows how to work the media just like every other "actress" or "celebrity". I'm not team Cambridge or team Sussex by any means, I don't care how they conduct their business or what they do, just stating facts. The Sussexs' want to control their image and what goes out.
11Click to rate
seaview66, Liverpool, United Kingdom, 19 minutes ago
WHAT NEXT A PHOTO OF HER BALLOONS ..12MONTHS NOTHING PARENTS HUMILIATED NOW CHILD CARD PLAYED..
ReplyNew Comment
932Click to rate
Sonia Roberts, Honiton, United Kingdom, 15 minutes ago
Many of us knew it was coming - they are such greedy snakes
24Click to rate
Sofa_king_cool, The planet smasher, Canada, 19 minutes ago
Least they waited a day after the jubilee to release the photos
ReplyNew Comment
430Click to rate
harro11, nottingham, United Kingdom, 20 minutes ago
Ah the new weapon of choice. Kept in reserve for just such an occasion.
ReplyNew Comment
944Click to rate
Nity x, Wirral, United Kingdom, 16 minutes ago
SHUT UP IDIOT!
30Click to rate
miss cynical, Lalaland, United Kingdom, 20 minutes ago
Wow shes the spit of her maternal aunt Samantha Markle and the strawberry blonde hair inherited from Harry and her cousins from the Dooley/Markle clan.
ReplyNew Comment
938Click to rate
Cosmic Cowboy, Cloud Nine, United States, 14 minutes ago
I was thinking the very same thing. The resemblance is absolutely uncanny. Makes one wonder who the bio parents of this child really are. Most unsettling. I could barely finish my good morning bowl of Cheerio's.
21Click to rate
jamesh17, Gaios, Greece, 20 minutes ago
The name Lilibet is so special to the Queen. It should have remained solely hers . It is hers alone and for the memories it holds . It is the pet name SHE was given.
ReplyNew Comment
1187Click to rate
Rosa73, Kisumu, Kenya, 17 minutes ago
Lilibet was not enough, she had to add Diana
17Click to rate
little old me, New England, United States, 21 minutes ago
Aren't both children important? If the answer is "Yes", then I have a question. Where is the full front facing photo of Archie? Why was no picture released for his 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th birthdays (other than back of head shots). Asking for a friend?
ReplyNew Comment
773Click to rate
Foggia27, Foggia Italy, United States, 18 minutes ago
It's bizarre why they don't show him?? what are they wanting the public not to see?
427Click to rate
RegalZandrite, LA, United States, 15 minutes ago
Need the money. No one interested in their kids after seeing all the other Royals kids. So now she trots them out because she has to get in quick with Platty Jubes vibes if not their is no value to the photos now. already too late . Interest has moved elsewhere Also P. Louis will be new focus with his antics good or bad . Lol She held it fot too long . value went down . always bad timing with them . Lol
311Click to rate
MeinNA, Somewhere, United States, 21 minutes ago
Just search the web for "how can I have redheaded children" and read how genetics work. Meghan and Harry expect us to believe the impossible.
ReplyNew Comment
1149Click to rate
mollymo36, Manchester, United Kingdom, 19 minutes ago
Diana was a red head when she was young.
712Click to rate
StBarts, MiddleAmerica, United States, 21 minutes ago
I think these children are designer babies. The embryo is manipulated to add or take away certain traits. She is adorable though.
ReplyNew Comment
2034Click to rate
ESuttonn, Sideney, Australia, 21 minutes ago
Why does George have such dark bags under his eyes? He always looks so sad and troubled.
ReplyNew Comment
5014Click to rate
guesswho , east coast , United States, 15 minutes ago
Leave him alone. He's only a child.
02Click to rate
Eatie Gourmet, Eastern USA, 14 minutes ago
He looks like the Queen's father, George VI, in that regard.
01Click to rate
Mooshway, Cheshire, United Kingdom, 21 minutes ago
Lovely family and I wish them all health and happiness.
ReplyNew Comment
2615Click to rate
ususer, Somewhere, United States, 21 minutes ago
Why do they do, what they do. Just follow the money trail with these two. I'm guessing this pic is a sneak peek of what's to come on Netflix.
ReplyNew Comment
935Click to rate
wealthy person, sandbanks Poole , United Kingdom, 21 minutes ago
Yawn. Enough already !
ReplyNew Comment
428Click to rate
IONO, TX, United States, 21 minutes ago
I wont be alive in 40 years to read the tell all book one of these kids is bound to write about their weak father and domineering manipulative mother. How they were kept apart from their extended families.
ReplyNew Comment
941Click to rate
Little Brutus, Derbyshire, United Kingdom, 22 minutes ago
Breaking news megs wants to visit her father with the kids
ReplyNew Comment
411Click to rate
Allie WR, North Norfolk Coast, United Kingdom, 22 minutes ago
The little girl has a lot of teeth for her age. The average 1 year old has between 2 and 4 teeth. She certainly looks older than 1. Yet again things don't add up.
ReplyNew Comment
2347Click to rate
Sillygilly 321, Yorkshire Dales, United Kingdom, 19 minutes ago
If things don't add up for you as they clearly don't, it's time you went back to school.