Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2023 18:37:06 GMT
Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on January 14, 2015, 02:18:23 pm ________________________________________ ^Oh, good! Sophie made sure to have a public engagement so that a big deal could be made of her birthday in front of a camera! :tehe: Let's take wagers on how she'll dress! Will there be cleavage? Will she go for the oh-so-youthful ponytail or will she get out her can of hairspray and go for the My-Hair-Is-As-Long-As-Kate's-version that she has recently adopted? :flower: ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Countess of Holland on January 15, 2015, 10:27:19 am ________________________________________ So when she would take a day off on her birthday you would blame her for 'laziness' since most people need to work on their birthday anyway. And now that she works, you blame her for seeking attention and making it all about her. Damned if she does, damned if she doesn't. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: gingerboy24 on January 15, 2015, 11:42:39 am ________________________________________ Give me Sophie any day over that ugly, unattractive and lazy shemale they call lazy waity katie. At least she gets her backside out there and does something, not just lazes around doing zilch and pretending to be "oh so busy". ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on January 15, 2015, 04:19:37 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: Countess of Holland on January 15, 2015, 10:27:19 am So when she would take a day off on her birthday you would blame her for 'laziness' since most people need to work on their birthday anyway. And now that she works, you blame her for seeking attention and making it all about her. Damned if she does, damned if she doesn't. It will be all about her if she MAKES it all about her. I.e., Anne probably works on her birthday, but she doesn't play it up and just gets on with her job. Sophie has been on a roll since 2011 [when Kate married in] to get as much press for herself as possible. So I am anticipating some crazy age-inappropriate hair/clothes, maybe some boobage, mugging faces for the camera, etc. She might even find a way to cry or to kiss a pensioner. What she SHOULD do is take her son James with her. That would be such an unusual event, it's bound to get some press! :hi: ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: india on January 16, 2015, 08:18:09 pm ________________________________________ Well, whatever Sophie does, it will be better than anything The Faking Stalker does. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: AnaBolena on January 16, 2015, 09:04:54 pm ________________________________________ ^^^ I think the lazy Waity is the reason this thread gains so much attention GB. There's a reason for everything. None so blind as.............. I won't be back posting on this thread. Period. If I've something to say about Sophie I'll find somewhere else. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: gingerboy24 on January 16, 2015, 09:52:30 pm ________________________________________ ^ Totally agree AB, obviously some do not appreciate Sophie, but she does work, and dress decently, unlike the other shemale. More class in her little finger than the shemale has in her entire body. Like you, I will not be back on this thread, I dislike to see good people being bashed all the time for no good reason. As you said, none so blind as.............. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Mememe on January 18, 2015, 12:21:41 am ________________________________________ new article about Sophie. Quote With her casually styled long blonde hair, Sophie, who is said to be very close to the Queen, is one of the hardest-working Royals. Quote The couple will also go to Finland next month, Buckingham Palace has announced. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2914947/Sophie-50-brimming-Wessex-appeal-Countess-releases-intimate-portrait-mark-milestone-birthday.html________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on January 18, 2015, 04:38:25 am ________________________________________ Pretty heavy-handed photoshopping on that photo. Not a wrinkle or a freckle to be seen. :bored: Well, she is entertaining. I look forward to her birthday appearance. :loveshower: ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Freya on January 18, 2015, 09:46:03 am ________________________________________ Quote The Daily Mail obtained records of the outstanding debts owed by RJ-H, which have since been written off. The largest debt owed was £600,000 to Barclays Bank, which stemmed from a 2004 loan taken out by the PR company in the amount of £1.5 million . The Daily Mail is reporting that £175,000 of the loan was personally guaranteed by the Countess and two other directors of the firm. This debt was one of 32 owed by the firm that was written off. I don't know why Barclays decided not to pursue the guarantee. Banks are like that though chase after small debts whilst losing billions. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on January 18, 2015, 01:58:25 pm ________________________________________ It all hushed up and just went away, didn't it? Sophie was immediately put under the Queen's protection, she became a "working" royal, and the Queen has bankrolled her and Ed ever since. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: kolkomilko on January 18, 2015, 03:15:57 pm ________________________________________ ^ Perhaps HM has a certain reason for it just as for let the lazy duo do what they want. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Val on January 18, 2015, 08:20:41 pm ________________________________________ HM was extremely grateful to Sophie for marrying her wimp (and allegedly other things!) youngest son and giving him the air of a respectable married man and father. It had to be something big to forgive Sophie for the sheik debacle when she called QE 'the old dear' and said Cherie Blair was 'horrid horrid in addition to saying she would introduce the (bogus) 'sheik' to to the RF. Sophie has been clever enough to listen, put her head down and not put afoot wrong since. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Fly on the wall on February 05, 2015, 08:43:55 pm ________________________________________ Rebecca English @re_DailyMail · The Queen will give a reception to celebrate the Patronages of The Earl and Countess of Wessex at Buckingham Palace on February 10. The Wessex reception is, I'm told,a belated 50th b/day party for the Countess and a sign of how fond Queen is of her youngest son & his wife ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: india on February 05, 2015, 09:45:50 pm ________________________________________ That's nice. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Fly on the wall on February 10, 2015, 10:58:10 pm ________________________________________ Even the royals share photos on Facebook! Prince Andrew uploads picture of the Queen with Edward and Sophie at their Buckingham Palace birthday party The Queen was a breath of spring in cold mid-February in a pale flor@l suit at a reception at Buckingham Palace this evening. Her majesty was hosting a bash in honour of the Earl and Countess of Wessex, who both recently turned 50, and the work they do to support a wide range of charities. 375 guests attended the event from organisations including the National Youth Theatre, The Commonwealth Games Federation, The London College of Fashion, The Craft Guild of Chefs, The British Paralympic Association, MENCAP and the Northern Ballet. www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2948033/Prince-Andrew-uploads-picture-Queen-Earl-Countess-Wessex-party-Buckingham-Palace.html________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Mememe on February 11, 2015, 12:15:49 am ________________________________________ Sophie appears to walking ahead of HM in a photo within the story. Oops!! ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: kolkomilko on February 11, 2015, 07:01:09 am ________________________________________ It was a nice motion from HM towards them because of their charity work. I think the lazy duo will never have any party because of the same reason. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Countess of Holland on February 11, 2015, 07:57:40 am ________________________________________ A party like this with the charities of Will and Kate can be held in the gardeners shed of Buckingham Palace. No more than 10 guests top. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: kolkomilko on February 11, 2015, 08:03:11 am ________________________________________ ^ :laugh: :laugh: ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Rebecca on February 11, 2015, 01:57:15 pm ________________________________________ The last pic in the article, with Andrew in it, is disgusting. :ick: ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on February 11, 2015, 03:47:18 pm ________________________________________ Looks like the cook went wild with the bobby pins again. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: HennyPenny on February 12, 2015, 10:30:51 pm ________________________________________ ^^^^^^MH I am done !!!! :worship: :worship: :worship: ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Little light on February 12, 2015, 11:01:04 pm ________________________________________ i've only just looked at these photos but HM does look very tired in them. Mods, please remove if in wrong thread, thank you. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Alexandrine on February 13, 2015, 09:54:24 pm ________________________________________ ^ don't worry a bit off topic doesn't matter though there are lot of threads to discuss QE health if you want. The wessex must be happy, the queen using their party to help andrew... ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: FortressODaveBarry on February 13, 2015, 11:30:42 pm ________________________________________ "Looks like the cook went wild with the bobby pins again." "He must be very good at coitus"-Sheldon Cooper ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on February 21, 2015, 06: :00 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: Miss Hathaway on December 16, 2014, 04:31:42 pm Quote from: Alexandrine on December 16, 2014, 04:14:45 pm When I saw it I thought of you! If there is sonething interesting please share. :hi: I shall! And, so, I've been very busy at work and have neglected to comment on Sophie's Majesty article. But, also, I was rather surprised by the article and wanted to read it a few times before commenting. The article was not at all what I expected -- I expected a complete tongue bath of how wonderful, hard-working, down-to-earth, elegant, mother-of-two, etc. But it wasn't that. I got the impression that Ingrid was damning Sophie with faint praise. To begin with, the photos chosen for the article were not that flattering. The cover photo was not the most flattering that could have been chosen from the many taken of Sophie over the years. And neither were the photos inside the magazine that highlighted her thin hair, thick Buddy Holly glasses, showing her cleavage with the Brownie troop, her too-large Ascot hat at a funeral, etc. The article itself was surprisingly lightweight. There were the usual references to her middle-class upbringing, the queen allowing her access to the royal life when courting Edward, and how she doesn't get the recognition she'd like for her work. But it's all just very general. By comparison, there is an article in the same issue on Princess Anne's tour of North America in November, and the photos of Anne are flattering and show the different facets of her work, and the article is full of specific facts about what Anne does -- which is considerable. Ingrid even kind of took a poke at some of the myths about Sophie such as her interest in horses and being the favored riding companion wtih the queen. Ingrid wrote: ". . . For the next six years Sophie did everything she could to get it right . . . she learnt to ride and trotted out nervously beside the Queen . . . " An interesting take from Ingrid. And not what I expected for a "milestone" article. :- ________________________________________
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2023 18:37:25 GMT
Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: india on February 21, 2015, 11:26:29 pm ________________________________________ Sophie makes an effort to do the right thing. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on February 21, 2015, 11:29:12 pm ________________________________________ It is odd that Sophie didn't have a birthday portrait with her children. Instead she issued one that had her hair down around her face trying to look all sexay. :- ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on February 26, 2015, 07:20:39 pm ________________________________________ Sophie is quite popular with the old dears, while the younger generations are less impressed with the young man at the end of the video saying he'd never heard of her. :bored: www.itv.com/news/channel/2015-02-24/countess-of-wessex-liberation-visit-your-thoughts/________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Rosella on February 27, 2015, 12:38:39 am ________________________________________ Well, it may be that he hasn't heard of Sophie Wessex. A lot of people don't keep up with individual members of the royal family IMO, and sometimes it's amazing when people don't know the name of the Prime Minister even, or care. I was in Ireland a few years ago and somebody (a shop owner) couldn't remember the name of the President at that time and her friends in the shop we were in couldn't either. Sophie'll just have to keep on keeping on and at least she's appreciated by some, I guess! ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on February 27, 2015, 02:38:15 pm ________________________________________ ^ It is indeed scary when shows do the roving reporter who asks people who current politicians are. The ignorance is astounding. :nervous: It is sad for Sophie, though, that rather than being content to be a valuable (which she is to her charities) behind-the-scenes player (Duchess of Kent, etc.), she expends so much money and energy to be noticed, and, it isn't working. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on March 08, 2015, 05: :16 pm ________________________________________ ^ Anyone have any news of the Wessex kids? They've been out of sight for a long while -- especially James. I hope that Sophie will decide to bring her son to Easter service with the rest of his family! ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Countess of Holland on March 09, 2015, 11:12:40 am ________________________________________ Why? So you can accuse her of trying to steal Wasty's thunder? ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: india on March 09, 2015, 04:00:54 pm ________________________________________ Quite frankly, there is no thunder to steal from The Moronic Potato Head who appears to be coming apart at the seams from all the stress of living a complete lie which in this case is a treasonable offense. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on March 09, 2015, 04:42:23 pm ________________________________________ Kate's thunder or her lack thereof have nothing to do with Sophie and her children. Sophie has a son, age 7. He has never been to the family Christmas service. That is odd. It is odd for the BRF who have historically brought their young children to church with them. It is especially odd for a woman who is touted as being a devoted mother. Easter is coming up, and hopefully Sophie will insist on bringing both her children to church with her. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on March 12, 2015, 12:57:11 am ________________________________________ Sophie and her scraggly hair went to the Royal Cornwall Ag Show. (Why are her fingernails blue??) scontent-lga.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfa1/t31.0-8/10520575_840497162652593_8601060864975015931_o.jpg________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Kuei Fei on March 12, 2015, 03:01:33 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Miss Hathaway on March 09, 2015, 04:42:23 pm Kate's thunder or her lack thereof have nothing to do with Sophie and her children. Sophie has a son, age 7. He has never been to the family Christmas service. That is odd. It is odd for the BRF who have historically brought their young children to church with them. It is especially odd for a woman who is touted as being a devoted mother. Easter is coming up, and hopefully Sophie will insist on bringing both her children to church with her. That is strange how her son is so hidden. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Rosella on March 12, 2015, 03:33:09 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Kuei Fei on March 12, 2015, 03:01:33 am Quote from: Miss Hathaway on March 09, 2015, 04:42:23 pm Kate's thunder or her lack thereof have nothing to do with Sophie and her children. Sophie has a son, age 7. He has never been to the family Christmas service. That is odd. It is odd for the BRF who have historically brought their young children to church with them. It is especially odd for a woman who is touted as being a devoted mother. Easter is coming up, and hopefully Sophie will insist on bringing both her children to church with her. That is strange how her son is so hidden. James might be one of those rather twitchy sort of little boys who can never keep still. I'm sure he'll come to the service in the future. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on March 12, 2015, 05:38:15 am ________________________________________ ^ Harry was quite twitchy. Diana took him to church. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: meememe on March 12, 2015, 07:54:55 am ________________________________________ The Wessexes didn't take Louise to the Christmas Service etc until she was past 8 and they are following the same pattern with James. Unlike Harry, who will live his life in the public eye - whether he likes it or not - the Wessex children will be able to live their lives basically under the radar with the occasional appearance at the big royal events and so can be brought to public events less often and thus grow up more in private. I see nothing strange in not taking James past the baying crowd on Christmas Day, or whenever the royals appear in public. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Countess of Holland on March 12, 2015, 10: :11 am ________________________________________ Exactly and Edward and Sophie made this very clear in an early stage when they stated they wanted their children to be known as Lord x or Lady x and not as Prince/ Princess like the York girls. Louise and James will have a life away from the royal scene, especially if Charles goes through with his ideas of a core royal family. In order to give them a proper chance of making it, as a private citizen, it is only decent to allow the two to have a life as normal as possible. And that includes that they shouldn't be paraded around at all times. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on March 12, 2015, 03:00:11 pm ________________________________________ Going to church with your family is not being paraded. Edward and Sophie did not decide to protect their children's privacy. They were offered the opportunity to become totally private citizens after Sophie was caught trading on her royal status. They hastily rejected that notion, quit their jobs and became full-time ribbon cutters because they LOVE their royal status. Zara and Peter are private citizens and they have always gone to church with the family from very young ages. It is weird that the Wessex children are not allowed out very often. I wonder why? ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Alexandrine on March 14, 2015, 11:31:54 pm ________________________________________ My personal theory is that they are not "parading" the children because they want to get in Charles good graces when QE dies then we will see what path they take. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Countess of Holland on March 15, 2015, 04:04:09 pm ________________________________________ The Wessex-couple has a lot of contact with the continental royals and the continental royals all protect the privacy of their children like a lion. You will see some of the children on official trips, like the Danish royal children to Greenland last year or Estelle on the road with her mother. But especially the minor royals, like the children of Prince Laurent of Belgium, younger brother of the King, or the children of Prince Constantijn of The Netherlands, are very rarely spotted by the press. I get the feeling that in this respect, the Wessex-couple has taken a page from the continental royal rule-book. They realise perfectly well that, no matter what Charles wants, their children will have a very minor role in the royal future, to be compared to the role of f.e. Princess Alexandra of Kent or Prince Michael of Kent, or even less if Charles indeed downsizes the RF the moment he becomes King. So they want to prepare their children for a private life, with a career and all. And the less royal exposure they have (or had), the more they will be able to grow into that private role. And I say good for them! Part of good parenting is to prepare your children for a future, and it seems that the Wessexes are doing just that. And in the end, when Louise and James are adults, I think Louise and James will proven to be the most sane grandchildren of Queen Elizabeth II, with a proper career and the ability to stand on their own two legs. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Kuei Fei on March 15, 2015, 04:09:21 pm ________________________________________ I've said negative things about Sophie, but she is raising her kids right, but also being smart about behaving herself. She isn't making a spectacle of herself on the world stage, treating the world like a stage where she is determined to have the starring role. She's done posing, but she isn't causing half the mess that she could be if she were even more narcissistic. She isn't acting out like Fergie or releasing routine documentaries like Camilla. Quote from: Alexandrine on March 14, 2015, 11:31:54 pm My personal theory is that they are not "parading" the children because they want to get in Charles good graces when QE dies then we will see what path they take. Yes, they are showing Charles that they will not at all challenge him. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Countess of Holland on March 16, 2015, 10:41:03 am ________________________________________ And rightly so...they have no business challenging him. He is the future monarch and once he is..his word goes in matters concerning the monarchy, in terms of who is needed for royal work and appearances. And he will have the strings to the royal purse. The UK monarchy can do very well without young siblings trying to undermine the monarch or the heir...there has been plenty of drama in the past. We'll see what happens in the future, but I wouldn't be surprised if it will be all about Charles and Camilla. Charles is a very insecure person and he hates it when someone else gets the attention (hence his problems with his first wife). And if he feels that Sophie is more liked by the people than Camilla, he will yank Sophie's chain and make sure Camilla will outshine all the other royals. Lord knows he realises that Waity won't be a threat in the work-department. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on March 17, 2015, 01:57:23 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: Countess of Holland on March 15, 2015, 04:04:09 pm The Wessex-couple has a lot of contact with the continental royals and the continental royals all protect the privacy of their children like a lion. You will see some of the children on official trips, like the Danish royal children to Greenland last year or Estelle on the road with her mother. But especially the minor royals, like the children of Prince Laurent of Belgium, younger brother of the King, or the children of Prince Constantijn of The Netherlands, are very rarely spotted by the press. I get the feeling that in this respect, the Wessex-couple has taken a page from the continental royal rule-book. They realise perfectly well that, no matter what Charles wants, their children will have a very minor role in the royal future, to be compared to the role of f.e. Princess Alexandra of Kent or Prince Michael of Kent, or even less if Charles indeed downsizes the RF the moment he becomes King. So they want to prepare their children for a private life, with a career and all. And the less royal exposure they have (or had), the more they will be able to grow into that private role. And I say good for them! Part of good parenting is to prepare your children for a future, and it seems that the Wessexes are doing just that. And in the end, when Louise and James are adults, I think Louise and James will proven to be the most sane grandchildren of Queen Elizabeth II, with a proper career and the ability to stand on their own two legs. The Wessexes are nothing like the minor royals of Belgium and The Netherlands, however. The Wessexes live in the largest private home of all the royal children. They receive an allowance from the Queen to carry out official duties. Sophie spends a fortune on her clothes and regularly releases press releases to the media to keep herself in the news. They were given the option in 2001 to withdraw from royal life and to be private citizens and carry on with their businesses. They refused and chose to be working royals. There are not many similarities between Edward and Constantijn in actuality. I think the best way to prepare children for the future is to love them and make them feel accepted by their family. It's the best foundation. And I think that some day James will look back at all the photos of his family going to family functions and will ask why he was never taken and why he was not allowed to be a part of the waning years of his grandmother's reign, when all the other children in the family were there. His grandmother is the Queen, after all. That's a part of his reality. He can be prepared just as Peter Phillips was: "Your grandmother happens to be a queen; you are a private citizen." I don't know why it is so different for the Wessex children. And, if the Wessexes goal in all this is to keep their children completely private, then they made a huge mistake by allowing Louise to be in the Cambridge wedding. They should have politely declined, citing privacy issues and their desire to be more like the Dutch. But it seemed to me they reveled in the attention their daughter got and basked in the reflected glow. It's a strange situation . . . . :- ________________________________________
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2023 18:37:51 GMT
Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Kuei Fei on March 30, 2015, 04:09:34 am ________________________________________ The Wessexes don't seem to have any kind of real footing or anything to stand on. Sophie is oddly unstable in that she keeps infantilizing her daughter and keeping her son out of the way is quite frankly just plain wrong. Throw in how she's constantly licking the boot of HM and keeps up the passive aggressive self promotion and it's disconcerting. Louise is kept dressed in Edwardian white tights and looks like a kid from "Village of the Damned" and I do think that she's going to have issues since she's way too old to be dressed so girlishly. As for the home and income, yes, it is obscene. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Ariel on April 05, 2015, 04:13:18 pm ________________________________________ they should start with the hairstyle. then the clothes - preferably something that fits her and is from this century. all this hiding her and trying to tone down her personality is going to get her to have very low self worth and possibly act out when she's older. there's too much restraint on this girl. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Alexandrine on April 05, 2015, 04:38:42 pm ________________________________________ comparing the three Louise doesn't look so bad, though yes her outfit is a bit dated for her age. Although I don't know how they make her wear this at all, when I was her age I wouldn't be caught dead in that. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: gingerboy24 on April 05, 2015, 05:29:23 pm ________________________________________ Mods, could you remove my post above please, thinking about it I prefer not to have posted it. Many thanks- :flower: ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: My2Pence on April 05, 2015, 07:15:43 pm ________________________________________ I don't get the Sophie criticism for this. Her son is kept out of the public eye as a minor minor minor royal. Linley and Lady Sarah act similarly with their kids. That doesn't mean James is on the autism spectrum, poorly-behaved, or being hidden as some dark secret. He'll show up when he's older, as they established that tradition with Louise. We've seen him at other public events - something with Jeeps I remember - and his behavior was nothing out of the ordinary. We've seen Louise in everyday casual clothing at things like the Girl Guides event. Louise is wearing Dolce & Gabbana, not rags. This is Easter Sunday with a traditional grandmother. If the great granddaughters were here, we'd see them in similiar formal outfits - even up to age 11. Marguerita Armstrong-Jones wears shorter skirts, but wears similar white tights and black shoes at formal family events. The three A's in the Netherlands wear similar clothing. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Kuei Fei on April 06, 2015, 12:00:21 am ________________________________________ It's all about Sophie catering to HM's Edwardian preferences. Early in her marriage, Diana wore stuff that HM approved of until Diana took charge. As for Sophie, I think Sophie would gladly wear an Edwardian outfit if it pleased HM, but Sophie does not since she would be lambasted by the press. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Rosella on April 06, 2015, 03:08:52 am ________________________________________ I agree that Louise looked truly awful, not like a pre-teen in the 21st century at all. The dress looked as if it had been made out of 1950's curtain material and I just can't comprehend where that pink jacket came from. I don't know any store that would stock such a thing! Plus, I hope that Louise stops wearing white tights and black strap shoes by the time she gets into her teens or she will look truly ridiculous, poor girl. By the way, why wasn't there any attempt to properly style her hair in any modern way? I have read that Sophie is quite an old-fashioned and rather strict mother. I do think it's her preferences that poor Louise has to follow, not the Queen's, whom she doesn't see that often. Even when Louise is out with her parents and brother there's often a rather old fashioned look about her, IMO. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on April 06, 2015, 03:02:11 pm ________________________________________ 1. No James. :- 2. Sophie should be visited by Children's Services to discuss how she dresses her daughter. This pink coat was worn by Louise a couple of years ago. Louise has grown a lot in two years. The sleeves are above her wrists, the shoulders are too tight, and it is way too short. The too small coat makes her too long dress look more dowdy than it should have. And, of course, the omnipresent thick white tights and black mary janes that look so inappropriate in a pre-teen. Does no one else in the family see how pitiful Louise looks? The Queen? Since she and Sophie are BFFs, can she not tell Sophie to buy her granddaughter clothes that fit? :- 3. And even Sophie looked less than her best today. The Daily Mail made fun of her hat [it is one of the more ugly ones she owns], and her copying Kate's messy bun is a failure and the cook needs to stop it. Look at the gray hair and the bobby pin just stuck in the middle, quite visible. :dontknow: :dontknow: :dontknow: It's a mess. i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/04/05/23/274D7C0F00000578-3026331-image-m-13_1428271475325.jpg4. The comments in the Daily Mail article are increasingly questioning where James is and why is Louise dressed so badly. Not quite the PR Sophie is aiming for. And the headline: Lady Louise joins the Easter parade . . . but what was that thing perched on mum's head? Countess of Wessex's featheredhat is not fly-away style winner as royals attend traditional service is a hoot and I can only imagine the shrieks at Bagshot when that bomb was dropped at the luncheon table! lol lol www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3026331/A-Royal-Easter-parade-Queen-Prince-Philip-joined-St-George-s-Chapel-Windsor-traditional-service-Princess-Beatrice-Countess-Wessex.html________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Alexandrine on April 06, 2015, 07:06:54 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: gingerboy24 on April 05, 2015, 05:29:23 pm Mods, could you remove my post above please, thinking about it I prefer not to have posted it. Many thanks- :flower: Please do not make this an habit but this one has been deleted. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: AnaBolena on April 07, 2015, 12:10:56 am ________________________________________ ^^ :cookie: :- :bored: :cookie:... ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: CathyJane on April 07, 2015, 01:20:11 am ________________________________________ Poor Lady Louise, she never looks quite right. I fear she and Soph are going to have some good fights the older Louise gets. Soph seems to want her daughter to stay a child so she herself won't appear old. :shy: ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on April 07, 2015, 01:50:30 pm ________________________________________ Too late for that, I fear. Sophie is showing her age and then some. It will be interesting to see how she handles the Louise matter now that the media is making it a story. :bored: ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: My2Pence on April 07, 2015, 02:22:06 pm ________________________________________ I think Sophie looks great period. That she looks like this at 50 is better than many in my experience. I haven't seen anyone in the media fussing about Louise's clothing, merely commenting on all of the royal lady outfits as a whole. Any particular reporters who have a problem with Louise's outfit? ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on April 07, 2015, 03:22:05 pm ________________________________________ I think Sophie looks older than most 50 year olds I know. She has simply been so photoshopped, people have an unrealistic picture of her. However, the DM did not photoshop the Easter photos. And they made fun of her hat. And, they did not say anything directly about Louise's clothes, but they knew the readers would, which they did, as you can read from the link posted above. This is a step away from the DM which up till now has been happy to print the stories praising Sophie as the queens' favorite daughter-in-law, jewel in the monarchy, a style queen, etc., etc. Makes you wonder if Charles/Camilla are taking aim at the Wessexes now that Andy has been dealt with. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on May 12, 2015, 07:07:59 pm ________________________________________ Sophie and Andy seem to be on quite friendly terms. She has not distanced herself at all from him since the bad PR he garnered recently. Following Her Maj's lead, no doubt. i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/05/12/15/2895D4AF00000578-3078334-image-a-56_1431439739684.jpgHer hair looks terrible. :thumbsdown: ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: simplyme on June 15, 2015, 08:13:25 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: CathyJane on April 07, 2015, 01:20:11 am Poor Lady Louise, she never looks quite right. I fear she and Soph are going to have some good fights the older Louise gets. Soph seems to want her daughter to stay a child so she herself won't appear old. :shy: To me they seem closer :dontknow: all girls fight with their mums at some point ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on June 16, 2015, 01:43:16 pm ________________________________________ Louise is shy and withdrawn which is understandable considering her eye condition. I doubt she stands up to anyone. Sophie is not very maternal. With her own children, I should say. She does a good photo op with kids when on duty. The Wessex kids looked better groomed and James was better behaved at the Trooping on Saturday without their mother there. Very interesting, eh? ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: simplyme on June 16, 2015, 02:26:51 pm ________________________________________ Louise is shy, agree but I think she will the prettiest from the queen female grandchildren ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: gingerboy24 on June 16, 2015, 08:42:58 pm ________________________________________ Yes, she is a pretty little girl. When you compare her withe Beatrice and Eugenie, who are both rather unattractive, she winds hands down. The two little girls of Peter Philips are very cute, and little Mia looks a cutie pie too. Sophie reminds me very much of photos of HM when she was a similar age. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: rosielinks on June 16, 2015, 09:02:19 pm ________________________________________ No Sophie is far too angular in the face to resemble HM. She does look regal however with her finely drawn features and pale colouring. Eugenie is attractive and Bea could be gorgeous if she just got her teeth filed down - they are so big. Her hair, eyes, figure and nose are good. Louise will be very striking as she grows older. Her height, very curly hair, and old fashioned clothes are going against her at present because nobody is caring enough to make them work for her, but once she has good advice, she will be a cracker and looks to be a sensitive and deep thinker. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Tpearl on June 17, 2015, 04:04:00 am ________________________________________ True ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: leogirl on June 17, 2015, 05:57:27 am ________________________________________ It's interesting to see how much she looks like her father. I didn't really notice before because of her eye and she was younger back then (I haven't really seen much of the royals since 2011). I think she is going to be pretty once she gets past this "awkward" preteen phase. New clothes that are age appropriate (not little girl and not grown woman), style her hair, braces on and off, and a little bit of makeup. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: simplyme on June 17, 2015, 09:28:30 am ________________________________________ Quote from: gingerboy24 on June 16, 2015, 08:42:58 pm Yes, she is a pretty little girl. When you compare her withe Beatrice and Eugenie, who are both rather unattractive, she winds hands down. The two little girls of Peter Philips are very cute, and little Mia looks a cutie pie too. Sophie reminds me very much of photos of HM when she was a similar age. agree, a title not make princesses or a beauties :tehe: Quote from: leogirl on June 17, 2015, 05:57:27 am It's interesting to see how much she looks like her father. I didn't really notice before because of her eye and she was younger back then (I haven't really seen much of the royals since 2011). I think she is going to be pretty once she gets past this "awkward" preteen phase. New clothes that are age appropriate (not little girl and not grown woman), style her hair, braces on and off, and a little bit of makeup. still agree :thumbsup:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2023 18:38:08 GMT
Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: simplyme on June 17, 2015, 10:16:41 am ________________________________________ sorry for the double post pbs.twimg.com/media/CHryuZyUMAEmFwL.jpglouise with her class wacthed the parade, the other day, so nice! :thumbsup: ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Stephanie on June 17, 2015, 12:57:10 pm ________________________________________ Louise will be a pretty girl when she reaches her teens. Her eye condition is hardly noticeable anymore. She IMO needs braces though. I think she's at that awkward age where you just don't know what to wear. No more children's clothing but adult clothing won't fit and doesn't suit you. I think she and her mother should go on a major shopping trip and visit different stores then they usually do. Try on different things and find out what works for her. Overall a likable kid, seems quit social and fun loving IMO. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: gingerboy24 on June 17, 2015, 02:50:22 pm ________________________________________ ^Agree, she is going to turn out to be a very pretty girl I think. She does need braces on her front teeth, no doubt about that, and I do hope her mother makes sure she gets them. Maybe they want to want until early teens, on dental advice? I feel sure Sophie must have looked into it, any parent with enough money to afford the dental work would want to have it done. She is going to be a very attractive young lady as she grows older. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: simplyme on June 17, 2015, 03:53:40 pm ________________________________________ Cute little "princess" :thumbsup: ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on June 17, 2015, 08:19:36 pm ________________________________________ Are there photos of the Wessex siblings interacting affectionately with one another? There were many of the York sisters and the Wales brothers as they grew up. And I love this one of Peter and Zara: s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/78/e5/87/78e587c65f414f18007e661cfb96798c.jpgThe Wessex siblings always seem to be separated from one another in photographs, not interacting at all. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on July 23, 2015, 04:27:31 pm ________________________________________ Interesting. This article has appeared -- not in People, not in the Daily Mail -- but in a PR publication: everything-pr.com/countess-of-wessex/258431/Revisiting Sophie's blunders. And at the end: Maybe the Queen has just grown used to all the publicity and scandals from her children and grandchildren. But the question remains, will those creditors ever recover all of what is owed to them? It was only a matter of time before the spotlight turned again to the Grand Wessexes in their Manor. We'll see how this plays out. :cookie: ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: simplyme on July 30, 2015, 04:52:35 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Miss Hathaway on June 17, 2015, 08:19:36 pm Are there photos of the Wessex siblings interacting affectionately with one another? There were many of the York sisters and the Wales brothers as they grew up. And I love this one of Peter and Zara: s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/78/e5/87/78e587c65f414f18007e661cfb96798c.jpgThe Wessex siblings always seem to be separated from one another in photographs, not interacting at all. I' m thinking you are right :dontknow:is strange, or maybe is because they weren't like all other cousins in the spotlight for all these years ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on July 30, 2015, 10:09:36 pm ________________________________________ Louise was kept out of the spotlight early on because of her eyes; we don't know why James has been so sheltered. But, yes, it is odd - the dynamics between these siblings. They don't even behave as though they are acquainted. :- ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: leogirl on July 31, 2015, 06:00:27 am ________________________________________ I think their parents are trying to make their lives as normal as possible, which is why they don't go out in public very often. The press/public know they are the queen's grandchildren and they will want to bother them with photos. Maybe they won't be close until they're teens or adults. There is a 4-year age gap and they're not the same gender. Different interests, different friends, etc. :dontknow: ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Countess of Holland on July 31, 2015, 07:29:03 am ________________________________________ Agreed. My sister and I differ four years as well, I am the elder one. And we weren't close as children, my mother could hardly get us toegther for the annual Christmas picture. Now that we are older, we get along much better and even make an annual city trip of 4-5 days together. The first time that happened, my mother almost fell of her chair. And the difference in gender is another hurdle for the Wessex-children that my sister and I didn't have. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on July 31, 2015, 10:43:59 am ________________________________________ Quote from: leogirl on July 31, 2015, 06:00:27 am I think their parents are trying to make their lives as normal as possible, which is why they don't go out in public very often. The press/public know they are the queen's grandchildren and they will want to bother them with photos. Maybe they won't be close until they're teens or adults. There is a 4-year age gap and they're not the same gender. Different interests, different friends, etc. :dontknow: Edward and Sophie aren't trying for normalcy for their children any more than Princess Anne did. Anne's children weren't even "lord" and "lady" as are the Wessex children, and Edward and Sophie have fought tooth and nail to raise their children in the largest private residence of all the royals when advisers preferred that they scale down their lifestyle. So they don't want to be all that normal. Plus, Anne's children are different genders, like the Wessex children, and there is a four-year age difference, also like the Wessex children. But unlike the Wessex children, Peter and Zara appeared to be fond of one another and have a great relationship both as children and now as adults. The Wessex children don't appear to have a healthy relationship, in my opinion. I wonder why? :- ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: simplyme on July 31, 2015, 12:51:42 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: leogirl on July 31, 2015, 06:00:27 am I think their parents are trying to make their lives as normal as possible, which is why they don't go out in public very often. The press/public know they are the queen's grandchildren and they will want to bother them with photos. Maybe they won't be close until they're teens or adults. There is a 4-year age gap and they're not the same gender. Different interests, different friends, etc. :dontknow: I agree. They are going in different schools, if I remember well. The education from 70" is different from now, in some aspects is better in other is worst ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: leogirl on August 01, 2015, 07:16:21 am ________________________________________ ^^ Just because Peter and Zara were close as kids doesn't mean other siblings with a similar age gap are close. Sometimes, kids find something in common; other times, they prefer to keep to themselves. Normal for a rich family, not normal for regular people. If they went out together as a family, they would be followed, photos taken, etc. Titles and large homes are part of being upper-class and rich in the UK. They still go to school and have friends, but we don't get to see photos very often. I was responding to why they are sheltered from the public eye. :flower: ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: simplyme on August 09, 2015, 06:14: am ________________________________________ hrhcountessofwessex.blogspot.com/2015/08/the-wessex-familys-trip-to-gatcombe-park.htmlSo cute and normal kids ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on August 10, 2015, 03:27:30 pm ________________________________________ And once again a family outing and zero photos of the Wessex siblings interacting with one another. They're not even in a shot together. He was playing on the slide with the Phillips girls and Louise was with Edward. Then, everyone except James is in this shot. Where is he? Why is he always left out? previews.rexfeatures.com/preview/4931242c.jpg?co=rex&wm=1&br=1&sb=rex&sr=30299844&pi=30299844&authorization=date-20150810T142436Z.expires-20150810T143936Z.company-rex.version-01.signature-af2c11f772eb6087a66a1dc43332b9dfe229573db7f229858559791b5d384ee6________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: kolkomilko on August 10, 2015, 04:59:11 pm ________________________________________ They seem to be a happy family. It is good to see two royal families together. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: gingerboy24 on August 10, 2015, 05:06:31 pm ________________________________________ I like Sophie, always have done. She also appears to have become a firm favourite of HM, which is nice. A rocky start, but fast learner. Rather her any day than wasty or fergie. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: marion on August 10, 2015, 05:25:46 pm ________________________________________ ITA Now she IS a normal middle class girl unlike waity - no grasping vulgar mother there. True, she made her mistakes but she learnt from them and moved forward - isn't that one of the things life is - a learning curve? ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: gingerboy24 on August 10, 2015, 06:16:09 pm ________________________________________ Yup, agree, for most people, but we must remember the medds are a breed apart, not a breed one would want replicated either. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on August 10, 2015, 07:17:09 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: kolkomilko on August 10, 2015, 04:59:11 pm They seem to be a happy family. It is good to see two royal families together. But without James. Why is James never included? Very odd. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: simplyme on August 10, 2015, 09:15:20 pm ________________________________________ He was played with his little cousins ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on August 10, 2015, 10:06:15 pm ________________________________________ Yes, he played with the Phillips girls. Then the Phillips girls, their mother, Sophie, Louise and Edward were all sitting in the grass together. James is not with them. He's never with his family. Only for short periods of time and then, what -- whisked off by the nanny? ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: leogirl on August 11, 2015, 08:06:07 pm ________________________________________ He's a 7-year-old boy. Maybe he's a trouble maker at home so they want him to be out in public as little as possible? ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on August 30, 2015, 07:17:33 pm ________________________________________ www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3216136/Better-not-fall-Countess-Couture-Sophie-Wessex-wears-935-Peter-Pilotto-dress-play-HOCKEY-daughter.html#commentsThe Copycat Countess is at it again. She's replaying Kate's hockey field photo op while wearing wedges like Kate. She look ridiculous. And speaking of ridiculous . . . can the woman not EVER put her daughter in clothes that fit her? The blouse is too small and the shoes are hideous. :- :bored: :- ________________________________________
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2023 18:38:28 GMT
Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Alexandrine on August 30, 2015, 08:00:53 pm ________________________________________ More than that aren't they appearing a bit too much lately? Shades of Andrew...? ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on August 31, 2015, 03:08:13 pm ________________________________________ ^ Sophie knows that her days of basking in the Queen's company are numbered. She is horning in on every photo op she can. Did you read any comments from the DM article? Other people (besides me!!) are commenting on Sophie's copying Kate's look and -- not just Kate's hair and clothes -- but even Kate's facial expressions. She is :- :- :- ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: kolkomilko on September 01, 2015, 07:06:18 am ________________________________________ I have respect for your opinion but why does Sophie need for copying Kate's look? Anyway Waity used to copy Diana's look and when she wants to have a different style she fails it. :flower: ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: gingerboy24 on September 01, 2015, 09:24:41 am ________________________________________ ^Agree. Sophie has her own style, and IMO knocks spots off cath medd every time. cath medd is not the only person who wears wedges, many women do. I have seen items of clothing or shoes on other women and thought oh, I like that look, I will treat myself to whatever it is. Women do it the world over. cath medd copies many people, we could write a book about how she copies Princess Diana. She even copied Grace Kelly´s wedding dress, although made it look tarty with the neck too low and the pointed cone boobs, but then we could expect no less from her, very fond of her flash gates, must be overdue on that front, not had one for a good while. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on September 01, 2015, 02:59:05 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: kolkomilko on September 01, 2015, 07:06:18 am I have respect for your opinion but why does Sophie need for copying Kate's look? Anyway Waity used to copy Diana's look and when she wants to have a different style she fails it. :flower: Well, that is something I would LOVE for some author to investigate and write about! Maybe after the queen is gone and Sophie is no longer under her protection. Because Sophie was famous for copying Diana when she first began dating Eddy. Then when Kate married in in 2011, Sophie switched over to copying Kate. An attempt to get attention? Diana and Kate both command(ed) publicity in a way that Sophie never has and never will. She obviously wants to be noticed and photographed and admired and it galls her that she married a prince so far down the line. So, for some weird reason, she evidently seems to think that copying two more popular women will rub off on her. It appears from recent articles and readers' comments that this behavior is starting to be noticed and hopefully someone will write more in depth about it soon. :hi: ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on September 01, 2015, 07:10:39 pm ________________________________________ We haven't talked about Edward in a while. Does everyone remember when Edward was young and had hair? He wasn't bad looking. And he was energetic and purposeful. Look at this photo of him working/helping at Gatcomb Park. Now he goes to the horse trials and glumly walks around while his wife mugs for the cameras. What happened to him? Is he depressed? He just seems so spiritless . . . previews.rexfeatures.com/preview/1393059a.jpg?co=rex&wm=1&br=1&sb=rex&sr=10586010&pi=10586010&authorization=date-20150901T180825Z.expires-20150901T182325Z.company-rex.version-01.signature-70e376fe62e66902180bbbbe0254b448c1a8b49ac69b30c7338a0f45b0b9b261previews.rexfeatures.com/preview/1393062a.jpg?co=rex&wm=1&br=1&sb=rex&sr=10586013&pi=10586013&authorization=date-20150901T180908Z.expires-20150901T182408Z.company-rex.version-01.signature-95435e31edb0b5ceb20fc12fd8661f8f65d97128d5b5687721f8abf9c1ee0975________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Val on September 01, 2015, 08:58:58 pm ________________________________________ ^^^ Perhaps Cath will have a flashgate at Balmor@l, she must be suffering withdrawal symptoms as just as you say she hasn't done one for some while. She always wants to spoil the Queen's celebrations or steal the limelight so what better opportunity. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on September 01, 2015, 11:00:41 pm ________________________________________ ^ Well, if Kate does, then Sophie will probably follow suit and return to her topless pin up girl days at Capitol Radio. :wopedo: ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on September 02, 2015, 06:07: pm ________________________________________ Ah, it looks as though those links quit working. Here's another link to a photo of Edward and a friend working at Gatcomb Park thirty years ago. Now he just trudges around. He does not appear to be a happy man. www.alamy.com/stock-photo-prince-edward-august-1985-gatcombe-horse-trials-prince-edward-with-32949299.html________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Rosella on September 03, 2015, 05:42:33 am ________________________________________ ^ sometimes Ed doesn't look glum or sad, though, and if he is it might not be to do with Sophie. He may miss his theatrical days or the time when he was working creatively with his company. The royal round, especially with some of the engagements the Wessexes get to perform, probably isn't the most inspiring life imaginable. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: kolkomilko on September 03, 2015, 07:05:37 am ________________________________________ Edward seems to be stern and rigid in general to me and perhaps it is not because of Sophie. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: gingerboy24 on September 03, 2015, 10:53:17 am ________________________________________ ^I think he wants be royal, with all the perks etc. and a funded lifestyle, but does not like doing the royal rounds. Another cath medd, wants everything but not keen to give back anything in return. Ungrateful little wrtech if that is the case. Many work their butts off for a pittance and have to live hand to mouth and scrape by if they are lucky. I also do not think it is anything to do with Sophie, IMO it is because he feels he is hard done by - he should team up with bill medd, let them both go and live a "normal" life, work for their own living, no taxpayers funding right down to the tissues they blow their noses with. Make them do it for a year. Small car, public transport, scratching for the money to go to the cinema once every few months. They might feel grateful then for the free, grandiose and luxurious life they lead at our expense. I have seen photos of him and Sophie together, and they always look comfortable and content. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on September 03, 2015, 06:47:14 pm ________________________________________ Quote . . . if he is it might not be to do with Sophie. . . . perhaps it is not because of Sophie. . . . do not think it is anything to do with Sophie Oh, did you all think I meant there were marital issues? Not at all. I think the Wessexes have a (platonic) friendship/partnership and rub along together quite well. But I agree (and that was my point) that Edward is finding his position in 2015 to not be to his liking. He was once the spoiled youngest child of the queen, and the world was his oyster. As can be seen from his university/theater days [and that link from 1985 isn't working; sorry], he was quite sparky and energetic and loving life. He doesn't seem to find the trudgery of handing out Duke of Edinburgh awards to be a fulfilling way to live his life, and who can blame him? It seems he has just stepped back and let his commoner wife -- who cannot believe the luck of marrying into the queen's family and pinches herself every morning -- to be the face of the Wessex family larking about for the media, while he seems to be becoming more and more withdrawn. I agree with you GB that he seems to feel hard done by. But not because he wants a "normal" life, but because he wants a more royal life, and the older his mother gets, the more he sees it all slipping away. He's having difficulty adjusting to the realities, imo. A lot like Andrew, in fact. It's too bad both brothers could not have been more like their sister who found contentment in the horse world, outside of her royal duties. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: FortressODaveBarry on September 08, 2015, 02:20:32 am ________________________________________ "I agree with you GB that he seems to feel hard done by. But not because he wants a "normal" life, but because he wants a more royal life, and the older his mother gets, the more he sees it all slipping away. He's having difficulty adjusting to the realities, imo. A lot like Andrew, in fact. It's too bad both brothers could not have been more like their sister who found contentment in the horse world, outside of her royal duties." I agree. Especially when I remember Edward trying to accept flowers during a Christmas walk & everyone ignoring him. He looked a bit dejected ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: simplyme on September 11, 2015, 03:31:36 am ________________________________________ Is the life of people who is not the future for the monarchy, walk and be ignored! He is doing his duties. Thanks for the old pics, anyway ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: leogirl on September 12, 2015, 09:31:36 am ________________________________________ Too many egos in that family. Most of them weren't born for the "top job"... out of their entire family, only Elizabeth, Charles, William and George--one person per generation--is going to rule. And only one at a time. The rest of them have a supporting role as children or grandchildren of a monarch. Remember why you're they're (it's not about you), stay humble, be friendly to well-wishers, and keep a positive attitude. I think part of the problem is that Andrew and Edward are so much younger than Charles and Anne. Charles grew up as the heir and I think he's just now come to terms with being the prince... before it was all about the day he'll be king but he seems to be doing more as Prince of Wales, realizing that his reign is going to be a short one. Anne was the "spare" growing up. She did appearances for her mother/country, but she always knew she wasn't going to be queen so she found other interests because the future of the monarchy is her brother and his heirs. I think Andrew and especially Edward were the "babies" in the family. Didn't grow up with their older siblings (Charles and Anne were already teenagers by the time Edward was born). Maybe more spoilt as children. Also, I notice that their children have titles, which probably adds to their sense of self-importance. Which also means they're going to take it harder if/when the monarchy is scaled back a bit. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: simplyme on September 12, 2015, 12:47:58 pm ________________________________________ Good post, i really enjoyed read and agree! Sincerely for Andrew and family I not feel sorry, for the Wessex yes because they are doing ought of the time very well their duties. So sorry we can't see James or Louise doing royal duties. Is life , no first child no throne, no power :cookie: ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Countess of Holland on September 26, 2015, 02:47:17 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: leogirl on September 12, 2015, 09:31:36 am Also, I notice that their children have titles, which probably adds to their sense of self-importance. Which also means they're going to take it harder if/when the monarchy is scaled back a bit. What do you mean exactly? Only Anne's children have no titles and Edward and Sophie actually opted for 'lower' titles for their children. Under the rules established in the early 1900's, the children of Edward are Prince/ Princess of the UK. Instead, the couple wanted their children to have the titles belonging to Edwards peerage of Earl of Wessex. So Louise is Lady and James has the courtesy title of his father, Viscount Severn. Just like f.e. George Percy has the courtesy title of his father the Duke of Northumberland. I think Edward decided on this because he realised very well that his children will never have a royal role (as adults) with royal appearances other than an occasional family-event. So to use lower titles for his children makes sense. I think the person who has the biggest problem with the upcoming change is Andrew. And that is probably because he is spoiled most, being his mother's favourite child. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Alexandrine on September 27, 2015, 08:25:45 pm ________________________________________ The Flying Countess! Sophie, Countess of Wessex, Takes a Skyward Spin to Honor the Troops www.people.com/people/package/article/0,,20395222_20955292,00.html ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on September 29, 2015, 06:49:35 pm ________________________________________ Quote I think Edward decided on this because he realised very well that his children will never have a royal role (as adults) with royal appearances other than an occasional family-event. So to use lower titles for his children makes sense. I think the person who has the biggest problem with the upcoming change is Andrew. And that is probably because he is spoiled most, being his mother's favourite child. I don't think this was Edward's choice. I think he was told how it was to be. Things were tricky for the monarchy in 1999, so soon after Diana's death. Edward was not popular, and so compromises had to be made. First, the wedding was held at St. George because it would have been embarrassing to have had a London wedding and no crowds show up. Even at Windsor, tickets were given out to members of the public so as to guarantee a crowd. Second, Edward was made an Earl, but with the promise that he would be the Duke of Edinburgh upon the deaths of Phil and Liz. [But there is no guarantee of that; it is up to Charles]. Edward has never chosen the lesser option. He has the largest private home of all the royals. When told (after Sophie-gate) that they must choose between their private careers or royal duties, they both chose royal duties. They were mightily miffed when their bodyguard was taken away. There is nothing in their behavior to indicate that they are yearning for a simple life. Edward is quite spoiled, having grown up as the Queen's youngest child. I think he and Andrew are equally spoiled, can't choose between them, and they both are having/will have difficulty adjusting to the new era. ________________________________________
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2023 18:38:53 GMT
Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Fly on the wall on October 08, 2015, 01:33:00 am ________________________________________ Countess of Wessex speaks movingly about plight of blind people across the world THE COUNTESS of Wessex has spoken movingly of the plight of blind and visually-impaired people across the world. Speaking as patron of the International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness to mark World Sight Day tomorrow, Sophie said 39 million people have sight problems but that 80 per cent of blindness is preventable. The 50-year-old royal, who is also global ambassador for Vision 2020, a worldwide initiative aiming to eliminate avoidable blindness over the next five years, gave the poignant speech in Doha, as part of a four-day trip to Qatar with the sight-saving charity Orbis UK. www.express.co.uk/news/royal/610581/Countess-of-wessex-Sophie-world-sight-day-royal-family-orbis-uk-Qatar-AirwaysThe Countess of Wessex urges big businesses to do more for charity THE Countess of Wessex has urged big businesses to do more for charity, saying some companies "fall far short" of their corporate social responsibilities. www.express.co.uk/news/royal/610316/Countess-of-Wessex-big-business-charity________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Alexandrine on October 08, 2015, 04:24:14 pm ________________________________________ wait wait She is in Quatar?! So what Andrew did more or less has gone to these two? Or even Sophie alone? How many trips the BRF does to middle east a year? :- ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Countess of Holland on October 10, 2015, 08:37:27 am ________________________________________ Sophie has been involved with the organisation Vision 2020 (actually with more organisations that are involved with the issue) for many years. She is in Quatar because the organisation held its annual meeting there. Nothing to do with what Andrew did. If the organisation holds its annual convention in Peru next year, the countess will be there as well I guess. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Alexandrine on October 11, 2015, 07:37:30 pm ________________________________________ Quote Her Royal Highness this afternoon attended a Lunch with the Qatar British Business Forum at W Hotel, Doha. The Countess of Wessex later visited the offices of Standard Chartered Bank, Doha. Her Royal Highness afterwards visited Mada (Qatar Assistive Technology Center) and Information and Communication Technology Senior Management Team, Doha. The Countess of Wessex, Global Ambassador, International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness, this evening attended a Dinner for Orbis and Seeing is Believing on board SHAMEKH. The Countess of Wessex this morning departed from Heathrow Airport, London, for Qatar and was received upon arrival this afternoon at Hamad International Airport by Her Majesty's Ambassador to the State of Qatar (His Excellency Mr. Nicholas Hopton). Her Royal Highness, Global Ambassador, International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness, this evening attended an Awards Ceremony and Dinner for the Qatar British Business Forum at the British Embassy in Doha. I agree that she went because of her patronage but the rest of the agenda is iffy. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Countess of Holland on October 12, 2015, 11:16:00 am ________________________________________ But how would the public react if Sophie is there for her charity and Andrew is there for another event, and probably took a different route, so a different plane? The outburst would be massive; two royals in the same country, at the same time, meaing double security detail in that country, being paid overtime etc. Now it is just one royal who combines things. I really see no problem in that. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Alexandrine on October 12, 2015, 11:59:31 am ________________________________________ But I didn't say that? Simply that the Wessex seem to be taking the controversial role Andrew had as trade ambassador. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Countess of Holland on October 12, 2015, 01:51:28 pm ________________________________________ Could be, but I am not convinced after just one visit. Especially after her other activities could be easily explained by stating that she was in the country anyway because of the annual conference of her charity. We'll see what happens in the future. If Sophie and/or Edward will start making dedicated visits to country for the sole purpose of trade-missions, we will know more. Anyway, I wouldn't mind seeing less of Randy Andy. Edward is not perfect (who is) but at least he was never mentioned in a child-abuse case like Andrew. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on October 12, 2015, 02:23:59 pm ________________________________________ The British royals never miss an opportunity to kiss up to rich Middle Easterners. I don't know if Sophie is taking on any of Andrew's responsibilities -- it's a thought -- but certainly she isn't going to let any opportunity slip by. She might get an expensive jewel or two, after all! Remember how enthusiastically she went after the "shiekh" to tell him insider tidbits to reel his supposed millions in to her company. This is not new ground for her. :bored: ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: My2Pence on October 29, 2015, 09:04:39 pm ________________________________________ Sophie, Louise, and James attend Families' Day on board HMS Daring hrhcountessofwessex.blogspot.com/2015/10/hrh-attends-families-day-and-trafalgar.html (http://hrhcountessofwessex.blogspot.com/2015/10/hrh-attends-families-day-and-trafalgar.html) ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Alexandrine on November 02, 2015, 10:16:54 pm ________________________________________ I didn't saw this one. The kid is cute! And Louise has grown a lot. But she will need a makeover soon. Though funny that they are giving the kids a lot more limelight even on official (semi?) events. This will end up like the Yorks... ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Rosella on November 02, 2015, 11:47:03 pm ________________________________________ ^ I think Sophie Wessex mentioned once after taking Louise and James to see a charity in action when they were overseas that she and Edward thought it was valuable that their children saw how others lived, away from their comfort zone. The Wessex kids are probably quite curious about how their parents occupy their time. I think it's been made quite clear to them that they will have to get jobs and lead a normal life. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Countess of Holland on November 03, 2015, 10:04:54 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Alexandrine on November 02, 2015, 10:16:54 pm I didn't saw this one. The kid is cute! And Louise has grown a lot. But she will need a makeover soon. Though funny that they are giving the kids a lot more limelight even on official (semi?) events. This will end up like the Yorks... Oh please... First 'we see too little of the Wessex-children and 'something is wrong with them'. Now we see a little of them, as they grow older, and they will turn out like the Yorks. No matter what the Wessexes do, someone will find fault in it. Princess Beatrix (when Crown Princess and later when Queen) brought her three sons to some events, if they were of interest to the boys. And the younger two sons of the Queen turned out OK. They have (or in Friso's cade had) their own careers, are only spotted on royal events on the big days and that is about it. I think Louise and James will be brought up in this manner and are prepped by their parents to have their own lives. As for Louise needing a make-over. What a horrible thing to say. We ridicule Kate because she is too focussed on who she looks, we protest magazines who place pictures of models that look like they neer had a decent meal in their lives and you feel it is OK to say that a girl barely in her teens needs a make-over. As far as I am concerned, that comes pretty close to bullying. And it is dangerous as well. Louise doesn't need to be body-shamed. She will go through a natural make-over in a few years like all girls who turn into young women do. Until then she looks perfectly OK for her age. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Alexandrine on November 03, 2015, 10:31:27 am ________________________________________ When did I say she needs to diet? *confused* Or criticised her body? Even body shamed?? Maybe you should reread my post before you accuse anyone of something like bullying. She will need a makeover because she is still dressing as a child and will soon be a teenager. Im sure it will be fun to experiment and find her own style. I was more like thinking that she needed a haircut. But really you like to found fault with wathever I say. I enjoy discussing with you even when we not agree but I see is not the same for you. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Countess of Holland on November 03, 2015, 12:05:30 pm ________________________________________ I guess it is semantic; in my point of view a make-over is much more than new clothes and a new hairstyle (BTW...I know plenty of teenage girls with long hair, like Louise). And even so, the use of the term 'need' is rather forceful. No one can decide wether she NEEDS a make-over. Louise can decide if she WANTS to make changes to her wardrobe and her hair.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2023 18:39:27 GMT
_______________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on November 03, 2015, 02:53:30 pm ________________________________________ The criticism about how Louise is dressed is directed toward Louise's mother, in my opinion. Why is Louise's mother spending boatloads of money on her own clothing and beauty treatments and placing articles in the media about how fashionable she is, and chasing the spotlight, while dressing her daughter in dowdy, ill-fitting clothing meant for much younger and smaller children? THAT, in my opinion, is the shameful behavior of Louise's mother toward her daughter. She should be ashamed of herself. It is possible to dress a young girl tastefully, modestly, AND fashionably. And if money is tight in Bagshot Manor, perhaps Louise's mother can forego buying new designer hats and dresses for a while in order to buy her rapidly growing daughter appropriate clothing.
