|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 18, 2024 13:21:30 GMT
www.celebitchy.com/880958/princess_kates_wimbledon_appearance_will_have_given_her_sustenance/Princess Kate’s Wimbledon appearance ‘will have given her sustenance’
July 18, 2024
By Kaiser Kate Middleton, RoyalsHer Wimbledon appearance will sustain her: “This will have given her sustenance. She has gone through something awful and stressful, and it is crucial to have little wins to look forward to or to give you the courage and energy to go forward,” a palace insider tells PEOPLE exclusively in this week’s issue. “And this was it.” The world was watching: The rare outing (announced the day before and just her second public appearance of the year) didn’t come without much thought, planning and steely preparation on the royal’s part. “It showed a lot of courage and character, as she knew that the world was watching,” says Robert Jobson, author of the new book Catherine, the Princess of Wales: A Biography of the Future Queen, out Aug. 6. Photographer Karwai Tang captured her memorable entrance: “She usually comes in, walks down and into her seat,” Tang tells PEOPLE. “But she stood for a while and took it all in. For her to acknowledge it and take in the applause was special. Wimbledon had been waiting with bated breath for her to return, and she was back.” Kate is gradually returning to her duties behind the scenes. A palace source confirms that Princess Kate has been making calls, speaking with staff and staying informed on the latest research for her royal causes while doing “a little work from home,” as Kate described on June 14. Adds a source close to the royal household: “It’s good not to feel under pressure and just take her time and have slow days if she needs to.” A shift in priorities. “Before, she used to live her life by the calendar, and now she is living her life, and the calendar comes in after,” Jobson says. “She will be back, but when you have had an experience like this, it changes your perspective and the order of things.” [From People] 
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 18, 2024 13:24:12 GMT
www.celebitchy.com/880958/princess_kates_wimbledon_appearance_will_have_given_her_sustenance/Some comments:
Libra says: July 18, 2024 at 8:45 am WHen will the British public tire of the DM push to bestow sainthood on this shallow woman? When is enough enough? Reply Tessa says: July 18, 2024 at 8:46 am Mr jobson the whole world does not care about Kate. She is not the center of the world. People can get sustenance that does not involve behaving like Kate Reply Lady Esther says: July 18, 2024 at 8:46 am Is the “sustenance” line a shady way of laying breadcrumbs about a possible ED? Or am I dreaming? Also, that dress was hideous and that shade did her no favours…with a closet like hers I’m sure she could have picked something better? Reply equality says: July 18, 2024 at 8:50 am The way her just appearing in public is over-dramatized makes it sound like that or some other MH issue. Other cancer patients appear in public daily without so much drama. Reply sevenblue says: July 18, 2024 at 9:11 am @equality, not that I like the guy, but Charles has been working with cancer for months. Where are his applauses? Digital Unicorn says: July 18, 2024 at 8:58 am I took ‘sustenance’ to be ‘a narcissist in dire need of an attention fix’ which so def got at the final. Reply Renae says: July 18, 2024 at 9:08 am Makes her sound like a psych vampire. Tessa says: July 18, 2024 at 8:47 am She looks so smug. Reply Jasper says: July 18, 2024 at 8:58 am Hold on, Jobson’s writing a book about her? Sorry, that’s all I got from this- we’ve got another few weeks of royal pandering to look forward to. Reply seaflower says: July 18, 2024 at 8:51 am >>steely preparation on the royal’s part. “It showed a lot of courage and character<<, oh please she put a dress on, overdid her make up, got a blow out and sat down in the open air for a few hours to watch her favourite game. Reply Zapp Brannigan says: July 18, 2024 at 8:54 am So admiration is what sustains her, applause sustains her, being placed on a pedestal sustains her, but I thought the Royals told us they live to serve, anything else was for gauche Americans? Reply Anna says: July 18, 2024 at 8:55 am Her appearance at Wimbledon is more notable probably because for normal people (non-royal watchers) it was the first time she was