|
Post by Admin on Jan 23, 2022 16:43:10 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 23, 2022 16:51:15 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 23, 2022 17:08:13 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 23, 2022 17:09:07 GMT
Aside: Just to clue you in, those in the Succession HAVE to be "of the body born". Can you honestly state that EVERY member of the top 10 is actually true royal? Well?
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 23, 2022 19:18:21 GMT
Aside: Could imagine that being behind completely non-royal heirs with no royal blood (allegedly) may prove a bigger challenge?
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 23, 2022 20:31:00 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 23, 2022 21:21:39 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 23, 2022 21:26:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 23, 2022 23:50:45 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 23, 2022 23:51:56 GMT
Aside: Wow, Carole - that bitter towards TRULY royal children?
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 23, 2022 23:53:37 GMT
Aside: Funny, though,why are children with NO ROYAL BLOOD WHATSOEVER (allegedly) in the Succession? Carole?
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 23, 2022 23:55:01 GMT
Aside: Yikes, what reasoning.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 23, 2022 23:56:49 GMT
Aside: Yikes, what reasoning. But there is no biological connection from George to King George V - none, allegedly, despite the M#ddletons pushing the falsehood that a certain trio are royal.
Too bad you didn't look up basic biology/genetics and read the Succession to the Crown Act 1707. I'll post a little blurbie on that... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Succession_to_the_Crown_Act_1707 [/quote]
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 24, 2022 0:07:08 GMT
|
|
|
Post by caseyanne on Jan 24, 2022 5:05:00 GMT
Personally I don't believe Chuck has any biological grandkids. All were born of surrogates. In Billy's case- I honestly think Ma carried George and Pips carried Char. No clue who carried Arch and Lil but it wasn't Megs.
|
|
|
Post by romilly on Jan 24, 2022 17:10:32 GMT
100% agree with that and so do thousands of others now. So many suggestions early in the threads as to where George’s deep brown eyes came from. Char certainly has ma’s mean little eyes. See above. It’s supposed to all come out this year although many were hoping it wouldn’t happen till QE departs.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 24, 2022 23:04:21 GMT
Aside: See how ingrained the alleged lies are woven into the narrative - this from 2018 from the USA. So many insidious lies...allegedly...and look at the untold of damage.
Just think,ANYBODY can become an heir to a 1000 year old Monarchy if you want it bad enough. A royal Monarchy to one completely f#ke/bogus/phony/contrived and meaningless. Everybody has been lied to...allegedly of course. The gravity of this cannot be ignored. An epic travesty.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 24, 2022 23:08:02 GMT
Aside: Read up on the Tr#ason Act, girls...it doesn't matter who you want. The Treason Act 1702[1] (1 Anne Stat. 2 c. 21[2]) is an Act of the Parliament of England, passed to enforce the line of succession to the English throne (today the British throne), previously established by the Bill of Rights 1689 and the Act of Settlement 1701. The Act makes it treason to "endeavour to deprive or hinder any person who shall be the next in succession to the crown for the time being ... from succeeding after the decease of her Majesty (whom God long preserve) to the imperial crown of this realm and the dominions and territories thereunto belonging".Originally a capital offence, the penalty was reduced in 1998 to life imprisonment. Although the Act was passed by the English Parliament, it was later extended to Scotland by the Treason Act 1708, following the Union of the two kingdoms in the previous year. The Parliament of Ireland passed a law to the same effect in 1703, the Treason Act (Ireland) 1703 (c.5). This is still in force in Northern Ireland. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason_Act_1702
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 24, 2022 23:11:06 GMT
Aside: Sniff...sob!!!! Take it away from bogus heirs with no royal blood. Allegedly.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 24, 2022 23:12:04 GMT
Aside: Royals as opposed to those pushing completely bogus heirs? Uh?
|
|