|
Post by kueifei on Oct 18, 2020 2:06:19 GMT
www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8850089/Meghan-Markle-pedal-woke-speeches-royal-expert-claims.htmlMeghan Markle could 'pedal back' on her woke speeches after realising it puts Prince Harry's relationship with his family at risk, royal expert claims Royal author Robert Lacey says Duchess of Sussex may rein in woke speeches Says she's realised how speeches 'risk husband's relationship with royal family' Lacey claims Meghan may 'pedal back' on some of her more 'extreme positions' By HAYLEY RICHARDSON FOR MAILONLINE PUBLISHED: 06:27 EDT, 17 October 2020 | UPDATED: 10:18 EDT, 17 October 2020
When are these authors going to stop bashing Meg? Meg as a citizen has a right to say what and as she pleases and Lacey should stop fancying himself a guardian of the throne. It's not like Lacey is someone who HM would need to maintain her dynasty. It is clear that Lacey overestimates his importance to HM. Chrissakes, if Lacey were to quit writing and quit as a royal consultant for The Crown, I do not think HM would care all that much, if at all. It's not like Lacey is a genuine aristocrat or courtiers who keeps the day to day routine going. Like Seward, he really believes that he is important to affairs of state and the continuation of the dynasty.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 18, 2020 2:22:13 GMT
www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8850089/Meghan-Markle-pedal-woke-speeches-royal-expert-claims.htmlMeghan Markle could 'pedal back' on her woke speeches after realising it puts Prince Harry's relationship with his family at risk, royal expert claims Royal author Robert Lacey says Duchess of Sussex may rein in woke speeches Says she's realised how speeches 'risk husband's relationship with royal family' Lacey claims Meghan may 'pedal back' on some of her more 'extreme positions' By HAYLEY RICHARDSON FOR MAILONLINE PUBLISHED: 06:27 EDT, 17 October 2020 | UPDATED: 10:18 EDT, 17 October 2020 When are these authors going to stop bashing Meg? Meg as a citizen has a right to say what and as she pleases and Lacey should stop fancying himself a guardian of the throne. It's not like Lacey is someone who HM would need to maintain her dynasty. It is clear that Lacey overestimates his importance to HM. Chrissakes, if Lacey were to quit writing and quit as a royal consultant for The Crown, I do not think HM would care all that much, if at all. It's not like Lacey is a genuine aristocrat or courtiers who keeps the day to day routine going. Like Seward, he really believes that he is important to affairs of state and the continuation of the dynasty.
But he IS getting some good stuff out there...finally.
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Oct 18, 2020 2:45:57 GMT
I am glad he is exposing the fact that Kate/William meeting wasn't a coincidence and I also believe that it is nice that William has been exposed as the origin and riving force behind Harry's delinquency. I can only believe that he has confirmed a lot of what we thought and I also believe that both are in fact going to get more exposure. I think Meg wasn't quite suited to the role, but I think she was the only one willing to put up with the BS that Kate and Co. would dish out. I also think that Meg could handle it in an abstract way, but the reality was quite different.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 24, 2020 13:53:32 GMT
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Oct 24, 2020 20:29:36 GMT
I think this shows how royal life can stagnate a personality. It is clear that Philip refuses to see that Harry was being mistreated as a whipping post and martyrdom might be for the saints, but it wasn't for Harry. Philip at his age should be able to see that the situation is unwinnable and that he himself got zinged in the press, but not like Harry and Meg, who were subjected to media whippings without palace protection and backup. Stuff was also surely going on behind the scenes as well and Philip should be more understanding. He should know that as consort, he would always be in a privileged position of protection.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 26, 2020 3:28:28 GMT