in public. Trooping isn’t on most people’s radars. Reply Flower says: July 18, 2024 at 8:56 am The Bar is so in the depths of hell for Will and Kate that I don’t know where it can go from here. The enabling by the UK media will backfire on them, because the minute they feel that they’re not getting enough scoops they will savage them both. I saw a tweet recently where someone was analysing how Charles and Diana used to attend the opening of UK Parliament, yet since Chuck’s investiture WanK are still to attend. It’s patently obvious at this point that they’re separated and using Kate’s illness as a ruse to further cover that will backfire on them. Reply ArtHistorian says: July 18, 2024 at 8:58 am She is very tan in those pics. Long vacatipn abroad or spray tan? Reply
|
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Jul 18, 2024 13:47:12 GMT
www.celebitchy.com/880958/princess_kates_wimbledon_appearance_will_have_given_her_sustenance/Some comments:
Libra says: July 18, 2024 at 8:45 am WHen will the British public tire of the DM push to bestow sainthood on this shallow woman? When is enough enough? Reply Tessa says: July 18, 2024 at 8:46 am Mr jobson the whole world does not care about Kate. She is not the center of the world. People can get sustenance that does not involve behaving like Kate Reply Lady Esther says: July 18, 2024 at 8:46 am Is the “sustenance” line a shady way of laying breadcrumbs about a possible ED? Or am I dreaming? Also, that dress was hideous and that shade did her no favours…with a closet like hers I’m sure she could have picked something better? Reply equality says: July 18, 2024 at 8:50 am The way her just appearing in public is over-dramatized makes it sound like that or some other MH issue. Other cancer patients appear in public daily without so much drama. Reply sevenblue says: July 18, 2024 at 9:11 am @equality, not that I like the guy, but Charles has been working with cancer for months. Where are his applauses? Digital Unicorn says: July 18, 2024 at 8:58 am I took ‘sustenance’ to be ‘a narcissist in dire need of an attention fix’ which so def got at the final. Reply Renae says: July 18, 2024 at 9:08 am Makes her sound like a psych vampire. Tessa says: July 18, 2024 at 8:47 am She looks so smug. Reply Jasper says: July 18, 2024 at 8:58 am Hold on, Jobson’s writing a book about her? Sorry, that’s all I got from this- we’ve got another few weeks of royal pandering to look forward to. Reply seaflower says: July 18, 2024 at 8:51 am >>steely preparation on the royal’s part. “It showed a lot of courage and character<<, oh please she put a dress on, overdid her make up, got a blow out and sat down in the open air for a few hours to watch her favourite game. Reply Zapp Brannigan says: July 18, 2024 at 8:54 am So admiration is what sustains her, applause sustains her, being placed on a pedestal sustains her, but I thought the Royals told us they live to serve, anything else was for gauche Americans? Reply Anna says: July 18, 2024 at 8:55 am Her appearance at Wimbledon is more notable probably because for normal people (non-royal watchers) it was the first time she was in public. Trooping isn’t on most people’s radars. Reply Flower says: July 18, 2024 at 8:56 am The Bar is so in the depths of hell for Will and Kate that I don’t know where it can go from here. The enabling by the UK media will backfire on them, because the minute they feel that they’re not getting enough scoops they will savage them both. I saw a tweet recently where someone was analysing how Charles and Diana used to attend the opening of UK Parliament, yet since Chuck’s investiture WanK are still to attend. It’s patently obvious at this point that they’re separated and using Kate’s illness as a ruse to further cover that will backfire on them. Reply ArtHistorian says: July 18, 2024 at 8:58 am She is very tan in those pics. Long vacatipn abroad or spray tan? Reply I now want to avoid CB; they are accusing President Trump of faking an attempt on his life and it is clear that I am sick of hearing about Meg and Harry on threads that do not concern them. |
|
|
|
Post by Julianna on Jul 19, 2024 21:27:40 GMT
Constant embiggoning for this lazy, fraud. I'm sick of her. The audacity to show up to the men's final and having done nothing for 7 months. She was gloating at being the center of the attention. Such a worthless human being being propped up by the press.
