|
Post by kueifei on Jan 18, 2021 3:24:34 GMT
You know, if my uncle had managed to get me an internship at an embassy, I would be kissing his feet on a regular basis and I would be nothing but sweet as butter to a daddy who spent lottery winnings on my tuition so I wouldn't have debt and could join a sorority. I mean really, she had no need to pay her tuition, could join a sorority, and had an uncle who got her a break into the work of international diplomacy. For all her airs and graces, one would think that she had worked in a coal mine or worked in a tannery to pay her way through school. Her sense of proportion is way off and it is clear that she's completely overreacting. No way should she be getting this worked up. It's a book and endless books are written about public figures that are sometimes very ugly. Samantha's book is likely upsetting her since Meg has worked hard at icing people out of her past and she is getting upset that her narrative, her web of lies is being broken up and she can't control the fact that there is nothing that she is able to do.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 18, 2021 3:35:39 GMT
You know, if my uncle had managed to get me an internship at an embassy, I would be kissing his feet on a regular basis and I would be nothing but sweet as butter to a daddy who spent lottery winnings on my tuition so I wouldn't have debt and could join a sorority. I mean really, she had no need to pay her tuition, could join a sorority, and had an uncle who got her a break into the work of international diplomacy. For all her airs and graces, one would think that she had worked in a coal mine or worked in a tannery to pay her way through school. Her sense of proportion is way off and it is clear that she's completely overreacting. No way should she be getting this worked up. It's a book and endless books are written about public figures that are sometimes very ugly. Samantha's book is likely upsetting her since Meg has worked hard at icing people out of her past and she is getting upset that her narrative, her web of lies is being broken up and she can't control the fact that there is nothing that she is able to do.
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Jan 18, 2021 3:50:44 GMT
Having experienced narcissism, having actually been in relationships with said types, I can understand why Harry was duped, but I do not forgive the fact that he didn't listen to people who likely informed him of things that she was lying about and the moron refused to listen. Thing is, this isn't just one relation or two, this is an entire family that is coming out and pointing out that Meg is either lying outright or grossly exaggerating (close to lying outright) and Meg is clearly shocked that they are fighting back instead of just taking her abuse and the stuff she's been saying about them borderlines criminal slander/defamation.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 21, 2021 2:32:10 GMT
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Jan 27, 2021 6:08:18 GMT
The Mail: Duchess Meghan had help from staff with the letter to her toxic father
Meghan Markle 'had help from Palace aides' to write letter she sent to her father Thomas at centre of privacy case with the Mail on Sunday, court documents claim
I do honestly believe that this is so adolescent. If Palace Aides helped out, this means that they helped facilitate a completely illogical vendetta against an old man who suffered two heart attacks because of all the sudden attention that he was not interested in handling (or equipped to) and it is clear to me that this was deliberately created to be 'leaked' and then published. There is no way that anyone would use aides in the writing of a letter that would tell a deeply devoted father to buzz off. It's NOT like the letter was ever meant to be private and it is clear at least to me that she wanted to publicly humiliate her father in the most roundabout way possible. It is clear at least to me that this is such an insane thing to do and there is no way that this would have leaked without Meg's cooperation. If Meg scapegoats the courtiers, then this is her way of committing some kind of seppuku that only she can commit. There is no way that staff would have written a hateful letter, let it 'leak,' and then end up getting out of control like this.
Deep down, I think Meg did this in the spur of the moment, letting unresolved issues take control and she wrote it, leaked it, but now she is freaking out since now it's out of her control. If this goes to active trial, this now means that courtiers might be required to testify under oath and might even result in the Queen being dragged into this vortex. If she ends up with the biggest media trial in recent history, this also means that she is putting the integrity of the palace's credibility on trial. This is almost like the Affair of the Necklace; it started out as a trial involving con artists and then ended up being a trial of the monarchical system. So now Palace staff/courtiers might be cited, expected to give statements, and then they might be ordered to testify by a judge. So if the palace did help, they did help draft a letter and deliberately leaking it to the press in a circuitous way that is downright cruel to a disabled old man who has been nothing but a devoted father. Then there is the other side, where if Meg is lying about staff involvement, then she has just deliberately given false claims that in a court system can be considered criminal perjury and also she is guilty of slandering the courtiers and that is in a way slandering the Queen since HM likely assigned that staff to her.
