|
Post by Guest on Jan 13, 2024 3:32:10 GMT
Apparently, Kate and Will sent legal letters to Tatler, which Tatler confirmed receipt of, according to this article, for writing she was overworked after Megxit. www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8380671/Kate-Middleton-taking-role-seriously-working-harder-ever.htmlDeeds speak louder than words. If Kate does not resent work, then why doesn't she work more and do it properly, while clothed, and why does Wil state and insist they do fewer engagements due to the greater pretend impact he claims this has, with no proof other than that they hardly work and did not demonstrate positive impact? If she is supposedly worker harder than ever, why does she only work altogether 1 month a year and why does she call watching a Boston Celtics basketball game work? Also, if she did, indeed, complain she worked harder after Megxit, why does she still only do 1 month of work? If she did make racist comments before and/or resulting in Megxit, and/or if she complained the bridesmaids' dresses had to be completely redone starting 3 days before the wedding, why would she complain she must do more work after Megxit, though she really only still works altogether 1 month a year? Also if she had or has a part, including not preventing it, in planting stories about others and false positive stories about herself, why complain about Megxit and more work? What proof does she have this Tatler story isn't true, and if she had it, why not produce it?
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Jan 13, 2024 4:40:43 GMT
For someone that, as I seem to remember, the press caught in a recording/video and published news stories of his offering fresh young girl prostitutes and serious drugs, constituting criminal offenses at his Maison de Bang Bang, Uncle Gary Middleton is bold to state the media should be sued for statements on Kate registering for St. Edinburgh once Will did, changing to St. Andrews once Will did, taking a gap year once Will made known his decision to, going to two of the same places, including Chile, as Will did the summer prior to freshers week, and majoring in the same major Will did. The photos were published of her and it was covered that the sheer skirt was a skirt and, as I recall, intended to be worn over a slip. Sources covered that Kate decided last minute to wear it over only skimpy underwear and insisted on it while repeatedly told and directed otherwise. The press photographed and covered the way she also walked in skimpy underwear making out with her and Will's suite mate on the stage.
Also, how did Kate manage to get placed in Will's suite freshman year?
Kate herself said Will was not there during freshers week and the press covered he often was not there freshman year so clearly he wasn't pursuing her and it was the other way around. Sources also went previously on record saying he and his friends found her bland and mousy and called her the limpet and made fun of her, her family and her mom as "doors to manual."
Does anyone find it odd Uncle Gary wasn't investigated and he allegedly beat his spouse or something too, though nothing seems to befall him and instead he goes on record as Kate and Carole's and Will's family's source and royal biographer/autobiographer?
Why wasn't Pippa investigated for pointing a fake gun or some such thing at another car in traffic?
Why have the video/recording/press stories of Uncle Gary offering the press fresh young girl prostitutes and cutting up drugs disappeared?
Since it was a private not public company, who other than Carole told the press for decades--was it a few decades?--she was a multi millionaire off multimillionaire Party Pieces website business, including through today after its insolvency and seeming bankruptcy? Why did it and they go from multi-million to bad debts, insolvency and seeming bankruptcy while still to this day telling the press of multi-millions? Why did not have famous big accounts to earn these multimillions off such low price points? Why was it not known and was its biggest competitor with more solid indicators only making a small fraction?
Who paid for Kate, Pippa and James' private schools, not ever working doing real work, vacations, Mystique vacations, yacht trips, James' sad raunchy shaped cake business and Carole's, Kate's, Pippa's and the family's mansions, houses, flats and property? What was Gary's pimp and drug dealer money spent and money laundered in, what was this money flow, and why wasn't this investigated? Why isn't Carole being investigated for this false inflation of Party Pieces and their financials?
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Jan 14, 2024 3:33:32 GMT
This relates to Carole and, for some reason, the thread I posted this in does not seem to get bumped:
I would add too to the post I posted under Not Great Kate, below, that her whole family and Will's whole family seems narcissistic so I don't think this will improve rather will worsen as these completely narcissistic whole families age.
I think Carole, Uncle Gary Goldsmith, Kate, Pippa and James seem like narcissists. Carole's husband isn't covered as much but went along with the decades through today of press stories they went from nothing to self-made millionaires by the time Kate was supposedly in preschool through their pretend multi-million $ private company Party Pieces', website, despite its low price points.
Also I don't remember any Brit, European, American or anyone worldwide ever mentioning, using or ever having heard of Party Pieces, as Kate was already on the scene, not until many years later into her waity decade due only to her waity decade, so they did not seem to have customers during the pretend time of becoming pretend multimillionaires.
I think a person on Twitter/X compared their financials to their much more successful competitor, which had stated a fraction of its pretend multimillions.