|
|
|
|
Post by J on Jul 19, 2024 22:05:48 GMT
www.celebitchy.com/880958/princess_kates_wimbledon_appearance_will_have_given_her_sustenance/Some comments:
Libra says: July 18, 2024 at 8:45 am WHen will the British public tire of the DM push to bestow sainthood on this shallow woman? When is enough enough? Reply Tessa says: July 18, 2024 at 8:46 am Mr jobson the whole world does not care about Kate. She is not the center of the world. People can get sustenance that does not involve behaving like Kate Reply Lady Esther says: July 18, 2024 at 8:46 am Is the “sustenance” line a shady way of laying breadcrumbs about a possible ED? Or am I dreaming? Also, that dress was hideous and that shade did her no favours…with a closet like hers I’m sure she could have picked something better? Reply equality says: July 18, 2024 at 8:50 am The way her just appearing in public is over-dramatized makes it sound like that or some other MH issue. Other cancer patients appear in public daily without so much drama. Reply sevenblue says: July 18, 2024 at 9:11 am @equality, not that I like the guy, but Charles has been working with cancer for months. Where are his applauses? Digital Unicorn says: July 18, 2024 at 8:58 am I took ‘sustenance’ to be ‘a narcissist in dire need of an attention fix’ which so def got at the final. Reply Renae says: July 18, 2024 at 9:08 am Makes her sound like a psych vampire. Tessa says: July 18, 2024 at 8:47 am She looks so smug. Reply Jasper says: July 18, 2024 at 8:58 am Hold on, Jobson’s writing a book about her? Sorry, that’s all I got from this- we’ve got another few weeks of royal pandering to look forward to. Reply seaflower says: July 18, 2024 at 8:51 am >>steely preparation on the royal’s part. “It showed a lot of courage and character<<, oh please she put a dress on, overdid her make up, got a blow out and sat down in the open air for a few hours to watch her favourite game. Reply Zapp Brannigan says: July 18, 2024 at 8:54 am So admiration is what sustains her, applause sustains her, being placed on a pedestal sustains her, but I thought the Royals told us they live to serve, anything else was for gauche Americans? Reply Anna says: July 18, 2024 at 8:55 am Her appearance at Wimbledon is more notable probably because for normal people (non-royal watchers) it was the first time she was in public. Trooping isn’t on most people’s radars. Reply Flower says: July 18, 2024 at 8:56 am The Bar is so in the depths of hell for Will and Kate that I don’t know where it can go from here. The enabling by the UK media will backfire on them, because the minute they feel that they’re not getting enough scoops they will savage them both. I saw a tweet recently where someone was analysing how Charles and Diana used to attend the opening of UK Parliament, yet since Chuck’s investiture WanK are still to attend. It’s patently obvious at this point that they’re separated and using Kate’s illness as a ruse to further cover that will backfire on them. Reply ArtHistorian says: July 18, 2024 at 8:58 am She is very tan in those pics. Long vacatipn abroad or spray tan? Reply I now want to avoid CB; they are accusing President Trump of faking an attempt on his life and it is clear that I am sick of hearing about Meg and Harry on threads that do not concern them. Not everyone at celebitchy shares the same views. And whether you like it or not Harry and Meghan are connected to C&C and W&K. Charles, Camilla, William and Kate are ALL guilty in weaponizing with the press to attack Harry and Meghan. They literally leaked and lied amd abused Harry and Meghan to the point where they FLED the country. The press sit there and infantalize William and Kate to ridiculous degrees. Just a few days ago Kate was heralded by the press as a fkn saint because she got dressed for a tennis match. She has done absolutely NOTHING for 7 months but conveniently shows up for the men's final Wimbledon match and is praised for it. In contrast, Meghan is eviserated by the press for fkn breathing. During the height of the FRAUD aka Kate's disappearance there were a few commentators that outed theirselves. Becks1, Sparrow to name a few. They are some of the regular commentators that try to galvanize the narrative often enough. During that time, they started "attacking" anyone that went against the cancer narrative. They literally called a few conspiracy theorist for questioning the authenticy of the cancer video and the cancer narrative. They literally started spouting palace talking points and gaslighting just like the palace. She finally got pushback from some of the other regular no nonsense commenter's. Becks1 is clever in how she goes about slipping in her palace narratives. Point