You know, Diana accused palace staff of being gangsters and ended up in a circuitous way accusing HM of the exact same thing and that is (along with the suggestion that Charles be overthrown) what set HM off and ended up with her ordering a divorce (whether Diana wanted it or not). I also believe that this entire mess is something that will just get worse. HM can't call off this trial now that this has come out and it is getting increasingly out of control. If/when this goes to trial, if the courtiers are called to testify, by proxy, the entire monarchy and HM herself could be put on trial.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 27, 2021 23:18:18 GMT
The Mail: Duchess Meghan had help from staff with the letter to her toxic father
Meghan Markle 'had help from Palace aides' to write letter she sent to her father Thomas at centre of privacy case with the Mail on Sunday, court documents claim I do honestly believe that this is so adolescent. If Palace Aides helped out, this means that they helped facilitate a completely illogical vendetta against an old man who suffered two heart attacks because of all the sudden attention that he was not interested in handling (or equipped to) and it is clear to me that this was deliberately created to be 'leaked' and then published. There is no way that anyone would use aides in the writing of a letter that would tell a deeply devoted father to buzz off. It's NOT like the letter was ever meant to be private and it is clear at least to me that she wanted to publicly humiliate her father in the most roundabout way possible. It is clear at least to me that this is such an insane thing to do and there is no way that this would have leaked without Meg's cooperation. If Meg scapegoats the courtiers, then this is her way of committing some kind of seppuku that only she can commit. There is no way that staff would have written a hateful letter, let it 'leak,' and then end up getting out of control like this.
Deep down, I think Meg did this in the spur of the moment, letting unresolved issues take control and she wrote it, leaked it, but now she is freaking out since now it's out of her control. If this goes to active trial, this now means that courtiers might be required to testify under oath and might even result in the Queen being dragged into this vortex. If she ends up with the biggest media trial in recent history, this also means that she is putting the integrity of the palace's credibility on trial. This is almost like the Affair of the Necklace; it started out as a trial involving con artists and then ended up being a trial of the monarchical system. So now Palace staff/courtiers might be cited, expected to give statements, and then they might be ordered to testify by a judge. So if the palace did help, they did help draft a letter and deliberately leaking it to the press in a circuitous way that is downright cruel to a disabled old man who has been nothing but a devoted father. Then there is the other side, where if Meg is lying about staff involvement, then she has just deliberately given false claims that in a court system can be considered criminal perjury and also she is guilty of slandering the courtiers and that is in a way slandering the Queen since HM likely assigned that staff to her.
You know, Diana accused palace staff of being gangsters and ended up in a circuitous way accusing HM of the exact same thing and that is (along with the suggestion that Charles be overthrown) what set HM off and ended up with her ordering a divorce (whether Diana wanted it or not). I also believe that this entire mess is something that will just get worse. HM can't call off this trial now that this has come out and it is getting increasingly out of control. If/when this goes to trial, if the courtiers are called to testify, by proxy, the entire monarchy and HM herself could be put on trial.
It is becoming messier and more ugly by the moment - and here's wishing that Kaiser and the other woked-up pro-Meghan hate brigade posse would just stop the abuse of Thomas Markle, too. How childish, mean, vindictive and just toxic and abusive. If they want to do some research, maybe look into the so-called mother that happily dumped their precious Meghan for 7 years. Guess who truly would be the one parent who deserves a little bad press? Sometimes children do tend to dump on the one parent that was there. Where was Doria, Kaiser? Try that on for a change, honey. But honestly, grow up. Meghan does seem to be grasping at straws and dragging anybody and maybe even the Queen and Monarchy into her mini reign of error. It's going to get way uglier before it's going to get any kind of better. She cannot play games with the Monarchy and Queen the way she seems to have been doing to everybody else her entire life. She just cannot "drop" the Queen - she cannot defy the courts or representatives of the Queen because they have solid backing and lying to them or about them, etc, could end up in major legal trouble (ie: perjury). Play your best friends/waiters turned authors or royal wheeler dealers, Meghan - dump your boyfriends by text, cold-shoulder your pals, turn on the only parent who was there for you, etc, but don't play the Queen and Monarchy - you are out of your league.
|
|
|
Post by purple1 on Jan 28, 2021 3:54:28 GMT
The Mail: Duchess Meghan had help from staff with the letter to her toxic father
Meghan Markle 'had help from Palace aides' to write letter she sent to her father Thomas at centre of privacy case with the Mail on Sunday, court documents claim I do honestly believe that this is so adolescent. If Palace Aides helped out, this means that they helped facilitate a completely illogical vendetta against an old man who suffered two heart attacks because of all the sudden attention that he was not interested in handling (or equipped to) and it is clear to me that this was deliberately created to be 'leaked' and then published. There is no way that anyone would use aides in the writing of a letter that would tell a deeply devoted father to buzz off. It's NOT like the letter was ever meant to be private and it is clear at least to me that she wanted to publicly humiliate her father in the most roundabout way possible. It is clear at least to me that this is such an insane thing to do and there is no way that this would have leaked without Meg's cooperation. If Meg scapegoats the courtiers, then this is her way of committing some kind of seppuku that only she can commit. There is no way that staff would have written a hateful letter, let it 'leak,' and then end up getting out of control like this.