Also, people here before her wedding could do similar analysis with public info so Will knew too.
Will, who chose to vacation at Maison de Bang Bang after press recorded/videoed Uncle Gary Goldsmith offering fresh young, minority girl prostitutes and drugs, as if these minority girls weren't even human.
Will, who chose constantly to vacation with the Middletons on Mystique while most likely knowing the money came from somewhere though probably not Party Pieces, while seemingly bringing his taxpayer-funded security and getting taxpayer funds caught up in this.
Where did this Mustique and Maison de Bang Bang money come from?
I would add too she seems she might be a sadist given
-what was reported about her crew, Killing Kittens, and many years' pal, its founder, Emma Sayles, during her decade of dating Will and after, and the club itself
-what was stated about complaining wedding dresses had to be completely remade starting 3 days before wedding
-what Jacintha Saldanha's family stated about her death
-what happened to the woman she blamed when she wore the wrong country's dress in tour
-what supposedly the press long knew about her supposed racist remarks
-her snapping at an innocent child on video after the young, small child innocently asked about Harry and Meghan
-what befell the DJs at the time of nurse Jacintha Saldana's death
-what befell the press for reporting her lies and complete nudity in front of the rooftop balcony by the railing in view of pedestrians, staff, neighbors and the public road
-their letters threatening to sue Tatler for reporting she resents work
-photo of her having thrown flowers at staff after the public gave them to her around the time of her wedding
-suppressing seemingly based on Robach's hot mic 3 years of journalism to report in Epstein so all the victims and more could be victimized 3 more years, after Virginia To erts has been hidden fearing for her life 12 years after many years of being trafficked
-what was reported about her exhibitionism working as a yacht girl
-her and Pippa's exhibitionism swimming with Will while dating, and hers completely nude at the rooftop railing while security and crew watched, given she herself worked as a yacht girl, on top of their suing and threatening to sue constantly
the list goes on:
Post:
I do not remember one Brit ever once mentioning receiving this supposed subsidy.
The people vote and the people were concerned about money and what I wrote about.
I already answered this above.
Not even a licensed mental health pro diagnoses through the internet.
This was during a work commitment and immediately prior lies about missing the disabled sports contest to ready for a tour, which I already wrote of, and which was in the articles around the time.
What remains is she and this whole family, the monarchy and related monarchies must go, right away. Look at what Sophie and Fergie did before during scandals if getting caught. This is this family's complete mindset.
Brits were working long, hard hours on top of long, exhausting commutes and not great living conditions. None of them cared about or thought about this family.
Her whole life she has demonstrated decades of 1) exhibitionism 2) refusal to work 3) lying, including cheating at St. Andrews 4) attention seeking 5) melodramatic antics, stirring conflict 6) infantile mind 7) scheming 8) narcissism 9) blaming those that call attention to the above, victim blaming (the woman she blamed when she wore the wrong country's clothes, Jacintha Saldana, the nurse), gaslighting and lying she is the victim in switched roles 10) unwillingness to change 11) arrogance 12) greed/stinginess/waste of taxpayer funds, including refusing to pay her parking meter while she shopped and had taxpayer-funded security guard her car from getting a ticket 13) duper's delight 14) copying others 15) stalking 16) obsession 17) cold complete lack of mor@ls eg suddenly going to hunt and doing blood sports after he broke up with her 18) temper tantrums supposedly about wedding dresses, and in photos, and in videos
Narcissists are addicts. Attention is their drug.
This is not going to change.
This will only worsen.
Narcissists worsen as they age.
As they think they are closer to power also, I think they will worsen.
