|
Post by Admin on Dec 25, 2023 14:41:16 GMT
Time again for Royal Predictions 2024.
Let your imagination run free!
Best,
Admin
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Dec 26, 2023 4:17:00 GMT
I think 2024 is going to bring an implosion, not an explosion. I think that while Kate is settled and feels secure in her situation of Princess of Wales, she is unaware of just how vulnerable she is. There will not be a formal separation or divorce, but William doesn't even spend holidays with her. I think Kate is under the impression that Charles supports her, but I think Charles hates her more than he lets on, least of all in public. I think the BRF is going to pull the rug out from under her and William will take the initiative, but Charles will be the one to make her pay. Kate should know that men cannot be completely predictable, and I am certain that Charles is quietly seething towards her. If Harry and Charles reconcile and Harry's price is that Kate be booted out (likely scenario) then Kate will be lucky to leave with her life and I mean that very seriously. When I was young and happily dumb, I didn't know the realities of leadership and how hardened leaders are. Now that I am older and have observed more, I believe that Charles has been giving Kate more and more leeway mainly since he intends to broom her out and leave her with as little as possible. The less Kate does, the less leverage she has. She will likely continue to get coddled mainly because that is how she is being set up to fail and be broomed out. If I were smart, if I were Kate, or in her position, I would be asking why the BRF was not breathing down her neck about doing her part. HME had her on track, but since then she has been quietly dwindling her duties and ignoring the public and it is clear that it could be for the chilling reason that Charles views her as disposable. Like how a boyfriend suddenly starts not caring about what their girlfriends are up to, it can be sign that all is not well.
I think 2024 will involve Kate being more and more marginalized and there will not be any fighting back. Her family is no longer protected, and their bills are still outstanding. There is no one paying the bills and she will eventually be broomed out. She has no real support; she has no real backup to keep her marriage together and she has no one to provide a safe place or a soft landing. I do not think she does not know this, but she has no clue that there will be huge culture shock. One thing I do note is that she is not wearing couture anymore and it is clear that she is in fact going to be unable to get even a quiet estate since she can't afford it. Point blank, I think she will end up with no real cushion and she will go from red carpet to hard street. The streets are not kind of unprepared women and while she will not be left homeless, she will not get a suite of palace rooms and fat pension or settlement. Since she does not work, she has no office expenses that have to be maintained.
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Dec 26, 2023 5:57:33 GMT
Her lifelong unwillingness to work . . . and her nannies, servants, butler, press office, staff and their entitled, spoiled children so it's not as if she seems like she is a full-time mom.
It's not as if she even contributed to the art history world in any significant way.
And how she insists she should play tennis with a famous athlete, attend a Boston Celtics game to be featured on camera, invite Dilly Parton for tea, show her disapproval at the BAFTA Awards jokes, cosplay at the Harry Potter castle, hang out with celebrities or film herself decorating a tree with ornaments the way everyone else does the few times she pretends to work. It's so narcissistic behaving like a child at play though also like a controlling tyrant ruler while insisting she can't work. Her children behave just like she does.
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Dec 26, 2023 8:38:44 GMT
Her lifelong unwillingness to work . . . and her nannies, servants, butler, press office, staff and their entitled, spoiled children so it's not as if she seems like she is a full-time mom. It's not as if she even contributed to the art history world in any significant way. And how she insists she should play tennis with a famous athlete, attend a Boston Celtics game to be featured on camera, invite Dilly Parton for tea, show her disapproval at the BAFTA Awards jokes, cosplay at the Harry Potter castle, hang out with celebrities or film herself decorating a tree with ornaments the way everyone else does the few times she pretends to work. It's so narcissistic behaving like a child at play though also like a controlling tyrant ruler while insisting she can't work. Her children behave just like she does. She says this stuff as an attempt to get it granted to her. Remember how she came to NYC for the first time? There was all this hype about how Kate was going to see the Rockettes and do one thing after another, but it was a pared down trip and nothing touristy about it. I cannot imagine anything like that being granted to her and if she were smarter, she would see just how unsafe her situation is. She reminds me of a version of myself if I had gone in a different direction in life. I find her attitude intriguing because she has clearly adopted the attitudes of the upper class without the mean to support it concretely. I think 2024 some kind of shift is going to manifest, and I am certain that it will not be in the favor of the royals. I think Camilla will make more demands and continue to irritate people in geopolitics since this really is not the time for vanity tours. I think Camilla will continue to undermine the entire monarchical system as Charles tries to either stabilize his nation or save his family. I think politicians will start chopping at royal privileges in order to make the BRF pay for their messes. As for the rest of world royalty, it is clear that the sands of time are running out and a lot of them are going to be unable to save and preserve their way of life.