Deep down, I think Meg did this in the spur of the moment, letting unresolved issues take control and she wrote it, leaked it, but now she is freaking out since now it's out of her control. If this goes to active trial, this now means that courtiers might be required to testify under oath and might even result in the Queen being dragged into this vortex. If she ends up with the biggest media trial in recent history, this also means that she is putting the integrity of the palace's credibility on trial. This is almost like the Affair of the Necklace; it started out as a trial involving con artists and then ended up being a trial of the monarchical system. So now Palace staff/courtiers might be cited, expected to give statements, and then they might be ordered to testify by a judge. So if the palace did help, they did help draft a letter and deliberately leaking it to the press in a circuitous way that is downright cruel to a disabled old man who has been nothing but a devoted father. Then there is the other side, where if Meg is lying about staff involvement, then she has just deliberately given false claims that in a court system can be considered criminal perjury and also she is guilty of slandering the courtiers and that is in a way slandering the Queen since HM likely assigned that staff to her.
You know, Diana accused palace staff of being gangsters and ended up in a circuitous way accusing HM of the exact same thing and that is (along with the suggestion that Charles be overthrown) what set HM off and ended up with her ordering a divorce (whether Diana wanted it or not). I also believe that this entire mess is something that will just get worse. HM can't call off this trial now that this has come out and it is getting increasingly out of control. If/when this goes to trial, if the courtiers are called to testify, by proxy, the entire monarchy and HM herself could be put on trial.
It is becoming messier and more ugly by the moment - and here's wishing that Kaiser and the other woked-up pro-Meghan hate brigade posse would just stop the abuse of Thomas Markle, too. How childish, mean, vindictive and just toxic and abusive. If they want to do some research, maybe look into the so-called mother that happily dumped their precious Meghan for 7 years. Guess who truly would be the one parent who deserves a little bad press? Sometimes children do tend to dump on the one parent that was there. Where was Doria, Kaiser? Try that on for a change, honey. But honestly, grow up. Meghan does seem to be grasping at straws and dragging anybody and maybe even the Queen and Monarchy into her mini reign of error. It's going to get way uglier before it's going to get any kind of better. She cannot play games with the Monarchy and Queen the way she seems to have been doing to everybody else her entire life. She just cannot "drop" the Queen - she cannot defy the courts or representatives of the Queen because they have solid backing and lying to them or about them, etc, could end up in major legal trouble (ie: perjury). Play your best friends/waiters turned authors or royal wheeler dealers, Meghan - dump your boyfriends by text, cold-shoulder your pals, turn on the only parent who was there for you, etc, but don't play the Queen and Monarchy - you are out of your league. Meghan is not the victim as much as her stans thinks she is. She was in her mid 30s when she married into the firm. She wasn’t a teenager like Diana. Although I agree with her the RR we’re vicious and didn’t help William and Kate were part of the smear campaign, she also did her own sneaky things.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 29, 2021 13:30:44 GMT
nationalpost.com/opinion/barbara-kay-text-messages-exonerate-jessica-mulroney-after-she-was-cancelled-last-summerBarbara Kay: Text messages exonerate Jessica Mulroney after she was cancelled last summer Author of the article:Barbara Kay Publishing date:Jan 21, 2021 • 6 days ago • 17 minute read Meanwhile...at Celebitchy... www.celebitchy.com/699061/jessica_mulroney_revealed_her_2020_emails_with_sasha_exeter_to_the_national_post/Jessica Mulroney revealed her 2020 emails with Sasha Exeter to the National Post January 29, 2021 By Kaiser Jessica Mulroney "To recap, the whole thing started last June, when Instagram influencer Sasha Exeter was using her social media for a call to action on Black Lives Matter and racial justice. In Sasha’s version of events, Jessica took it personally that Sasha was encouraging other influencers to use their platforms similarly, and they began DMing, texting and emailing an increasingly hostile back-and-forth which ended when Jessica threatened Sasha’s livelihood if Sasha made any of their conversation public. Well, after Jessica’s November interview with the National Post fell flat as a f–king pancake, Jessica is at it again. This time she went to a “friendly” columnist at the same outlet, the National Post, and provided the alleged paper trail between herself and Exeter. The NP columnist used the email and text trail to declare that Mulroney is completely exonerated from the crime of being a racist brat. *deep sigh* "
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 29, 2021 13:40:22 GMT
From the above National Post link:nationalpost.com/opinion/barbara-kay-text-messages-exonerate-jessica-mulroney-after-she-was-cancelled-last-summer"June 2 Jessica hopes the dialogue has run its course. But the next day, in the evening, Sasha continues to express anger.