She was Gollum pursuing the ring and remains Gollum pursuing the 1 ring to rule all the Commonwealth and coerce the press to rule the world in culture, media and press.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 14, 2024 23:41:30 GMT
This relates to Carole and, for some reason, the thread I posted this in does not seem to get bumped: I would add too to the post I posted under Not Great Kate, below, that her whole family and Will's whole family seems narcissistic so I don't think this will improve rather will worsen as these completely narcissistic whole families age. I think Carole, Uncle Gary Goldsmith, Kate, Pippa and James seem like narcissists. Carole's husband isn't covered as much but went along with the decades through today of press stories they went from nothing to self-made millionaires by the time Kate was supposedly in preschool through their pretend multi-million $ private company Party Pieces', website, despite its low price points. Also I don't remember any Brit, European, American or anyone worldwide ever mentioning, using or ever having heard of Party Pieces, as Kate was already on the scene, not until many years later into her waity decade due only to her waity decade, so they did not seem to have customers during the pretend time of becoming pretend multimillionaires. I think a person on Twitter/X compared their financials to their much more successful competitor, which had stated a fraction of its pretend multimillions. Also, people here before her wedding could do similar analysis with public info so Will knew too. Will, who chose to vacation at Maison de Bang Bang after press recorded/videoed Uncle Gary Goldsmith offering fresh young, minority girl prostitutes and drugs, as if these minority girls weren't even human. Will, who chose constantly to vacation with the Middletons on Mystique while most likely knowing the money came from somewhere though probably not Party Pieces, while seemingly bringing his taxpayer-funded security and getting taxpayer funds caught up in this. Where did this Mustique and Maison de Bang Bang money come from? I would add too she seems she might be a sadist given -what was reported about her crew, Killing Kittens, and many years' pal, its founder, Emma Sayles, during her decade of dating Will and after, and the club itself -what was stated about complaining wedding dresses had to be completely remade starting 3 days before wedding -what Jacintha Saldanha's family stated about her death -what happened to the woman she blamed when she wore the wrong country's dress in tour -what supposedly the press long knew about her supposed racist remarks -her snapping at an innocent child on video after the young, small child innocently asked about Harry and Meghan -what befell the DJs at the time of nurse Jacintha Saldana's death -what befell the press for reporting her lies and complete nudity in front of the rooftop balcony by the railing in view of pedestrians, staff, neighbors and the public road -their letters threatening to sue Tatler for reporting she resents work -photo of her having thrown flowers at staff after the public gave them to her around the time of her wedding -suppressing seemingly based on Robach's hot mic 3 years of journalism to report in Epstein so all the victims and more could be victimized 3 more years, after Virginia To erts has been hidden fearing for her life 12 years after many years of being trafficked -what was reported about her exhibitionism working as a yacht girl -her and Pippa's exhibitionism swimming with Will while dating, and hers completely nude at the rooftop railing while security and crew watched, given she herself worked as a yacht girl, on top of their suing and threatening to sue constantly the list goes on: Post: I do not remember one Brit ever once mentioning receiving this supposed subsidy. The people vote and the people were concerned about money and what I wrote about. I already answered this above. Not even a licensed mental health pro diagnoses through the internet. This was during a work commitment and immediately prior lies about missing the disabled sports contest to ready for a tour, which I already wrote of, and which was in the articles around the time. What remains is she and this whole family, the monarchy and related monarchies must go, right away. Look at what Sophie and Fergie did before during scandals if getting caught. This is this family's complete mindset. Brits were working long, hard hours on top of long, exhausting commutes and not great living conditions. None of them cared about or thought about this family. Her whole life she has demonstrated decades of 1) exhibitionism 2) refusal to work 3) lying, including cheating at St. Andrews 4) attention seeking 5) melodramatic antics, stirring conflict 6) infantile mind 7) scheming 8) narcissism 9) blaming those that call attention to the above, victim blaming (the woman she blamed when she wore the wrong country's clothes, Jacintha Saldana, the nurse), gaslighting and lying she is the victim in switched roles 10) unwillingness to change 11) arrogance 12) greed/stinginess/waste of taxpayer funds, including refusing to pay her parking meter while she shopped and had taxpayer-funded security guard her car from getting a ticket 13) duper's delight 14) copying others 15) stalking 16) obsession 17) cold complete lack of mor@ls eg suddenly going to hunt and doing blood sports after he broke up with her 18) temper tantrums supposedly about wedding dresses, and in photos, and in videos Narcissists are addicts. Attention is their drug. This is not going to change. This will only worsen. Narcissists worsen as they age. As they think they are closer to power also, I think they will worsen. She was Gollum pursuing the ring and remains Gollum pursuing the 1 ring to rule all the Commonwealth and coerce the press to rule the world in culture, media and press. Any response would be bumped, so never fear! ![;)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/wink.png) This is all quite brilliant and thank you for posting it. It is a lot to absorb and you seem right on the money with all your conclusions! I would write more but a little under the weather today so just resting a tad. Bravo!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Jan 15, 2024 7:26:59 GMT
