KATE MIDDLETON'S ALLEGED CANCER DIAGNOSIS - GD -

There is a lot of conversation that the cancer video of Kate is AI. If so, what do y'all think is going on now?

Something is off and I am not sure if it is cancer. When Charles was diagnosed, it was all very straightforward and clear. With Kate this has been a mess and second, people at the top are not supposed to be jerking the rest of the nation around. At some point, things are going to blow and William will not be able to dodge this.

I now believe the cancer video is AI. If it is not then show us definite proof of life. A live stream with Willy.

Kate and her victimhood:

www.wral.com/story/zeynep-tufekci-kate-middleton-is-yet-another-victim-of-the-royal-circus/21345934/

They can say whatever they want. But there is no REAL PROOF OF LIFE. Is the woman really alive?

Separate from the recent video and her speaking of illness, which I am not opening on here, I think KWail did herself no service, was very short-sighted and not that smart by not working. Ever. Before and after saying she would and taking official title.

Grace Kelly had an illustrious career. She still worked after taking official title, in her new official capacity. Diana worked. Diana's mother-in-law worked. I think Noor worked. I think Rania worked. This is how the public thinks of these kinds.

By not working. Ever. KWail has no file in memory--analogizing to computer memory--to stay in. She is some stray. This is unkempt and annoying to the mind and its organization, similar to a computer's organization for its user.

She simply showed up to some fun photo ops every once in a while.

Now that the world has seen the series of successions of photos have been manipulated and not honestly, she not only has no file to stay in, but, in addition, her stray image is tarnished and fake so she seems she should be swept into the trash bin, since she does not belong in the file with the others, has no use and is some fake, manipulated image that is stray and annoying. Like some corrupt thumbnail image on the desktop. Unpeel it and under it is another corrupt thumbnail image. And under it. And under it. The only solution is to sweep it into the trash bin so it isn't seemingly corrupting the other files. She isn't saying what caused the corruption, time is going by and there is little time for everyone to think of it except to tidy up the desktop and sweep it into the trash bin.

It seeems she and they read this site since after the horribly handled earlier announcements, they switched it up and decided to seem as though they had made no such announcement and instead just started releasing old, not honestly altered images, with today's holidays and dates, instead of, as I had suggested here after their announcement, intentionally earlier creating a set of new images and short videos to be released monthly during and correlating to this season. It is not dishonest to release a photo with no statement to the contrary within a month(s) and in the same season as it had been taken, such as taken a couple months ahead of time, with the intention of feting Mother's Day then Easter. Everyone takes their Christmas card photo before Christmas Day, for example, and if you do it earlier you simply seem well organized.

Also, if she had such a serious planned surgery that could turn into such a serious illness, how come she bent her outer car leg under her during the Korean state event and stood with her dress pulled up to almost her underwear, in a stance that appeared could not be anything other than intentional? How come she did not do at least 1 to 2 solid, professional, official functions in appropriate, respectful, respectable, admirable manner?

I will add that even though they don't live off the taxpayers those thought of in similar manner as royals in the U.S. worked too.

Laura Bush supposedly earned a Masters degree and worked in libraries and education. As first lady of Texas and the U.S., she worked in these official capacities too.

While I think a lot of sketchiness involves this family, especially unanswered questions involving a woman's death regarding one of the senators from it, Kennedy Onassis worked as First Lady.

Audrey Hepburn worked as an anti-Nazi, undercover WWII spy helping the rescue of Allied pilots that had been shot down. Then she has one of the most if not the most illustrious career to this day as dancer, actor and singer. Then she worked in charity. She did not ever live off the taxpayers though.

If you read KWail's bio, it is a lot of fluff, especially compared to those above, her grandmother-in-law, although both enabled Epstein and company's child trafficking, Diana, Noor and Rania.

On Wikipedia, it has to list as her accomplishments trips and and WWail did together, a solo trip she canceled and did not do, a speech she made and that she holds about 20 patronages though nothing of value she did for them and a short video she filmed of herself mumbling. It also lists as her work that she watches Wimbledon, etc.

Epstein should have been held accountable criminally and legally, and should have been even, theoretically, if he had eventually one can imagine been sick. Weinstein said he had ill health though still was held accountable.

I sympathize if this illness is true though she and they all should still be held accountable as conceivably accessories for suppressing Epstein news and enabling at least 3 more years of child trafficking and do should Andrew.

In addition to the post above, about not working, she and they have lied to much.

Here, she said to cover up falsely manipulated photos and lying that she is "amateur photographer" though earlier she said her job before marriage was pri photographer for her parents' company though its site photo credits named another. They also seemingly lied about being millionaires off the broke company. Which is it? She is still lying even as she covers up lies. She lied so much they can't keep track of her lies even with $300 million a year they receive funded by taxpayers annually:

www.foxnews.com/entertainment/kate-middletons-cancer-diagnosis-video-newly-marked-disclaimer-photo-agency

Both seem lies. The false photos do not appear work if a pro photographer. Apparently, she lied earlier and did not have a job and lied again releasing these false photos and lied again with her excuse minimizing it.

She and they lied about not doing the disabled sports contest work they had committed to saying they were preparing instead for a tour. However, instead, she was smiling at the camera stark naked at the front railing of a rooftop deck as the photographer stood in a visible, known, regularly used by pedestrians and drivers public road about a mile or maybe less in full view.

She lied during the engagement interview that she was going to work really hard starting really quickly. It is scary the way she lies so seriously.

She and her family also lied for decades about their nonsensical wealth that nothing and no one has ever corroborated and instead records show the opposite.

Supposedly, according to accounts, she lied and cheated her way through St Andrews.

According to accounts, she lied that it was the Levis guy, not WWail, she stated at in a poster on her wall as she stalked WWail for decades. Others' account(s) recounted it was Will.

I am unable to keep track of her lies since there have been so many.

She had taxpayer-funded bodyguard prevent her car from being ticketed at an unpaid meter as she shopped. Cheating is a form of lying.

Either she or her sister-in-law lied about making the other cry.

She lunged at her sister-in-law in front of worldwide public and cameras during the walk about though her statements about her sister-in-law trying to insinuate benevolence sound like lies.

Accounts state she bullied Eugenie, Beatrice, her sister-in-law and every female anywhere remotely near WWail so she seems to have lied about this too.

Her and Harry's (and her sister-in-law's) statements don't line up so it seems one of them if not both at least sometimes is lying. WWail said they're not a racist family so it seems there is some lying there somewhere by someone too.

I think there was some lie that she had nothing to do with taking down the painted portrait of her and the one of Harry in the museum she is patron if as it closed then she made her short video announcement it reopened. Honestly, that sounded like a lie. Now there are extremely, unrecognizably photoshopped photos of her there instead, sent by her.

She also together with WWail and their kids wore the same clothes in photos for holidays throughout the year so that didn't seem like other than similar to a lie.

She also falsely manipulated and seemingly lied about a number of photos she released.

So if it is true, I extend sympathy though I am not stating thought in if it is true.

I think she and they all should be held accountable and investigated as enabling Epstein and Epstein accessories. I think she lies a lot. I think she should not receive taxpayer funds. I think she, they and both their families should be swiftly, thoroughly held accountable for all their lies, crimes, child trafficking enabling, etc., corruption and on and on.

You know, I am so fatigued by the lot of them. The bickering, the lying, the crass media manipulations, etc. Nothing tragic about Kate's pronouncements or Meghan's need to ride the coattails of the BRF. Enough.