|
|
Post by india on Mar 16, 2021 14:39:28 GMT
She is covering for the Cambridges because he is the heir to the heir.
|
|
|
|
Post by romilly on Mar 17, 2021 7:30:54 GMT
When Betty goes the revelations are allegedly going to be explosive.
|
|
|
|
Post by india on Mar 17, 2021 14:48:56 GMT
I wouldn't wait for Betty's passing. I'd do it now.
|
|
|
|
Post by romilly on Mar 18, 2021 18:02:02 GMT
Some say the Sussexes are ready to drop everyone in it. There is still much of the Oprah interview not seen yet either.
|
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Mar 21, 2021 20:27:34 GMT
When Betty goes the revelations are allegedly going to be explosive.
Why wait? HM is the one enabling this mess, not defusing it or even keeping it contained.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 21, 2021 21:26:19 GMT
When Betty goes the revelations are allegedly going to be explosive. Why wait? HM is the one enabling this mess, not defusing it or even keeping it contained.
Yes, she's doing nothing about it, and as we are all aware, has been told about this. I feel sorry for her in the sense of how to rightly handle such a catastrophic situation; in normal circumstances, how we could we or anybody for that matter know what to do? It's such an unbelievable mess, but she IS the Monarch and it's her responsibility to protect the dignity of that position, and what her ancestors handed down to her. To NOT do anything is just an insult to what they represented and the sanctity of the position. You are a Representative of your nation and your Commonwealth. People fought and died for the protection of your country and what it is was supposed to represent. You are Head of the Church. That is WAY above the petty and ridiculous little power games and possible outright tr#ason and criminality (is that the right word?) of some of your family members and the outsiders and users they gladly allowed into the family fold. If you do nothing, you are essentially agreeing to the dismantling of your position and weakening the very status of your country. (How I may word things if I were an advisor). |
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Mar 22, 2021 0:27:24 GMT
HM could go to Parliament and ask for intervention or she could convene a specialized Privy Council on how to deal with this. She could order all the Dukes (minus the royal dukes) to meet and discuss and decide on how to deal with her out of control family. I mean, these nobles are at her disposal and would LOVE to serve.
|
|
|
|
Post by india on Mar 22, 2021 0:55:16 GMT
Betty is a weak old woman. ( That's where Charles gets it from ). She is not going to do a damn thing. There will be no specialized Privy Council. And if there were, they would acquiesce to her. Disgusting.
|
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Mar 22, 2021 4:29:47 GMT
Betty is a weak old woman. ( That's where Charles gets it from ). She is not going to do a damn thing. There will be no specialized Privy Council. And if there were, they would acquiesce to her. Disgusting.
I think HM is one of those people who believes she is there by God's Grace (something I admit I agree with), but refuses to accept that God isn't going to do the work for her. HM really does think that it should sort itself out in time, but realistically, leaving something like this alone is just making the problem worse.
|
|
|
|
Post by india on Mar 22, 2021 5:22:38 GMT
HM and her gross inferior lot think they are literally God's gift and totally entitled. The rest are peons to serve. The whole system is so disgusting and unbelievable.
|
|
|
|
Post by romilly on Mar 31, 2021 9:43:09 GMT
More and more are thankfully realising that they are not and once Betty goes so much which has been hidden will come out and it will be a fast downward slope to oblivion.
|
|
|
|
Post by romilly on Mar 31, 2021 9:45:02 GMT
More and more are realising that they are not and once Betty departs and all the scandals emerge, it will be a fast downward slope to oblivion
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 4, 2021 17:55:00 GMT
www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1418805/Royal-family-secret-files-vladimir-putin-queen-Elizabeth-and-the-spy-in-the-palaceAside: I think it's more what is actually "new" that could be the problem. So congrats to the modern-day royals who have given this thug and dictator (I will leave it at that) the goods to possibly harm the Monarchy. Way to go, idiots.Is Putin poised to unleash secret files on wartime Windsors to 'bring down Royal Family'? VLADIMIR Putin may hold secret files on the wartime generation of the Windsors which could be used to blackmail the Royal Family and "bring down the dynasty", a documentary will claim. By DAVID STEPHENSON PUBLISHED: 07:59, Sun, Apr 4, 2021 | UPDATED: 13:43, Sun, Apr 4, 2021 The so-called “Tony Files” were allegedly passed to the Russians by notorious spy Sir Anthony Blunt, once Keeper of the King’s Pictures who later worked with the Queen at Buckingham Palace. He was outed as a traitor by Margaret Thatcher in 1979. The Channel 4 documentary says the files may include letters giving details of the Duke of Kent and the Duke of Windsor expressing fascist sympathies and support for the Nazis in the 1930s, and for the policy of appeasement towards Hitler.