is, not everyone on celebitchy that comment have the same views. I can't speak for Trump because I haven't seen those comments and only read the royals sections. If it weren't for sites like celebitchy or forums like this even there wouldn't be a solid record of all the deleted articles and changed narratives coming from Kensington Palace. Just the other day something as simple as Kate having a "weird moment" trying to introduce Pippa got literally deleted to save face for Kate. But you mean to tell us they couldn't lay off Meghan¿  ? This last 6 months shows us they had every bit of control over what got published in the press and yet Harry and Meghan are still being abused even after all these years of leaving. So yes. Of course they are always going to be a part of the story. |
|
|
|
Post by Leopard on Jul 19, 2024 22:26:52 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 19, 2024 22:44:50 GMT
I now want to avoid CB; they are accusing President Trump of faking an attempt on his life and it is clear that I am sick of hearing about Meg and Harry on threads that do not concern them. Not everyone at celebitchy shares the same views. And whether you like it or not Harry and Meghan are connected to C&C and W&K. I agree, not everybody shares the same views and that's a good thing. I can just speak for myself, of course, but yes, Harry and Meghan are interconnected whether we like it or not. But, sometimes, they are a little TOO much focused on. Charles, Camilla, William and Kate are ALL guilty in weaponizing with the press to attack Harry and Meghan. They literally leaked and lied amd abused Harry and Meghan to the point where they FLED the country. Yes, I would agree with that, and it's beyond relentless and ridiculous now. It's gotten to the point where H & M are dragged into things whether they had anything to do with the matter or most often, not much or anything. Camilla, William, Kate and the Middletons are the worst culprits. Richard Eden, Jo Elvin, Dickie Arbiter, Victoria Arbiter, The Sun, GB News, Dan Wootton, Lady C, Piers Morgan, etc, etc, etc, will never stop dragging in the Sussexes. They have been doing this for years, and our site is the BEST (I believe!) for having quite the record of their social media posts from going way back. There's even more in my archives that I can bring forward, but for now, we have a solid record posted here. The press sit there and infantalize William and Kate to ridiculous degrees. Just a few days ago Kate was heralded by the press as a fkn saint because she got dressed for a tennis match. She has done absolutely NOTHING for 7 months but conveniently shows up for the men's final Wimbledon match and is praised for it. In contrast, Meghan is eviserated by the press for fkn breathing. Yes, Kate and William are lauded to the sky. Two of the worst examples of royalty EVER; the very two beings whose actions have literally and figureatively destroyed a 1000 year old monarchy (IMHO), are praised. For sloughing off, lying to the world, abusing family, bullying innocent people, mocking those with cancer, faking pregnancies (though not many people even know or want to go there), yet whenever they are called on what they are doing, manage to turn it around on others. Meghan and Harry are just two of many, but yes, they are eviserated by a segment of the press (right-wing press). If they bring themselves into a situation, fine, they could expect criticism, but not if they are keeping to themselves. During the height of the FRAUD aka Kate's disappearance there were a few commentators that outed theirselves. Becks1, Sparrow to name a few. They are some of the regular commentators that try to galvanize the narrative often enough. During that time, they started "attacking" anyone that went against the cancer narrative. They literally called a few conspiracy theorist for questioning the authenticy of the cancer video and the cancer narrative. They literally started spouting palace talking points and gaslighting just like the palace. She finally got pushback from some of the other regular no nonsense commenter's. Becks1 is clever in how she goes about slipping in her palace narratives. I'm not familiar with this as haven't really been following CB lately. For some reason, I have never been able to post, but not surprised. I've been on the warpath about the Cambridge for years, and trying every possible means to wake some people up, but the right-wing press and social media sites (not CB) like to censor and ban me. Their loss if they don't realize what I have known for years. Point is, not everyone on celebitchy that comment have the same views. I can't speak for Trump because I haven't seen those