|
Post by Admin on Nov 11, 2023 16:04:40 GMT
Oh, I get it, it's the Sussex children you Cambridge monsters wish to insult and degrade? Hmmm. Carole is THAT bitter now? Leaving your IP address up again, Cambridge abusers/astroturfers/Middleton family. Hoping the proper authorities look into your abusive threats and whatnot. 90.208.9.167
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Nov 11, 2023 16:08:43 GMT
What horrible things of you all to say! Obviously you all don't know anything about witnessing of the birth by the men in grey and the Royal Drs which incidentally if you remember, Meghan didn't have. Throughout time heirs and their children have had to be witnessed at birth born of the body. Additionally as time has moved on, blood tests are undertaken as standard. So you see there is no doubt with the Wales children that they are 100% pure Windsor descent. I can't speak for H&M children however, who the RF have only seen Archie a few times and Lili - never! Their births weren't witnessed by any Royal team What is pure Windsor descent? lol Explain the east European/far-eastern features, bleached blond hair, and other genetically impossible features, sweetie. Explain what the BRF and several prime ministers, etc, were advised. Windsor descent? b#tch, pu-LLLEEEEEEEEZZZZZZE.
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Nov 11, 2023 16:17:38 GMT
If Kate had given William two unquestionably legitimate heirs, Kate would not look like the frightened, insecure woman that she is now. She would be confident in that area and the BRF would be dressing her better and would be treating her better. It's not like she didn't enjoy luxury to the full at first. One thing I have always noticed is over the years the BRF has been pulling the clothing budget to the point where she is obviously wearing retail and bargain bin. I do not think Kate has given two legit kids and if the kids are Eastern European, imagine the stink that it would cause politically and diplomatically. Even if the UK sanctions Russia, Putin might have that knowledge and be chill about sanctions because he has info that would blow up the BRF.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Nov 11, 2023 16:24:46 GMT
It will be very traumatic - and thanks to the adults allegedly using them/lying about them. People who always supported the Cambridges will be beyond traumatized, too - but who cares about them? The children that the HARKLES have/use / pouncing about, aren't their children. Me-gain birthed neither Archieficial or Lilibetplastic..... She had a daughter years ago but had many masny abortions since and it messed her womb up, she has been unable to have children ever since. She froze some eggs (not sure why) as she's no motherly instincts..... Actually she has NO INSTINCTS..... SHE'S A ONE SAD CASE OF A NUT JOB... MARKLE NEEDS PSYCHIATRIC AND PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION.... I'M SAYING THIS AS A PSYCHOLOGIST, SHE'S A FRUIT LOOP SHORT OF A BOX.... đ HER CHEESE đ§ HAS SLID OFF IT'S CRACKER.... THERE'S NO WAY BACK FOR MURKY MARKLE AS SHE'S TOO FAR GONE...A POINT OF NO RETURN.. MARKLE LOOKING TO FOCUS ON NEW IDEAS FOR FUTURE GOALS, I HAVE ONE FOR HER - RENT A KID đŚđź IT'S A NO BRAINER, SHE NEEDS TO RENT KIDS FOR AN HOUR HERE, HOUR THERE, SET UP YOUR OWN BUSINESS.... COME ON, WE ALL SAW HER MOONBUMP DID HER NO FAVOURS 𤣠IT WAS ACTUALLY HILARIOUS đ MURKY MEG, THE YATCH GIRL, THAT KEEPS GIVING BLOW J'S, THE ONE THAT KEEPS GIVING - ANYTHING BUT A CHILD, ANYTHING BUT MONEY TO CHARITY, ANYTHING BUT CARE, COMPASSION, AID, HUMANITARIAN SERVICES......... IF IT'S NOT A PAY CHEQUE FOR HER SHE AIN'T GIVING sh#t đŠ AWAY...... SHE'S A LIAR 𤼠FRAUD, RACIST, BULLY, THIEF, SCAMMER, NARCISSISTS, PSYCHOPATH, DELUSIONAL, IDIOTIC, CLOWN.... MARKLES CLOCK HAS STOPPED TICKING..... LITERALLY....... SHE CAN'T PRODUCE AN EGG, HERE YOU GO I'LL GIVE YOU AN EGG OR 2 đĽ đĽ MAYBE THAT'S WHY SHE KEEPS A CHICKEN COUPE đ đ đ SOUTH PARK NAILED IT 𤣠𤣠𤣠𤣠FAMILY GUY SMASHED IT 𤣠𤣠𤣠𤣠MORE TO FOLLOW AND WE CAN'T WAIT... MARKLES = MR & MRS DUMB-AR-TONS 2.223.78.103
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Nov 11, 2023 19:10:01 GMT