There have been no other young girls who have been body shamed and bullied on the internet more than the York girls. And they were ridiculed for their bodies and teeth and eyes -- things they cannot help -- as well as their clothing. The only thing pointed out about Louise is how her mother dresses her. Not Louise herself, who has the potential to be a pretty young women when she gets through her gawky stage (and if she has the backbone to stand up to her forceful and self-centered mother who won't want even her daughter to outshine her).
And, as has been commented on before here and in other forums (and is becoming increasingly a topic in readers' comments in stories about the Wessexes), the Wessex children are different because their parents treat them differently. Louise was kept away from public eye until the wedding when she was seven. Only then did she began joining her parents regularly. James has not yet been regularly included in the Royal Family gatherings, and when he is photographed with his family on the rare occasion, he and Louise have no interaction with one another and the entire family seems stressed. It is abnormal any way you look at it, as all other royal children (except for the Cambridge children and their absence is criticized harshly on this forum, so why not the Wessex children) appear at family outings and are photographed with their families on a regular basis: The Danes, the Swedes, the Spanish, the Norwegians and all the British royals except for the Wessexes and the Cambridges. So it is odd, and since this is a gossip board, it is fair game to discuss, in my opinion.
________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: My2Pence on November 03, 2015, 03:20:31 pm ________________________________________
Has anyone considered that Louise has a brain and gets to select her own clothing? I sincerely doubt Sophie stands there telling her she isn't allowed to wear her favorite pink coat, even if Sophie knows the sleeves are too short. Sophie the mom would just roll her eyes and think, next time I'm getting her to wear a new coat if it kills me. Others of you insist that Sophie-the-evil-mother does it deliberately to try to shove her daughter aside. I see absolutely no evidence of anything other than a normal, loving relationship between all four members of this little family. Likewise their interactions with the extended family appear normal and loving to me.
Louise is wearing trainers, jeans, and a tshirt at that event. In other casual photos she is dressed the same as the other girls. Why do some people insist that Sophie is an evil mother because Louise dresses like other girls her age in casual gear? She wears the old-fashioned clothes is at formal events with her formal granny. When she's out riding with granny, she wears riding clothes. When doing casual things, she wears the same casual clothes as other girls her age - jeans, tshirt, trainers.
It seems to me it has always been the plan that Anne and Edward's children would be private citizens. The wildcards were Andrew's kids, partly due to Counselor of State duties. B&E may be called upon for those roles, even if they are not working royals. Because of that, and Andrew in general, the question of whether or not B&E would be working royals was up in the air for two decades. Louise and James, it was always known they wouldn't be working royals and their parents acted accordingly.
Sophie and Edward have never been big on polo, so why would they drag their kids to polo events? They take them to riding events, where they all interact just fine with each other and other members of the family. The Wessex children are private citizens. Private Citizens. Their parents are under NO obligation to trot them out for public consumption to be torn apart on gossip boards. Linley and Sarah's kids aren't discussed and they are in much the same position. I question whether Louise and James are "fair game" on a gossip board, as they are private citizens and under the age of 18. They will never work for the family firm, will never be working royals. Their parents are "fair game" but the kids? That's a big question.
Why compare them to royal children who are going to be the heir-and-spare like W&K's kids or any of the Scandinavian kids? The children lower down in the succession for all royal houses are all seen and photographed less than those higher up, whether Scandinavian, Continental European, or British.
________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: Miss Hathaway on November 03, 2015, 03:40:02 pm ________________________________________ ^ I don't know any families wherein the 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 year old children pick their own wardrobes or where if they did and it was unsuitable for the occasion (such as wearing coats and dresses that are too short and the sleeves are halfway up the arm to a ROYAL occasion), then the parent would step in as a parent and say no, you may not wear this today. Show respect for Granny.
Is that a common practice in Britain? That the children tell their parents what to do rather than vice versa?
Are the Wessex children private citizens? Unlike Anne's children, they have courtesy titles, and they live in a big ol' manor courtesy (at least in part) of the taxpayers. I'd say (and this is my opinion only) that they are "semi-private".
I see no reason for the Wessexes to go to polo if they aren't into it, but every year they go to Christmas with the family and James has never been there. That is a family function and he is part of the family.
And have you ever seen Louise and James interact? Regularly? There were lots of photos of Zara and Peter, William and Harry, Beatrice and Eugenie, Christian and Isabella, etc. playing around with one another as siblings do.
Edward and Sophie were given the option of leaving the royal life altogether and working their business as private citizens. They were quite alarmed at this option and immediately gave up their (failing) businesses and totally embraced the royal life and began cutting ribbon (as Sophie swore she would never do, while disparaging Diana). This was before they had children. Therefore, they knew that their children would be in the public eye. If this was so distasteful to them, they should have renounced the royal life before starting their family -- they were given that option in 2001. But they want to be royal, and so they brought this life to their children as well.
________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: My2Pence on November 03, 2015, 04:13:59 pm ________________________________________ Through the course of time in any society with royals and aristocracy, there is this transition. A young prince or princess far down the line marries. Their children may end up with titles (and secretly some royal cash and tiaras) but are private citizens. Through the years, the royal association fades away, the money gets hidden and spent, and they continue as private citizens. Has happened for centuries and that's all we're seeing here.
Louise and James remain private citizens, no matter what funding their parents receive. Linley and Chatto have a big inheritance from their mother (and TITLES) and no doubt perks from Auntie Queen, but are private citizens descended from someone who used to be a working royal. Zara and Peter live on a private estate fixed up by the Crown Estate that is the basis for Anne's lifestyle and business.
They ALL have been funded through the years by a mixture of public and private funds when their parent is a working royal. Margaret had a public role, Linley and Sarah do not. Anne has a public role, Zara and Peter do not. Yet even as adults, they live off their mother and her royal largess. Louise and James are no less private citizens because their parents (like Margaret and Anne) have public funding for a public role.
A child wanting to wear her favorite coat is now an example of all of UK society having bad parenting practices? Maybe granny bought her that coat and that's why Louise loves it. I see nothing abnormal in the family interactions between the Wessex family members as a unit and their interactions with the larger family. Nor do I think that they are required to trot their children out to interact with their cousins in public places so you can criticize them.
Not taking your child to a PR parade (AKA church at Christmas with the Queen) is a personal decision, especially when that child is a private citizen. For all you know, Louise and James regularly attend church with the Queen in private. You find something nefarious in private citizens being raised as private citizens. I see nothing wrong with this practice and I see nothing wrong in Sophie and Edward's parenting.
They were asked to help the family firm at a time when things were falling down around the BRF's ears, and oh heaven forbid, they chose to do so? If they were needed for royal work, if the Board of Directors (Queen and Prince Philip) asked them to, they should have said no? You are assuming that they ran scared, you're making enormous assumptions. They would have ended up fine if they were to try again in business, and they like all the others would have continued to have behind the scenes financial support, whether publicly through the Sovereign Grant or privately. They were asked to join the firm full-time at a time when the Firm really needed them, so they did. Zut Alors!
________________________________________ Title: Re: The Wessex Family: News and Photos Post by: YooperModerator on November 03, 2015, 04:25:42 pm ________________________________________ Ok. I'm not liking the direction nor the tone that this thread is taking, so I'm locking it for a cooling off period. We're getting into personal attacks and veering off topic, in general. A new, fresh thread to start over will be created soon and you will find it under Wessex, which is under QEII/PP.
Moving forward: Keep in mind the title of the thread which is News and Photos, not general chat. Thanks! YM
Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines | Imprint
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2023 19:33:33 GMT
Royal Gossip The British Royal Family *Windsor* => Wessex => Topic started by: benign on April 24, 2011, 01:51:18 am Title: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: benign on April 24, 2011, 01:51:18 am ________________________________________ www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1380021/She-s-wearing-Bruce-Oldfield-Countess-Wessex-feeling-little-frayed-Sophies-outburst-bodyguard-outside-bridal-shop.htmlQuote It would seem that prenuptial nerves are not confined to Kate Middleton and her family. Prince Edward’s wife Sophie seemed frayed around the edges as she was spotted leaving Bruce Oldfield’s bridal salon last week. She took out her irritation on her personal bodyguard by waving her arms and jabbing at him with her fingers as she came out of the exclusive Knightsbridge boutique. - poor bg.. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex feeling a little bit frayed Post by: Yooper on April 24, 2011, 01:55:10 am ________________________________________ Can you imagine being in the employ of stellar designers like Oldfield and others and dealing with these nervous wrecks on a daily basis? I know, they make a fortune, but still. I walked in, saw the dress, had it fitted and left because, well, I'm perfect. Just kidding. It's just all so nuts, to me right now. I'll get back in the groove. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex feeling a little bit frayed Post by: Duchess Georgiana on April 24, 2011, 04:23:04 am ________________________________________ I feel sorry for the butlers/maids who work for this witch. I once saw pictures of Mette-Marit of Norway doing the same to her female protection officer. That's what happens when commoners marry into a Royal House. Their egos reach the moon and they think they can walk all over everyone. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex feeling a little bit frayed Post by: Yooper on April 24, 2011, 04:25:58 am ________________________________________ Seriously. Nothing is worse than a newbie but they eventually disappear. I hope. OT - anybody see the slaughtering (in my mind) of Upstairs/Downstairs by BBC recently? I hated it. They lost the whole sense of the thing this time 'round. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex feeling a little bit frayed Post by: Kezza on April 24, 2011, 04:37:25 am ________________________________________ Dragging Sophie into the dirt to prop up you know who. Dont know what has upset her. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex feeling a little bit frayed Post by: Earth Angel on April 24, 2011, 04:57: am ________________________________________ Dear God, this makes Carole look like she fits right in. First UG and Andrew with comparable shady behaviors and now Sophie and Carole with unprofessional behavior in association with couture designers. However, I venture a guess that Sophie had both outfits commissioned from the same designer and/or made it clear from the beginning that she was not sure which outfit she would wear. Either way, the indecisive pretentiousness is uncalled for. Get a grip! ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex feeling a little bit frayed Post by: Kezza on April 24, 2011, 04:58:21 am ________________________________________ Edit timed out sorry to double post. I think the fact the media was out there might be a clue as to why Sophie wasnt happy. Did someone from the media get in the shop while Sophie was in there and got a bit too close to comfort for Sophie? Maybe even tried to get a peek at something she was trying on in there? It might explain the reason she was angry and upset at the bodyguard if something like that did happen. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex feeling a little bit frayed Post by: Earth Angel on April 24, 2011, 05:01:41 am ________________________________________ ^^^ It's not Sophie's day! What's the big deal if the public has an idea of her outfit prior to the wedding day. It's not like she's the center of attention anyway. Why be so haughty? She and Carole will probably get along well. It appears they've lost their minds! Uncalled for and immature, imo. ... ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex feeling a little bit frayed Post by: Kezza on April 24, 2011, 05:39:03 am ________________________________________ As I said i'm not judging her. Fact the media was there is perhaps a clue to what has set Sophie off. The media has gone crazy over the wedding and perhaps went a bit too far like trying to get a peep at what she was trying on in the changeroom while trying to get an inside scoop as to what one of the members of the RF maybe wearing to the wedding. Maybe she was angry and upset at the bodyguard for allowing the situation to develop by not checking properly as to who was entering the shop. Sophie has never striked me as being someone who is after attention and just maybe at the time she felt justified at being a little upset at the time. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex feeling a little bit frayed Post by: berlin on April 24, 2011, 06:10:51 am ________________________________________ I like seeing Sophie like this. It cuts away from her cookie-cutter image. However, I do suspect that the media is trying to hurt Sophie's image to make way for Kate. Reminds me of what happened to Diana when Sophie came onto the scene. It will be interesting how Sophie reacts and treats Kate. Of course she'll have to walk a fine line so as not to incur William or Charles' wrath. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex feeling a little bit frayed Post by: Earth Angel on April 24, 2011, 06:22:46 am ________________________________________ Well Kezza, it's obvious I am judging Sophie and I am comfortable with doing so. Their security is supposed to protect them from physical harm, not from media leaks. Sure they can try to keep the media at bay, but the public does not pay their security bill to ensure the public is kept in the dark about their personal lives. Granted, they should be allowed to have personal lives, but I don't think it is their security's responsibility to make sure that is possible. Their security is to protect them at public events and from harmful people. Their PR, which Sophie is well trained in and capable of herself, is to protect their public image. If your scenario is the case, then Sophie failed to maintain her own privacy. It's nobody's fault but her own. It is not the security guard's fault, imo. ... Boundaries, these royals need to have boundaries, and they should know how to behave in public, as well as how to treat their hired help with dignity. Sophie's behavior is unbecoming and she failed herself for all account and purposes, as far as I'm concerned. ... ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex feeling a little bit frayed Post by: Kezza on April 24, 2011, 06:48:30 am ________________________________________ Quote from: berlin on April 24, 2011, 06:10:51 am I like seeing Sophie like this. It cuts away from her cookie-cutter image. However, I do suspect that the media is trying to hurt Sophie's image to make way for Kate. Reminds me of what happened to Diana when Sophie came onto the scene. It will be interesting how Sophie reacts and treats Kate. Of course she'll have to walk a fine line so as not to incur William or Charles' wrath. I agree Berlin. The media will play the rest of the RF off against Kate and vice versa. Its not a side of Sophie we see and her and Edward like to keep a quiet and low profile, so I wonder what happened. I suspect the media may of gone too far or the Body guard wasnt doing the job he was paid to do. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex feeling a little bit frayed Post by: Kuei Fei on April 24, 2011, 08:32:16 am ________________________________________ I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that Sophie isn't reacting well to the chaos that the RF has just been plunged into and I am sure she isn't thrilled with the thought of her ill daughter Louise being exposed to so many around the world. Then considering the regard that Sophie has for HM, I am sure that Sophie is a bit peeved at the stress that William has caused HM and the rest of the family. At some point Edward is going to get picked at by the press and then there's this joke of a wedding she will have to go to. See if that doesn't cause problems. This is horrible for all involved really. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex feeling a little bit frayed Post by: Gaeaskywalker on April 24, 2011, 06:52:10 pm ________________________________________ Actually the media, tries to make a twist with this story. They try to make the reader think it has something to do with the designer, but they don't no why Sophie was up set. I don't think she did a Carole here. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex feeling a little bit frayed Post by: Alexandrine on April 24, 2011, 07:01:48 pm ________________________________________ She looks really upset and nearly crying. I hope we read more about this. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex feeling a little bit frayed Post by: June on April 25, 2011, 05:17:06 am ________________________________________ ^ Yes, she does. However, I agree with EA - this kind of public induced hissy fit is just not acceptable conduct for a royal of her status. I wouldn't classify her as a "minor" royal - she is married to the Queen's son and is part of the immediate family. Of course, once William steps up more, she will take a further back seat, but that is not the case for now. I do wonder what got to her though. Perhaps the strain from the wedding, as Lady Louise is in the bridal party? :think: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex feeling a little bit frayed Post by: Kuei Fei on April 25, 2011, 06:59:07 am ________________________________________ I think that it could be nerves about Lady Louise and I am sure that there's something else. It looks like the whole RF is on tempermental tenterhooks. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex feeling a little bit frayed Post by: Varya on April 26, 2011, 04:43:43 am ________________________________________ Who knows what the situation really is/was. Maybe in fact her bodyguard didn't do something correctly (aka: let the media too near or something) or most probably it doesn't have anything to do with the designer or the bodyguard but something entirely different. OR (conspiracy theory here) maybe the Middletrashes took up his entire time to do their outfits and Sophie's was pushed to the side... :whistle: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex feeling a little bit frayed Post by: June on April 26, 2011, 04:49:21 am ________________________________________ I'm going to give her a pass this time because she looks really distressed. Still, there is a time and place for such misconduct, and this was not it. bignono Is it her job to discipline the protection officer? I highly doubt it; he is not one of HER employees - he's hired and paid for by the government. There would be proper channels she could go through if she wasn't satisfied with his performance. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex feeling a little bit frayed Post by: Kuei Fei on April 26, 2011, 06:57:42 am ________________________________________ Look, people can come unhinged at any point if pushed badly enough. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex feeling a little bit frayed Post by: Lanvin Pearls on April 26, 2011, 07:34:33 pm ________________________________________ Sophie is allegedly adored. She can do no wrong. IMHO at 46 it is simply menopause. Same with Carole but Carole is probably PAST it at 56 IMHO. Yooper - YES I was like "WTF" ?? "Upstairs Downstairs" was the most simple, poorly-written, boring series ever. The scenes with that sister of Agnes were the worst. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex feeling a little bit frayed Post by: Kuei Fei on April 27, 2011, 12:37:11 am ________________________________________ I can't fathom how Edward might be losing it regularly or how many courtiers might be ranting and raving over the phone, so I don't blame her for looking frayed and perhaps being a little tempermental. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex feeling a little bit frayed Post by: June on April 27, 2011, 01:38:51 pm ________________________________________ I was surprised at Sophie's public display of temper and distress too, but that only adds to my disappointment in her. ________________________________________ Title: Sophie gets a trainer to keep up with Kate Post by: Nighthawk on June 12, 2011, 03:46: am ________________________________________ Sophie gets a trainer to keep up with Kate www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2002586/Kate-Middleton-Sophie-gets-trainer-younger-royals.html#ixzz1P1fzJqzYQuote The Countess of Wessex has hired a personal trainer to help her keep up with the younger members of the Royal Family. Prince Edward’s 46-year-old wife has undertaken gruelling sessions at their home in Bagshot, Surrey, to regain her svelte figure. :rolleyes: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie gets a trainer to keep up with Kate Post by: Contessa on June 12, 2011, 11:12:31 am ________________________________________ I hope she does well. Though she's not overweight, she may just feel a little uncomfortable. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie gets a trainer to keep up with Kate Post by: Byechoc on June 12, 2011, 11:16:33 am ________________________________________ Well get a trainer is not bad.. and help us with our health Good for her... ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie gets a trainer to keep up with Kate Post by: Yooper on June 12, 2011, 03:16:33 pm ________________________________________ Sophie gets a trainer to keep in shape should've been enough for the article topic. Comparing is flawed and unnecessary. The best motive to get in shape is to do it for yourself, not to try and be the bone that WK or what anybody else is. Does Wasty have to be the yardstick and reason for everything? It's condescending to a woman who, probably, in fact, is wise enough to be aware of doing things for her own reasons. Silly to say otherwise. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie gets a trainer to keep up with Kate Post by: Kuei Fei on June 13, 2011, 03:40:22 am ________________________________________ I think Kate has been leaking; before the engagement, we knew next to nothing about the Wessexes, but now we know more. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie gets a trainer to keep up with Kate Post by: Alexandrine on June 13, 2011, 08:42:32 pm ________________________________________ I think that it's the press making a battle between them to create drama, although I can believe that about Sophie. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie gets a trainer to keep up with Kate Post by: Yooper on June 13, 2011, 10:06:42 pm ________________________________________ Well, I think the media is going to end up on the stinky end of the stick on this one because something tells me that this wedding is going to be gracious, understated, elegant and royally appropriate. I might even go so far as to say that it sets a new standard. Not the gaudy three-ring circus of the Cambridges' mess-a-thon. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie gets a trainer to keep up with Kate Post by: Nighthawk on June 13, 2011, 10:09:24 pm ________________________________________ I'm glad that sophie is working out and all that but did they really have to use WK's name seriously ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie gets a trainer to keep up with Kate Post by: Yooper on June 13, 2011, 10:13:32 pm ________________________________________ Drives me nuts, too, NH. She has to be mentioned in everything. What Would Kate Do? should be a bumper sticker on every party bus in California next month, if she wants PR so badly. Let's at least get it accurate for once. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie gets a trainer to keep up with Kate Post by: Fernanda Nunes on June 13, 2011, 10: :03 pm ________________________________________ I believe Sophie is better, better, better than Kate :cookie: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie gets a trainer to keep up with Kate Post by: YooperModerator on June 13, 2011, 10:49:49 pm ________________________________________ And I agree, agree, agree with you my dear! ________________________________________
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2023 19:33:52 GMT
Title: Re: Sophie gets a trainer to keep up with Kate Post by: Yooper on June 14, 2011, 12:06:14 am ________________________________________ Me, too, too, too. kisss ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie gets a trainer to keep up with Kate Post by: Kuei Fei on June 14, 2011, 12:09:26 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Alexandrine on June 13, 2011, 08:42:32 pm I think that it's the press making a battle between them to create drama, although I can believe that about Sophie. I personally think that Kate really, really gets yelled at (or at least withering looks) by the courtiers and Charles and likely William. I can only think that William wishes that he had some peace in his domestic life. He had it before, but he wrecked it by marrying Kate. Now there's more strife in the RF than has been in YEARS and Kate is the source of all of it. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie gets a trainer to keep up with Kate Post by: Contessa on June 14, 2011, 12:13:07 am ________________________________________ I don't think the real juicy strife has begun yet KF. But look forward to seeing it all unravel when it does happen. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie gets a trainer to keep up with Kate Post by: Fernanda Nunes on June 14, 2011, 12:34:34 am ________________________________________ Quote from: akasha2411 on June 13, 2011, 10:49:49 pm And I agree, agree, agree with you my dear! Quote from: Yooper on June 14, 2011, 12:06:14 am Me, too, too, too. kisss :hug: :hug: :hug: kisss kisss kisss I do not believe that Sophie is doing this because of Kate, Sophie in years of royal family should already be accustomed to seeing beautiful women, but she has a strong personality, she does what is good for her. The press must learn that it is useless to put KM at the center of gravity, it lacks the charisma to her ... ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie gets a trainer to keep up with Kate Post by: Yooper on June 14, 2011, 12:35:10 am ________________________________________ Don't we ALL know this as a Truth? Any of us who are married anyway? No matter how close you are, no matter how much in love, marriage changes everything. I even foolishly lived with my first, now gratefully ex-husband for a while and thought that was the same thing. It isn't. It's not even in the same planetary system. So, it follows the line of deductive reasoning that every marriage has an adjustment period. THIS marriage was, in my opinion, doomed before it began, so any small issue is more than magnified by the marriage contract that feels, if you're not fully prepared and supremely in love, suddenly constrictive. You have to think about somebody else first and are held to it. You start thinking about when you're 70 years old and look at that person and wonder. When I look at the picture of Sophie and her groom to be, I see a sort of mutual respect that I never saw in WK/PW. I see a pair of people willing to take on the challenge and have a clear and present concept of what their future holds. It's enormously helpful when the reality shows up. Where you once thought that it was 'cute' that he snaps his newspaper....after marriage? You start looking at the hatchet by the fireplace. My grandma said it best. "Imagine the worst thing about him." I did. "Now. Magnify it a million times. That's marriage." If you hold to that logic, and have been there, then you can accurately assume that the marriage of WK/PW is not going to last unless they make a new contract of mutual understanding. And even at that rate, you're never going to be with the one you love. And I think Sophie and her groom get that. Wasty never, ever did, but will. And yes, I do believe that she's getting a lot of 'guidance' from her husband. And I don't think it's very pretty. These two, even after years and years together, in my mind, never really knew each other. Why? Because Wasty lied about who she was. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie gets a trainer to keep up with Kate Post by: windsor2 on June 14, 2011, 03:33:39 am ________________________________________ These two, even after years and years together, in my mind, never really knew each other. Why? Because Wasty lied about who she was. Agreed Yooper. Wills is said to be stubborn and arrogant so he could also be blamed for believing and trusting Waity. "Sophie suffered a fall while out horse riding in April, breaking a rib in the process. Ordered to take it easy, the Countess was upset to find she gained some weight and, once recovered, she contacted a personal trainer to visit her at home." This is the real reason to me. It's about being healthy not keeping up with Waity and the younger crew. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie gets a trainer to keep up with Kate Post by: Yooper on June 14, 2011, 06:47:41 am ________________________________________ It's Wasty PR bullsh#t, pure and simple. What you said is true, without a doubt in my mind, Windsor. She fell, had to be prone and gained a few, then wanted to lose it when she felt better. End of story. No need to make it about Wasty's bones. Somebody's working overtime to sell this pap to the public without realizing that the public have a brain. GaDUH. PW believing Wasty's verbiage still confuses me. There are only two theories: One, Wasty's telling the truth. Or, Two, PW is delusional and desperate. I take #2. Maybe I've watched too many Miss Marple's, but, for me, no one can watch too many Miss Marples. Not with the marvelous Margaret Rutherford. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie gets a trainer to keep up with Kate Post by: Kuei Fei on June 14, 2011, 11:46:17 pm ________________________________________ Quote Somebody's working overtime to sell this pap to the public without realizing that the public have a brain. GaDUH. It HAS to be Kate; how else on earth would we know of Lady Louise's eye issues or about half the stuff we know of now? As for William, he's definately delusional and I hope someone breaks through to him. He's like an alcoholic who has seen way too much and needs intervention. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie gets a trainer to keep up with Kate Post by: Grace and Diana Fan on June 15, 2011, 12:09:28 am ________________________________________ If Sophie got a trainer, I doubt it has anything to do with Waity! Seriously, come off it. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie gets a trainer to keep up with Kate Post by: June on June 15, 2011, 05:50:02 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Yooper on June 14, 2011, 12:35:10 am Don't we ALL know this as a Truth? Any of us who are married anyway? No matter how close you are, no matter how much in love, marriage changes everything. I even foolishly lived with my first, now gratefully ex-husband for a while and thought that was the same thing. It isn't. It's not even in the same planetary system. So, it follows the line of deductive reasoning that every marriage has an adjustment period. THIS marriage was, in my opinion, doomed before it began, so any small issue is more than magnified by the marriage contract that feels, if you're not fully prepared and supremely in love, suddenly constrictive. You have to think about somebody else first and are held to it. You start thinking about when you're 70 years old and look at that person and wonder. When I look at the picture of Sophie and her groom to be, I see a sort of mutual respect that I never saw in WK/PW. I see a pair of people willing to take on the challenge and have a clear and present concept of what their future holds. It's enormously helpful when the reality shows up. Where you once thought that it was 'cute' that he snaps his newspaper....after marriage? You start looking at the hatchet by the fireplace. My grandma said it best. "Imagine the worst thing about him." I did. "Now. Magnify it a million times. That's marriage." If you hold to that logic, and have been there, then you can accurately assume that the marriage of WK/PW is not going to last unless they make a new contract of mutual understanding. And even at that rate, you're never going to be with the one you love. And I think Sophie and her groom get that. Wasty never, ever did, but will. And yes, I do believe that she's getting a lot of 'guidance' from her husband. And I don't think it's very pretty. These two, even after years and years together, in my mind, never really knew each other. Why? Because Wasty lied about who she was. Great post, Y. :worship: Yes, Waity 'lied about who she was', but I also believe that the reason they 'never really knew each other' was by reason that William kept her at arm's length. He shoved her back to Berkshire when he got tired of her and wanted freedom. He used her when he wanted or needed company. It was easy for her to keep up the ruse. It wouldn't have mattered to Waity, but William never got to see the real Waity ... and he didn't want to imagine the real one, either. He conditioned his mind into believing that she could handle this gig, for whatever reason/s ... :June: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie gets a trainer to keep up with Kate Post by: Yooper on June 15, 2011, 03:49:43 pm ________________________________________ :BFF: June! PW may be starting to wake up now. Too little, too late, but I totally agree that he really bent his mind into believing certain aspects of WK's character and will be deeply disappointed. She knows The Sell, but she doesn't have the product in stock, and never will. But on topic, Sophie is a woman in her own right and if were she, I would be livid that whatever I'm doing is somehow 'inspired' by Wasty. It's such blatant PR, I can't even believe these things when I see it with my own eyes. And I would think it would cause more dissent and resentment within the Circle over garbage like this article. She's not "all that", media! She just isn't. And, boy, are they going to back pedal in the not-too-distant future. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie gets a trainer to keep up with Kate Post by: Kuei Fei on June 16, 2011, 05:01:30 am ________________________________________ Quote I would be livid that whatever I'm doing is somehow 'inspired' by Wasty. It's such blatant PR, I can't even believe these things when I see it with my own eyes. And I would think it would cause more dissent and resentment within the Circle over garbage like this article. I would be seeing red myself and as for the Circle, I'm sure that there are already acid looks at her over the dinner table at Clarence House. As it is she's been causing Camilla quite a bit of bad press and Camilla was recently accused of being the reason that Kate and William aren't staying at Clarence House. ________________________________________ Title: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: serene grace on October 05, 2011, 11:11:08 pm ________________________________________ I went to the Royal.gov site to view how many charities and royal patronages came up for the Countess of Wessex. So far six pages of charities and patronages come up for her. So while the press is going overboard to make Kate into working Royal, here is Sophie the Countess of Wessex quietly working hard as a Royal and she has been doing this for ten years now, but the press still wants to ignore her and focus on lazy Kate. Sophie is very pretty, seems very sweet and is a go-getter, self-starter and hardworker, it would be nice if the press would throw the lady a compliment every now and then and some lovely press. www.royal.gov.uk/CharitiesandPatronages/Search%20Charities%20and%20Patronages.aspx Look at all the charities and patronages she is a part of, it goes on and on for six pages. If link does not work, I'll go through and list them all later when I have time. She has so many patronages and charities she is a member of and works with. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: windsor2 on October 05, 2011, 11:23:39 pm ________________________________________ TThanks for pointing this out, serene grace. :thankyou: She should get a lot of press because this is how a member of the British Royal Family should behave. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: memyselfandroyals on October 05, 2011, 11:28:50 pm ________________________________________ She a princess in all senses. I love her :sigh: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: YooperModerator on October 06, 2011, 12:28:41 am ________________________________________ Hmm she's even a global ambassador for one organisation and she has a few international things going as well, I didn't know that! :thumbsup: good job Sophie! ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: Contessa on October 06, 2011, 06:51:36 am ________________________________________ She's something else. Go Sophie. :spooky: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: serene grace on October 06, 2011, 09:50:26 pm ________________________________________ I've always liked her and I like that fact that Sophie actually had two charities she worked with prior to ever meeting Pr.Edward. When she worked at the radio station, she got involved with her a childrens charity on her own. The UK press ignores her, but I think she's better for it now, because the UK press is a nasty bunch if they decide you will be their target to bash. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: memyselfandroyals on October 06, 2011, 09:55:51 pm ________________________________________ I bet she thinks for that. She has a much calm life without the press pressure. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: Alexandrine on October 06, 2011, 10:23:37 pm ________________________________________ I think she is low key because the press has already made a joke of her. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: memyselfandroyals on October 06, 2011, 10:26:33 pm ________________________________________ Oh, i had no idea : : Why, what did they publish? ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: Alexandrine on October 06, 2011, 10:27:17 pm ________________________________________ She believed the fake sheik as did Sarah recently. ________________________________________
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2023 19:34:11 GMT
Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: memyselfandroyals on October 06, 2011, 10:28:48 pm ________________________________________ That was so unfair :thumbsdown: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: Alexandrine on October 06, 2011, 10:31:51 pm ________________________________________ If she hadn't done anything wrong, she wouldn't have been find out. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: memyselfandroyals on October 06, 2011, 10:35:04 pm ________________________________________ But in the begining it's normal to make some mistakes ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: serene grace on October 07, 2011, 12:08:24 am ________________________________________ I agree but it was different than Sarah in that Sophie was not sneaking around.. she was working for her PR firm conducting business, it was not some underhanded secret business on HER part, the problem was not that she went to dinner with the sheik for business because she always went to dinner or lunch with pr clients, it was conducted as normal business(and Sophie thought he was a real sheik and if he was real, there would not have been a problem besides gossiping she was doing)...the problem was Sophie discussed royalty and her private thoughts politically during the conversation. The fake sheik idea was said to have come from Prince Charles pr office in attempt to put Sophie out of the press,and to have her as a new bride in the house of windsor viewed unfavorably in order to prop-up Camilla who he was trying to build up her image. Up until that point, Sophie was getting basically good press and Diana comparison's I do believe Charles was involved in that whole shiek-set up, despite it all being covered up now. One of his men who stopped working for him a few years later, said that Pr.Charles was involved in that whole sheik affair, I believe it. Sophie basically said the Queen Mother was an Old dear. She said Charles and Camilla were the two most unpopular people in the Country at that time. She said Blair was too Presidential and she something about Blair destroying the Countryside. She did not say anything about Princess Diana....that was made up by the NOTW. Sophie never said one unkind thing about the Princess, but the press ran with that. Still I think Sophie is very respected now, despite the press attempts to destroy her and if one mistake is all they can find about her since marrying into the Royal family, I think she's performing quite well. Because if you look at Sarah Ferguson, she was in the press messing up every month when she was married to Pr.Andrew. Sophie's made one wrong move in the press, which was a set-up from a newspaper, but she wasn't doing underhanded business like Sarah, it was perfectly ok for her to take on a sheik pr-client and to take him to lunch or dinner, she did not know the guy was fake, if the sheik was real it would not have been a big story..except that she gossiped about the royals which was really what she did wrong, imo. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: memyselfandroyals on October 07, 2011, 12:13:34 am ________________________________________ Quote Up until that point, Sophie was getting basically good press and Diana comparison's I do believe Charles was involved in that whole shiek-set up, despite it all being covered up now. One of his men who stopped working for him a few years later, said that Pr.Charles was involved in that whole sheik affair, I believe it. Oh God, if that is true... Family is suposed to be to protect, not to do these things... :wopedo: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: serene grace on October 07, 2011, 12:20:08 am ________________________________________ I read it quoted from one of Charles former PR men, he said Charles was in on that whole set up, he did not want Sophie to be popular,because he was working on Camilla's image and he also said Charles was determined to stop Pr.Edward's company, he had various reasons for wanting Sophie and Edward contained,he did not want them out front in public. I believe it. The idea was negative press until they throw in the towel and come in under the umbrella of the firm, quietly retreating to the backround. IMO Kate can forget it, if the thinks she can beat Pr.Charles at the pr game, Kate is never going to be put on the world stage in a big way, If Pr.Charles has anything to say about it. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: memyselfandroyals on October 07, 2011, 12:26:49 am ________________________________________ Indeed. I imagine what they talk in the table, on dinner (considering all those things) ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: YooperModerator on October 07, 2011, 12:36:01 am ________________________________________ Ah so that's what happened I always found it odd that she was put into the shadows like that because of one mistake. Especially if you consider the fact that HM apparently likes her a lot! Always thought that Charly was a sly devil that you shouldn't underestimate at any case. Good luck going against him Kate! :tehe: Wonder what would happen if the Wessexes decided to quit the Firm and start a business on their own again :think: after all Camilla is 'inside' now so... ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: serene grace on October 07, 2011, 12:48:51 am ________________________________________ Thank goodness Sophie had the Queen and Pr.Phillip behind her at that point. Yes she made a mistake, but the press pounding was a bit over the top for one mistake. imo The Queen made a public statement that she supported Sophie. Sophie was breaking down in public if you remember after the story came out, she was going to things and crying publicly, I think the Queen put a stop to it on the inside and put a protective arm around her in the press, but by then Charles and the press minions had their way.imo I think with Kate the difference is the press is on her side and they want Pr.William to be golden, whereas Edward had made a enemy of the press and they didn't care about Sophie really, she whatever happened to them was just collateral damage. The problem for Kate is she only has one real protector in the House of Windsor, it's Pr.William, but I don't think anyone else would step up to save her, the way the Queen did with Sophie. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: memyselfandroyals on October 07, 2011, 01:02:03 am ________________________________________ Quote Thank goodness Sophie had the Queen and Pr.Phillip behind her at that point. Yes she made a mistake, but the press pounding was a bit over the top for one mistake. imo The Queen made a public statement that she supported Sophie. HM is my hero :spooky: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: Kuei Fei on October 07, 2011, 02:45:34 am ________________________________________ Quote from: memyselfandroyals on October 07, 2011, 12:13:34 am Quote Up until that point, Sophie was getting basically good press and Diana comparison's I do believe Charles was involved in that whole shiek-set up, despite it all being covered up now. One of his men who stopped working for him a few years later, said that Pr.Charles was involved in that whole sheik affair, I believe it. Oh God, if that is true... Family is suposed to be to protect, not to do these things... :wopedo: Another reason men should not marry mistresses; they spend so much time working on getting them accepted that the man in question always ends up backstabbing his own family in order to ensure social acceptance at any cost. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: Alexandrine on October 07, 2011, 05:36:49 pm ________________________________________ Interesting post SG! But I thought that the big mess was more related to using her connections as a new royal for her business. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: serene grace on October 08, 2011, 08:15:28 am ________________________________________ it was that she went to dinner and name dropped Royalty ,she discussed her royal opinions and she discussed political things and mentioned royals, but that was all she did, she gossiped about royals which was a no, no......because it was viewed as using royals to impress the client, but she didn't do more than that. She said the Queen(Mother's) an old dear She said Charles and Camilla were two of the most unpopular people She said Blair was too presidential and ruining the countryside She didn't say anything mean about Princess Diana, that was totally made up ,by NOTW Sophie went to a very public lunch or dinner with a client who pretended to be a sheik. She started chitcatting about royalty and private things at a lunch-dinner , some felt it was to impress the client, but she never did more than sit and talk, nothing more. It was not some sneaky backroom deal like Sarah. Sophie just basically was gossiping too much. The sheik was the dishonest person in that meeting, not Sophie, she truly thought the guy came to her PR company for pr, she was doing what she always did, taking a client to lunch, but she did gossip too much, she should never have been discussing the royals even if it was a comment like the Queen's an old dear, the press blew it all up to be way more. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: MOSAIC on October 09, 2011, 03:46: pm ________________________________________ I've just been looking at the GREMB and came upon the 40th birthday festivities given by King Harold and Queen Sonia of Norway for their only daughter Princess Martha, and there celebrating with them was a large group of royals from the Netherlands and other places and there in the front row I saw Sophie Countess of Essex, and presumably Edward. No Charles and Camilla, no other British Royals. So she and Edward are the Queen's automatic choice as representatives at European and Scandanavian courts. They must all know her very well now, and that is very important. Wasty will never replace her in that way, good heavens they don't even know William that well!!!! ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: Byechoc on October 09, 2011, 06:53:21 pm ________________________________________ When Charles be king will chose other people to represent him... but if Sophie and Eduard can make friends with those royals maybe they can get a invite for them... Waiity will do everything to go to that parties... ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: memyselfandroyals on October 09, 2011, 10:13:12 pm ________________________________________ Quote No Charles and Camilla, no other British Royals. So she and Edward are the Queen's automatic choice as representatives at European and Scandanavian courts. They must all know her very well now, and that is very important. Wasty will never replace her in that way, good heavens they don't even know William that well!!!! Sophie is amazing. I admire her so much :sigh: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: Varya on January 05, 2012, 04:08:07 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Kuei Fei on October 07, 2011, 02:45:34 am Quote from: memyselfandroyals on October 07, 2011, 12:13:34 am Quote Up until that point, Sophie was getting basically good press and Diana comparison's I do believe Charles was involved in that whole shiek-set up, despite it all being covered up now. One of his men who stopped working for him a few years later, said that Pr.Charles was involved in that whole sheik affair, I believe it. Oh God, if that is true... Family is suposed to be to protect, not to do these things... :wopedo: Another reason men should not marry mistresses; they spend so much time working on getting them accepted that the man in question always ends up backstabbing his own family in order to ensure social acceptance at any cost. That's very true! Look what happened with Wallis Simpson and Edward! ________________________________________
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2023 19:34:44 GMT
Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: Kuei Fei on January 06, 2012, 01:24:28 am ________________________________________ Sophie had best avoid Kate since Kate seems to pretty much burn anyone who does reach out to her. I think Kate is a broken soul. ________________________________________ Title: Sophie Countess of Wessex's "Voice and speech" Post by: serene grace on September 24, 2012, 12:52:17 pm ________________________________________ www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRpu-howcs0She speaks here at timecode 1:00. I find her voice much more pleasant than Kate's. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex's "Voice and speech" Post by: Freya on September 24, 2012, 01: :49 pm ________________________________________ She seems much more natural than Kate. Has she got some hair loss at the front? ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex's "Voice and speech" Post by: serene grace on September 24, 2012, 01:54:14 pm ________________________________________ Yes, her voice seems more natural than Kate's and she does sound more intelligent, IMO. :bored: Ingrid Seward once said, even though Sophie cut her hair like' or similar to Diana's, that in person she could see why she would prefer the fringe(bangs) because Sophie's hair is very fine. www.zazzle.co.uk/sophie_countess_of_wessex_1995_stickers-217772635006871397www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKVnopM8WU0________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex's "Voice and speech" Post by: Freya on September 24, 2012, 01:58:17 pm ________________________________________ ^ Look at 1min into the video. She looks as if she has a skin condition on her hairline. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex's "Voice and speech" Post by: Snokitty on September 24, 2012, 02:52:01 pm ________________________________________ Sophie is more intelligent than Kate. Sophie had a career when she got married which helped her personal growth. Kate's career was whatever William wants. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex's "Voice and speech" Post by: serene grace on September 24, 2012, 03:02:15 pm ________________________________________ YUP, Kates career was to be on her back and William's go to girl when he desired. I like what Sophie said about being inivolved with her charities. :flower: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex's "Voice and speech" Post by: Snokitty on September 24, 2012, 03:05:34 pm ________________________________________ Yes and at least Sophie does get involved with her charities and at the same time seems to be a hands on Mum like so many other women. I just don't see that being the case with Kate. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex's "Voice and speech" Post by: serene grace on September 24, 2012, 04:07:57 pm ________________________________________ Kate never really got her hands dirty before marriage, never was a hardworker, I think she'll find it difficult being completely involved in royal duties. Sophie gets her schedules, does her homework on these events, puts time in. Someone wrote that Pr.Edward by the time he was 18 or 19 had done twice to three times as many Royal duties as Pr.William when he married at 28. I am not sure where the person got the info? ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex's "Voice and speech" Post by: mrharrywales on September 24, 2012, 05:39:07 pm ________________________________________ I loved her voice... She sounds really sweet... My only problem with this interview is that she said "ammm' all the time. I think she should work on that. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex's "Voice and speech" Post by: Acornia on October 10, 2012, 06:39:24 am ________________________________________ She doesn't have a posh accent that I expected her to have. Kate's accent was polished up (she slipped several times during the engagement interview) perhaps Sophie didn't undergo the same lessons that Waity did :tehe: I think she did alright but like mrharrywales said, the 'uhmmm's are distracting. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex's "Voice and speech" Post by: serene grace on October 10, 2012, 08:38:14 am ________________________________________ Kate just sounds Fake, imo, not even posh, but rather indecipherable, it sounds like she has learned a new language and just learned to speak it. I like Sophie's voice, much more gentry of the Countryside sounding and authentic, like the ladies from Pride and Predjudice and more importantly her ability to speak clear thoughts intelligently. Kate sounds completely fake, she doesn't even sound posh to me because I have to strain to sometimes understand what she's saying because she is trying too hard to get the posh voice going and has no real concise thoughts to verbalize what she even means. The thing I read about Diana, is that when she spoke, you could hear that she was from a highborn background by the way certain vowels were delivered, but she was clear and understandable, it flowed. Diana never spoke as if she had a mouth full of marbles. Kate is getting it so wrong, that's why she sounds so fake, it's sounds too put on, she just sounds like someone trying to speak like she believes the posh speak. Kate just sounds phoney. Dickie Arbiter said Kate when she speaks, he said basically you can hear her middleclass background, she gets the vowels all wrong. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex's "Voice and speech" Post by: Spice on October 11, 2012, 03:49:09 am ________________________________________ So refreshing to hear a genuine, caring person from that family speaking, and not putting on a fake accent! Sophie is lovely. ________________________________________ Title: How the Queen helped Sophie put her wobbles behind her with stunning results Post by: berlin on April 07, 2013, 01:18:51 am ________________________________________ How the Queen helped Sophie put her wobbles behind her with stunning results, as the confident Countess turned heads on Easter Sunday in an electric blue outfit Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2304827/How-Queen-helped-Sophie-wobbles-her.html#ixzz2PjSKzBhV Follow us: @mailonline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook Adorable first picture ________________________________________ Title: Re: How the Queen helped Sophie put her wobbles behind her with stunning results Post by: Stephanie on April 07, 2013, 12:32:48 pm ________________________________________ Sophie has found her place in life, she seems to enjoy family life and her duties. Edward isn't photogenic and seems shy in public but maybe he is nicer then he seems if they managed to stay together for all those years. :thumbsup: ________________________________________ Title: Re: How the Queen helped Sophie put her wobbles behind her with stunning results Post by: MelissaRose on April 07, 2013, 05:08:51 pm ________________________________________ The first picture is lovely, it speaks volumes about Sophie's character that the Queen trusts her so much, and clearly loves her. She is a very elegant, well-dressed lady too. A true Princess. kisss Sophie definitely has the best position of all royal wives. All the benefits, but not so much of a goldfish-bowl life and pretty much able to live a normal life - more so than the rest of the RF anyway. Would much rather have her life than Kate's! ________________________________________ Title: The real terrifying story of how Sophie Wessex and her baby cheated death Post by: Snokitty on March 22, 2014, 08:24:53 am ________________________________________ www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2586553/The-real-terrifying-story-Sophie-baby-cheated-death-haunts-her.htmlQuote Sophie Wessex is usually serenity itself. Quiet and friendly, yes, but always in control. An elegant, regal figure no more prone to emotional outbursts than the Queen herself. So when the Countess was pictured, red eyes brimful of tears and hugging a midwife in a Surrey hospital earlier this week, it was both touching and shocking. Her breakdown, though, was entirely understandable. For she was returning to Frimley Park Hospital, where ten years ago she nearly died while giving birth to her first child, Louise. As the Countess of Wessex opened the hospital’s new neo-natal unit, she said: ‘The service you can provide can literally make the difference between life and death. I can attest to that.’ Now, for the first time, the Mail can reveal the full story of how Sophie’s life hung in the balance that day — and how it has profoundly affected her as a mother. ‘It was utterly traumatic, and in some ways Sophie has never got over it,’ says a friend. ‘It completely reshaped her character and affected how she relates to her children.’ ________________________________________ Title: Re: The real terrifying story of how Sophie Wessex and her baby cheated death Post by: kolkomilko on March 22, 2014, 03:08:15 pm ________________________________________ It is really sad. Marcus Setchell didn't get any more attention, rewards and party like he had after Waity's labour. :nervous: ________________________________________ Title: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on October 15, 2014, 06:47: pm ________________________________________ Quote from: AnaBolena on October 15, 2014, 04:23:52 pm ^^^^ Actually, no, more like this one as its a close up. theincredibletide.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/dark.jpgOf course Sophie has wrinkles and lines, but she doesn't look scary. Kate looks scary and if I didn't know her I'd put her between 42-45 and no less. I've seen better skin on faces and necks of 55 year olds. I work with portraits in Photoshop and kate is bad bad for her age. Sophie, nope, she's not doing great either but I like the woman's softer appearance even if she had double the wrinkles - her eyes are kind whereas Kate's are hard, calculating, and yes, at times miserable from the bed she now has to lie in - the bed she made for herself. My grandmother always said by 30 we start wearing our inside on our face - I think she's right. :flower: I agree with your grandmother! :hi: I have to say that I am bemused by the number of royal watchers on different boards who want to compare Kate and Sophie. That is comparing apples and oranges. Kate is married to a man in line to be the next king. Sophie is way, way down the line, with no prospect of ever being queen. Sophie is old enough to be Kate's mother, so I don't understand the royal watchers who want to compare those two with regard to dress and appearances. They are two different generations and I would hope that Sophie would NOT be dressing like a daughter [Sarah Ferguson has been ridiculed for doing the same]. However, since posters are wanting to compare the two, here are my thoughts: Kate is in way, way, over her head. She married a man who was bored with her. Their university relationship had run its course and she should have moved on. She did not and now is a very unhappy young woman. This, of course, shows up in her demeanor and appearance. Sophie, too, was in way, way over her head, but she was lucky in that the Queen and Philip protected her and Edward with their failing business ventures and Sophie's selling her royal position. The Queen has bankrolled them, and Sophie was very lucky in that Charles and Andrew were both divorced and so Sophie was the Second Lady after the Queen. So she enjoyed an artificial status for several years. Sophie, like Kate, married a man who was not thrilled about getting married -- Ed and Soph dated many years and there were stories over the years that Sophie gave Ed ultimatums -- but Ed and Sophie work because it's more like a business arrangement. They both are getting what they need/want and have no other expectations. So Sophie is luckier in that regard more so than Kate who is expected by the public to be in love with her prince, and William is expected to be Prince Charming to his Princess, and every little gesture is remarked upon. The Wessexes don't receive that kind of attention and so their platonic relationship gets by. But Sophie is quite calculating. We can see from stories that have appeared in the news since 2011 about how Sophie is a royal favorite and such an asset to the monarchy, etc. etc. We can see how she has changed her dress since 2011, wearing clothes that a 50-year old shouldn't wear and running up and down hockey fields looking ridiculous, showing her cleavage, etc. She is obviously trying to compete with a woman young enough to be her daughter, and if she doesn't pull back from that, she will quickly become a figure of ridicule. Because . . . while Kate has had her day of reckoning, coming to terms with the reality of the expectations of her royal position, Sophie has not yet had her day of reckoning. But it is moving closer. Turning 50 will be a big blow to her. Philip and the Queen are quite elderly and their protective embrace is weakening and the Wessexes are going to be on their own. Charles will not underwrite them and he and Edward are not on the best terms. So, while Sophie has made the most of her situation and the void within the Royal Family -- and this shows just how calculating she is to have accomplished what she has -- it is all coming to an end, and then we will see Sophie's true character [of which we have seen glimpses in her talk with the undercover journalist and her yelling at her bodyguard in public]. ________________________________________ Title: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: HennyPenny on October 15, 2014, 09:40:04 pm ________________________________________ ^^ ITA :flower: Please do not quote the message above yours, use ^^ or the name of the poster to make it clear who you are referring to. ________________________________________ Title: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: AnaBolena on October 17, 2014, 10:23:19 pm ________________________________________ I tend to agree with you MissH but I see no sense in pulling Sophie apart. It isn't going to make Kate look better in any way at all, not even if Sophie looked and acted like a dragon. :cookie: ________________________________________ Title: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: india on October 17, 2014, 10:39:12 pm ________________________________________ You cannot compare the Countess of Wessex to the Duchess of Crotchbridge. That dog don't hunt. ________________________________________ Title: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on October 17, 2014, 11: :34 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: AnaBolena on October 17, 2014, 10:23:19 pm I tend to agree with you MissH but I see no sense in pulling Sophie apart. It isn't going to make Kate look better in any way at all, not even if Sophie looked and acted like a dragon. :cookie: True, just as criticisms about Kate do not make Sophie younger, prettier, more interesting, more genuine, and the next Princess of Wales. :thumbsup: ________________________________________