comments and only read the royals sections. Agreed. Thank goodness for those who can counter with interesting, provocative opinions. Advocating for violence is wrong no matter who it is. On the flip side, right-wing media seems to be rather hypocritical in their outrage. If it weren't for sites like celebitchy or forums like this even there wouldn't be a solid record of all the deleted articles and changed narratives coming from Kensington Palace. Just the other day something as simple as Kate having a "weird moment" trying to introduce Pippa got literally deleted to save face for Kate. You like the banner? Poor Pips couldn't have her moment. Awh, too bad, so sad, Pippa. But you mean to tell us they couldn't lay off Meghan¿ ? They do need to lay off on the abuse, of course, but then again, the glowing references to Meghan from some can get way over the top. This last 6 months shows us they had every bit of control over what got published in the press and yet Harry and Meghan are still being abused even after all these years of leaving. So yes. Of course they are always going to be a part of the story. |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 20, 2024 19:08:41 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by J on Jul 21, 2024 15:22:59 GMT
Not everyone at celebitchy shares the same views. And whether you like it or not Harry and Meghan are connected to C&C and W&K. I agree, not everybody shares the same views and that's a good thing. I can just speak for myself, of course, but yes, Harry and Meghan are interconnected whether we like it or not. But, sometimes, they are a little TOO much focused on. Charles, Camilla, William and Kate are ALL guilty in weaponizing with the press to attack Harry and Meghan. They literally leaked and lied amd abused Harry and Meghan to the point where they FLED the country. Yes, I would agree with that, and it's beyond relentless and ridiculous now. It's gotten to the point where H & M are dragged into things whether they had anything to do with the matter or most often, not much or anything. Camilla, William, Kate and the Middletons are the worst culprits. Richard Eden, Jo Elvin, Dickie Arbiter, Victoria Arbiter, The Sun, GB News, Dan Wootton, Lady C, Piers Morgan, etc, etc, etc, will never stop dragging in the Sussexes. They have been doing this for years, and our site is the BEST (I believe!) for having quite the record of their social media posts from going way back. There's even more in my archives that I can bring forward, but for now, we have a solid record posted here. The press sit there and infantalize William and Kate to ridiculous degrees. Just a few days ago Kate was heralded by the press as a fkn saint because she got dressed for a tennis match. She has done absolutely NOTHING for 7 months but conveniently shows up for the men's final Wimbledon match and is praised for it. In contrast, Meghan is eviserated by the press for fkn breathing. Yes, Kate and William are lauded to the sky. Two of the worst examples of royalty EVER; the very two beings whose actions have literally and figureatively destroyed a 1000 year old monarchy (IMHO), are praised. For sloughing off, lying to the world, abusing family, bullying innocent people, mocking those with cancer, faking pregnancies (though not many people even know or want to go there), yet whenever they are called on what they are doing, manage to turn it around on others. Meghan and Harry are just two of many, but yes, they are eviserated by a segment of the press (right-wing press). If they bring themselves into a situation, fine, they could expect criticism, but not if they are keeping to themselves. During the height of the FRAUD aka Kate's disappearance there were a few commentators that outed theirselves. Becks1, Sparrow to name a few. They are some of the regular commentators that try to galvanize the narrative often enough. During that time, they started "attacking" anyone that went against the cancer narrative. They literally called a few conspiracy theorist for questioning the authenticy of the cancer video and the cancer narrative. They literally started spouting palace talking points and gaslighting just like the palace. She finally got pushback from some of the other regular no nonsense commenter's. Becks1 is clever in how she goes about slipping in her palace narratives. I'm not familiar with this as haven't really been following CB lately. For some reason, I have never been able to post, but not surprised. I've been on the warpath about the Cambridge for years, and trying every possible means to wake some people up, but the right-wing press and social media sites (not CB) like to censor and ban me. Their loss if they don't