If Kate had given William two unquestionably legitimate heirs, Kate would not look like the frightened, insecure woman that she is now. She would be confident in that area and the BRF would be dressing her better and would be treating her better. It's not like she didn't enjoy luxury to the full at first. One thing I have always noticed is over the years the BRF has been pulling the clothing budget to the point where she is obviously wearing retail and bargain bin. I do not think Kate has given two legit kids and if the kids are Eastern European, imagine the stink that it would cause politically and diplomatically. Even if the UK sanctions Russia, Putin might have that knowledge and be chill about sanctions because he has info that would blow up the BRF. And nothing wrong too with any eastern European or far-eastern heritage for anybody (I proudly have eastern european heritage, myself) it's just that the features are very striking and just back the point that there is obviously some outside genetic input into 3 alleged royal heirs. I think we are now seeing the impact and it will continue to become even more obvious,way WORSE, maybe to lay people who don't follow royalty. It's THAT striking, IMO. People can only fed so much PR but when you get saturated with pro-royalty missives every day, you begin to get angry about having your intelligence insulted.
|
|
|
Post by W. on Nov 11, 2023 19:13:43 GMT
I still canât believe I came across this message board and other people seeing that the kids look Eastern European. For me, at first it was Charlotte that looked so different. When I looked more, thereâs definitely photos of Louis who could pass as Romanian. Can someone explain the whole bleaching hair process and altering features? Isnât possible that George could have just been born with light hair that changed? I know someone whose child had white blonde hair as a child but later, the hair became very dark. Is there actual evidence of bleaching? Has anyone ever touched on eye color? According to all eye color charts, itâs not possible for two of the child to have brown eyes since William and Kate donât but doctors have suggested that eye color can jump a generation. While I think genetics can be interesting and maybe this is possibleâŚ.but in TWO children?? What is pure Windsor descent? lol Explain the east European/far-eastern features, bleached blond hair, and other genetically impossible features, sweetie. Explain what the BRF and several prime ministers, etc, were advised. Windsor descent? b#tch, pu-LLLEEEEEEEEZZZZZZE.
|
|
|
Post by W. on Nov 11, 2023 19:18:23 GMT
I completely agree. Itâs very noticeable when you compare other royal families. If you look at their families and children, you can SEE the kids look exactly like the parents (most notable with the Swedish Royals). If you look at all other families and then come back to the Cambridge kids, you can really see that they look different. If Kate had given William two unquestionably legitimate heirs, Kate would not look like the frightened, insecure woman that she is now. She would be confident in that area and the BRF would be dressing her better and would be treating her better. It's not like she didn't enjoy luxury to the full at first. One thing I have always noticed is over the years the BRF has been pulling the clothing budget to the point where she is obviously wearing retail and bargain bin. I do not think Kate has given two legit kids and if the kids are Eastern European, imagine the stink that it would cause politically and diplomatically. Even if the UK sanctions Russia, Putin might have that knowledge and be chill about sanctions because he has info that would blow up the BRF. And nothing wrong too with any eastern European or far-eastern heritage for anybody (I proudly have eastern european heritage, myself) it's just that the features are very striking and just back the point that there is obviously some outside genetic input into 3 alleged royal heirs. I think we are now seeing the impact and it will continue to become even more obvious,way WORSE, maybe to lay people who don't follow royalty. It's THAT striking, IMO. People can only fed so much PR but when you get saturated with pro-royalty missives every day, you begin to get angry about having your intelligence insulted.