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Oct 26, 2020 3:35:09 GMT
I kind of agree. They shouldn't be using their titles on film credits and they shouldn't be doing all this very public activism. He should be settling into therapy and finding his niche in a post-royal life.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Nov 3, 2020 2:21:13 GMT
www.vanityfair.com/style/2020/11/royal-family-coping-with-harry-and-meghan-absence“Everyone Really Misses Archie”: The Royal Family Is Still Coping With Harry and Meghan's Absence The Windsors haven’t seen Archie since the family first decamped to Canada last fall, and it seems to be hitting his grandfather Prince Charles the hardest. BY ERIN VANDERHOOF NOVEMBER 2, 2020 "It’s been a year since Meghan Markle and Prince Harry made their first move to North America to spend the holidays in Canada with their young son, Archie. In 2020, the couple made two trips back to the U.K. amid their royal exit, one in January and another in March. But for both of these trips, Archie stayed behind at the home the couple was renting on Vancouver Island. According to a report in the Daily Mail, it’s been nearly a year since any of the Windsors have seen Archie, and his grandfather Prince Charles is especially feeling the loss. “The Prince of Wales enjoyed popping into Frogmore Cottage to see his youngest grandchild and is sad that he hasn’t seen him for so long. He has missed much of his development since he is now growing up in the USA,” a friend of Charles’s told the tabloid. “Other members of the family are very sad at not seeing him. Everyone really misses Archie—they feel it’s particularly sad for the Queen and Prince Philip.” "
|
|
|
Post by india on Nov 3, 2020 15:24:01 GMT
Well if they are so sad and miss Baby Archie, why did they sit back and do nothing when jealous Willy, Keen and The Viper were bullying the hell out of Meghan and Harry?
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Nov 3, 2020 15:42:49 GMT
Good rhetorical question. They could have put a stop to the abuse that M&H were being subjected to, but wouldn't and it is clear at least to me that all this could have been ended within months if Charles and HM and a handful of others had gotten all those vicious attacks under actual control. HM could have picked up a phone and ordered a courtier to give a 'talk' to various press outlets and could have put a permanent stop to the trouble making done by WK. All of that power to make things better was well within the reach of that family and if they had been less fixated on perpetuating a vicious cycle and MADE William make something of himself, I am quite sure that he wouldn't be inclined for a lot of petty BS.
|
|
|
Post by india on Nov 3, 2020 16:00:24 GMT
^The RF cannot have it both ways. They could have stopped it. But they didn't. They let Weak and Team Middleton rip Harry and Meghan apart with their big ugly snarling teeth with blood spilling everywhere. Whining and woo wooing about Archie is a load of crap. Shut Up and Get Your House In Order.
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Nov 3, 2020 19:52:30 GMT
I for one am sick of seeing the BRF have it both ways. Paid by the public, but engaging in commercial work that pays millions and also whining about privacy while using the media as a weapon against each other and it is clear that none of them have any sense of ACTUAL self sufficiency.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Nov 9, 2020 14:01:47 GMT
This was a very classy and touching thing to do: www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1357781/meghan-markle-prince-harry-remembrance-sunday-royal-news-cenotaphMeghan Markle and Prince Harry mark Remembrance Sunday ‘in their own way' MEGHAN MARKLE and Prince Harry have marked Remembrance Sunday "in their own way", as they celebrate the special day away from the rest of the Royal Family. By EMILY FERGUSON PUBLISHED: 00:00, Mon, Nov 9, 2020 | UPDATED: 00:06, Mon, Nov 9, 2020 Meghan and Harry laid flowers picked from their garden at the graves of two Commonwealth soldiers - one from the Riyal Australian Airforce and one from the Royals Canadian Artillery. The Duke also laid a wreath. He wrote: “To all of those who have served, are are serving. Thank you.”