realize what I have known for years. Point is, not everyone on celebitchy that comment have the same views. I can't speak for Trump because I haven't seen those comments and only read the royals sections. Agreed. Thank goodness for those who can counter with interesting, provocative opinions. Advocating for violence is wrong no matter who it is. On the flip side, right-wing media seems to be rather hypocritical in their outrage. If it weren't for sites like celebitchy or forums like this even there wouldn't be a solid record of all the deleted articles and changed narratives coming from Kensington Palace. Just the other day something as simple as Kate having a "weird moment" trying to introduce Pippa got literally deleted to save face for Kate. You like the banner? Poor Pips couldn't have her moment. Awh, too bad, so sad, Pippa. But you mean to tell us they couldn't lay off Meghan¿ ? They do need to lay off on the abuse, of course, but then again, the glowing references to Meghan from some can get way over the top. This last 6 months shows us they had every bit of control over what got published in the press and yet Harry and Meghan are still being abused even after all these years of leaving. So yes. Of course they are always going to be a part of the story. I got blocked from celebitchy for a short period because I went against certain commentators that suggested I (and a few others) were conspiracy theorist and insensitive for not believing the cancer narrative in the beginning. I thought maybe it was an error so I wrote to them and she did unblock me but after I realized she blocked me I decided not to comment there anymore. I have mixed feelings about the site. I like the fact they aren't fawning articles about William and Kate 24/7 but I sometimes wonder what she is all about now after seeing she heavily censors some but allows a certain narrative to be published by people other people. And these othe people literally defend William and Kate on a lot of things like obvious photoshopped pictures. So I really don't know what to think anymore about it. I read there but haven't engaged since that happened. I only recently found this site. I never honestly thought that those Wales kids might not be theirs except I did notice both the boys have deep brown eyes. The odds of that are pretty much 0 with a green eyed and blue eyed parent. Unless Kate actually has brown eyes I dunno. I do remember also her doing an event right after giving birth with her shirt pulled up and she didn't have a stretch mark on her. Just weird. |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 21, 2024 15:48:47 GMT
I got blocked from celebitchy for a short period because I went against certain commentators that suggested I (and a few others) were conspiracy theorist and insensitive for not believing the cancer narrative in the beginning. I thought maybe it was an error so I wrote to them and she did unblock me but after I realized she blocked me I decided not to comment there anymore. I have mixed feelings about the site. I like the fact they aren't fawning articles about William and Kate 24/7 but I sometimes wonder what she is all about now after seeing she heavily censors some but allows a certain narrative to be published by people other people. And these othe people literally defend William and Kate on a lot of things like obvious photoshopped pictures. So I really don't know what to think anymore about it. I read there but haven't engaged since that happened. I only recently found this site. I never honestly thought that those Wales kids might not be theirs except I did notice both the boys have deep brown eyes. The odds of that are pretty much 0 with a green eyed and blue eyed parent. Unless Kate actually has brown eyes I dunno. I do remember also her doing an event right after giving birth with her shirt pulled up and she didn't have a stretch mark on her. Just weird. I'm so used to being censored/banned/suspended/attacked/insulted, etc, etc, etc, that I'm almost immune to caring anymore. Almost - I still do for the simple fact I am NOT a liar nor am I a conspiracy theorist. Sick and tired of social media that seemingly allows the narrative of liars and bullies, yet restricts those who write the truth as they know and see it. Posters HERE and elsewhere wrote to the BRF for years expressing their grave concerns about the Middletons, the surrogacies, the bullying, abuse and lies, etc, and these weren't/aren't conspiracy theorists. People VERY close to the scene/action, so to speak, and they were deeply troubled about this. I use as reference here a very dear and honest poster here (who passed away) who was one of the very few people onto the