|
|
|
Post by india on Nov 12, 2023 3:59:56 GMT
But on the serious note, this site is absolutely disgraceful and vile... Shame on all of you.... You wish harm on innocent children that are very well behaved and caused you no harm, just shows your true intentions to pure, innocent children on the streets... You all need to be locked up and kept away from all children. You're not to be trusted, you wish harm and worse death.. What's wrong with you people, where's peace and love??? You should all be locked in a psychiatric unit or prison.. A sick and twisted site... Why not join the red shoe group because YOU ARE NO BETTER, YOU SHOULD NOT HAVE CUSTODY OF ANY CHILD... We know who you are so do not waste your sleazy time on this site. We will not be intimidated. We have been on to you and your shenanigans for many years. So I suggest you had better spend your time figuring out a way to deal with the mess that you have created with your incompetent lazy slattern of a daughter because both of you are going down.
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Dec 5, 2023 22:46:33 GMT
If this is true, this means that not only are these kids not legitimate, but the cold reality is also that ten years have been wasted; the British nation has been waiting decades for William to do his job and if he has failed at this, I am certain that he is in fact ruined. At forty-three he should have two decades of service and he has none. The British nation is not supposed to be waiting on him to make a sincere contribution.
|
|
|
Post by W. on Dec 21, 2023 20:08:39 GMT
What do others make of the new Kate childhood photo looking like Louis? Some are saying itâs a PR tactic due to the recent âphotoshop failâ of the Cambridgesâ Christmas card.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 21, 2023 22:03:12 GMT
What do others make of the new Kate childhood photo looking like Louis? Some are saying itâs a PR tactic due to the recent âphotoshop failâ of the Cambridgesâ Christmas card. From what I was told , a procedure that Kate had in the South of France? (fertility clinic/experimental?). The person who related this information to me was a former monarchist/member of the Conservative party of the U.K who had some association/knowledge of the Middletons, as lived in the same general area/Kate later went to the same club (that had a 25 year waiting list?) - This person had other connections/insider knowledge of the BRF, etc - so, not a conspiracy theorist in any way, shape or form. This information was privately related to me, and I really don't know the source of it. Another suggestion is that perhaps her own father is the sperm donor? It's all so messy and horrible, when one thinks of it. I heard years (?) before the wedding of William and Kate that Camilla HERSELF revealed that Kate would have difficulty ever getting pregnant, and this wasn't in the U.K, but another country, and this person didn't have any especial or know connections (ie: NOT a royal fan) and another person, a late teacher/mentor, indicated that if there was ANY problem with "begetting" or having a royal heir, that they (royal figures) would find any means to do so. That is the "gist" of what I heard and it has always stayed with me. At the time, I didn't think too hard about that,plus we were mainly talking about Shakespeare and the royal characters associated with his plays. But, we come to present day UK, and a scheming gauche-climber like Carole Middleton who had way more ambition than brains, allegedly having a daugther with a condition that means she will never conceive naturally. Carole didn't count on her own daughter stepping in the way of her nasty plans, so it's been alleged that eggs/sperm were frozen/stored. Yup. Try to even relate this to people and they will think you are some looney conspiracy theorist who the men in white coats need to take to a padded room. I have been called everything nasty under the sun and then some, but concerns about surrogacies and suspected bio mixes of all 3 Cambridge children were actually brought to the notice of the BRF and the British Press, etc. Prime ministers, officials in high circles, newsrooms, etc, etc, etc. Yes, actual letters were written to Queen Elizabeth and other family members, so they at the VERY least are aware of something extremely troubling. William is being protected because think of the catastrophic damage a false Succession will cause. There is zero precedent for how to handle such a gross betrayal on an entire Commonwealth. Driving out Prince Harry just wasn't because he didn't want to be in his family, or serve; that was the result of HAVING to be bullied out to cover for Bill, the traitor. Harry was always the "spare", but in today's royal families, that has very little real meaning anymore - except in the BRF. They have yet to get with the times and progress, despite being one of the longest democracies