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Dec 26, 2023 9:19:10 GMT
Inexplicably, they seem to think looking like '70s JC Penny photo shoots, except strangely sometimes in '50s black and white, together with the above indulging herself in celebrity perks for herself as her rare instances of "work" is the "safe" track for securing the monarchy and crown. Her hairstyle, makeup and clothes remind me of the '70s though not in a timeless, cool way like James Bond Jane Seymour.
If she didn't want to work that much, she could have carried herself and done work and civic contributions like Laura Bush or Grace Kelly or something that showed and related to her active involvement in the education of her children and everyday, impoverished children.
Instead, she constantly comes across as flirting with males other than her husband at her occasional celebrity self-indulgence as "work." Or she rolls her eyes, coldly snaps at an innocent child's mention of Harry and Meghan, wears tights as pants, sports short shorts, flaunts dresses that fly up to her ears or pats Will on his bottom in front of the press cameras at "work." Even knowing her, their, her family's and their family's past. Unlike Diana, who was calling attention to mines in Angola, AIDS patients and sick children while dressed with class, she has to constantly call attention to her body, her legs, her flirtation and herself as if she is a celebrity.
I don't understand why the public accepts her constantly showing up the few times she "works" in tights as pants, short shorts and honestly inappropriate attire for work much less so-called "royal" "work." Diana's work clothes met a higher standard than everyday employees had to. I don't know anyone that works a white collar job dressed as she does, including in a sheer shirt with a wide open view of her chest, which shows she wears no undergarments or skin-tight tights instead of pants or very short or high-flying clothes that barely cover what a skimpy bikini bottom covers. Other than that she wears gowns, which over half the time remind me of the '70s. I honestly think she vastly contributes to everything that is very wrong with society and spiralling fast downward, including the deplorable state of customer service, which has been replaced by selfish entitled, identity theft, selling everyone's privacy and billing people for hidden and auto charges that are impossible to stop, ostensibly for bad, buggy software or really nothing at all. And no service. Just a bad bot. Always grabbing at more while having a negative effect and doing less of anything productive then spending all the customer's stolen money on political lobbying and obsessive, maniacal PR/media whitewashing. Plus add all the ties to Gary offering fresh young girl prostitutes and drugs, Emma Sayle's Killing Kittens swingers club, Epstein Andrew, Charles' Jimmy Savile and Harvey Weinstein. Allusions, throwbacks to and imagery straight out of colonialism and racism. Everything wrong with society.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 26, 2023 23:53:04 GMT
Inexplicably, they seem to think looking like '70s JC Penny photo shoots, except strangely sometimes in '50s black and white, together with the above indulging herself in celebrity perks for herself as her rare instances of "work" is the "safe" track for securing the monarchy and crown. Her hairstyle, makeup and clothes remind me of the '70s though not in a timeless, cool way like James Bond Jane Seymour. If she didn't want to work that much, she could have carried herself and done work and civic contributions like Laura Bush or Grace Kelly or something that showed and related to her active involvement in the education of her children and everyday, impoverished children. Instead, she constantly comes across as flirting with males other than her husband at her occasional celebrity self-indulgence as "work." Or she rolls her eyes, coldly snaps at an innocent child's mention of Harry and Meghan, wears tights as pants, sports short shorts, flaunts dresses that fly up to her ears or pats Will on his bottom in front of the press cameras at "work." Even knowing her, their, her family's and their family's past. Unlike Diana, who was calling attention to mines in Angola, AIDS patients and sick children while dressed with class, she has to constantly call attention to her body, her legs, her flirtation and herself as if she is a celebrity. I don't understand why the public accepts her constantly showing up the few times she "works" in tights as pants, short shorts and honestly inappropriate attire for work much less so-called "royal" "work." Diana's work clothes met a higher standard than everyday employees had to. I don't know anyone that works a white collar job dressed as she does, including in a sheer shirt with a wide open view of her chest, which shows she wears no undergarments or skin-tight tights instead of pants or very short or high-flying clothes that barely cover what a skimpy bikini bottom covers. Other