Thanks. Feel better. I saw this article about how Kate released extremely airbrushed, unrecognizable photos--of herself! not portraits with her family including kids--a couple birthdays ago. Another example that causes me to think of narcissism: www.celebitchy.com/748695/duchess_kate_released_three_photo_portraits_for_her_40th_birthday/I would think her intertwined mother or dad, or a person close to her, would considerately give her feedback these look like a different person if she does not see it herself. She pretended she was Party Pieces photographer though people here pointed out another person was credited for those photos so she must realize what the signs of too much photo retouching are. This goes beyond too much retouching. Remember the famous portrait artist who painted the massive painting of her like she looks in real life, which she seemed really unhappy with? Anyone that tells remotely the truth she does not like faces her vengeful, vindictive years of lawsuits, spretend suicidal death, hiding decades for their lives, or decade-long "she made me cry!" wrath: -the portrait artist, -Jacintha Saldana, -the radio djs, -the woman she blamed when she wore the wrong country's dress on tour, -her dismissed security guard, -the newspaper that photographed her stark naked smiling looking straight at camera in the public road while she lied she couldn't do her disabled sports competition work -Tatler -the innocent child who inquired about Harry and Meghan -Harry -Markle -the New Yorker who said this was speed wrapping so she rolled her eyes right in front of a camera, knowing she would seemingly plant press disparaging the visible, recognizable New Yorker, who was probably doing her job -from articles, Beatrice and Eugenie -from articles, any female remotely near Will -any press that does not pretend stark naked Buttress of Wails is pretend Emperor With New Clothes I am no fan of Markle, though Harry interviews better by himself. Since his interview, the sky high fake praise of Wails Buttress' half naked appearance in front of the Korean head of state, spun as if this were a celebration of recordbreakingly pretty legs, which she does not possess, was odd and disgusting. As were the decades of press going on about their victimization while she smiled totally nude at the camera in the public road. And press like a broken record that she never puts a foot wrong. And that this constantly nude, sex clubber, partier with pimps is painfully shy so can't work. And that she can't work because she is raising spoilt bratty temper tantrums throwing children. And that the New Yorker saying this engagement was speed wrapping was pushy and deserved the eye roll in front of cameras and poor press. Incidentally, I read about Louis Mountbatten being Charles' de facto really close grandfather/mentor being associated too with Jimmy Savile, who was also really close to Charles and coincidentally also not investigated until after his death, and never completely. Similarly to recorded/videoed confessor as pimp Uncle Gary Goldsmith, Epstein, Andrew, seemingly false financials-stating during decades Carole, and fake gun pointing Pippa. Wasn't brother James ditching bad debts too with his insolvent/bankrupt raunchy cakes company? Kate sexualizes everything, James does too, Pippa does too, Gary pimped, and so do these families. This is a disturbing nightmare. It is really foul. It ought to come fully to light and investigated properly, with the perpetrators dismissed from office.
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Jan 15, 2024 7:52:54 GMT
Thanks. Feel better. I saw this article about how Kate released extremely airbrushed, unrecognizable photos--of herself! not portraits with her family including kids--a couple birthdays ago. Another example that causes me to think of narcissism: www.celebitchy.com/748695/duchess_kate_released_three_photo_portraits_for_her_40th_birthday/I would think her intertwined mother or dad, or a person close to her, would considerately give her feedback these look like a different person if she does not see it herself. She pretended she was Party Pieces photographer though people here pointed out another person was credited for those photos so she must realize what the signs of too much photo retouching are. This goes beyond too much retouching. Remember the famous portrait artist who painted the massive painting of her like she looks in real life, which she seemed really unhappy with? Anyone that tells remotely the truth she does not like faces her vengeful, vindictive years of lawsuits, spretend suicidal death, hiding decades for their lives, or decade-long "she made me cry!" wrath: -the portrait artist, -Jacintha Saldana, -the radio djs, -the woman she blamed when she wore the wrong country's dress on tour, -her dismissed security guard, -the newspaper that photographed her stark naked smiling looking straight at camera in the public road while she lied she couldn't do her disabled sports competition work -Tatler -the innocent child who inquired about Harry and Meghan -Harry -Markle -the New Yorker who said this was speed wrapping so she rolled her eyes right in front of a camera, knowing she would seemingly plant press disparaging the visible, recognizable New Yorker, who was probably doing her job -from articles, Beatrice and Eugenie -from articles, any female remotely near Will -any press that does not pretend stark naked Buttress of Wails is pretend Emperor With New Clothes I am no fan of Markle, though Harry interviews better by himself. Since his interview, the sky high fake praise of Wails Buttress' half naked appearance in front of the Korean head of state, spun as if this were a celebration of recordbreakingly pretty legs, which she does not possess, was