and serving over a commonwealth of nations. I cannot get over how such a destructive and alienating force like Prince William is saluted as being a man of merit and character, when if anything, he is the EXACT opposite. I personally know the extent of Carole Middleton's raw nastiness and ambition (vulgar and jealous nobodies like her usually don't care for me), and no matter how long it takes, I am not going to stand by whilst people are lied to and betrayed by a family/institution that is actually rendering their own family line EXTINCT and making a shambles/mockery out of a 1000 year old institution. Harry being bullied out is just one small part of the whole epic mess - just one person in a long line of those with changed or ruined reputations/careers/lives because William's tr#ason will not be checked. There, I let it all out. I will certainly continue to contribute in any way I can. Peace. Admin
|
|
|
Post by W. on Dec 21, 2023 22:47:00 GMT
Thank you for your response! YesâŚI have also heard about the South of France scenario, Iâve always wondered if this was already planned at the wedding or they found out after that Kate couldnât get pregnant? Does anyone else feel âcult vibesâ with Royal families? I donât mean just with the BRF but all royal families? protocals as that donât make sense, outdated curtsying/bowing, old fashioned clothing, âline of succession,â if youâre âout,â say goodbye to this and that. Heirs belong to the government etc. Iâm remembering reading how Daniel couldnât sit beside his wife, Crown Princess Victoria (Sweden) because of âprotocolâ at some big event because he isnât technically royalty. What?? Husband and wife canât sit because of protocol? I canât be the only one who feels cult vibes?? What do others make of the new Kate childhood photo looking like Louis? Some are saying itâs a PR tactic due to the recent âphotoshop failâ of the Cambridgesâ Christmas card. From what I was told , a procedure that Kate had in the South of France? (fertility clinic/experimental?). The person who related this information to me was a former monarchist/member of the Conservative party of the U.K who had some association/knowledge of the Middletons, as lived in the same general area/Kate later went to the same club (that had a 25 year waiting list?) - This person had other connections/insider knowledge of the BRF, etc - so, not a conspiracy theorist in any way, shape or form. This information was privately related to me, and I really don't know the source of it. Another suggestion is that perhaps her own father is the sperm donor? It's all so messy and horrible, when one thinks of it. I heard years (?) before the wedding of William and Kate that Camilla HERSELF revealed that Kate would have difficulty ever getting pregnant, and this wasn't in the U.K, but another country, and this person didn't have any especial or know connections (ie: NOT a royal fan) and another person, a late teacher/mentor, indicated that if there was ANY problem with "begetting" or having a royal heir, that they (royal figures) would find any means to do so. That is the "gist" of what I heard and it has always stayed with me. At the time, I didn't think too hard about that,plus we were mainly talking about Shakespeare and the royal characters associated with his plays. But, we come to present day UK, and a scheming gauche-climber like Carole Middleton who had way more ambition than brains, allegedly having a daugther with a condition that means she will never conceive naturally. Carole didn't count on her own daughter stepping in the way of her nasty plans, so it's been alleged that eggs/sperm were frozen/stored. Yup. Try to even relate this to people and they will think you are some looney conspiracy theorist who the men in white coats need to take to a padded room. I have been called everything nasty under the sun and then some, but concerns about surrogacies and suspected bio mixes of all 3 Cambridge children were actually brought to the notice of the BRF and the British Press, etc. Prime ministers, officials in high circles, newsrooms, etc, etc, etc. Yes, actual letters were written to Queen Elizabeth and other family members, so they at the VERY least are aware of something extremely troubling. William is being protected because think of the catastrophic damage a false Succession will cause. There is zero precedent for how to handle such a gross betrayal on an entire Commonwealth. Driving out Prince Harry just wasn't because he didn't want to be in his family, or serve; that was the result of HAVING to be bullied out to cover for Bill, the traitor. Harry was always the "spare", but in today's royal families, that has very little real meaning anymore - except in the BRF. They have yet to get with the times and progress, despite being one of the longest democracies and serving over a commonwealth of nations. I cannot get over how such