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2023 19:35:01 GMT
Title: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Alexandrine on October 18, 2014, 12:58:41 am ________________________________________ I also do not see the need of making Kate image worse by tring to make the rest of the BRF women as saints. Kate is a mesd but so is Sophie. And no one can forget the Yorks. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Mandosiel on October 18, 2014, 01:12:52 am ________________________________________ Anne is the only one who acts the same she always has and doesn't care about fashion, just doing her job and damn hardworking at it too, but she's not a saint either. I don't really think Sophie is the perfect Royal wife, she does the best she can with her situation and that's pretty much anyone could expect given her standing in the pecking order. I do think she's been a bit off lately, feeling the weight of looking her years I guess and not happy about it, happens to a lot of woman, especially ones who are under scrutiny like celebs and such. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Alexandrine on October 18, 2014, 01:25:58 am ________________________________________ ^ was not able to think a better title if anyone offers something catchy I can change it. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Rosella on October 18, 2014, 02:02:17 am ________________________________________ I don't think Sophie Wessex is perfect, she has had her share of mistakes and is fairly low down in the pecking order of the Royal Family. However, she always looks interested at her public engagements, (for which she doesn't get a great deal of publicity), is hardworking and has made an effort to maintain her marriage, be a good mother and get on well with her mother-in-law. As a minor royal you can't ask for more from Sophie really. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Mandosiel on October 18, 2014, 03:41:56 am ________________________________________ ^Totally agree. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on October 18, 2014, 03:17:53 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: Alexandrine on October 18, 2014, 01:25:58 am ^ was not able to think a better title if anyone offers something catchy I can change it. It's perfect! :flower: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: AnaBolena on October 18, 2014, 09:03:34 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: Miss Hathaway on October 17, 2014, 11: :34 pm Quote from: AnaBolena on October 17, 2014, 10:23:19 pm I tend to agree with you MissH but I see no sense in pulling Sophie apart. It isn't going to make Kate look better in any way at all, not even if Sophie looked and acted like a dragon. :cookie: True, just as criticisms about Kate do not make Sophie younger, prettier, more interesting, more genuine, and the next Princess of Wales. :thumbsup: I never said they did. Neither do I even think that. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on October 18, 2014, 09:43:21 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: AnaBolena on October 18, 2014, 09:03:34 pm Quote from: Miss Hathaway on October 17, 2014, 11: :34 pm Quote from: AnaBolena on October 17, 2014, 10:23:19 pm I tend to agree with you MissH but I see no sense in pulling Sophie apart. It isn't going to make Kate look better in any way at all, not even if Sophie looked and acted like a dragon. :cookie: True, just as criticisms about Kate do not make Sophie younger, prettier, more interesting, more genuine, and the next Princess of Wales. :thumbsup: I never said they did. Neither do I even think that. I'm just bringing full circle your statement that criticizing Sophie wasn't going to make Kate look better with the other side of the coin that neither will criticizing Kate make Sophie look better. Both women stand alone on their own individual merits. I fully agree with you. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Alexandrine on October 18, 2014, 11:21:49 pm ________________________________________ my comment was not towards you anabolena in case you felt it that way :flower: Now I've been a long royal watcher and many times I've seen one royal idolised while some other is considered the worst. I think that everyone has their good and bad points (even Kate :tehe:) and I enjoy discussing all of them. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: AnaBolena on October 19, 2014, 05:13:17 am ________________________________________ I was in a rush so made hasty replies, but I agree with both ^^ I shouldn't work and post lolol bignono ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: CathyJane on October 20, 2014, 08:03:52 pm ________________________________________ I think the press is comparing Waity and Soph because they look to be the same age. Waity looks decades older than Zara and the York sisters even though they are closer in age. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on October 21, 2014, 02:30:23 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: CathyJane on October 20, 2014, 08:03:52 pm I think the press is comparing Waity and Soph because they look to be the same age. Waity looks decades older than Zara and the York sisters even though they are closer in age. I haven't seen the press compare Kate and Sophie, but there are numerous posters on several venues who believe the photoshopped photos of Sophie to be accurate and that she really looks younger than Kate in real life. :laugh: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: HC on October 21, 2014, 07:18:33 pm ________________________________________ Sophie looks very average. I dont know which profile she has made for herself ør which causes she is known for. And I don't understand why she is not doing a normal career instead. She has the opportunity to have a normal life. If it is me I would escape and get a job. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Kit on October 31, 2014, 03:10:30 pm ________________________________________ The only real difference between the 2 is that Sophie understands that she must sing for her supper. HM appears to have greater work expectations for her children. Chuck doesn't seem to have that same power over the lazy duo. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Alexandrine on October 31, 2014, 03:22:04 pm ________________________________________ ^ LOL but very well said. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on October 31, 2014, 04:48:38 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: Kit on October 31, 2014, 03:10:30 pm The only real difference between the 2 is that Sophie understands that she must sing for her supper. HM appears to have greater work expectations for her children. Chuck doesn't seem to have that same power over the lazy duo. Charles lost mor@l ground when he divorced his sons' mother and married his mistress. So, if he tries to preach duty to the monarchy to them, they just have to point to Camilla and say, "Reallllllly?!?" :bored: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: india on November 12, 2014, 03:49:47 pm ________________________________________ That is all well and good but the fact of the matter is that The Faker Kate is cut from a different cloth than Camilla. To wit, her ungodly low rent family and The Faker's ungodly, heinous behavior in all areas. This female is one disaster after another. An unending sh*t show. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: gingerboy24 on November 12, 2014, 05:01:56 pm ________________________________________ I do not agree with the way Princess Diana was treated, and I most certainly do not like camzilla. But to be fair, chucky has always got on with it and done his duty, and marrying camzilla did not turn him into a lazy, bone idle good for nothing like wimpo, , shouting and wanting to sue everyone in sight who dared to take a photo he did not approve of. I am not a fan of chucky, not one bit, but in my personal opinion losing mor@l ground did not change his nature from a full time working member of the rf into the person his son always appears to have been, but has become worse aided and abetted no doubt by the ghastly, greed, grasping, down market, sink estate meddleton family. I do not think he would have been completely different had he done the sensible thing and stayed away from them, but IMO they have definitely made him much, much worse. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: india on November 13, 2014, 11:28:47 am ________________________________________ You are so right GingerBoy. Chuck has carried on with his duties but Prince Punk Petulant has morphed into one hot, lazy, entitled brat of a mess since he aligned himself with all things Middleton. What a disaster. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on November 13, 2014, 03:49:53 pm ________________________________________ ^^I agree with you both that Charles works hard and has been a dutiful Prince of Wales. However, he ignored the advice of his mother the queen and all of the courtiers by marrying the divorced woman who was his mistress during his marriage. And now, despite the fact that most people agree that Camilla seems a good egg and all, there is a taint attached to her and Charles. She doesn't dare use the "Princess of Wales" and there continues to be debate about whether she should be called "Queen Consort". There is talk Australia is hanging in with the Commonwealth only until after Her Majesty dies because they really don't respect Charles. He undermined the throne. He did what Edward VIII was not allowed to do. Queen Mary is rolling over in her grave. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Alexandrine on November 13, 2014, 04:31:23 pm ________________________________________ :BOT: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on December 08, 2014, 10:42:59 pm ________________________________________ Sophie has been able to develop a persona for herself of being the "perfect" royal wife, trotting along to her various engagements and connecting with people. But doesn't the perfect royal wife show themselves to be interested mothers, engaged in their children's lives? Elizabeth, The Queen Mother, was very present and engaged in Lilibet and Margaret's lives. The present queen, while not as warm as her mother, was often photographed with her children at Balmor@l, Sandingham, etc. Diana, of course, was a famously hands-on, huggy mother. Sarah, too, was very involved in her children's lives and photographed often with them [still is, in fact]. Anne was not tactile, but she was with her children at all the family functions and obviously was active in their lives. Sophie seems strangely aloof from her children. James rarely is seen with the family. Louise more so since she was asked to be a part of the Cambridge wedding. But if Sophie is so interested and connected and good with children, then where are the photos of her hugging and interacting with her kids? ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Alexandrine on December 08, 2014, 11:09:29 pm ________________________________________ I don't think you can question how involved she is because we get no press about this at all. No photos doesn't mean she is not a good mother, simply that for whatever reason they are not choosing to use the kids for PR. In that sense what you say is true it is strange that Edward and her do not use photoogs to get more popular. Maybe they had to agree with what Charles/Queen said about the future role of their children and so they are more hidden. This way they cannot used the way the York daughters are. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on December 09, 2014, 03:46:15 am ________________________________________ You put it perfectly: ". . . we get no press about this at all." I mean, how is it avoided? Diana spent every minute she could with her children, and therefore their interactions were photographed. Likewise every other member of the royal family. We saw Peter, Zara, William, Harry, Beatrice and Eugenie grow up. They weren't used for PR -- they were simply living their lives and they were photographed doing so. The future role of the Wessex chlldren has no bearing in their going about their lives as part of the Windsor family. Peter and Zara don't have courtesy titles at all nor a royal role, and they have been quite prominent all their lives simply because they have been involved with the family. I am sure that Ed and Sophie dearly love their children, but why don't they interact as a unit? The kids are old enough now that it is just strange. :sob: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on December 26, 2014, 01:22:56 pm ________________________________________ So, the cracks in the myth of Sophie being a perfect royal wife get bigger: 1. Remember how often we heard how much the queen loved Sophie so much that only Sophie was asked to ride in the car with her at appearances? Well, Sophie hasn't ridden with Her Majesty since Christmas 2011 -- three years ago (and when Kate married in). Did the Queen kick Sophie out of the car? Or did Sophie tell the Queen to stuff it because she wanted to walk and have her photo taken? 2. If Sophie were a perfect royal wife, she should pay less attention to her clothes and hair and seeking out and grinning at the camera, and pay more attention to what her pre-teen daughter is wearing. Louise is way too big and old to wear white tights and mary janes like a little girl. Her coats tend to be too small for her or too big. Sophie needs to spend less money on herself and a bit more on her daughter. I think Sophie is going to be one of those mothers who feel threatened by their daughters growing up and becoming "competition". 3. And James. Again, James is left with the nanny on Christmas. Why? He is seven years old. No longer a toddler. Why does Sophie not want to let her son be a part of the family? Very, very strange situation. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: terrajoule on December 26, 2014, 02:18:14 pm ________________________________________ Okay, where in the h3ll was/is James? Locked in the tower? Poor kid always hidden away like Colin in Secret Garden or like Miss Rochester in the attic or like the Humpback of Notre Dame or like Prince John. Kid have epilepsy, attention deficit or something? How Odd. :- ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Alexandrine on December 26, 2014, 04:41:16 pm ________________________________________ He comes out from time to time. Though I also find it strange that he is so little shown. But in any case the problem lies in both Sophie and her husband whatever the reason is. She had a very difficult pregnancy with Louise and lost another but James had a normal childbirth and nothing has been talked about. Maybe they are simply trying to be nice with Charles. ________________________________________
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2023 19:35:19 GMT
Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: CarryingOn on December 26, 2014, 09:36:11 pm ________________________________________ I agree with Kit Quote The only real difference between the 2 is that Sophie understands that she must sing for her supper. Also, she like Kate doesn't have any competition so it's easy for her to be seen as such. I, for one, have never bought into her being the Queen's favorite. Some think that her tiaras are something to judge by but they're both so ugly, I don't see how the proper conclusion is that. Plus, I've always wondered why Diana didn't like her. Maybe she was just having a a moment(s) but I've always wondered if there was more to that story and definitely more to Sophie than meets the eye, the latter I'm sure there is. At the end of the day though, she works, she upholds the image and image is everything. As far as James, no he's not seen as much as Louise is but when he is brought out into the public sphere, he seems to do well. There have been no reports, murmurings, anything about him displaying any out of the ordinary behavior. You wonder if may be he just doesn't want to go on all of these outings and so his parents let him stay home. I will say that I'm not going to take her to task for not using Louise and James for PR, the way that Kate uses George for PR whenever she takes a nosedive time and time again. As far as how the Wessex's avoid press, it's quite simple and easy. No one is interested in them or their children in the first place. Peter and Zara's children are also not that prominent. We only get pictures of them when they're at some horse event or another. Otherwise, we don't get pictures of them strolling through the park or going to the movies or any other daily life activities. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on December 27, 2014, 04:35:21 am ________________________________________ Diana didn't like Sophie because she saw her for the golddigger that she is. She also was creeped out by the way Sophie was copying her and trying to look like her. She supposedly would say, "Oh, here's my twin" whenever one of Sophie's photos would appear. She was not amused by it. Sarah also made comments to people about how Sophie was copying Diana and didn't think she was a nice person. Re Sophie using her children for PR (like Kate, because it seems everything comes back to Kate), Sophie would use her children in a New York minute if she thought it would get her some press. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: meememe on December 27, 2014, 04:57:05 am ________________________________________ James was seen with his parents at the races a day or so before Christmas. He isn't being hidden - just not going to church with the family for Christmas yet. Louise didn't go to the Christmas service until she was 8 - 9 - so James could be seen next year. I see nothing wrong with Louise's dress - she looks like what she is - a young girl - not yet a teenager, still at primary school. Mary-Janes are the most commonly worn school shoes amongst the girls at my school well into their late teens (usually they stop wearing them in Year 11 aged 16 - 17) and some not even then. I also know many adults who wear them - they are some of the 'approved designs' for staff at my school where we must wear flat, enclosed shoes (part of our dress code - along with dresses or skirts and tops - not trousers). Kids, of course, have a mandatory school uniform and the girls uniform includes white tights until the end of the primary years - aged 12 with them optional for girls in Years 7 and 8 (first two years of High School). Sophie is also the Patron of British Fashion - or something like that - and so she has to look good to promote their cause. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: cate1949 on December 27, 2014, 05: :17 am ________________________________________ I think Louise looked fine this year - last year her coat was too small and that did create an odd impression - but she looked perfect for her age this year in a well fitting coat. I'd think James is old enough to go to church but obviously that is the parent's choice so perhaps we'll see him next year. I have no particular feeling re: Sophie - she seems to represent the family well. I think she should take more care with her hair but otherwise she seems fine. I do not see her as either a negative or some sort of paragon of royal virtue. She does her job and appears to do it well. No more no less. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on December 27, 2014, 06:01:46 am ________________________________________ theroyalpost.com/2011/12/15/the-walk-to-church-at-sandringham-on-christmas-day-diana/Photos of a very young Zara (ages three and five) and William (age five) going to church with the family on Christmas. Perhaps Anne and Diana were better royal mothers than Sophie and so had children who could behave in church? ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: meememe on December 27, 2014, 09:45:42 am ________________________________________ Or maybe they weren't as good and exposed their children to the crowds way too early. Edward and Sophie are deliberately trying to give their children a less public upbringing than royal children before them and there are people who get upset because they are doing so. I think their decision should be respected and it has nothing to do with who is the better parents but the fact that they are parenting differently. By the way - why should it be that Anne or Diana are better or worse mothers than Sophie and not include the fathers? ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Ariel on December 27, 2014, 10:11:50 am ________________________________________ sorry, but I think that Sophie and Edward have made a very good decision to not turn their children from a very young age into attention seeking camera loving wanna be celebrities. MissH, you point out William and how cute it was to get him to church so early in life. and how did that turn out? He wants to mix with celebrities only and to be considered as a very important celebrity... without even moving a finger to work. how very kingly of him :angry: or just look at Eugenie - who is a 24 years old grown woman but behaves like a 5-years old child when the cameras are not on her and pushes the in-laws so that she can get attention. As for Zara - she obviously had a very good parenting and turned out really well. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: india on December 27, 2014, 09:55:06 pm ________________________________________ I thought Sophie looked quite pretty on Xmas day. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: gingerboy24 on December 27, 2014, 10:17:52 pm ________________________________________ ^Yes I did too. I like Sophie. She is not perfect, but then who is, we all have our imperfections. Ask me to choose between Sophie and wasty and hands down Sophie wins every time, in every way. All wasty does is disgust me beyond belief with her common ways and her odious family. Sophie´s family behave as royal in laws should, and apart from her obvious discretion years ago, which she has worked hard to put behind her, she has done the royal family proud. Give me Sophie every time. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: india on December 27, 2014, 10:27:19 pm ________________________________________ Absolutely GingerBoy. Sophie has worked very, very hard. She's a great addition to the RF. Does them proud every time. Edward must be quite proud of her. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on December 28, 2014, 11:55:46 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Ariel on December 27, 2014, 10:11:50 am sorry, but I think that Sophie and Edward have made a very good decision to not turn their children from a very young age into attention seeking camera loving wanna be celebrities. MissH, you point out William and how cute it was to get him to church so early in life. and how did that turn out? He wants to mix with celebrities only and to be considered as a very important celebrity... without even moving a finger to work. how very kingly of him :angry: or just look at Eugenie - who is a 24 years old grown woman but behaves like a 5-years old child when the cameras are not on her and pushes the in-laws so that she can get attention. As for Zara - she obviously had a very good parenting and turned out really well. I didn't say it was "cute" for William to go to church as a young child, I simply pointed out that ALL the royal children with the exception of the Wessex children went to church with their families as young children and it is odd that the Wessexes do not want to take their son to church. And are you saying that William and Eugenie turned out badly because they were taken to church at a young age but Zara (despite being taken to church at a young age) turned out well? I'm failing to understand your point here? :- ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Kuei Fei on December 29, 2014, 05:20:32 am ________________________________________ I think HM likes Sophie because Sophie fanatically conforms, even to dressing daughter Louise like one of the creepy Village of the Damned children. Louise is too old for white tights and doll shoes and Sophie barely steps out of turn and likely enables Edward's delusions. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: CarryingOn on December 29, 2014, 07:52:21 am ________________________________________ ^ Exactly. Sings for her supper like Kit said. You have to wonder though how long she's going to keep that bit about dressing Louise up the way she does. Isn't the girl heading into her teens soon? It's just stupid now. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Stephanie on December 29, 2014, 10:07:17 am ________________________________________ www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2889445/New-role-slimline-Sophie-50-Countess-Wessex-tells-lessons-learnt-Queen-poses-series-photos-interviewed-ahead-birthday.html________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: gingerboy24 on December 29, 2014, 10:59:39 am ________________________________________ Agree, but I still think she is a vast improvement on wasty in every way. Wasty also dresses sprog as though he has just fallen out of a 1950´s orphanage. What is it with the royals, is it meant to be trendy or something. Don´t see others dressing their kids like ragamuffins do we. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on December 29, 2014, 12:16:03 pm ________________________________________ ^ Evidently Sophie thinks that Kate is the improvement in the Royal Family and that is why she is so blatantly copying Kate's hair, clothes, shoes, facial expressions, photo ops. :tehe: And George is less than two years old, so it isn't strange for him to be dressed like a child. Louise is 11 and can look her mother in the eye. The little girl clothing choices are weird. :- ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Kuei Fei on December 29, 2014, 01:50:01 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: CarryingOn on December 29, 2014, 07:52:21 am ^ Exactly. Sings for her supper like Kit said. You have to wonder though how long she's going to keep that bit about dressing Louise up the way she does. Isn't the girl heading into her teens soon? It's just stupid now. I'll never understand WHY so many modern career successes end up being the most conformist royal wives; Sophie should be dressing her daughter in a way that healthily makes her like her peers, it is possible to be modern an appropriate. By dressing her daughter in an Edwardian way she's making her daughter conform to a way of life that is literally dying and of course, Louise needs to be groomed for a more practical way of life outside of the royal ring. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: india on December 29, 2014, 04:31:43 pm ________________________________________ HM has BILLIONS of dollars. When she goes to her reward all of her children and grandchildren will be well taken care of. None will have to work unless they choose to do so. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: CarryingOn on December 29, 2014, 07:38:46 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: Kuei Fei on December 29, 2014, 01:50:01 pm Quote from: CarryingOn on December 29, 2014, 07:52:21 am ^ Exactly. Sings for her supper like Kit said. You have to wonder though how long she's going to keep that bit about dressing Louise up the way she does. Isn't the girl heading into her teens soon? It's just stupid now. I'll never understand WHY so many modern career successes end up being the most conformist royal wives; Sophie should be dressing her daughter in a way that healthily makes her like her peers, it is possible to be modern an appropriate. By dressing her daughter in an Edwardian way she's making her daughter conform to a way of life that is literally dying and of course, Louise needs to be groomed for a more practical way of life outside of the royal ring. I don't understand it either. Times change, time moves forward and it's NOT coming back! I think that's another reason why I don't like he way Louise dresses. You can tell there's nothing authentic or loved about the way she dresses, it's just another way for Sophie to show her conformity. Same with George, no love and appreciation of the style of dress, just another way to draw parallels between the way William and Harry grew up dressing. Not to mention, although, Louise is plain too old to be dressing the way she does, there are so many designers that are doing a more modern version of traditional dress. There's a woman I follow on instagram who dresses her little girl (and boy) in a more traditional manner but it's lots of pretty prints and bright colors going on. Also very cute and bright colored Mary Janes www.gramfeed.com/allieroyall (http://www.gramfeed.com/allieroyall). I think the mother shows a real love of the style of dress. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Alexandrine on December 29, 2014, 08:19:24 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: india on December 29, 2014, 04:31:43 pm HM has BILLIONS of dollars. When she goes to her reward all of her children and grandchildren will be well taken care of. None will have to work unless they choose to do so. Though that's true both Sophie and Edward tried working before failing hard and having to get money directly for the Queen. They will never have problems with money but I'm sure they would have liked to be as independent as possible not having to deal with the Queen and then with Charles. ---- For Queen and Country Bazaar's Justine Picardie meets Sophie, Countess of Wessex for the February 2015 issue Quote Those close to the Royal Family have observed that the Queen is very fond of Sophie Wessex; and the feeling is reciprocated (they share an interest in military history, and are often to be seen deep in conversation together). When I ask the Countess what she has learned from the Queen, her response is swift. ‘It doesn’t matter how tired you are – carry on. In the early days, I used to rush around as quickly as I could, but when you observe the Queen, she does things in such a measured way, and I hope I’ve learnt to try not to bounce into the room, but do things in a slightly more elegant way.’ www.harpersbazaar.co.uk/fashion/fashion-news/for-queen-and-country-sophie-countess-of-wessex-february-2015BTW it also talks about her children in the article for those interested. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Stephanie on December 29, 2014, 09:04:45 pm ________________________________________ I like Sophie. There's a lot more to her then meets the eye. She's intelligent and learns something new every day, then puts it to good use. She is a hard worker and makes things happen-not necessarily glamorous things that sell ad in the papers. Seems capable to deal with life lessons whether good or bad, not self absorbed and those are good qualities IMO. ________________________________________