odd and disgusting. As were the decades of press going on about their victimization while she smiled totally nude at the camera in the public road. And press like a broken record that she never puts a foot wrong. And that this constantly nude, sex clubber, partier with pimps is painfully shy so can't work. And that she can't work because she is raising spoilt bratty temper tantrums throwing children. And that the New Yorker saying this engagement was speed wrapping was pushy and deserved the eye roll in front of cameras and poor press. Incidentally, I read about Louis Mountbatten being Charles' de facto really close grandfather/mentor being associated too with Jimmy Savile, who was also really close to Charles and coincidentally also not investigated until after his death, and never completely. Similarly to recorded/videoed confessor as pimp Uncle Gary Goldsmith, Epstein, Andrew, seemingly false financials-stating during decades Carole, and fake gun pointing Pippa. Wasn't brother James ditching bad debts too with his insolvent/bankrupt raunchy cakes company? Kate sexualizes everything, James does too, Pippa does too, Gary pimped, and so do these families. This is a disturbing nightmare. It is really foul. It ought to come fully to light and investigated properly, with the perpetrators dismissed from office. In my view a woman's sexuality should be a topping to her personality, not the tool of her way through this world. Kate uses this as a tool. She acts out to get WIlliam to pay attention to her. What concerns me is that she throws herself out there and shrieks about getting papped, but then does it again. She is jerking everyone around and using her sexuality as a way to do it. That is seriously disturbing. She has shown herself to be seriously unstable, seriously perturbed, and now she is obviously losing her husband and she is making an even worse mess by doing all the worst things.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 15, 2024 14:13:50 GMT
Thanks. Feel better. I saw this article about how Kate released extremely airbrushed, unrecognizable photos--of herself! not portraits with her family including kids--a couple birthdays ago. Another example that causes me to think of narcissism: www.celebitchy.com/748695/duchess_kate_released_three_photo_portraits_for_her_40th_birthday/I would think her intertwined mother or dad, or a person close to her, would considerately give her feedback these look like a different person if she does not see it herself. She pretended she was Party Pieces photographer though people here pointed out another person was credited for those photos so she must realize what the signs of too much photo retouching are. This goes beyond too much retouching. Remember the famous portrait artist who painted the massive painting of her like she looks in real life, which she seemed really unhappy with? Anyone that tells remotely the truth she does not like faces her vengeful, vindictive years of lawsuits, spretend suicidal death, hiding decades for their lives, or decade-long "she made me cry!" wrath: -the portrait artist, -Jacintha Saldana, -the radio djs, -the woman she blamed when she wore the wrong country's dress on tour, -her dismissed security guard, -the newspaper that photographed her stark naked smiling looking straight at camera in the public road while she lied she couldn't do her disabled sports competition work -Tatler -the innocent child who inquired about Harry and Meghan -Harry -Markle -the New Yorker who said this was speed wrapping so she rolled her eyes right in front of a camera, knowing she would seemingly plant press disparaging the visible, recognizable New Yorker, who was probably doing her job-from articles, Beatrice and Eugenie -from articles, any female remotely near Will -any press that does not pretend stark naked Buttress of Wails is pretend Emperor With New ClothesI am no fan of Markle, though Harry interviews better by himself. Since his interview, the sky high fake praise of Wails Buttress' half naked appearance in front of the Korean head of state, spun as if this were a celebration of recordbreakingly pretty legs, which she does not possess, was odd and disgusting. As were the decades of press going on about their victimization while she smiled totally nude at the camera in the public road. And press like a broken record that she never puts a foot wrong. And that this constantly nude, sex clubber, partier with pimps is painfully shy so can't work. And that she can't work because she is raising spoilt bratty temper tantrums throwing children. And that the New Yorker saying this engagement was speed wrapping was pushy and deserved the eye roll in front of cameras and poor press. Incidentally, I read about Louis Mountbatten being Charles' de facto really close grandfather/mentor being associated too with Jimmy Savile, who was also really close to Charles and coincidentally also not investigated until after his death, and never completely. Similarly to recorded/videoed confessor as pimp Uncle Gary Goldsmith, Epstein, Andrew, seemingly false financials-stating during decades Carole, and fake gun pointing Pippa. Wasn't brother James ditching bad debts too with his insolvent/bankrupt raunchy cakes company? Kate sexualizes everything, James does too, Pippa does too, Gary pimped, and so do these families. This is a disturbing nightmare. It is really foul. It ought to come fully to light and investigated properly, with the perpetrators dismissed from office. Bravo!!!! ![:|](https://www.free-smileys.com/files/bouncy-smileys/948.gif) It IS a disturbing nightmare - and we have been calling for some accountability for YEARS. Never has one person and her revolting family wrought so much damage on the BRF and been protected, protected, protected. The BP knows the score, but are too scared to do anything but tow the BRF line. Everything and everybody gets used, abused, slandered, betrayed, etc, etc, etc, all so that they can keep royal secrets, especially Willy and Kate's, under wraps. But, truth, even if decades or centuries later, DO out themselves. Better people, much, much, MUCH better and worthwhile people, including some royals, got drummed out of the family/circle far, FAR, etc, worse than Harry and Meghan ever did. From my viewpoint and what I have learned, harping on racism is the least of things. Kate and her family. Yikes. WHERE to start, but at least at the new Royal Gossip,we at least have a few years record of our fight against the sleaze-bucket Middletons. Unfortunately, the Middletons had the old Royal Gossip removed somehow. They are truly a vile lot of despicable traitors, IMHO. What is speed wrapping, by the way? I have never heard of that. Please elaborate. stark naked Buttress of Wails. lol - now that's a keeper. ![hyene](http://www.smiley-lol.com/smiley/animaux-insectes/hyene.gif)