a destructive and alienating force like Prince William is saluted as being a man of merit and character, when if anything, he is the EXACT opposite. I personally know the extent of Carole Middleton's raw nastiness and ambition (vulgar and jealous nobodies like her usually don't care for me), and no matter how long it takes, I am not going to stand by whilst people are lied to and betrayed by a family/institution that is actually rendering their own family line EXTINCT and making a shambles/mockery out of a 1000 year old institution. Harry being bullied out is just one small part of the whole epic mess - just one person in a long line of those with changed or ruined reputations/careers/lives because William's tr#ason will not be checked. There, I let it all out. I will certainly continue to contribute in any way I can. Peace. Admin
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Dec 22, 2023 4:58:20 GMT
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Dec 22, 2023 5:03:29 GMT
Yes. Point blank, it is a kind of inverse mess. Usually in cults, once in you are golden and for the consort of the Crown Princess of Sweden to be treated bad is showing that the royals are almost one hundred percent unhinged. What is concerning to me is how they are psychotically fixated on a version of purity despite the fact that most of the recent generation come from commoner lineage and quite frankly, it is clear that the reigning royals are not smart about a lot of things. Mette-Marit and most of the mess driving this is how the royals are being discredited by their own actions. One thing that is concerning is how they are basically repressing and humiliating their consorts increasingly blatantly. Daniel looks downright subjugated, and elderly and it is clear that Crown Princess Mary of Denmark is being humiliated on a regular basis because of her husband's infidelity and this time he got caught. He put her in a bad place since it is clear that she is under pressure to leave him and 'be an independent woman' as the feminists love to shoot their mouths off. What we all see is how William disrespects Kate and I believe that SOMETHING is up that these crown princes are acting out more and more outrageously.
A huge mess is how they get away with disrespecting those who marry in. Diana was subjected to condescension that she should not have as Princess of Wales and Fergie was mistreated and, in my view, Prince Philip was treated badly as well. Another issue is that because of longevity in service, staff can become judgmental about the new consorts despite the fact that it isn't their place. really it isn't. Second, the royals in my view are not trying to help the government, I think they are trying to take over. Why is a Queen Consort meeting with government officials and second, royals are hyped as ruling Europe, but it is clear that they are not at all supposed to be doing that according to their own rules and way of life. Second, in Europe there is a lot of political instability and politicians are likely sincerely worried about their own survival.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 22, 2023 15:43:42 GMT
It's okay - you don't have to reference other posts - important thing is that people are posting, rather than necessarily using the "right" or most appropriate threads, but a little reminder to look at other threads is fine, too. All good! Who knew that Carole Middleton would be such a hot potato with 2024 coming up. Sigh. Best All, Admin
|
|
|
Post by W. on Dec 24, 2023 21:11:51 GMT
That was something else I was thinking as well that you pointed out - Victoriaâs kids are hardly âRoyalâ since Victoriaâs mom was a commoner (?) and Daniel is a commoner so how âRoyalâ are their kids?? I do feel for Daniel, and I donât blame Victoria as she seems to come across as very genuine, itâs simply that when you are born into this and know nothing else, one canât necessarily see or think outside the box. I didnât know about Crown Princess Maryâs husbands affairs since I donât follow royals that much but thatâs just it - the âcult vibes.â Because of the affairs, she has every right to divorce as any sensible women who was in a good financial state to do so - would. BUT, she would lose a lot of security, money, and the kids would not legally be hers, thatâs exactly how they get you to stay. How was Prince Philip treated unfairly? I was also under the impression that he was content in letting the Queen take the primary role, but of course, the media also told me this! đ