Middletons from the start. I like to think that in continuing the onslaught against the Cambridges/Middletons and what they are REALLY all about, that this is honouring them. They were deeply committed to exposing what essentially amounts to pure treason. CB? Hmm. Kaiser doesn't seem to have the brains to know that if one's a female, it's "kaiserin". A self-important twit, in many respects. There was a very troubling post she posted about King Charles a little while back, calling him out which I found rather disgusting. Since I seem to keep EVERYTHING, I attached a screenshot of it. While I have some sympathy for Harry and Meghan, it's for when they are being unfairly bullied, insulted and abused. There is honest criticism of their ways and actions, and then there is the abusive BS that is tossed at them courtesy of Cams, William, Kate and her disgusting shitwad of a mother, Carole, and family. They are truly awful people and need to be exposed. Traitors, really. Pure traitors who have destroyed a 1000 year old Monarchy. Who knew that a descendant of a flagrant and prolific British prostitute and homewrecker (Camilla), an abusive Spencer dolt and fake father (Prince William) and his scheming crotch-flasher and Berkshire gauche-climber stalker wife Kate would set the stage for the entire BRF to collapse. It's literally come to this. Wow, covering a lot of ground here. lol You know more than you realize. It's a lot of the so-called "royal experts" who don't know much of anything. I have written and cc'd a lot of news organizations, those in social media, political leaders, etc, etc. etc. over the years. I will not stop at spreading the word about their abusiveness and treason. Peace, Admin  |
|
|
|
Post by J on Jul 21, 2024 16:02:53 GMT
I got blocked from celebitchy for a short period because I went against certain commentators that suggested I (and a few others) were conspiracy theorist and insensitive for not believing the cancer narrative in the beginning. I thought maybe it was an error so I wrote to them and she did unblock me but after I realized she blocked me I decided not to comment there anymore. I have mixed feelings about the site. I like the fact they aren't fawning articles about William and Kate 24/7 but I sometimes wonder what she is all about now after seeing she heavily censors some but allows a certain narrative to be published by people other people. And these othe people literally defend William and Kate on a lot of things like obvious photoshopped pictures. So I really don't know what to think anymore about it. I read there but haven't engaged since that happened. I only recently found this site. I never honestly thought that those Wales kids might not be theirs except I did notice both the boys have deep brown eyes. The odds of that are pretty much 0 with a green eyed and blue eyed parent. Unless Kate actually has brown eyes I dunno. I do remember also her doing an event right after giving birth with her shirt pulled up and she didn't have a stretch mark on her. Just weird. And just noticed this site isn't Harry and Meghan friendly. |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 21, 2024 16:07:00 GMT
I got blocked from celebitchy for a short period because I went against certain commentators that suggested I (and a few others) were conspiracy theorist and insensitive for not believing the cancer narrative in the beginning. I thought maybe it was an error so I wrote to them and she did unblock me but after I realized she blocked me I decided not to comment there anymore. I have mixed feelings about the site. I like the fact they aren't fawning articles about William and Kate 24/7 but I sometimes wonder what she is all about now after seeing she heavily censors some but allows a certain narrative to be published by people other people. And these othe people literally defend William and Kate on a lot of things like obvious photoshopped pictures. So I really don't know what to think anymore about it. I read there but haven't engaged since that happened. I only recently found this site. I never honestly thought that those Wales kids might not be theirs except I did notice both the boys have deep brown eyes. The odds of that are pretty much 0 with a green eyed and blue eyed parent. Unless Kate actually has brown eyes I dunno. I do remember also her doing an event right after giving birth with her shirt pulled up and she didn't have a stretch mark on her. Just weird. And just noticed this site isn't Harry and Meghan friendly. Not exactly true. We don't celebrate either group. It's about discussion, not fawning over anybody. Everybody is free to back who or what they wish. Peace. Admin  |
|
tale BS.
#JamesMiddleton