|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 27, 2020 2:00:25 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by cleopatra on Jun 27, 2020 2:16:28 GMT
Does anyone think the timing of this article is interesting or relevant?
Royal Family unmasked: Bizarre tradition barring ‘imposters’ from births exposed
THE ROYAL FAMILY have many weird and wonderful traditions and protocols, but there is one particularly strange one that pertained to royal births.
In a now abolished tradition, it used to be required to have the Home Secretary present for a royal birth, as well as the Archbishop of Canterbury. It is believed this was done to verify the child’s regal legitimacy ‒ in other words, to check it is the genuine descendant of the monarch and prevent “imposters”. This was done away with by King George VI in 1948 before the birth of Prince Charles, so the last royal birth for which this happened was Princess Alexandra, the Queen's cousin, in 1936.
|
|
|
|
Post by romilly on Jun 27, 2020 6:45:23 GMT
Well one thing for sure is that the ascendency would certainly be different now if they did! Timing probably because a lot of truths discussed on this forum are becoming more public.
|
|
|
|
Post by india on Jun 27, 2020 20:30:47 GMT
Timing is everything. It is seeping out. Slowly but surely.
|
|
|
|
Post by cleopatra on Jul 1, 2020 17:39:09 GMT
Just reading Lady Colin Campbell's book on Harry and Meghan. Lady CC devotes nearly a whole chapter to the s#rrog#cy theory. Interesting stuff One quote in particular caught my eye - she says how relieved BP/RF were that the press didn't run with the story as it was rife on the internet Direct quote - "Matters of sartorial taste aside, the real danger was what would happen of the wider public came to believe, as a vociferous section of the internet commentators and press did, that Meghan was faking a pregnancy. Because the Palace were alert to the danger, there were teams of people working behind the scenes to shut down some of the internet sites and shut up some of the more extreme commentators" How surprising !!!! Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 1, 2020 18:49:46 GMT
Just reading Lady Colin Campbell's book on Harry and Meghan. Lady CC devotes nearly a whole chapter to the s#rrog#cy theory. Interesting stuff One quote in particular caught my eye - she says how relieved BP/RF were that the press didn't run with the story as it was rife on the internet Direct quote - "Matters of sartorial taste aside, the real danger was what would happen of the wider public came to believe, as a vociferous section of the internet commentators and press did, that Meghan was faking a pregnancy. Because the Palace were alert to the danger, there were teams of people working behind the scenes to shut down some of the internet sites and shut up some of the more extreme commentators" How surprising !!!!  Maybe not? Thanks for sharing, Cleo. Time to get that book!  This is something I found on Tumblr yesterday (I know...) www.tumblr.com/dashboard/blog/duchessdreadful/621876379007467520Now, does this make people want to really think hard about some things that have been presented as truth, or just a means to down Meghan somehow? Credit: what.meghan.wants account on instagram *For everyone who is still waiting for the book - this is a great preview that goes through the chapters without revealing too much. I’m not sure what the exact release date is (sometime in July...) for our friends across the Atlantic in America, but in case you do not follow this account ^^^ I thought of sharing this. ***disclaimer: The below information has been up for a few weeks and was public, so I wanted to share it for people who are still waiting and chomping at the bit for their copy of the book. In my opinion it doesn’t exactly spoil anything in detail, but please read at your own discretion if you’d like to be completely surprised. The book is also currently sold out on amazon (U.K.). The admin, (who had received an early copy of the book by accident) was nice enough to share this with followers and I think she did a great job. Please enjoy if you decide to take a look! GIF by butteryplanet Image * There are actually 12 chapters of the book, but so far she has only done a summary of the first 8. Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by india on Jul 1, 2020 21:07:29 GMT
^ ^Well, Well, Well. We know all about teams of people trying to shut down internet sites and extreme commentators now don't we? There need to be more books regarding what has been really going on at KP. What they have been hiding since 2013. KP is going to need a lot more than a team to stifle the truth. Let it rip.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 1, 2020 22:35:58 GMT
^ ^Well, Well, Well. We know all about teams of people trying to shut down internet sites and extreme commentators now don't we? There need to be more books regarding what has been really going on at KP. What they have been hiding since 2013. KP is going to need a lot more than a team to stifle the truth. Let it rip. WE do, don't we?  Now, a lot of latter-day "experts" want to get in on the action. I ask them: where were you YEARS ago? It's allegedly a colossal mess of epic proportions NOW, and there have been some of us who have put a lot of effort into supporting the truth getting out there. And all we got was flak.  Either put up or shut up, I say.    |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 1, 2020 23:55:14 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 2, 2020 2:42:13 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by cleopatra on Jul 2, 2020 9:40:23 GMT
Surrogacy is a huge issue for the RF though unless you are so far down the line of succession for it not to be relevant.