Yes. Point blank, it is a kind of inverse mess. Usually in cults, once in you are golden and for the consort of the Crown Princess of Sweden to be treated bad is showing that the royals are almost one hundred percent unhinged. What is concerning to me is how they are psychotically fixated on a version of purity despite the fact that most of the recent generation come from commoner lineage and quite frankly, it is clear that the reigning royals are not smart about a lot of things. Mette-Marit and most of the mess driving this is how the royals are being discredited by their own actions. One thing that is concerning is how they are basically repressing and humiliating their consorts increasingly blatantly. Daniel looks downright subjugated, and elderly and it is clear that Crown Princess Mary of Denmark is being humiliated on a regular basis because of her husband's infidelity and this time he got caught. He put her in a bad place since it is clear that she is under pressure to leave him and 'be an independent woman' as the feminists love to shoot their mouths off. What we all see is how William disrespects Kate and I believe that SOMETHING is up that these crown princes are acting out more and more outrageously. A huge mess is how they get away with disrespecting those who marry in. Diana was subjected to condescension that she should not have as Princess of Wales and Fergie was mistreated and, in my view, Prince Philip was treated badly as well. Another issue is that because of longevity in service, staff can become judgmental about the new consorts despite the fact that it isn't their place. really it isn't. Second, the royals in my view are not trying to help the government, I think they are trying to take over. Why is a Queen Consort meeting with government officials and second, royals are hyped as ruling Europe, but it is clear that they are not at all supposed to be doing that according to their own rules and way of life. Second, in Europe there is a lot of political instability and politicians are likely sincerely worried about their own survival.
|
|
|
Post by W. on Dec 24, 2023 21:18:27 GMT
Iâm not sure if it was posted here or somewhere else but I read that someone had wondered why even the RF didnât bail the Middleton family out? Are things really falling apart behind the scenes? It's okay - you don't have to reference other posts - important thing is that people are posting, rather than necessarily using the "right" or most appropriate threads, but a little reminder to look at other threads is fine, too. All good! Who knew that Carole Middleton would be such a hot potato with 2024 coming up. Sigh. Best All, Admin
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 24, 2023 23:51:56 GMT
That was something else I was thinking as well that you pointed out - Victoriaâs kids are hardly âRoyalâ since Victoriaâs mom was a commoner (?) and Daniel is a commoner so how âRoyalâ are their kids?? I do feel for Daniel, and I donât blame Victoria as she seems to come across as very genuine, itâs simply that when you are born into this and know nothing else, one canât necessarily see or think outside the box. I didnât know about Crown Princess Maryâs husbands affairs since I donât follow royals that much but thatâs just it - the âcult vibes.â Because of the affairs, she has every right to divorce as any sensible women who was in a good financial state to do so - would. BUT, she would lose a lot of security, money, and the kids would not legally be hers, thatâs exactly how they get you to stay. How was Prince Philip treated unfairly? I was also under the impression that he was content in letting the Queen take the primary role, but of course, the media also told me this! đ
Yes. Point blank, it is a kind of inverse mess. Usually in cults, once in you are golden and for the consort of the Crown Princess of Sweden to be treated bad is showing that the royals are almost one hundred percent unhinged. What is concerning to me is how they are psychotically fixated on a version of purity despite the fact that most of the recent generation come from commoner lineage and quite frankly, it is clear that the reigning royals are not smart about a lot of things. Mette-Marit and most of the mess driving this is how the royals are being discredited by their own actions. One thing that is concerning is how they are basically repressing and humiliating their consorts increasingly blatantly. Daniel looks downright subjugated, and elderly and it is clear that Crown Princess Mary of Denmark is being humiliated on a regular basis because of her husband's infidelity and this time he got caught. He put her in a bad place since it is clear that she is under pressure to leave him and 'be an independent woman' as the feminists love to shoot their mouths off. What we all see is how William disrespects Kate and I believe that SOMETHING is up that these crown princes are acting out more and more outrageously. A huge mess is how they get away with disrespecting those who marry in. Diana was subjected to condescension that she should not have as Princess of Wales and Fergie was mistreated and, in my view, Prince Philip was treated badly as well. Another issue is that because of longevity in service, staff can become judgmental