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 15, 2024 14:18:25 GMT
Thanks. Feel better. I saw this article about how Kate released extremely airbrushed, unrecognizable photos--of herself! not portraits with her family including kids--a couple birthdays ago. Another example that causes me to think of narcissism: www.celebitchy.com/748695/duchess_kate_released_three_photo_portraits_for_her_40th_birthday/I would think her intertwined mother or dad, or a person close to her, would considerately give her feedback these look like a different person if she does not see it herself. She pretended she was Party Pieces photographer though people here pointed out another person was credited for those photos so she must realize what the signs of too much photo retouching are. This goes beyond too much retouching. Remember the famous portrait artist who painted the massive painting of her like she looks in real life, which she seemed really unhappy with? Anyone that tells remotely the truth she does not like faces her vengeful, vindictive years of lawsuits, spretend suicidal death, hiding decades for their lives, or decade-long "she made me cry!" wrath: -the portrait artist, -Jacintha Saldana, -the radio djs, -the woman she blamed when she wore the wrong country's dress on tour, -her dismissed security guard, -the newspaper that photographed her stark naked smiling looking straight at camera in the public road while she lied she couldn't do her disabled sports competition work -Tatler -the innocent child who inquired about Harry and Meghan -Harry -Markle -the New Yorker who said this was speed wrapping so she rolled her eyes right in front of a camera, knowing she would seemingly plant press disparaging the visible, recognizable New Yorker, who was probably doing her job -from articles, Beatrice and Eugenie -from articles, any female remotely near Will -any press that does not pretend stark naked Buttress of Wails is pretend Emperor With New Clothes I am no fan of Markle, though Harry interviews better by himself. Since his interview, the sky high fake praise of Wails Buttress' half naked appearance in front of the Korean head of state, spun as if this were a celebration of recordbreakingly pretty legs, which she does not possess, was odd and disgusting. As were the decades of press going on about their victimization while she smiled totally nude at the camera in the public road. And press like a broken record that she never puts a foot wrong. And that this constantly nude, sex clubber, partier with pimps is painfully shy so can't work. And that she can't work because she is raising spoilt bratty temper tantrums throwing children. And that the New Yorker saying this engagement was speed wrapping was pushy and deserved the eye roll in front of cameras and poor press. Incidentally, I read about Louis Mountbatten being Charles' de facto really close grandfather/mentor being associated too with Jimmy Savile, who was also really close to Charles and coincidentally also not investigated until after his death, and never completely. Similarly to recorded/videoed confessor as pimp Uncle Gary Goldsmith, Epstein, Andrew, seemingly false financials-stating during decades Carole, and fake gun pointing Pippa. Wasn't brother James ditching bad debts too with his insolvent/bankrupt raunchy cakes company? Kate sexualizes everything, James does too, Pippa does too, Gary pimped, and so do these families. This is a disturbing nightmare. It is really foul. It ought to come fully to light and investigated properly, with the perpetrators dismissed from office. In my view a woman's sexuality should be a topping to her personality, not the tool of her way through this world. Kate uses this as a tool. She acts out to get WIlliam to pay attention to her. What concerns me is that she throws herself out there and shrieks about getting papped, but then does it again. She is jerking everyone around and using her sexuality as a way to do it. That is seriously disturbing. She has shown herself to be seriously unstable, seriously perturbed, and now she is obviously losing her husband and she is making an even worse mess by doing all the worst things. ![](https://storage.proboards.com/7148753/thumbnailer/QhrsJihSlzzaAEXhbuAO.png) Discreet little thing, ain't she?
|
|
|
Post by india on Jan 15, 2024 15:36:57 GMT
She is such a gross me out ditty ho.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 15, 2024 18:50:17 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Jan 16, 2024 2:47:11 GMT
I agree though don't know how to reply to all the posts in between this and my previous reply together.
In the video in which Kate rolled her eyes at the New Yorker, in NY, the headlines said the New Yorker said, "Keep wrapping," though to me it sounded like she said, "This is speed wrapping," which doesn't sound deserving of Kate's eye roll, especially not how her eye roll praised by the press. Particularly due to what the world knows about Kate's very few, very brief engagements, attention seeking, narcissism and refusal to do actual work. Kate refuses to take or follow directions.
The press even tried to positively spin Kate snapping at the innocent, young child asking about Harry and Meghan.