than that she wears gowns, which over half the time remind me of the '70s. I honestly think she vastly contributes to everything that is very wrong with society and spiralling fast downward, including the deplorable state of customer service, which has been replaced by selfish entitled, identity theft, selling everyone's privacy and billing people for hidden and auto charges that are impossible to stop, ostensibly for bad, buggy software or really nothing at all. And no service. Just a bad bot. Always grabbing at more while having a negative effect and doing less of anything productive then spending all the customer's stolen money on political lobbying and obsessive, maniacal PR/media whitewashing. Plus add all the ties to Gary offering fresh young girl prostitutes and drugs, Emma Sayle's Killing Kittens swingers club, Epstein Andrew, Charles' Jimmy Savile and Harvey Weinstein. Allusions, throwbacks to and imagery straight out of colonialism and racism. Everything wrong with society. I am just one of a few folks who tries her best to counter this nonsense, but can only speak for myself. Best to actually write to those in the media and suggest they do themselves a favour by writing the truth about this completely destructive and useless excuse of a woman. British media outlets have their hands tied but that doesn't mean that foreign ones do. Write and cc as many as you can. I have done that and plan to do it again shortly (once back to my main computer). That Middleton family is pure scheming scum of the Earth and Prince William should not get let off lightly. I still cannot accept that decent, respectable family (this is going back sometimes centuries) get written out of history, but the Cambridges and Middletons get protected. Not on my watch and what I know and continue to learn.
|
|
sanka
Count/Countess
Posts: 269
|
Post by sanka on Dec 28, 2023 4:09:31 GMT
Here goes with some predictions for this year.
1. The safe prediction is that Princess Anne will continue to work hard. As this is no.1 there is not much hope for some of the others. 2. Another safe prediction is Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh working hard to their causes (not as hard as Princess Anne) but they will at least turn up, show interest etc. 3. King Charles will continue his ways as I think he is still transitioning from being Prince of Wales to the King. 4. I am not certain about Camilla but I think we may see more of her family being around the royals and I take this as a sign that there may concerns regarding her ongoing health. 5. I still have thoughts that Windsor Castle may be yet another residence for the Wales/Cambridges along with Adelaide Cottage, Kensington Palace, Anmer Hall and likely to have a residence somewhere on the Balmor@l estate. One cannot have too many residences where William is concerned because he needs to be separate from his family. 6. I don't hold much hope for the Wales' doing excessive engagements as their history shows they just are not up to working hard. 7. The dubious duo in California will move from Montecito. It won't be out of choice but necessity as they cannot afford the luxurious lifestyle. They will continue to use the excuse to be closer to where the work is but it is clear they are not just getting the lucrative deals because they screw them up all the time. 8. WME will drop the dubious duo. If they do manage to get some high profile agency it will be incredible. 9. Netflix has had enough but may see the end of their contract to 2025. 10. The duo will continue on the redemption year and potentially reinventing The Tig but nothing will eventuate. That Tig promotion is wearing thin as I am assuming MM is waiting on name brands etc to get in contact with her so that she can use them for material but they are not forthcoming. As they duo have spent more time out of the royal family than in, they no longer have limited material. The public are not listening to the constant whining and victimhood. 11. The duo will continue to say they are stronger together and more connected - basically they are separated and cannot be in the same room together unless forced. 12. Prince Andrew and new revelations could be interesting but time will tell. There are likely to be more public figures worried about the Epstein connection than Andrew these days. 13. Possibly the removal of the titles bill will be passed by Parliament. Yay! Parliament will continue to scrutinise the funding for the Royal Family meaning there will be further slimming down and cutting the purse strings. 14. One thing I would really like to see with the Removal of Titles bill is for for anyone to be in the Line of Succession be a resident either in the UK or a Commonwealth country. Also, any children in the line of succession at least in the top 20 etc that they have to be educated in the UK or a Commonwealth country to remain in the Line of Succession. It would be good if King Charles just made a similar decision as Queen Margarethe did with titles.
|
|