about the new consorts despite the fact that it isn't their place. really it isn't. Second, the royals in my view are not trying to help the government, I think they are trying to take over. Why is a Queen Consort meeting with government officials and second, royals are hyped as ruling Europe, but it is clear that they are not at all supposed to be doing that according to their own rules and way of life. Second, in Europe there is a lot of political instability and politicians are likely sincerely worried about their own survival. Victoria of Sweden's children are descendants of old Swedish royalty, German nobility and royalty (for instance, Victoria's 2x great grandmother, Victoria of Baden, was a granddaughter of Kaiser Wilhelm I and her father was a grandson of the deposed Gustaf IV Adolf). Marshall Bernadotte was created King of Sweden shortly after this (my record of this time is very sketchy,but information about this can be found online)- To gain validity as a true royal line or ingrain themselves with the Swedish people, the descendants of Bernadotte married in with German royals. A granddaughter of the Empress Josephine became a Queen of Sweden, for instance. Gustaf IV Adolf marrying with Victoria of Baden, brought more true Swedish royalty back into the mix, so to speak. Nobody should look down on Daniel because he has never given a solid reason to show he's not an appropriate consort. He's 100 % Swedish, so he's one of the people. Bonus. I'm not too familiar with Mary's story but her husband's alleged affair is making the gossip rounds. But,Mary set out with her friends in Australia to meet and bag a prince, so I don't have too much sympathy for her situation. Better things for me to be concerned about. Her son's 18th birthday party was way too grand for what is a very small country and in a world where a good many children are being destroyed by war and many, many more that have to deal with being deprived of the basics. Very insensitive and out of touch. Prince Philip could be considered more royal than the Queen as both his parents were both desecended from royalty. QE had Cookie to contend with as a mother. Cookie had zero rights to turn her (jealous) nose up at Philip. At another time when I could do more as currently on my phone, could post some family trees and show people why. Part of the issue with Philip's ancestry (if you could even call it that) is that Louis of Battenberg's mother was not of a royal line, but a Tsar's ward who ran off with a dashing German prince. This Prince ,Alexander of Battenberg, was a brother of what would be Tsar Nicholas II's grandmother. There may be some threads already in the Old Royalty section about this, but if not,those could be found and posted later, too. Rumours of some illegitimacy, etc, but still, thanks to some intricate royal inter-marrying, still royal. Fancy that? Cookie and the rest who turned up their noses had some nerve, IMO.
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Dec 25, 2023 2:01:55 GMT
That was something else I was thinking as well that you pointed out - Victoriaâs kids are hardly âRoyalâ since Victoriaâs mom was a commoner (?) and Daniel is a commoner so how âRoyalâ are their kids?? I do feel for Daniel, and I donât blame Victoria as she seems to come across as very genuine, itâs simply that when you are born into this and know nothing else, one canât necessarily see or think outside the box. I didnât know about Crown Princess Maryâs husbands affairs since I donât follow royals that much but thatâs just it - the âcult vibes.â Because of the affairs, she has every right to divorce as any sensible women who was in a good financial state to do so - would. BUT, she would lose a lot of security, money, and the kids would not legally be hers, thatâs exactly how they get you to stay. How was Prince Philip treated unfairly? I was also under the impression that he was content in letting the Queen take the primary role, but of course, the media also told me this! đ
Victoria of Sweden's children are descendants of old Swedish royalty, German nobility and royalty (for instance, Victoria's 2x great grandmother, Victoria of Baden, was a granddaughter of Kaiser Wilhelm I and her father was a grandson of the deposed Gustaf IV Adolf). Marshall Bernadotte was created King of Sweden shortly after this (my record of this time is very sketchy,but information about this can be found online)- To gain validity as a true royal line or ingrain themselves with the Swedish people, the descendants of Bernadotte married in with German royals. A granddaughter of the Empress Josephine became a Queen of Sweden, for instance. Gustaf IV Adolf marrying with Victoria of Baden, brought more true Swedish royalty back into the mix, so to speak. Nobody should look down on Daniel because he has never given a solid reason to show he's not an appropriate consort. He's 100 % Swedish, so