Sasha: “I’ve lost all respect for you” (Jessica believes Sasha is still dwelling on Jessica’s allegedly inadequate response to the call-to-action Jessica never saw.)
Jessica: “I’m sorry you feel that way. Was only trying to help and learn from you…I believe working together is the answer. Do you? I tried to make a conversation happen. I was just hurt.”
Sasha: “Honestly, I think I’m done with this conversation. You are not Woke and you won’t be. Ever. You’re scared which is probably why your account is private and you’re taking a social media ‘break.’ Girlfriend, you aren’t fooling anyone. This entire thread is proof that you have not learned one thing. I cannot devote energy to ignorance. I am very sad because I foolishly expected different.”
(Jessica had made her account private because of a separate issue: a fake story from the Daily Mail, for which she was being attacked online. Sasha apparently took it personally.)
Jessica: “You have no idea what goes on behind my closed doors. But think what you like. I’m a good person.”
Sasha: “Especially since you seem to have (friends) who are black.”
Jessica: “I hope you realize I was only trying to do the right thing the right way with your guidance. I’ve been hated before and I’ll be hated again.”
Sasha: “Sad. Still selfishly making this ALL about you.”
Jessica: “No. It’s about wanting your help. That’s so selfish. But think what you want.”
Jessica: “My only way is to do things the right way. I thought you could help me. If that’s selfish, I’m sorry. I don’t want animosity. Truly.”
Jessica: “I have 400k followers that I would NEVER threaten you with like you did to me about not being ready to speak out. It’s not how I believe change works.” "
|
|
bonnie
Count/Countess
Posts: 359
|
Post by bonnie on Jan 29, 2021 13:49:10 GMT
Lol i find it good if Megs doesn't communicate w Jessica anymore - J style is awful.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 6, 2021 14:59:11 GMT
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9332203/Meghan-Harry-interview-Jessica-Mulroney-defends-actress-amid-pressure-politics.html#newcommentMeghan Markle's best friend Jessica Mulroney defends actress amid 'pressure and politics' ahead of bombshell Oprah interview being aired and praises her 'kindness, empathy and love' Meghan Markle's best friend Jessica Mulroney has defended the Suits actress Stylist said no one has ever dealt with 'the pressure and politics' like Meghan Jessica, 41, praised Meghan's 'kindness, empathy and love' ahead of interview Meghan and Prince Harry are involved in war of words with Buckingham Palace By JACK WRIGHT FOR MAILONLINE PUBLISHED: 20:07 EST, 5 March 2021 | UPDATED: 03:06 EST, 6 March 2021
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 11, 2021 18:30:14 GMT
www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1407973/Phillip-Schofield-Meghan-Markle-friend-Janina-Gavankar-clash-This-Morning-ITV-video'What are you saying?!’ Phillip Schofield probes Meghan's friend 'Why are you here?' PHILLIP SCHOFIELD grilled Meghan Markle's friend Janina Gavankar on Wednesday's edition of This Morning as he was confused as to why she agreed to speak with the show. By CHARLIE MILWARD PUBLISHED: 05:35, Thu, Mar 11, 2021 | UPDATED: 07:25, Thu, Mar 11, 2021 Phillip Schofield, 58, and Holly Willoughby, 40, were joined on the show by Janina as the fallout from Meghan Markle, 39, and Prince Harry’s, 36, interview with Oprah Winfrey, 67, continues to send shockwaves around the world. As the This Morning guest knows the Duchess of Sussex on a more personal level, the presenters wanted to get her candid take on the two-hour discussion, which aired on ITV on Monday evening. However, as she failed to go in-depth about certain matters, Phillip had to question why she was on the programme as they entered into an awkward clash.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 23, 2021 23:02:28 GMT
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Mar 23, 2021 23:06:14 GMT
IS she laying groundwork for the kind of accusation I think she is leading up to?
|
|
bonnie
Count/Countess
Posts: 359
|
Post by bonnie on Mar 24, 2021 11:54:20 GMT
I hope they can finally get on well. I really hope. Meg is grown a$$ woman. Yes, such a behavior hurts especially knowing that it's her father, not a stranger. But she has to get a grip and take a first step.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 25, 2021 13:08:38 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 26, 2021 13:19:28 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 27, 2021 0:50:19 GMT
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Mar 27, 2021 10:47:16 GMT
That would skyrocket ratings and would skyrocket drama big time. Netflix should hire an interviewer and have him interviewed. Imagine if they dropped Meg and ended up hiring someone who would recruit Thomas for an extensive interview and hash it out with him. Imagine the drama, the ratings, the endless coverage.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 22, 2021 13:15:01 GMT
|
|