I had no idea the old site was taken down. I wonder how that was managed.
I agree, since Me Too was a start of revealing something very severe after decades of gaslighting. It was only still the start and only at its start of beginning to shed some light. They have made it clear Epstein, Andrew, Jimmy Savile, Louis Mountbatten, pimp uncle Gary Goldsmith, Kate herself constantly complaining/suing, "This is my private life!" to photographers while she struts around naked and is photographed doing so including living off taxpayers though doing no work, Kate and Will vacationing at Maison de Bang Bang while Gary and Will dj'd together and all this foul press manipulation, and getting away with it, are doing much to counteract Me Too. To not just before Me Too but worse.
I saw Buttress I think maybe on Celebrity and Wails here or there.
Again, I think Markle did not have pure or good intentions with Harry though Harry interviews better by himself. After Harry did interviews about his family members' press manipulation, it is so transparent. They made the mistake, particularly Meghan, of using the Oprah interview and almost everything after constantly as a manipulation of the public to get it to side with them as a negotiating tool for more taxpayer-funded perks, at least as many as Epstein Andrew and refuse-to-work Kate and Will have.
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Jan 16, 2024 3:04:25 GMT
Typical narcissist for Kate, Will, Carole and their mouthpieces, to lecture the public, world, taxpayers, family members and press on "manners," including Harry's and his wife's. Meanwhile they pretend to believe their own manipulations of press that her treatment of the child asking about Harry and Meghan, smiling at the photographer on the public road as she was stark nude, threatening Tatler with a lawsuit for reporting she resents work, leaving Jacintha Saldana dead and her family convincingly stating she was in no way suicidal and more investigation should occur, and countless others. And all the press manipulation falsely stating she and her whole family are known for perfect manners, that the public locally is in uproar about the Buckleberry signs about Carole, Kate and Party Pieces' false financials (doesn't ring true sounding), how she does secret charity and work, and how she went from initially shy to a confident, capable, model of good public speaking.
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Jan 16, 2024 3:34:34 GMT
Around the time of before their engagement or so, Will made a remark to the press I think about people in the internet commenting unfavorably about them. The post about the old site being taken down reminds me of that.
So in addition to threatening ABC and Robach in a million different ways,ying to the press, planting false stories in the press, coercing the press to write falsely positive stories about them, Will and Kate threaten free speech democracy.
Another reason this monarchy and monarchy should be finished right away.
The irony of pump Uncle Gary threatening lawsuits and complaining of injustice while depriving the fresh young, minority prostitute girls he pimped at Maison de Bang Bang while he and Will dj'd there together with Kate. And complaining of injustice toward Carole who seemingly falsely stated financial info, using taxpayer-funded Will for publicity reach and shafting the creditors. These are the lighthouses of good manners, Will thinks.
Buttcheeks of Wails has a certain ring.
I think it was on Twitter/X in or reply to a post by one of the Kate Middleton parody accounts a commenter wrote, Behind every Baldie is a Stick, and she is that Stick.
Worth it for you to check out given what you posted about this site. These other sites--Celebitchy, AmIAnnoying, Bayou something, a search for Kate Middleton Annoying, Kate Middleton Exhibitionist . . . Workshy . . . Stalker . . . Obsessed . . . Refuses to Work . . . New York Post
Similar searches on Twitter/X, video platforms . . .