As Lady CC points out in her book the Cambridge's always travel together, including flight which was not allowed in the past for obvious reasons, so if ever there was a fatal accident Harry would jump from 7th in line to 3rd and bingo we have King Harry and Queen Meghan the Archie so his legitimacy/Meghan's possible use of a surrogate is very relevant.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 2, 2020 15:31:49 GMT
Surrogacy is a huge issue for the RF though unless you are so far down the line of succession for it not to be relevant. As Lady CC points out in her book the Cambridge's always travel together, including flight which was not allowed in the past for obvious reasons, so if ever there was a fatal accident Harry would jump from 7th in line to 3rd and bingo we have King Harry and Queen Meghan the Archie so his legitimacy/Meghan's possible use of a surrogate is very relevant. She's on to something, that is for sure. Harry is more relevant that a lot of people may wish to believe. Any usage of surrogacy by royal persons, as we know, verbotten. People have been removed from the Succession for seemingly minor or relatively harmless reasons (ie: rigid marriage requirements in their Constitutions, marrying a commoner, etc) or even more serious ones (ie: being Catholic or of the "wrong" faith, etc), but surrogacy and in particular LYING ABOUT IT, would be the proverbial straw that broke the camel's back. That is epic betrayal on a world wide scale. The natural order of things in royal circles is that if you didn't have children and/or male heirs, then the Succession would follow other family members after your death. We have seen that countless times in royal history. It wasn't a huge issue, as the Succession passed to the next legitimate family member. If true, again, a huge, HUGE betrayal. |
|
|
|
Post by india on Jul 2, 2020 16:27:53 GMT
^ THIS IS TREASON.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 2, 2020 17:27:47 GMT
Yes, if true, that would be as close to treason as could be.  |
|
|
|
Post by india on Jul 4, 2020 1:09:56 GMT
And again. This needs to be investigated.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 10, 2020 2:58:23 GMT
An interesting item found on the Alternacity board. I've give credit where credit is due: alternaticity.boards.net/thread/43/royal-babies-means?page=3Spencers and Wales have attached Earlobes_ _______________________ The Spencers and Wales have attached Earlobes as dominant feature. When two Attached parents mate the have children with Attached earlobes. The middtons; wales; spencers have attached Earlobes as dominant genetic disorder. How come Little George and Charlotte do not have attached Earlobes like their parents and grand parents. I think this is genetic proof that the middtons are not the grand parents of Charlotte and George because they have not inherited the dominant features of that family which are asiatic attached Earlobe, Small eyes; long nose ; narrow mouth typical of the middton clan ; Our challenge is to find true genetic mother of the little pincess and princess. The spencers and wales attached earlobes is not as dominate because the Queen Bee has unattached earlobes. Dianas father had unattached earlobes . This clear scientific proof beyond reasonable doubt Kate us just a consort like camila and she will never be addressed as genetic queen mum ie mother of the king or queen. I Dianas mother has attached earlobes and her children too . There is a hint here that mother determines kind of earlobes. Carole and francess gave their children attached earlobe Whats clear george, Charlotte and even Ludwig have unattached earlobes and they have same mother with large unpressed, unattached earlobes because Williams ears are attached and pressed close to his head . |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 10, 2020 12:57:20 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 12, 2020 16:07:52 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 12, 2020 16:57:12 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 12, 2020 17:03:13 GMT
|
|
Maybe not? Thanks for sharing, Cleo. Time to get that book!
Now, a lot of latter-day "experts" want to get in on the action. I ask them: where were you YEARS ago? It's allegedly a colossal mess of epic proportions NOW, and there have been some of us who have put a lot of effort into supporting the truth getting out there. And all we got was flak. 
tale BS.
Oct 20, 2024 18:30:58 GMT
Oct 20, 2024 18:30:58 GMT
#JamesMiddleton