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2023 19:35:36 GMT
Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: benign on December 29, 2014, 09:39:22 pm ________________________________________ Quote I don’t recommend that to anyone,’ she says quietly. ‘He was six weeks old, and we went through 24 hours of tests, which wasn’t much fun for him. Trying to fill 10 phials of blood from a tiny baby isn’t easy.’ Fortunately, the hospital was to diagnose the cause of his ill health as a milk intolerance, ‘and we were lucky because it was caught so early, he didn’t suffer any lasting effect... But some children aren’t so lucky, and by the time they end up in Great Ormond Street they are in a seriously bad way, and have to be fed via an intravenous method because their stomachs are so damaged’. Such is her gratitude to Great Ormond Street that she has proved to be a loyal fundraiser for the hospital and its research facilities. - thanks Alexandrine. Was it ever reported her son was taken to the hospital after 6 weeks? Good to see that she at least learned something and adapt to it. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Kuei Fei on December 30, 2014, 12:25:17 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Stephanie on December 29, 2014, 09:04:45 pm I like Sophie. There's a lot more to her then meets the eye. She's intelligent and learns something new every day, then puts it to good use. She is a hard worker and makes things happen-not necessarily glamorous things that sell ad in the papers. Seems capable to deal with life lessons whether good or bad, not self absorbed and those are good qualities IMO. Certainly as a result of her business success and her career, she has those traits. Yet she seems determined to throw that away on being as retroactively conformist as she can be. I think this is the only reason HM likes her. Quote from: CarryingOn on December 29, 2014, 07:38:46 pm Quote from: Kuei Fei on December 29, 2014, 01:50:01 pm Quote from: CarryingOn on December 29, 2014, 07:52:21 am ^ Exactly. Sings for her supper like Kit said. You have to wonder though how long she's going to keep that bit about dressing Louise up the way she does. Isn't the girl heading into her teens soon? It's just stupid now. I'll never understand WHY so many modern career successes end up being the most conformist royal wives; Sophie should be dressing her daughter in a way that healthily makes her like her peers, it is possible to be modern an appropriate. By dressing her daughter in an Edwardian way she's making her daughter conform to a way of life that is literally dying and of course, Louise needs to be groomed for a more practical way of life outside of the royal ring. I don't understand it either. Times change, time moves forward and it's NOT coming back! I think that's another reason why I don't like he way Louise dresses. You can tell there's nothing authentic or loved about the way she dresses, it's just another way for Sophie to show her conformity. Same with George, no love and appreciation of the style of dress, just another way to draw parallels between the way William and Harry grew up dressing. Not to mention, although, Louise is plain too old to be dressing the way she does, there are so many designers that are doing a more modern version of traditional dress. There's a woman I follow on instagram who dresses her little girl (and boy) in a more traditional manner but it's lots of pretty prints and bright colors going on. Also very cute and bright colored Mary Janes www.gramfeed.com/allieroyall (http://www.gramfeed.com/allieroyall). I think the mother shows a real love of the style of dress. Right; there are dozens and dozens of nice stuff, look at Modcloth or dozens of other retailers who have wonderful designs that are modern, chic, and still very modest. While HM has billions, will have billions to give away, it's not healthy to cut Louise off and groom her for a life in an Edwardian cocoon. William and Harry to me were just dressed nicely and I don't think the little Edwardian outfits were too bad as infants and toddlers, since the styles are practical and nice. It's just when it spills over past a certain age, that is when it becomes creepy and unhealthy. With her professional background I for one would have been dressing my kid in a nice long dress, long thermals, and sensible boots to keep the feet covered and warm. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Rosella on December 30, 2014, 01:48:51 am ________________________________________ I wonder whether the fact that Edward and Sohie are older parents has something to do with Louise's style of dress. After all, Sophie is just about fifty, Edward is already there. Sophie can probable remember wearing strap shoes, tights and long coats when she was Louise's age and so just automatically copies it, in a way a parent in their thirties or early forties probably wouldn't. I don't think Sophie does it deliberately, though there have been suggestions on blogs etc that she might be trying to keep Louise child-like for as long as possible, so she doesn't make Sophie look old. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: meememe on December 30, 2014, 02:15:42 am ________________________________________ Have any of you ever seen Louise's friends and how they dress? They may dress the same way. Personally I see nothing wrong with the way she dresses - similar to the 11 - 12 year old girls I know. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Fly on the wall on December 30, 2014, 02:34:17 am ________________________________________ Showing off her super-slim figure and, now, risking major controversy by praising the burka. As she turns 50...Is Sophie trying to snatch the limelight from Kate? She was just another skier with two young children parking their equipment at the end of the day at the hire shop. There was nothing to distinguish the Countess of Wessex and her children Lady Louise, 11, and James (Viscount Severn), seven, from any other family holidaying in Zermatt, Switzerland. Surprisingly, for a senior royal, she hadn’t expected their police protection officers to carry the skis back to the shop for them. Even the children carried their own. www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2890663/As-turns-50-Sophie-trying-snatch-limelight-Kate.html________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Kuei Fei on December 30, 2014, 03:29:14 am ________________________________________ I do find it odd that Sophie is going on this sort of blitz. Why the sudden need to promote herself has come up I don't know and I don't understand why Sophie is being so visible all of a sudden. Quote from: meememe on December 30, 2014, 02:15:42 am Have any of you ever seen Louise's friends and how they dress? They may dress the same way. Personally I see nothing wrong with the way she dresses - similar to the 11 - 12 year old girls I know. I might be wrong, but most kids aren't wearing clothes straight out of an Edwardian portrait. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on December 30, 2014, 04:57:52 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Kuei Fei on December 30, 2014, 03:29:14 am I do find it odd that Sophie is going on this sort of blitz. Why the sudden need to promote herself has come up I don't know and I don't understand why Sophie is being so visible all of a sudden. ... Indeed. Wasn't Diana criticized for "outshining" HER husband, a royal prince? And yet Sophie is going all out on an obvious, deliberate make-over to outshine not only royal princes, but their wives who are above her in the pecking order. To what end? What does she think she's going to get out of this? The people will fall soooo in love with her beautiful, sexy 50-year old self that they'll make her queen? It's ridiculous! And why doesn't the queen put her in her place as she did Diana? Why does Sophie get to do all this crazy stuff unchecked? It's very odd. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Rosella on December 30, 2014, 05:53:14 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Miss Hathaway on December 30, 2014, 04:57:52 am Quote from: Kuei Fei on December 30, 2014, 03:29:14 am I do find it odd that Sophie is going on this sort of blitz. Why the sudden need to promote herself has come up I don't know and I don't understand why Sophie is being so visible all of a sudden. ... Indeed. Wasn't Diana criticized for "outshining" HER husband, a royal prince? And yet Sophie is going all out on an obvious, deliberate make-over to outshine not only royal princes, but their wives who are above her in the pecking order. To what end? What does she think she's going to get out of this? The people will fall soooo in love with her beautiful, sexy 50-year old self that they'll make her queen? It's ridiculous! And why doesn't the queen put her in her place as she did Diana? Why does Sophie get to do all this crazy stuff unchecked? It's very odd. There are a few things going on there, probably. Edward, like Andrew doesn't like the idea of a slimmed down monarchy. That balcony appearance with just Charles, Camilla and his children standing beside the Queen was a shock to the siblings in my opinion. Allied to that rather grim future as far as the Wessexes are concerned, is that younger members of the Royals are squeezing out the older ones as far as media coverage is concerned. Even Charles complains that his charities aren't getting the publicity they deserve. How much more so for Sophie who is down the pecking order and is not getting very much media oxygen at her public engagements? Sophie can see the writing on the wall. Her status as a favoured daughter in law of the Queen isn't going to mean squat after the aged monarch is dead and a new reign has begun. IMO Sophie is getting a bit of public notice while she can. It's likely to be sparse in future years. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Val on December 30, 2014, 08:28:38 am ________________________________________ The RF are behind the promotion of Sophie as a much more suitable representative than Kate who has constantly embarrassed them with her inadequacies and frequent flashing of body parts (not to mention her pushy social climbing family). A response to the Burka article says much about public feeling too. ExPatPat, Lisbon, Portugal, 39 minutes ago AND she knows how to talk and act in public, she smiles and she doesn't make a grimace instead of a smile, no fiddling with too long locks, no heavy handed make up and too short skirts, she is extremely pretty and it would be better not to make a comparison as Sophie Wessex is miles ahead of Kate Cambridge. Also we have never seen her parents elbowing their way into the royal circle. ReplyNew 11 66Rated Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2890663/As-turns-50-Sophie-Wessex-trying-snatch-limelight-Kate-Middleton.html#ixzz3NMpLEtXy Follow us: @mailonline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Stephanie on December 30, 2014, 10:25:49 am ________________________________________ At least the public can now see what a working royal actually does (as opposed to Wasty). About Louise's Christmas outfit; maybe Louise wants to wear white stockings because she feels that's the festive and Christmassy thing to do. cdn.c.photoshelter.com/img-get/I0000CqbqhU1EgL0/s/650/650/NEWSPIX1181104-Lady-Louise.jpgLouise has plenty of nice clothes and boots. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: gingerboy24 on December 30, 2014, 10:51:06 am ________________________________________ I like Sophie and think she is far superior to wasty in every area. As far as it goes, for me wasty has not even hit the starting block yet, and doesn´t look likely to, ever, an d she has that vile family of hers to drag along everywhere, gives me the impression she can´t function without ma pushing her buttons. Sophie is much more her own woman. Some lovely photos of her on here princessmonarchy.eklablog.com/nouveau-portrait-de-la-comtesse-sophie-de-wessex-dans-le-domaine-de-su-a114105260________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Stephanie on December 30, 2014, 11:09:15 am ________________________________________ :thumbsup: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Freya on December 30, 2014, 11:12:08 am ________________________________________ ^^ I agree. Sophie is much more soft and natural looking than Kate who has a hard look. Kate looks as if she is acting out a part and not comfortable in the role. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Stephanie on December 30, 2014, 11:22:17 am ________________________________________ Sophie at 49 isn't using botox and fillers like wasty. Why should she have to wipe out the few mimic lines that she has? Sophie's skin is way better than Wasty's- no muscle atrophy from botox, no horrible leathery orange skin with neglected clogged up pores. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: india on December 30, 2014, 12:13:33 pm ________________________________________ All in all, I would say if you had to compare Sophie's competence as a representative of the RF to that of WK, there is no competition. Sophie wins hands down. WK is a loser in all areas and in all arenas. WK has only been successful in snagging the idiot prince. And that is it. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: gingerboy24 on December 30, 2014, 01:38:25 pm ________________________________________ ^ Nothing to add to that India, just about sums it all up for a lot of us. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Val on December 30, 2014, 01:48:10 pm ________________________________________ The RF are actively promoting Sophie as a representative as they have accepted that Kate is totally incompetent and unsuitable for the role. Too much flashing, no conversational skills, gurning, open mouthed grinning, inappropriate dress, hand flapping, head nodding and more. No amount of desperate PR can help Kate either. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Stephanie on December 30, 2014, 02:31:46 pm ________________________________________ Totally agree. The monarchy is sinking with only Aging Adulterer Chuck, the Wrinkly Homewrecker, Barbie and Baldie- and Harry to pick up everyone's pieces. Chuck IMO should not go ahead with the mini monarchy. He needs his brothers, sister and sister in law to help him with the daily workload. The York girls would also improve the image of the RF IMO. He should give them some tasks-they are charming and seem to enjoy it. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on December 30, 2014, 05:51:19 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: Stephanie on December 30, 2014, 11:22:17 am Sophie at 49 isn't using botox and fillers like wasty. Why should she have to wipe out the few mimic lines that she has? Sophie's skin is way better than Wasty's- no muscle atrophy from botox, no horrible leathery orange skin with neglected clogged up pores. She doesn't have to when the media is photoshopping her to death. The Harpers Bazaar photos are like oil paintings they are so photoshopped. :bored: :cookie: ________________________________________
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2023 19:36:15 GMT
Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Kuei Fei on December 30, 2014, 07:32:50 pm ________________________________________ I'm kind of mixed up with Sophie. She needs to dress and raise her daughter to fit in with her peers and be less Edwardian. I think she's only HM's favorite since Sophie is such a doormat. I do think that she's failed to break new ground, so she hasn't really done anything that would cause her to be more in-depth. As for the positives, she does keep her life and business from becoming a mess. It's easy since she's married to a minor prince, not a major one. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Stephanie on December 30, 2014, 09:22:38 pm ________________________________________ Sophie will be 50 in a couple of weeks so there's bound to be some publicity. Sophie's make over IMO has nothing to do with Wasty, with whom she has little to nothing to do. Personally I think that Sophie knows she HAS to remain fit, alert and receptive if she wants to raise her kids right. She fell pregnant aged 42 and has a boy at home who just turned 7 and probably still believes in Santa. For the next 10-15 years she and Edward have to toe the line, so no comfortably slipping into middle age for them I'm afraid. :tehe: They have work to do, both for the RF as for their family. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: AnaBolena on December 30, 2014, 09:29:49 pm ________________________________________ ^ Very much agree, Stephanie. Besides which, nothing she wears looks like Waity Wear at all. www.harpersbazaar.co.uk/fashion/fashion-news/for-queen-and-country-sophie-countess-of-wessex-february-2015Many women do a 'new me' makeover at 30 40 50 60 etc. I have a sister 16 years older than me and she's more with it since she turned 50 not that long ago. It's not unusual or uncommon. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: gingerboy24 on December 30, 2014, 09:37:08 pm ________________________________________ I think she is doing well for 50, I would think many women would be happy to look like her at 50. As you say Stephanie, she still has a 7 year old to contend with, and Lady Louise is 11, teenage years to weather yet. I think a lot of the royals are heavily photoshopped, camzilla being the one they appear to work on the most, after wasty of course, they photoshop her up to the hilt. I think I saw a piccie of camzilla recently, obviously unphotoshopped, jeepers, enough to frighten the life out of you. Must see if I can find it again and will post, the difference is so amazing, it made me realise just how much photoshopping they do on her. Photos of wasty unphotoshopped are dreaful, all those wrinkles, forehead lines, pock marks, large pores in her skin, lots of fluffy facial hair - all that gets photoshopped out, Will look for the camzilla photo, it really is a huge surprise. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Alexandrine on December 30, 2014, 09:47:32 pm ________________________________________ ^I want to see that, please post! ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: gingerboy24 on December 30, 2014, 10:08:03 pm ________________________________________ Will put them in members only section, not fair otherwise. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Alexandrine on December 30, 2014, 10:13:54 pm ________________________________________ ^ ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: gingerboy24 on December 30, 2014, 10:19:43 pm ________________________________________ ^Sent you a pm but your inbox full. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Alexandrine on December 30, 2014, 10:26:14 pm ________________________________________ try now ? ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: gingerboy24 on December 30, 2014, 11:06:10 pm ________________________________________ Weird, thought I just posted this. Miss Hathaway gave me a link to a DM article with the same piccies in it. My response to MH and the piccie links. Thank you very much, yes. These are the two i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/11/03/1415019385422_Image_galleryImage_HIDALGO_MEXICO_NOVEMBER_0.JPGi.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/11/03/1415019424592_Image_galleryImage_HIDALGO_MEXICO_NOVEMBER_0.JPGI did not want to put them on here as I saw them on Getty Images and I was not sure about copyright etc, but as these are from the DM it is not a problem. I have not seen that DM article before, will go back and have a read. Thanks again. Mods can you remove the piccies from the Photoshopping thread I made in Members Only please. Many thanks, and sorry for causing you inconvenience, I was being cautious on the copyright front.. thankyou ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Alexandrine on December 30, 2014, 11:09:34 pm ________________________________________ ^ moved it to the other thread already ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: gingerboy24 on December 30, 2014, 11:22:30 pm ________________________________________ Thank you very much :flower: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Countess of Wessex has six pages of Charities & Royal patronages Post by: Kuei Fei on December 31, 2014, 12:36:52 am ________________________________________ Sophie kind of epistomizes a modern career woman marrying in and suddenly ending up completely conformist, moreso than most born to the background. So weird; Diana and Sarah (Fergie) had huge dallops of Stuart lineage and dressed a lot more modern and a lot more daring, dressing their kids as normally as possible. Quote from: serene grace on October 08, 2011, 08:15:28 am it was that she went to dinner and name dropped Royalty ,she discussed her royal opinions and she discussed political things and mentioned royals, but that was all she did, she gossiped about royals which was a no, no......because it was viewed as using royals to impress the client, but she didn't do more than that. She said the Queen(Mother's) an old dear She said Charles and Camilla were two of the most unpopular people She said Blair was too presidential and ruining the countryside She didn't say anything mean about Princess Diana, that was totally made up ,by NOTW Sophie went to a very public lunch or dinner with a client who pretended to be a sheik. She started chitcatting about royalty and private things at a lunch-dinner , some felt it was to impress the client, but she never did more than sit and talk, nothing more. It was not some sneaky backroom deal like Sarah. Sophie just basically was gossiping too much. The sheik was the dishonest person in that meeting, not Sophie, she truly thought the guy came to her PR company for pr, she was doing what she always did, taking a client to lunch, but she did gossip too much, she should never have been discussing the royals even if it was a comment like the Queen's an old dear, the press blew it all up to be way more. Sophie should have done a check on the potential client and made sure the sheik was real. For a successful businesswoman, she made a huge mistake there. I'm surprised, it's like the business brain she had suddenly went out the window after marriage. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on December 31, 2014, 02:02:32 am ________________________________________ Ah, but Sophie was never a successful businesswoman in her own right. That is just one of the many myths that floats around Sophie. She worked for a PR company and then, after becoming the queen's son's girlfriend and making some connections, she started her own company. Word was she wasn't that good. She was greedy and opportunistic, and it was her downfall. The undercover journalist never intended to talk to Sophie, he was just sniffing around Harkin because he had heard Sophie was flouting her royal status. It was SOPHIE herself who showed up to talk to the guy himself thinking she could land a fat account. And she made promises -- as did Harkin -- about her royal connections which was a big no-no. And so she was . She tried to keep the company going even after she supposedly "retired" but it went bankrupt because the only thing the company had going for it was the royal connection. There were much better PR firms out there. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: cate1949 on December 31, 2014, 02:53:14 am ________________________________________ Gingerboy - Camilla looks about to cry in those photos - when were they taken? If you know please. The pics of Sophie in the magazine article just go to show how much better she could look if she did her hair properly - not a big deal to blow it out with a bit of gel and style it - she looks so much better with her hair fussed over a bit. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Stephanie on December 31, 2014, 10:36:15 am ________________________________________ O my gaaawd GB! Campon has a white moustache and a small beard! :ick: :ick: Guess who doesn't get kissed anymore.. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: gingerboy24 on December 31, 2014, 03:05:06 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: cate1949 on December 31, 2014, 02:53:14 am Gingerboy - Camilla looks about to cry in those photos - when were they taken? If you know please. The pics of Sophie in the magazine article just go to show how much better she could look if she did her hair properly - not a big deal to blow it out with a bit of gel and style it - she looks so much better with her hair fussed over a bit. Mexico, and was allegedly laughing! ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Kuei Fei on December 31, 2014, 03:41:43 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: Miss Hathaway on December 31, 2014, 02:02:32 am Ah, but Sophie was never a successful businesswoman in her own right. That is just one of the many myths that floats around Sophie. She worked for a PR company and then, after becoming the queen's son's girlfriend and making some connections, she started her own company. Word was she wasn't that good. She was greedy and opportunistic, and it was her downfall. The undercover journalist never intended to talk to Sophie, he was just sniffing around Harkin because he had heard Sophie was flouting her royal status. It was SOPHIE herself who showed up to talk to the guy himself thinking she could land a fat account. And she made promises -- as did Harkin -- about her royal connections which was a big no-no. And so she was . She tried to keep the company going even after she supposedly "retired" but it went bankrupt because the only thing the company had going for it was the royal connection. There were much better PR firms out there. Another round of hype to benefit the BRF. They can't just have a smart businesswoman, they have to have a SUCCESSFUL business owning woman who is SO honored to be in the BRF she willingly gave it ALL up for LURVE! Would explain why HM favors her, Sophie played along with the hype and the lies. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on December 31, 2014, 04:01:24 pm ________________________________________ ^ Yep. And lets not forgot that by marrying Ed, Sophie helped dampen the stories that he was gay. Liz and Phil would have been thrilled with any woman who was willing to marry him. It wasn't like they were all lined up to date him. :June: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Stephanie on December 31, 2014, 04:31:32 pm ________________________________________ Gay- I don't think so. Unlike Chuck he didn't wait for the line ups but pursued someone. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: gingerboy24 on December 31, 2014, 04:41:04 pm ________________________________________ The royals didn´t start letting the low-lifes in until campon and wasty, now it seems they let any old tramp in no matter what. At least eh had the savvy to choose his own bride, unlike chucky, and they are still together, credit where it is due. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Stephanie on December 31, 2014, 04:42:45 pm ________________________________________ And actually sharing a home and a life unlike W and W. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: gingerboy24 on December 31, 2014, 04: :48 pm ________________________________________ Frankly you can´t compare the two really can you . wasty is the common old cod roe from Asda to Sophie´s luxury caviar from Fortnum and Mason - and boy does it show in every photo. Sophie has more class in her little finger than wasty will ever have. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on December 31, 2014, 05:12:59 pm ________________________________________ Yeah, throwing a temper tantum on the sidewalk and yelling at an employee is Klassy! :snob: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1380021/Royal-Wedding-2011-Countess-Wessex-wearing-Bruce-Oldfield.html________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: AnaBolena on December 31, 2014, 05:29:03 pm ________________________________________ One word for Sophie's outburst of apparent anger and then apparent tears 'PERIMENOPAUSE'. Poor Sophie - no break for even having a hormonal meltdown.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2023 19:36:38 GMT
Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Kuei Fei on December 31, 2014, 06:05:46 pm ________________________________________ Yelling at a security officer is to me bad bad bad bad bad bad form. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: AnaBolena on December 31, 2014, 06:25:32 pm ________________________________________ ^ Totally agree KF - as is yelling at anyone, but I give ppl breaks when hormonal. Coming from a huge family if sisters who all were well educated I've seen it all. Hormones aren't completely controllable ALL the time especially in pre and peri meno, which Sophie would be. No, it's not good, not elegant or classy, but so what - she's human- she doesn't do it every day, at least not in public. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on December 31, 2014, 07:08:55 pm ________________________________________ Maybe. I'd put it down to JEALOUSY myself. :hi: In any event, the old girl is touted to be the Model of Royalty and her screeching like a fishwife on the sidewalk at an employee who cannot talk back is low class. And not what the queen (her teacher) would do. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Kuei Fei on December 31, 2014, 08:19:18 pm ________________________________________ I do think that yelling at a security officer is the lowest of the low. If a member of congress or member of the First Family were videotaped/photographed screaming and pointing at a US Secret Service agent, it would incinerate their poll ratings and likely trigger the Congress to issue a censure. Sophie has no excuse not to handle her stress in a more adult manner. Zero excuse really. She could take pills to relax her or indulge in some stress reduction exercise, not mouth off to a security officer. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: AnaBolena on January 01, 2015, 07:24:38 pm ________________________________________ MH - but jealous of what? ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Freya on January 02, 2015, 02:25:59 am ________________________________________ I like Sophie but a member of the RF is a public representative and shouting at a security officer is not good form. If she had been an MP she would have been in big bother. Royals do seem to get away with a lot in comparison with elected representatives. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Kuei Fei on January 02, 2015, 02:57:59 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Miss Hathaway on December 31, 2014, 07:08:55 pm Maybe. I'd put it down to JEALOUSY myself. :hi: In any event, the old girl is touted to be the Model of Royalty and her screeching like a fishwife on the sidewalk at an employee who cannot talk back is low class. And not what the queen (her teacher) would do. Quote from: AnaBolena on January 01, 2015, 07:24:38 pm MH - but jealous of what? I think Sophie has treasured her role as HM's favorite, the youngest of the royal consorts, and felt threatened by Kate coming into the RF, disliked the idea of no longer being the most 'modern' of the consorts and there was likely yelling and screaming around the palaces for weeks after the announcement. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: AnaBolena on January 02, 2015, 03:39:15 am ________________________________________ ^ KF if that's the case, I wish Sophie would Google Waity a while back. She's been nothing but a glorified mistress for a decade pre-marriage, a non starter in the work force EVER and has hardly been seen looking decent pre-marriage. I'd have thought of her as a tart! Sophie is so silly to be jealous of such a social climbing,cheap overrated piece of lack of work. Message to Sophie!!!! :flower: Shaking my head Sophie. You're better than that wastrel any day. Get with the program and wake up to Waity. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: gingerboy24 on January 02, 2015, 03:10:40 pm ________________________________________ ^Heartily agree. Sophie or wasty - hmmm, let me see, nope, no thought needed, Sophie every time. More class in her little finger than wasty has in the whole of her emaciated body. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: AnaBolena on January 02, 2015, 06:28:24 pm ________________________________________ ^ :thumbsup: GB - one would have to be actively wanting to discredit Sophie to say otherwise in light of Waity's actions. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on January 02, 2015, 06:52:24 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: Kuei Fei on January 02, 2015, 02:57:59 am Quote from: Miss Hathaway on December 31, 2014, 07:08:55 pm Maybe. I'd put it down to JEALOUSY myself. :hi: In any event, the old girl is touted to be the Model of Royalty and her screeching like a fishwife on the sidewalk at an employee who cannot talk back is low class. And not what the queen (her teacher) would do. Quote from: AnaBolena on January 01, 2015, 07:24:38 pm MH - but jealous of what? I think Sophie has treasured her role as HM's favorite, the youngest of the royal consorts, and felt threatened by Kate coming into the RF, disliked the idea of no longer being the most 'modern' of the consorts and there was likely yelling and screaming around the palaces for weeks after the announcement. Yes, this is what I think. And her actions since then only reinforce this belief. Her copying Kate is downright creepy and I hope someone talks to her about getting help/stopping it. Frankly, neither Kate nor Sophie are exactly what one thinks of when thinking of "class". :bored: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on January 10, 2015, 03:27:48 pm ________________________________________ Quote Sophie and Edward like to be around their children. It is easily apparent that they enjoy them. No complaining about them. Quite refreshing. It is clear that they do not enjoy being around their son because he's rarely with them. No huggy, smiley photos with them. If Sophie were really a perfect royal wife, she'd fix this and start appearing with James. He's seven. He's way old enough. It's odd that they have never taken him to church on Christmas. Wonder why? :cookie: ________________________________________ Title: Sophie Wessex - Myths and Legends Post by: Miss Hathaway on January 21, 2015, 08:41:43 pm ________________________________________ Every royal figure has myths and legends surrounding them, and Sophie Wessex is no different. The same stories keep circulating around her, and no one bothers to set them straight. This article, for instance, repeats the same stuff about Sophie that isn't accurate: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfamily/11352032/Sophie-Wessex-at-50-a-countess-the-Queen-can-rely-on.htmlFor instance: . . . . gradually the Earl and Countess of Wessex became more absorbed in royal duties. Actually, the Earl's business (Ardent) was becoming an embarrassment and the Countess of Wessex's greediness led her to trying to land a rich "sheikh's" account by offering him access to the royal persona. Thus, they were given an ultimatum -- business or royal life. They quickly chose royal lives and so work had to be created for them. And: The Countess closed down her company in 2002, the same year as the Queen’s Golden Jubilee. Sophie -- contrary to her assurances to the queen -- continued her involvement with the company. It didn't close down (due to bankruptcy) for another seven years. www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1200621/Sophie-Wessex-1-7m-business-debt--won-t-pay.htmlAnd: It soon became clear that the Countess was never going to upstage the Queen or her husband in the way that Diana, Princess of Wales had done The author makes it sound as though this became clear AFTER Sophie had to leave her company and become a working royal. In fact, this was what the queen noticed when Sophie first started dating Edward. "You wouldn't notice her in a crowd" the queen told Margaret. They were thrilled that she did not have the charisma of Diana. And: nor did she have any of the perceived extravagances of the Duchess of York. This isn't completely true. Sophie lives in the largest of the private homes of all the royals. And she bankrupted her company. She's not so very different from Sarah York in that respect. The difference is that the queen has bankrolled her. And: Indeed, she has a close relationship with the Queen. She has often been seen leaving church in the car with Her Majesty, while other members of the Royal family walk. The car riding was true up until December 2011. That was the last time Sophie rode in the car with the Queen at one of the family get togethers. After that she has walked with everyone else, clearly enjoying the camera. And: Over time, the Wessexes have taken on an enormous number of royal engagements, and these do not always appear to be the most glamorous ones. I think the author has this confused with Princess Anne. She takes on an enormous number of not-so-glamorous engagements. The Wessexes are the ones who can be found dressing up in gowns and tiaras for weddings. And: puts aside time for her children. She collects them from school and they often ride together, frequently with the Queen. This may have been true in the past, but I think the Queen's riding days are increasingly behind her. And Sophie being a rider is more myth than fact, it would seem. I think she is much more into taking her children to riding lessons these days. And: Over the years, there have been members of the Royal family who have quietly gone about such business and duties. The Countess of Wessex is in the mould of Princess Alice, Duchess of Gloucester and Princess Alexandra, who, in their different, quiet ways, never failed to support the monarch of the day. Such dedication does not attract daily headlines, and nor should it. Actually, Sophie is not at all quiet while going about her duties, as were Princesses Alice and Alexandra. Sophie's having been the second lady in the land when she first married in seems to have gone to her head, and she is not gracefully ceding that position. There have been a spate of articles about Sophie since Charles and William have married and pushed her down the line. Put "Sophie Wessex" in the google news search and you will see story after story of "Royal mother-of-two dazzles on Spanish beach"; "Countess of Wessex: the Royal Family's latest style icon?"; "The only way is Wessex: How stylish Sophie has transformed into a real jewel in the crown"; "Sophie Wessex: The unsung star of the Royal Family"; "Sophie at 50: the Queen's quiet favorite". And on and on. Now put in "Princess Anne" in the google news search and you find fewer, very matter of fact headlines, despite the fact that Anne works much more than Sophie. It's pretty obvious that Sophie has a pr person to place stories to raise her profile. Sophie would know how to work this since she was a pr person herself. There's nothing wrong with this, but it puts paid the myth that Sophie is "quietly" and "unassumingly" going about her duties. She intends to get as much press out of her position as she can. :flirt:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2023 19:36:57 GMT
Title: Re: Sophie Wessex - Myths and Legends Post by: india on January 21, 2015, 09:05:14 pm ________________________________________ At the present time, Sophie is not an embarrassment like the bloated Potato Head Stalker. She knows how to act as a proper representative of the RF. She does them proud. She is not constantly exposing herself or pressing her crotch. She does not gurn, twirl her hair, make weird facial expressions or make stupid remarks. And finally, she lives with her husband.....not with her Mama and Dada. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Wessex - Myths and Legends Post by: Rebecca on January 22, 2015, 02:35:14 am ________________________________________ ^Excellent post. :flower: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Wessex - Myths and Legends Post by: HennyPenny on January 22, 2015, 03:32:49 am ________________________________________ Miss Hathaway - When its comes to a Sophie Post I always look for you response. You make me laugh so hard sometime I know my neighbors think I am losing my mind... Keep up the good work!!!!! :thumbsup: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Wessex - Myths and Legends Post by: AnaBolena on January 22, 2015, 01:26:02 pm ________________________________________ ^ True, I get a good laugh too. Never seen such obsession over someone who is as low down the royal list as Sophie. The obsessive component is so creepy it's laughable. :laugh: :tehe: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Wessex - Myths and Legends Post by: Little light on January 22, 2015, 01:30:19 pm ________________________________________ re Miss Hathaway's post. Maybe this is why Sophie tries to copy WK, her messy hairstyle etc etc. She's probably hoping some of the tabloid glitter that Waity gets will rub off on her too, raising her profile. And if i wanted a patron of the charity and had to choose between WK and Sophie, I'd rather have Sophie for all her faults. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Wessex - Myths and Legends Post by: Miss Hathaway on January 22, 2015, 03:51:27 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: HennyPenny on January 22, 2015, 03:32:49 am Miss Hathaway - When its comes to a Sophie Post I always look for you response. You make me laugh so hard sometime I know my neighbors think I am losing my mind... Keep up the good work!!!!! :thumbsup: Ah, HennyPenny, you get it! Yes, Sophie is a great source of amusement for royal watchers if they cut through the myths and legends that have been placed around her. I'm doing my bit to point these out and have some fun along the way! :thankyou: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Wessex - Myths and Legends Post by: CathyJane on January 22, 2015, 08:39:23 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: india on January 21, 2015, 09:05:14 pm At the present time, Sophie is not an embarrassment like the bloated Potato Head Stalker. She knows how to act as a proper representative of the RF. She does them proud. She is not constantly exposing herself or pressing her crotch. She does not gurn, twirl her hair, make weird facial expressions or make stupid remarks. And finally, she lives with her husband.....not with her Mama and Dada. :thumbsup: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Wessex - Myths and Legends Post by: Kuei Fei on March 05, 2015, 07:41:33 pm ________________________________________ No matter what, there's something about Sophie that keeps unsettling me. She obviously is so determined to kiss up to the Queen and it's kind of an insult that she only got a pieced together tiara, not a normal one of her own. She still got jewels from Saudis, but thing is, she's incredibly pathetic. Quote from: Little light on January 22, 2015, 01:30:19 pm Maybe this is why Sophie tries to copy WK, her messy hairstyle etc etc. She's probably hoping some of the tabloid glitter that Waity gets will rub off on her too, raising her profile. Exactly; Sophie needs to get it into her head that she's no longer the youngest of the royal wives and needs to stop with the coy passive aggressiveness. She's not an ingenue (never was when she was living with Edward before marriage) and frankly needs to stop marketing herself. It irritates me when mothers act so childish and frankly, not being an embarrassment is very normal for many adult women. She's not a kid and she's not unused to press attention. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on March 06, 2015, 05:30:28 pm ________________________________________ ^ You have described Sophie to a tee, KF. She is indeed an accomplished kiss up. She was never an equestrianne and I sincerely doubt when she was growing up in her village that military history was on her mind, yet she honed in on the Queen's weaknesses and used them to gain a toe hold. I am disappointed in the queen . . . And you're exactly right about her passive aggressive ingenue tact. The woman was 34 when she married and been around a few blocks. But she has persisted in pretending that she was a 19-year-old virgin bride like Diana. Even now she is not moving into her own as a mature 50-year-old and persists with the cutsey short skirts, jeggings, cleavage, and pony tails, always with an eye out on how to get the camera on her. :- ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Wessex - Myths and Legends Post by: CarryingOn on March 07, 2015, 02:17:27 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Kuei Fei on March 05, 2015, 07:41:33 pm No matter what, there's something about Sophie that keeps unsettling me. She obviously is so determined to kiss up to the Queen and it's kind of an insult that she only got a pieced together tiara, not a normal one of her own. She still got jewels from Saudis, but thing is, she's incredibly pathetic. Quote from: Little light on January 22, 2015, 01:30:19 pm Maybe this is why Sophie tries to copy WK, her messy hairstyle etc etc. She's probably hoping some of the tabloid glitter that Waity gets will rub off on her too, raising her profile. Exactly; Sophie needs to get it into her head that she's no longer the youngest of the royal wives and needs to stop with the coy passive aggressiveness. She's not an ingenue (never was when she was living with Edward before marriage) and frankly needs to stop marketing herself. It irritates me when mothers act so childish and frankly, not being an embarrassment is very normal for many adult women. She's not a kid and she's not unused to press attention. Same here and I think it's the kiss a$$ thing too and that she does come across as highly pathetic. I was so damn incredulous when I finally saw that damn tiara! I couldn't believe it! Every time I turned around I read someone talking about how the Queen likes Sophie because she gave a tiara. When I finally saw the thing, all I could think was damn if that were me I'd rather be hated for all eternity by that old woman. It's so ugly and it looks extremely cheap and so do the other ones she's been allowed to wear. The way people were going on you'd think she was wearing something equivalent to the one the Queen gave Diana or the Spencer Tiara. Talk about #disappointed. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Kuei Fei on March 07, 2015, 03:54:21 am ________________________________________ That piecemeal tiara, I think this is something that royals and aristocrats do to those who marry in without a family tiara of their own. It was such a slap in the face that I think Sophie should have walked rather than be treated like this. Look at how Kate was given a little coronet and asked to give it back after the ceremony. I would have been offended by such a small thing and she's STILL not wearing anything too massive. I don't think she likes it. Quote ^ You have described Sophie to a tee, KF. She is indeed an accomplished kiss up. She was never an equestrianne and I sincerely doubt when she was growing up in her village that military history was on her mind, yet she honed in on the Queen's weaknesses and used them to gain a toe hold. I am disappointed in the queen . . . HM is not and never has been a good judge of character; HM should have seen the red flags when Sophie wanted to move into the palace, essentially mooching. When she picked at her security officer, all bets were off to me. NO ONE has any right to pick at their security officer. Quote And you're exactly right about her passive aggressive ingenue tact. The woman was 34 when she married and been around a few blocks. But she has persisted in pretending that she was a 19-year-old virgin bride like Diana. Even now she is not moving into her own as a mature 50-year-old and persists with the cutsey short skirts, jeggings, cleavage, and pony tails, always with an eye out on how to get the camera on her. :- At the Luxembourg wedding, she looked disgraceful; too tight dress, fascinator tack hat, and of course, grinned like she was at a premiere. She looked nice at the banquet, but horrendous on the actual wedding day. She is too old to be clueless about how to dress and needs to stop acting like some newbie. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Val on March 07, 2015, 08:09:42 am ________________________________________ Many never never felt right about her since the Arab scam, what she said about members of the RF then, the disrespect she showed them and how she tried to use her RF connections to promote her own business. It is thought by those close that the reason QE accepted her is that she 'rescued' Edward's reputation, gave him a family and a sort of air of respectability. Many however still think that she revealed her true colours in the early days also that QE has a very poor sense of character judgement. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: india on March 07, 2015, 03:26:40 pm ________________________________________ All of the above is true. But that was in the beginning and as the years went by, she put in tremendous effort to rectify her mistakes. Some members say, that she likes to copy The Stalking Flashing Waiter and to suck up to the Queen. Maybe true. But there is one glaring truth about the Countess of Wessex: her children are hers and Edward's. There is no question of their parentage and no question of the usage of a surrogate. And to top it off, Lady Louise is the spitting image of The Queen. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Kuei Fei on March 07, 2015, 03:58:55 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: Val on March 07, 2015, 08:09:42 am Many never never felt right about her since the Arab scam, what she said about members of the RF then, the disrespect she showed them and how she tried to use her RF connections to promote her own business. It is thought by those close that the reason QE accepted her is that she 'rescued' Edward's reputation, gave him a family and a sort of air of respectability. Many however still think that she revealed her true colours in the early days also that QE has a very poor sense of character judgement. All the highlighted are completely true; thing is, Edward got upset about being accused of being gay (not that there's anything wrong with that) and Sophie came along at the right time and wormed her way in. The Arab scam, she could have done her research about the client and she would have avoided a lot of humiliation. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on March 07, 2015, 06:54:48 pm ________________________________________ ^ Yes, the undercover reporter could have been sniffed out easily had Sophie been as smart as some people make her out to be. But she is greedy and saw dollar signs and invited herself to lunch with the guy [it was her idea, not his], and thought to dazzle him with insider stories. I doubt very much that she learned from that experience, and as soon as the queen's protection ceases, Sophie will land in the suds again. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Alexandrine on March 07, 2015, 09:56:01 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: Val on March 07, 2015, 08:09:42 am Many never never felt right about her since the Arab scam, what she said about members of the RF then, the disrespect she showed them and how she tried to use her RF connections to promote her own business. It is thought by those close that the reason QE accepted her is that she 'rescued' Edward's reputation, gave him a family and a sort of air of respectability. Many however still think that she revealed her true colours in the early days also that QE has a very poor sense of character judgement. your analysis is spot on. I can see that she is innocuous right now, but after the arab scam she is nearly on the same level as Fergie. Then there is also the try hard vibes she emits. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Kuei Fei on March 08, 2015, 01:17:01 am ________________________________________ She's innocuous because she should be; her husband is lower in the line of succession now and she had no business trying to launch herself as a star. Just be a good wife and be happy and go about your appearances and business. Quote from: Miss Hathaway on March 07, 2015, 06:54:48 pm ^ Yes, the undercover reporter could have been sniffed out easily had Sophie been as smart as some people make her out to be. But she is greedy and saw dollar signs and invited herself to lunch with the guy [it was her idea, not his], and thought to dazzle him with insider stories. I doubt very much that she learned from that experience, and as soon as the queen's protection ceases, Sophie will land in the suds again. This is the problem with people like Sophie; they don't do their research and don't think to hire someone to find out, which makes me wonder about her vaunted successful business background. She was way too stupid and reckless. If it had not been a spy, but a terrorist, just think of the damage that could be done. I wonder how different things will be once HM is gone, what with how Sophie is HM's favorite (I don't think it's because Sophie tries to be normal) and I think Charles will cut Edward and Sophie's perks down. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Sophie Wessex - Myths and Legends Post by: Miss Hathaway on April 08, 2015, 02:19:14 pm ________________________________________ And another Myth and Legend about Sophie is that she is so good with children and such a loving mother. Yet Easter Sunday shows that her son is left out of the family function again, and her daughter is dressed dreadfully. Another Sophie Myth bites the dust . . . . kisss ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Countess of Holland on April 12, 2015, 07:19:20 pm ________________________________________ The Wessex-couple took both their children with her on a visit to the Ubunye Foundation. The Foundation, of which Sophie is patron, helps rural communities in South Africa to be more self-reliant. As it is Easter Holiday in England, the visit didn't clash with the school of the children. www.express.co.uk/news/royal/569863/Lady-Louise-James-accompany-Countess-Wessex-Ubunye-Foundation-visit-South-Africa________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on April 12, 2015, 11:33:38 pm ________________________________________ So, James can't go to church with his family on Christmas or Easter but he can go on an official engagement with Sophie in South Africa? Isn't this a parallel to George who was paraded around New Zealand and Australia but never seen in Great Britain? What's up with these royal kids? And, Sophie always looks stressed when she is with James. Look at her face. It's like, go away, kid, can't you see I'm in the middle of a photo op? :- And why are the Wessexes working in South Africa? Isn't that Wales territory? ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: kolkomilko on April 13, 2015, 06:51:59 am ________________________________________ Whatever her reason for staying James away from the public, that's improper. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: AnaBolena on April 22, 2015, 05:06:27 pm ________________________________________ Is it possible that he has mild autism or sensory disorders? My sister has a child with sensory issues and this little girl hates the sounds of the outside world and will literally have a meltdown if she's made to go out. My sister, needless to say, feels very stressed at her daughters distress. I'm not sure what is in the Windsor bloodline and forget what John had. Autism or Epilepsy? ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: india on April 22, 2015, 05:09:05 pm ________________________________________ Epilepsy ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Rosella on April 22, 2015, 05:53:32 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: AnaBolena on April 22, 2015, 05:06:27 pm Is it possible that he has mild autism or sensory disorders? My sister has a child with sensory issues and this little girl hates the sounds of the outside world and will literally have a meltdown if she's made to go out. My sister, needless to say, feels very stressed at her daughters distress. I'm not sure what is in the Windsor bloodline and forget what John had. Autism or Epilepsy? I think John was believed to have both conditions, (not that people knew much about autism in the early 1900's). I've read that his epilepsy got progressively worse in the last years of his life. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: india on April 22, 2015, 10:51:04 pm ________________________________________ It was unforgivable how he was removed from his family, at their behest, and until the day he died. Ungodly people. ________________________________________
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2023 19:37:34 GMT
Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: AnaBolena on April 22, 2015, 11:51:23 pm ________________________________________ ^ India, I just watched a YouTube video that is based on as much fact as can be found. You might find it of interest because it seems his initial parting from his family was due to the war. Clearly there were the usual RF issues surrounding illness, or the inability to accept not all is perfect, but it's a more humane light that is shed in this one. m.youtube.com/watch?v=peKGD48yqTkI do think it terribly sad that he was parted, but he certainly wasn't unloved by any means. Poor child, the illness alone was suffering enough, but it has often made me question if Edward and Sophie's child has something wrong. I hope not. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Countess of Holland on April 23, 2015, 07:59:57 am ________________________________________ James is seen often enough with his family, to the races, to the Commonwealth Games, a few weeks ago to South Africa. I just get the feeling that he is a very active boy (he always seems to be climbing on things) who can't sit still for longer than ten minutes. So his parents decided not to take him to the more official events that require him to sit still, like church services. And that is a wise thing because if an anonymous child is shifting and turning on his chair we might say 'oh well', but when he does it, the press will cry 'shame on him' and will go after his parents for not raising him properly. While these journalists, for all we know, have an equally active son who just happens not to be in the spotlights. So no, I don't think anything is wrong with him. I have nephews (and a few tom-boy nieces) who are overly active as well, or who were when they were younger. And as they get older, they will adapt easier to what is expected and will act accordingly. And it is for the parents to decide when that moment is with James. They most certainly know him much better than we do (and perhaps with the nanny, they know him best). ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: AnaBolena on April 23, 2015, 05:37:12 pm ________________________________________ ^ Well said CoH :thumbsup: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on June 17, 2015, 03: :34 am ________________________________________ Does Sophie have any girlfriends? Does she ever socialize with friends? I never see photos of her out and about with her kids doing normal activities or out and about with girlfriends. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Tpearl on June 17, 2015, 04:02:49 am ________________________________________ Good question. She seems to be a bit of a loner. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on October 20, 2015, 05:27:33 pm ________________________________________ Well, I have neglected the Coy Countess because of all the excitement in the Swedish Court. kisss But while scrolling through some headlines, I found this article, published yesterday: www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3278885/From-frumpy-fabulous-Sophie-Wessex-caved-royal-style-demands-ditched-boring-trouser-suits-one-Vanity-Fair-s-best-dressed.htmlI cannot believe the audacity of this woman. Periodically, there appears a DM article (with Sophie's fingerprints all over it), to tell us how AMAZING this woman is! The Best Royal Evah! The Perfect Royal Wife! So Stylish! Looking Younger Every Day! Bestest Bosom Buddies with the Queen! Never Puts a Hoof Wrong! Et Cetera. :wopedo: And here we go again. Sophie feels the need to drum up some attention for herself. And we get this ridiculous dribble: ". . . The wife of the Prince Edward, told the Sunday Express, that during the early years of her marriage, she tried to resist wearing expensive designer clothes for fear that her outfits would overshadow her charity work. She said: 'It's still not about me, it's about my charities. But I recognise that I'm on display.' The Countess revealed that a casual chat with someone had made her realise that fashion was something to be taken seriously. She added: 'I wrestled with that one for a little while and caved in at the end of the day.' . . . " Huh? She did not realize that for HUNDREDS (a thousand) years that everyone was interested in what the royals wore? Does she not realize how shallow this makes her look? After all Princess Anne has worn the same hairstyle for years, wears appropriate -- but not fashion forward -- clothes, gets few headlines or cover photos for her work, but realizes that it is about the WORK she does for the charity and not her clothes or looks?! Evidently, for Sophie, it is all about the clothes and how much attention she gets, and the personal acclaim she receives. It really is all about her. I think she does care about her charities, but she is also very aware of how to use the charities as her own personal vanity vehicle. And then this story, the day before the one above, we again, hear about her closeness with the Queen and this statement: "Sophie, Countess of Wessex, is fast becoming one of the most popular members of the royal family, who earns as much admiration for her sense of duty and charity support as for her sense of style. . . ." Fast becoming one of the most popular? Really? Most people don't even know who she is or who her husband is. Well, Soph, it's good to have a dream. :laugh: :laugh: www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3278383/The-Queen-great-listener-Sophie-Wessex-praises-amazing-mother-law-never-loses-desire-learn.htmlI think Sophie believes she can PR her way into the Queenship. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Kuei Fei on October 20, 2015, 08:26:31 pm ________________________________________ I get so sick and tired of the deliberate clueless that is expressed by women who marry into these families, as if they're all virginal ingenues. The woman is a mother of two and married for nearly twenty years, time to set the silliness aside and grow up and find something new to talk about. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on October 29, 2015, 03:17:45 pm ________________________________________ ^KF, this story was timed to remind everyone of the fabulous Sophie since she was not going to be at the State Dinner and Kate was. She wanted to get some attention for herself, but to no avail. She was ignored as always and Kate has had much media attention. That's the way it works, and Sophie needs to accept it. She was once the second lady in the land by a fluke. It's over now, and she needs to accept the position she is in and that she is never going to move up. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: My2Pence on October 29, 2015, 08:56:04 pm ________________________________________ I don't see this article as a Sophie plant. More like the press trying to get back at W&K by showcasing how Sophie works and dresses well all at the same time. Her style has definitely improved from the early years, although most female members of the BRF looked like they were wearing costumes in the 1990s. If I never seen another color block skirt suit it will be too soon. Sophie is also the patron of London College of Fashion. She's going to have to talk fashion every so often, and if she public said fashion didn't matter to her at all, she'd be in trouble as their patron. Wasn't Sophie on the way to Germany to visit her regiment at the time of the State dinner? Anne was a real fashion plate in her day and continues to wear some quite elaborate outfits. Her early fashions were sometimes crazy fads, but involved her really paying attention to what she was wearing. In her own way she still does this, from the rose-and-flor@l outfit from Zara wedding to the elaborate embroidered coats that she's worn lately. Anne's a champion re-cycler and she wears a lot of basic suits with her mended black gloves, but every so often the fashion plate comes out with a vengeance. Recent Anne fashion images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/106/590x/secondary/37984.jpg (http://images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/106/590x/secondary/37984.jpg) i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/06/03/article-1393596-0C6063A200000578-362_306x641.jpg (http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/06/03/article-1393596-0C6063A200000578-362_306x641.jpg) i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/03/16/article-2115949-12334151000005DC-2_306x709.jpg (http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/03/16/article-2115949-12334151000005DC-2_306x709.jpg) i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/06/19/23/29BE595B00000578-0-image-m-88_1434754254297.jpg (http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/06/19/23/29BE595B00000578-0-image-m-88_1434754254297.jpg) ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on October 29, 2015, 10:01:29 pm ________________________________________ ^Oh, in my opinion, it was definitely a Sophie plant, as the press doesn't give a hoot about her to write about her on their own -- otherwise, they would. And the evening of the State Banquet, Sophie was at Exeter Cathedal in Exeter, Devon. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: My2Pence on October 29, 2015, 10:33:26 pm ________________________________________ Looks like Germany thing was just prior to the Chinese visit. I don't see the article as a Sophie plant. If the press doesn't care enough to write about her, they care enough to write about her to take a dig at W&K (which is what I think this was). Looks like Sophie had three engagements the date of the State dinner, so makes perfect sense she wasn't there (just like Charles and Camilla weren't present). October 20 The Countess of Wessex this afternoon visited Vispring Limited, Ernesettle Lane, Ernesettle, Plymouth, and was received by Her Majesty's Lord-Lieutenant of Devon (Mr. David Fursdon). Her Royal Highness later visited Headway Devon, the XCentre, Commercial Road, Exeter. The Countess of Wessex, Patron, the Two Moors Festival, subsequently attended the Fifteenth Anniversary production of the Opera "Tarka the Otter" at Exeter Cathedral. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on October 30, 2015, 03:48:54 am ________________________________________ Sophie's stories about how popular and fashionable she is, doesn't make it so. Nor will she ever be able to compete with any woman young enough to be her daughter, and she makes herself look foolish in trying to do so, in my opinion. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: My2Pence on October 30, 2015, 03:08:12 pm ________________________________________ You think they are Sophie plants. I don't. Neither of us will ever know. She shows up, does her work, and seems appreciated by the People and Firm. Since that's her job as Royal Spouse, she's doing it well. As the older and lower-down royals phase out and W&K refuse to work, I expect Sophie to continue as as royal workhorse for another 20 years. As for fashion? I think Sophie has improved through the years and she shows you can be fashionable and fashionably age-appropriate at any age. I don't think being fashionable should be restricted to 20 or 30 somethings, so I appreciate Sophie's stylish efforts. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on October 30, 2015, 03:41:36 pm ________________________________________ I do believe Sophie is behind her puff pieces. She was in PR, you know. She is very frustrated that she does not have a higher profile and does everything she can to raise it rather than be content with the position to which she has risen in life. Her marrying into the queen's family was beyond her wildest dreams, yet it isn't enough for her. Sophie will continue to work, no doubt, but Charles' vision of a much reduced royal family puts a question mark as to the extent of the Wessex role. The relationship between the Wessexes and Charles is historically rocky. And Charles won't be giving them the financial assistance the Queen and Phil have given them over the years, so we'll see how it all works out for Sophie. :bored: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: My2Pence on October 30, 2015, 04:03:06 pm ________________________________________ I think Sophie knows this is a PR job, so she does the job of PR for the BRF. I don't think she's behind these stories, I think it is the press promoting Sophie over KM as a way of getting back at W&K. As long as a member of the BRF is getting good press and showing up to work, that member is doing a good job as a royal. If Sophie is getting good press, it means she's doing her job as Perfect Royal Wife (likewise Birgitte). I doubt Charles will have a choice. W&K refuse to work, and they cannot reduce the royal workload or number of annual engagement without the public screaming. Charles needs Edward and Sophie, even if he doesn't want to need them. E&S do their jobs, they're solid royals, they'll pick up the slack of daily engagements W&K refuse to do. They engage with the Continental royals so Charles doesn't have to. Sophie and Edward will continue to work for the Firm for 20 years, and Charles will pony up the money to keep them in style because he needs them working. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on October 30, 2015, 06:51:04 pm ________________________________________ I think Sophie does a PR job for herself. The press isn't going to compare Sophie to Kate because that's apples to oranges. They aren't comparable. Kate can be compared to Mary of Teck, Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, and Diana Spencer. Sophie can be compared to Alice, the Duchess of Gloucester and Marina, the Duchess of Kent. Sophie always wants people to know that she's the queen's favorite, and that's lovely. However, what will that get her when the queen is gone other than her own personal feelings (and I'm not discounting that)? It doesn't push her into a new position within the royal family. Kate will move up even higher and Sophie will be even lower because now it is not her mother-in-law who is the monarch, but her brother-in-law; while it is Kate's father-in-law who is monarch rather than her grandmother-in-law. Granted, I think Kate is a complete disaster and never wanted William to marry her. But as long as she is there, these are the realities of how the pecking order works in a royal family, and the press follows the pecking order. Sophie can be as dutiful and hardworking as can be, and while her charities are appreciative, she will never have the limelight that Kate and Harry's wife will have. No one today remembers the work that Alice and Marina did, even though they were dutiful members of the BRF (and in Marina's case, of royal blood, beautiful and stylish). That is Sophie's future, and she does not appear to be accepting the realities. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: My2Pence on October 30, 2015, 08:01:49 pm ________________________________________ You think she isn't accepting her position, I think she doesn't care. You think she is begging for press, I think the press is pushing her forward to try to shame Middleton. We'll continue to disagree because, reading your posts, Sophie is always wrong in your eyes. At least you admit her charities appreciate her. I think Sophie really is the perfect royal wife, much like Marie of Denmark, which is the title of the thread. She does the job, shows up, bats cleanup, and is appreciated by the royals and the people. Most members of the family always look happy to see Sophie, which tells me a lot in a family this crazy. She makes the effort to get along and be a peacemaker. The BRF desperately needs someone like Sophie, both now and into the future. We are allowed to compare any royals we want. Sophie can be compared to KM because she is a working royal. It doesn't matter whether she is the wife of a future consort or not. She is a married-in spouse who is working rings around Middleton, has always been engaged with her work, and is a royal the family and the people can count on to do the job. Edward is Philip's favorite, hence the DoE title that will likely come to him. Sophie is HM's favorite. What will that get them? A significant chunk of the private inheritance and guarantees secured by HM that Charles will treat them well. HM and Philip will not leave E&S hanging. No matter what Charles does, they'll be VERY well taken care of by private funds as will their children. Again, Charles's slimming plan will only work if W&K work. Since they won't work, Edward and Sophie will continue to be quiet workhorses for 20 years. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Stephanie on October 30, 2015, 08:04:52 pm ________________________________________ I don't see Sophie as a conniving person at all. She married the youngest brother so she knew from the start that she wouldn't be a high ranking royal. She is a hard worker and always looks good. About her relationship with HM:good for her. Sophie's mother passed away and she had a difficult relationship with her so if she gets some warmth and appreciation from her MIL I can't see the harm in that. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: leogirl on October 31, 2015, 04:32:22 am ________________________________________ I think Sophie is doing a great job. :thumbsup: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Freya on October 31, 2015, 07:06:30 am ________________________________________ Sophie shows up in the Midlands more than the others and for that she gets my vote. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on November 13, 2015, 04:01: pm ________________________________________ I wonder why Sophie did not make a fuss over her daughter's 12th birthday? I have not seen any photos of Louise or a mother-daughter photo of Louise and Sophie to celebrate this occasion. Louise is rapidly becoming a young woman. She has the potential to be a very pretty girl, and I do hope that her mother will buy her a pretty skirt and sweater/jacket, some stylish flats and black tights, and maybe pull her hair back in a bow for the Christmas church appearance. And I hope that James will finally be allowed to be with the family that day, as well. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: leogirl on November 14, 2015, 10:34:40 am ________________________________________ I agree, something should have been done to celebrate. Maybe they will next year when she officially becomes a teenager? I hope so. Maybe her birthday was kept low key because it was on Remembrance Day this year? ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Alexandrine on November 30, 2015, 09:36:21 pm ________________________________________ I think this was not posted Quote In a speech she told a group of some of the city’s wealthiest women: ‘I am rare because I am one of the few ladies in the British Royal Family who has had a professional business career and their own company. ‘So perhaps I am able, through my own experience, to have a deeper appreciation of the corporate world and what it’s like to have to climb the career ladder.’ Sophie is, indeed, one of the few royal women to have run her own business. Princess Anne has always undertaken full-time royal duties, while the Duchess of Cambridge flitted from a part-time job working as an accessories buyer to working for her family firm before marrying William and having children. Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3327946/Sophie-Wessex-says-s-royal-woman-career-PR-firm-bombed-newspaper-sting.html#ixzz3t0sRZlY2Follow us: @mailonline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook Though it's true she could have worded it differently the I am rare sounds like she thinks she is a special snowflake. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Kuei Fei on December 04, 2015, 05:05:50 am ________________________________________ The other royal women are a product of their times, they didn't get to have sustained independent careers. Sophie couldn't sustain hers after marriage. I dislike how Sophie paints herself as a perfect example of royal modern womanhood. Kate flitted about, but that is hardly the norm. Crown Princess Masako was a high flying diplomat while Queen Maxima was involved in high finance. The other consorts had good honest jobs and so Sophie is not unique. ________________________________________
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2023 19:37:52 GMT
Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Countess of Holland on December 05, 2015, 03:14:46 pm ________________________________________ She is unique in the BRF, which is what she said. Diana was too young when she married, Sarah was in her mid-twenties so she could have had a a job but IIRC she didn't. But to use the word 'rare' is indeed kind of odd. Personally I would not focus so much on the fact that she had a career and others had not. But on the other hand, it is perhaps the reason why she was asked for this position, so she could not have ignored her previous career. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Kuei Fei on January 02, 2016, 01:23:47 am ________________________________________ How Sophie Wessex has risen to become the Queen's favourite in-law...leading to chilly relations with Kate Sophie free from being talked of as the natural successor to Princess Diana With focus turning on Kate, Countess of Wessex has escaped limelight Allowed her to become closer to Queen, who sees her as most trusted ally But while that relationship has flourished, she remains frosty with Duchess of Cambridge Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3381564/How-Sophie-Wessex-risen-Queen-s-favourite-law-leading-chilly-relations-Kate.html#ixzz3w2uM6PtRAnother promotional piece by the DM. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Countess of Holland on January 02, 2016, 10:57:51 am ________________________________________ I like Sophie, but this is indeed over the top. Equally funny are the comments of people saying that Kate never put a foot wrong and follows royal protocol to the tee. I guess showing your private parts is protocol then. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: gingerboy24 on January 02, 2016, 11:42:58 am ________________________________________ ^ I like Sophie too, But the joke of saying cath medd never puts a foot wrong and always follows royal protocol, is the biggest lie in creation, and the public know it. Wonder if juggers is still trying to make her look good? If so thought he would have given up on that, or maybe he just likes keep bashing his head agains t a brick wall. lol lol ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on January 02, 2016, 07:20:10 pm ________________________________________ ^^^Oh, KF, this article is hilarious! I laughed and laughed. Kay and Levy are definitely tweaking Sophie and showcasing her pretentiousness! First, we have that hilarious subheading of "Sophie free from being talked of as the natural successor to Princess Diana". Whoever (other than Sophie herself) thought that she was EVER a successor to Diana? Sophie was never going to be Princess of Wales or Queen Consort. She will continue to go further DOWN the line with every new marriage and birth. So, I'm not quite sure what she thinks she is "free" of since this was never her reality. Then the next hilarious subheading of "With focus turning Kate, CoW has escaped the limelight." Of course, with or without Kate, the focus has NEVER been on Sophie except when she blabbed to the undercover reporter. And, of course, in my opinion, Sophie is DESPERATELY trying to get herself into the news and have herself photographed. Hence, the personal trainer, the over-the-top, expensive outfits, copying Kate's look (after having ceased copying Diana's look), etc. No one really pays her any mind, and while she performs her duties adequately, she nevers draws a crowd. And then we move to the subheadings that go to that tired, old statement of how close she is to the Queen who sees her as most trusted ally, daughter, blah, blah, blah. I wonder what Charles and Anne think of these statements? Also down in the article a royal aide is quoted: "She is trusted and relied on by the Queen in a way I couldn't say applied to the Duchess of Cambridge or the Duchess of Cornwall. She is like another daughter to Her Majesty, they are that close." Anne really IS the queen's daughter and has represented the monarch well, and truly HAS flown under the radar as Sophie claims she wishes to do. What does Anne think about Sophie being the "favorite" daughter? And we all know of Charles's jealousy. What does he think about Sophie being touted as the "favorite" rather than his wife, Camilla? I cannot believe that all is sunshine and roses behind the scene, and I think Sophie has done herself a disservice in blaring this stuff around rather than simply enjoying a private relationship with her mother-in-law. Then we have that photo of Kate in the blue coatdress and Sophie with those feathers around her neck. Kate is just standing there minding her own business but Sophie is zeroed in on Kate, glaring at her. There are other photos like this, and I think they portray which of them harbors the jealousy and ill-feelings. Then we move on to the paragraph about the Wessex Christmas card. First of all, I think it is odd that Ed and Soph did not have a family photo as most royals do. When royals have children, then children typically are in the card. But their card was only Ed and Soph in Finland; then the article says that there was a SECOND photo on the back of just Sophie laughing in the snow: i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/02/04/2555212500000578-2939786-image-m-21_1423066074989.jpgReally? This is what Sophie wanted to send out as her Christmas card? Nothing of her children, only one of Edward who IS the royal, but there is a second separate photo of just Sophie. What an ego that one has. Then that ridiculous statement [where you know that Kay and Levy MUST be pulling our legs] that Sophie is the only mother in the family who would dare over-rule her royal husband to forbid her 8-year old son from going in the royal shoots. Oh, yes, right. Because Diana never had influence over her children, or Sarah, or Mark Phillips, etc. Sophie after all wears the pants in the Wessex family. That is obvious, imo. Ed just trots along behind her. Then we move on to how Sophie is not troubled about slipping down in the rankings from second lady in the land, nor is she troubled by the fact that she no longer has full-time police protection. Yes, pull the other one! And we are told that she was happy at this new status because it meant she could live life as an ordinary family the way she was brought up in a village in Kent. Hahahahaha! So, they'll be moving out of Bagshot soon, eh, and into a farmhouse? Next we have the mindboggling statement that Sophie is the "model modern royal" a "prototype" for the future from which young royals might learn. There is absolutely nothing modern about Sophie. She is a throwback to the queen's generation. She wants the titles, the perks, the mansion, the whole royal bag of tricks. There is nothing modern about her at all. But, oh, we learn that Sophie does her own hair. Well, it often looks like a blind chimpanzee did her hair, but I truly don't think some of the updos lately could have been done by her alone. Kate famously "did her own makeup" for her royal wedding, and do we believe that Anne has a hairdresser on call? So I don't think Sophie is doing anything unusual here. But we learn that we all would have thought that Sophie would have been Kate's sounding board and counsel and that Sophie has never been "entirely at ease" with Kate. Well, so what? That's not unusual in a family with in-laws. Sophie is, in my opinion, jealous of Kate's position -- one that she will never have -- and tried to kiss up to her in the beginning, as she did with the queen, but Kate obviously wasn't interested. Probably William clued her in to Sophie's desire to hang onto her to try to get some of the spotlight. And we close with the fact that Sophie is approaching her 51st birthday without caring a jot. Yeah, right. This was quite an entertaining article, and I hope that Kay and Levy continue to follow up with Sophie as the year progresses. :thumbsup: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: india on January 02, 2016, 07:41:07 pm ________________________________________ Sophie behaves and toes the line. She is not an embarrassment. She is an asset not a liability to The Firm. And, she has not declared open warfare on the Queen. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: gingerboy24 on January 02, 2016, 08:07:18 pm ________________________________________ ^Totally agree. Cath medd is what she is - council estate nobody and thinks she should not improve herself, her way or no way. She stalked for long enough, she should have been reading and learning royal etiquette etc. Did she - no way, sees nothing wrong with herself, she must be one of the few. About time the press laid off Sophie, she is perfection compared to cath medd in every way. As the saying goes, you can take the girl out of the council estate, you can´t take the council estate out of the girl. Scarol(e) definitely has her genetics in those kids, council estaters to the end. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: CathyJane on January 02, 2016, 09:10:52 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: india on January 02, 2016, 07:41:07 pm Sophie behaves and toes the line. She is not an embarrassment. She is an asset not a liability to The Firm. And, she has not declared open warfare on the Queen. True but I honestly doubt Soph is 'untroubled' by not being the second lady of the land anymore. If she wasn't, she wouldn't be dressing the way she does etc. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: YooperModerator on January 02, 2016, 09:14:32 pm ________________________________________ ^For me, I've read a lot about Kate amping up her appearance or at least making an attempt to conform so I don't have a problem with Sophie working on her image. That's what this whole blasted family is about. ^^ and ^^^ Agree. Sophie, unlike so many others, understands the corporate hierarchy and Rule #1 is, "Never forget who's the boss". So, she doesn't make a fuss, shows up when asked, actually asks questions and is pro-active in her events and makes nice with HM. It's very simple if you want to make any org a working machine. So, no problem with her from me. This is her job. And it's something Kate just hasn't realized yet; that she has a real job now. I don't care if she has 12 kids (Victoria had quite a few!), she should be taking a few minutes to evaluate history and what happens to those who go against the person in charge. It's never pretty. Like it or lump it, HM is the only boss here. In addition, PC, when his mother passes and if he's still living, will remember who made his mother happy so this is not only effectual on Sophie's part, it's smart behavior as well as good for hers or any of the royal charities. My only real big beef with Kate, other than embarrassing her country and thrusting her odious family on everybody, is that she's lazy as muck. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Kuei Fei on January 02, 2016, 09:54:29 pm ________________________________________ I do think she dislikes not being the youngest of the BRF anymore and I do think she's hardly disinterested; she's done her job, but seems to be just as fixated on the perks of the position and the prestige. I think her closeness is overrated and I think Princess Anne and Princess Margaret were more allies with HM than Sophie could be. No one can succeed Diana and Sophie is not going to be successor in any area of the succession. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Miss Hathaway on January 03, 2016, 07:40:42 pm ________________________________________ Quote . . . Sophie, unlike so many others, understands the corporate hierarchy and Rule #1 is, "Never forget who's the boss". So, she doesn't make a fuss, shows up when asked, actually asks questions and is pro-active in her events and makes nice with HM. It's very simple if you want to make any org a working machine. So, no problem with her from me. Like it or lump it, HM is the only boss here. In addition, PC, when his mother passes and if he's still living, will remember who made his mother happy so this is not only effectual on Sophie's part, it's smart behavior as well as good for hers or any of the royal charities. Sophie's big mistake is that she is not smart enough to grasp that the monarchy is bigger than the monarch. Sophie has chapped lips from kissing up to the Queen and Phil, but, meanwhile, she has behaved badly toward the next in line: Charles. This will come back to haunt her in the very near future. Both Charles and Anne were horrified by the damage Sophie inflicted on the monarchy with her blabbing secrets in return for PR accounts. In fact, both of them were against Ed and Soph maintaining their businesses at all as they felt their business had the potential to harm or embarass the monarchy, as was proven to be the case. Much was written about this in many sources at the time. Here is a headline from a story at that time where Charles refused to participate in Ed and Soph's shenanigans immediately following Sophiegate: www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-73511416.htmlAnd then, when you would think Sophie would have learned her lesson and been ashamed of herself, she went back on her word to the queen to quit and was battling to keep the PR company and even took on the Prince of Wales: www.thefreelibrary.com/YOU+HYPOCRITE%3B+Sophie's+showdown+with+Charles+over+his+money-spinning...-a077544401 I remember reading about the attitude of the Wessexes during this period of time and one source said that Sophie told Charles: "Not all of us have a Duchy of Cornwall to fall back on." The woman truly has amazing cheek. Does she really believe she is entitled to live in a larger home than the Heir? And then, of course, about three months after these talks, Edward's company violated an agreement with the media to give William privacy his first year at St. Andrews and was caught filming and interviewing on campus. And Philip took Edward's side against Charles and Sophie had to again criticize the Heir to the Throne: www.thefreelibrary.com/GAG+SOPHIE%3B+Palace+anger+as+she+joins+Wills+TV+row.-a078777496She has been lucky up til now because for whatever reason [perhaps to thwart the Edward is gay rumors], Liz and Phil have covered for her many, many mistakes. And they have been many. Unfortunately for her, the queen really is declining and Charles is already taking over many responsibilities. I do not think Charles will throw them on the trash heap, and they will continue to carry out engagements, but there is no love lost between Charles and the Wessexes. The queen loves the York girls, but Charles is adamant that they will not be working royals. I feel he will be equally adamant that the Wessexes begin living within their means and according to their position in the family. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Alexandrine on January 03, 2016, 07:59:13 pm ________________________________________ @miss H please do not use caps to highlight. Use the bold, underline or italicised tools instead. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Countess of Wessex: The Perfect Royal Wife? Post by: Kuei Fei on January 03, 2016, 10:06:47 pm ________________________________________ Sophie just strikes me as passive aggressive and I do get sick of Sophie the Ally promotional pieces. ________________________________________ Title: Official Duties Post by: Miss Hathaway on March 04, 2016, 04:14:05 pm ________________________________________ It's been two years since the Earl and Countess of Wessex enjoyed a jaunt to Jamaica on official business, so the hardworking minor royals are clearly due some R&R. Edward and Sophie Wessex set off yesterday on a six-day tour of the Bahamas, Florida and the Cayman Islands to promote the Duke of Edinburgh Awards. Since engagements are official, I'm sure the Wessexes will eschew the private jet they chartered for their private family skiing holiday last year. Still, this week's West Indies trip is perfectly timed for clement weather. Life's a beach when one's not paying. Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3474082/SEBASTIAN-SHAKESPEARE-Jagger-s-girl-mourns-love-life-Daisy.html#ixzz41x2E4rlQ Follow us: @mailonline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines | Imprint
|
|