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 16, 2024 3:59:47 GMT
I agree though don't know how to reply to all the posts in between this and my previous reply together. In the video in which Kate rolled her eyes at the New Yorker, in NY, the headlines said the New Yorker said, "Keep wrapping," though to me it sounded like she said, "This is speed wrapping," which doesn't sound deserving of Kate's eye roll, especially not how her eye roll praised by the press. Particularly due to what the world knows about Kate's very few, very brief engagements, attention seeking, narcissism and refusal to do actual work. Kate refuses to take or follow directions. The press even tried to positively spin Kate snapping at the innocent, young child asking about Harry and Meghan. I had no idea the old site was taken down. I wonder how that was managed. I agree, since Me Too was a start of revealing something very severe after decades of gaslighting. It was only still the start and only at its start of beginning to shed some light. They have made it clear Epstein, Andrew, Jimmy Savile, Louis Mountbatten, pimp uncle Gary Goldsmith, Kate herself constantly complaining/suing, "This is my private life!" to photographers while she struts around naked and is photographed doing so including living off taxpayers though doing no work, Kate and Will vacationing at Maison de Bang Bang while Gary and Will dj'd together and all this foul press manipulation, and getting away with it, are doing much to counteract Me Too. To not just before Me Too but worse. I saw Buttress I think maybe on Celebrity and Wails here or there. Again, I think Markle did not have pure or good intentions with Harry though Harry interviews better by himself. After Harry did interviews about his family members' press manipulation, it is so transparent. They made the mistake, particularly Meghan, of using the Oprah interview and almost everything after constantly as a manipulation of the public to get it to side with them as a negotiating tool for more taxpayer-funded perks, at least as many as Epstein Andrew and refuse-to-work Kate and Will have. There are no firm or fast rules - typically just quote and write. Some people can quote from different posts but I would screw something like that up. The important thing is to post and share - Sometimes I just like reading other people's succinct and spot on posts and wonder why so-called media/royal experts, etc, don't see as clearly as our posters do. They aren't even close and wonder if it's cowardice or having their hands tied somehow, or other reasons. WE all in our own ways see very troubling things happening, so why is nothing continuing to be done? The old site was taken down somehow a few years ago (when did we start, 2020?) - that's how we started up the new one. But, thousands of posts from a good many people gone forever...there's a thread on her Internet Archive... a former poster posted a lot of what were lost online items and took the time to post them here. Neither Kate or Meghan is suitable for royal life, but no surprise there as the Not So Fab Spencer boys are not exactly royal material themselves. They were never going to get suitable mates because women of worth will not settle and/or downgrade. Buttress of Wails... I still love that. ![:D](https://yoursmiles.org/ssmile/fun/s0261.gif)
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Jan 16, 2024 5:22:46 GMT
How did they get the old site taken down?
I think political parody is protected free speech, and it is important to democracy, as is free speech about heads of state.
BWails, or KWails, is ridiculous for anyone. She is beyond ridiculous for any public figure.
She is unbelievably ridiculous for a head of state type.
The only reply that makes is similar to why and why the press covers up for her is what Harry stated and why Epstein, Savile, Louis Mountbatten, Uncle Gary, the list goes on . . . were not investigated properly or prosecuted and why KWails/Harry's family got away with threatening ABC/Robach a million different ways to suppress the Epstein news for 3 years though got away with it so far . . . . Both families must go, right away, and must be investigated and prosecuted properly as proper investigation deems is warranted.
The Kpop girl band at the Korean state banquet were dressed more modestly and professionally than she conducted herself.
Imagine if Nikki Haley did what KWails did. 1 such deed and she would be done and gone.
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Jan 16, 2024 6:56:41 GMT
In reply, it is not like KWails possesses the charm or allure of a young Audrey Hepburn, Grace Kelly, Brigitte Bardot, young Catherine Deneuve, 1940s Elizabeth Taylor or '70s James Bond Jane Seymour, including in the photos posted.
With her constant sexualization of herself in public, of WWails, of all males, of the red carpet and state events and always everything, she still does not possess the appeal of Marilyn Monroe, young Phoebe Cates, young Brooke Shields, pre-operation Emmanuelle Beart or Sophia Vergara.
She in-your-face drops her clothes constantly.
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Jan 16, 2024 8:29:17 GMT
Please ignore this comic's occasional profanity regarding his pent up frustration. This is precisely why Keen for Wails-fare (Keen for Welfare) must go. It is worth watching to the finish when the comic replies regarding Keen for and Willbe on Wails-fare's complaints blaming media invasion. He even talks about Pistol Pippa's gun youtu.be/f3PJF0YE-x4?feature=shared
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Jan 20, 2024 22:44:22 GMT
Given what seemingly occurred with the old site, Lipstick Alley Kate Middleton search--in addition to previously mentioned similar search with Celebitchy, Bayou, parody X, and key words written prior--will display many photos and articles from before.
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Jan 21, 2024 0:29:56 GMT
In reply, it is not like KWails possesses the charm or allure of a young Audrey Hepburn, Grace Kelly, Brigitte Bardot, young Catherine Deneuve, 1940s Elizabeth Taylor or '70s James Bond Jane Seymour, including in the photos posted. With her constant sexualization of herself in public, of WWails, of all males, of the red carpet and state events and always everything, she still does not possess the appeal of Marilyn Monroe, young Phoebe Cates, young Brooke Shields, pre-operation Emmanuelle Beart or Sophia Vergara. She in-your-face drops her clothes constantly. Kate uses her sexuality as a tool to get what she wants, no different than any tart in the red-light district of various nations. She does not flaunt her sexuality as a celebration of her femininity, she uses it as a tool or weapon to get what she wants and men use her, but do not respect her.
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Jan 21, 2024 2:38:49 GMT
In reply, it is not like KWails possesses the charm or allure of a young Audrey Hepburn, Grace Kelly, Brigitte Bardot, young Catherine Deneuve, 1940s Elizabeth Taylor or '70s James Bond Jane Seymour, including in the photos posted. celebration of her femininity Good word choice.
|
|