|
|
|
|
Post by india on Apr 4, 2021 21:58:49 GMT
BFD
|
|
bonnie
Count/Countess
Posts: 359
|
Post by bonnie on Apr 5, 2021 11:49:38 GMT
www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1418805/Royal-family-secret-files-vladimir-putin-queen-Elizabeth-and-the-spy-in-the-palaceAside: I think it's more what is actually "new" that could be the problem. So congrats to the modern-day royals who have given this thug and dictator (I will leave it at that) the goods to possibly harm the Monarchy. Way to go, idiots.Is Putin poised to unleash secret files on wartime Windsors to 'bring down Royal Family'? VLADIMIR Putin may hold secret files on the wartime generation of the Windsors which could be used to blackmail the Royal Family and "bring down the dynasty", a documentary will claim. By DAVID STEPHENSON PUBLISHED: 07:59, Sun, Apr 4, 2021 | UPDATED: 13:43, Sun, Apr 4, 2021 The so-called “Tony Files” were allegedly passed to the Russians by notorious spy Sir Anthony Blunt, once Keeper of the King’s Pictures who later worked with the Queen at Buckingham Palace. He was outed as a traitor by Margaret Thatcher in 1979. The Channel 4 documentary says the files may include letters giving details of the Duke of Kent and the Duke of Windsor expressing fascist sympathies and support for the Nazis in the 1930s, and for the policy of appeasement towards Hitler. I think it's kind of nonsence. 3 of the 10 richest Londoners are russians, there are a lot of people from Russia with dirty money, lot of people with unclear past. Putin will never harm monarchy just bc he has too much of things inside of Russia now which need to be done. Even if he tries to do something, his "inner circle" won't let him as far as their families and money stay at UK. |
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Apr 5, 2021 16:24:49 GMT
I think it might contain info that the Windosrs funded the Nazi party, That would blow the monarchy to smithereens.
|
|
|
|
Post by india on Apr 5, 2021 16:39:02 GMT
Why do you think that?
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on May 1, 2021 2:49:10 GMT
Here's just something I found....en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_treason_in_the_United_KingdomHigh tr#ason in the United Kingdom ... Under the law of the United Kingdom, high tr#ason is the crime of disloyalty to the Crown[/b]. Offences constituting high tr#ason include plotting the murder of the sovereign; committing adultery with the sovereign's consort, with the sovereign's eldest unmarried daughter, or with the wife of the heir to the throne; levying war against the sovereign and adhering to the sovereign's enemies, giving them aid or comfort; and attempting to undermine the lawfully established line of succession. Several other crimes have historically been categorised as high tr#ason, including counterfeiting money and being a Catholic priest.[1] ... Offences High tr#ason today consists of: tr#ason Act 1351 (as amended – last amended by the Succession to the Crown Act 2013): compassing the death of the sovereign, or of the king's wife (but not a ruling queen's husband), or the sovereign's eldest child and heir
violating the king's wife, or the sovereign's eldest unmarried daughter, or the sovereign's eldest son's wife (only if the eldest son is also heir to the throne)
levying war against the sovereign in the realm
adhering to the sovereign's enemies, giving them aid and comfort, in the realm or elsewhere
killing the King's Chancellor, Treasurer (an office long in commission) or Justices
tr#ason Act 1702 and tr#ason Act (Ireland) 1703:
attempting to hinder the succession to the throne under the Bill of Rights 1689 and the Act of Settlement 1701
tr#ason Act 1708:
killing the Lords of Session or Lords of Justiciary in Scotland
(in Scots law only) counterfeiting the Great Seal of Scotland
See the English History section below for detail about the offences created by the 1351 Act.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on May 1, 2021 2:59:59 GMT
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason_Act_1702tr#ason Act 1702 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigationJump to search tr#ason Act 1702 Act of Parliament Parliament of England Long title An Act for the further Security of Her Majesties Person and the Succession of the Crown in the Protestant Line Citation 1 Anne Stat. 2 c. 21 Territorial extent Kingdom of England (inc. Wales); extended to Scotland in 1708 Status: Current legislation Revised text of statute as amended The tr#ason Act 1702[1] (1 Anne Stat. 2 c. 21[2]) is an Act of the Parliament of England, passed to enforce the line of succession to the English throne (today the British throne), previously established by the Bill of Rights 1689 and the Act of Settlement 1701. The Act makes it tr#ason to "endeavour to deprive or hinder any person who shall be the next in succession to the crown for the time being ... from succeeding after the decease of her Majesty (whom God long preserve) to the imperial crown of this realm and the dominions and territories thereunto belonging".Originally a capital offence, the penalty was reduced in 1998 to life imprisonment. Although the Act was passed by the English Parliament, it was later extended to Scotland by the tr#ason Act 1708, following the Union of the two kingdoms in the previous year. The Parliament of Ireland passed a law to the same effect in 1703, the tr#ason Act (Ireland) 1703 (c.5). This is still in force in Northern Ireland.
|
|
|
|
Post by india on May 1, 2021 13:16:40 GMT
Talking about treason: the DNA of the three Fraudlings needs to be checked by someone who cannot be paid off.
|
|
tale BS.
#JamesMiddleton