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Nov 10, 2020 2:49:01 GMT
Yeah it was. It is nice that they did their own little tribute and quite honestly, it might be a good Hollywood tradition as well.
|
|
|
Post by touchstonemomma on Nov 10, 2020 2:59:14 GMT
It was a nice thing to do & the courtiers are butt hurt about it. Their incompetence is being shown how they are either 1. Making the Queen look like an incompetent puppet Queen or 2. Like she’s evil. The way they are going after Harry will only tarnish what little is left of the royal family goodwill & reputation
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Nov 10, 2020 3:31:20 GMT
It was a nice thing to do & the courtiers are butt hurt about it. Their incompetence is being shown how they are either 1. Making the Queen look like an incompetent puppet Queen or 2. Like she’s evil. The way they are going after Harry will only tarnish what little is left of the royal family goodwill & reputation I think it may be William's influence that may have helped, too - don't think the courtiers are very fond of him, and they are just doing the jobs they were hired to do. Who knows? All in all, a very tacky move to stop a wreath from being placed for fallen soldiers. Like give it a rest for one day!
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Nov 10, 2020 3:50:43 GMT
They just never stop punishing him for leaving and finding peace. Irritating.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Nov 10, 2020 13:42:23 GMT
www.celebitchy.com/688100/ingrid_seward_the_sussexes_are_so_unpopular_we_cant_put_them_on_magazines/Ingrid Seward: The Sussexes are so unpopular, we can’t put them on magazines November 10, 2020 By Kaiser Ingrid Seward, Meghan Markle, Prince Harry, Royals eghan Markle and Prince Harry ‘aren’t selling when on the cover of magazines despite their beautiful pictures’ amid their popularity plummeting, a royal biographer has claimed. Majesty magazine’s editor-in-chief Ingrid Seward explained how she stopped having the Duke, 36, and the Duchess of Sussex, 39, on the cover of her publication ‘a while ago’. Speaking to the Royally Obsessed podcast, she said HELLO! magazine told her ‘the same thing’ and suggested the couple, who now live in the US with their son Archie, one, has seen their admiration decrease after ‘deserting’ the British public. ‘We stopped having Harry and Meghan on the cover a while ago,’ Ms Seward said. ‘It just wasn’t selling, the magazine wasn’t selling when they were on the cover. HELLO! magazine actually told me the same thing. Obviously there are some beautiful pictures of them. I would like to have them on the cover but it just doesn’t seem to work. I find that weird and interesting.’ The royal biographer noted a YouGov poll on royal popularity from the end of October, which shows Harry and Meghan’s scores have reached their lowest point to date. She told the podcast: ‘There was a poll conducted in the UK recently, and their popularity has plummeted completely. It was extraordinary. I think it’s because the British people feel that Harry’s deserted us, and Meghan is probably the reason he’s done so. Rather than saying wasn’t he clever, wasn’t he great, he got out. The perception is that he was pretty lucky to be where he was in the first place. There aren’t too many royal princes around so why did he have to give it all up? Yet he still seems to be living off his name, that’s the reason that all these things have come to them. He wants to take advantage of all that but not put in the hard work on the other side. I think that is the perception, though I think it’s very different in the US.’ Co-host Roberta Fiorito offered an American insight, adding: ‘It is interesting because I feel like their popularity here skyrocketed. So it’s interesting to see the perception over in the UK.’ [From The Daily Mail]
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Nov 10, 2020 18:03:55 GMT
Well, she does have to justify airbrushing them out like a Stalinist bureaucrat now that they're out of the BRF and on their own.
|
|
|
Post by touchstonemomma on Nov 10, 2020 21:10:41 GMT
It was a nice thing to do & the courtiers are butt hurt about it. Their incompetence is being shown how they are either 1. Making the Queen look like an incompetent puppet Queen or 2. Like she’s evil. The way they are going after Harry will only tarnish what little is left of the royal family goodwill & reputation I think it may be William's influence that may have helped, too - don't think the courtiers are very fond of him, and they are just doing the jobs they were hired to do. Who knows? All in all, a very tacky move to stop a wreath from being placed for fallen soldiers. Like give it a rest for one day! Thing is the courtiers don’t seem to be very good at their job and typically when you suck at your job you get sacked.
|
|