he's one of the people. Bonus. I'm not too familiar with Mary's story but her husband's alleged affair is making the gossip rounds. But,Mary set out with her friends in Australia to meet and bag a prince, so I don't have too much sympathy for her situation. Better things for me to be concerned about. Her son's 18th birthday party was way too grand for what is a very small country and in a world where a good many children are being destroyed by war and many, many more that have to deal with being deprived of the basics. Very insensitive and out of touch. Prince Philip could be considered more royal than the Queen as both his parents were both desecended from royalty. QE had Cookie to contend with as a mother. Cookie had zero rights to turn her (jealous) nose up at Philip. At another time when I could do more as currently on my phone, could post some family trees and show people why. Part of the issue with Philip's ancestry (if you could even call it that) is that Louis of Battenberg's mother was not of a royal line, but a Tsar's ward who ran off with a dashing German prince. This Prince ,Alexander of Battenberg, was a brother of what would be Tsar Nicholas II's grandmother. There may be some threads already in the Old Royalty section about this, but if not,those could be found and posted later, too. Rumours of some illegitimacy, etc, but still, thanks to some intricate royal inter-marrying, still royal. Fancy that? Cookie and the rest who turned up their noses had some nerve, IMO. Point blank, with a narcissist they are dangerous in my view mainly because it is a complete lack of logic and connected mental thinking. Diana herself showed a huge amount of instability and much of what we saw was what Charles had to deal with. With Victoria, there is something about her and her increasingly rictus grin that disturbs me and Daniel looks sicker and sicker each year. I wonder if Victoria is in fact either unaware or not caring. The late Queen Mother's behavior was disturbing in that she came from a prominent family, but she came with ideas of how a royal should be instead of accepting that royals are not entirely supposed to be prissy snowflakes. Edward VIII was a perfect monarch of his times and I sincerely think that if he had reigned long, Wallis would have brought a huge connection to the genuine upper class, and I am certain that Britain would have been able to withstand the Nazi onslaught a lot more effectively. Cookie was a lot like all brainless narcissists in that she would not accept that Edward was a partier, but he was likely effective in that had WWII begun he would have been able to straighten up and marshal his set and they would have helped. One mark of a good leader in my view is that during good times they kick back and relax and as a result, can be better during times of crisis. HMQM was so neurotically hung up on image that she developed nothing within herself and as a result, exhausted the BRF on focusing on trivialities instead of things that were in fact serious. HMQM ended the practice of inner self development beyond the 'basics' and since then the BRF has been worried about media coverage rather than substance and there is so much infighting it won't take much to bring them down. As for this mess, if William has perpetuated some kind of succession fraud, I am certain that there will be war, world war. William has a diplomatic passport and as I have been growing older the more, I understand the realities of 'broader consequences'. From a purely global perspective, it would provide a lot of enemies to take shots at the UK/Commonwealth and I cannot imagine how any of this could be explained. William has put his nation in a huge bind and if he has been living some kind of double life, I am certain that the UK will explode. William reminds me of his mother in that he refuses to accept that he is part of a broader world, and his actions carry geopolitical repercussions. If he has some kind of overseas mistress, if there has been a surrogacy and a nurse was murdered, that covers all areas of dysfunction and crime and he has perpetuated the greatest fraud of royal history. Like his mother, he is too stupid to see that it isn't just about him. Politicians and diplomats will not be able to explain this away and there would be no fixing this. Plus the kids. Those kids are identifying as royals, and it is now ingrained. Charlotte in particular will be traumatized and kids are cruel. They wouldn't let up. Ultimately, there are three kids who have been raised as one thing and may in reality be another. I think that is the worst that can come out of this.
|
|
sanka
Count/Countess
Posts: 292
|
Post by sanka on Dec 25, 2023 4:10:53 GMT
If William has been involved in succession fraud then it is the end of any chance that he will become King.
I sit on the fence with this as there is something about it all but I cannot nail it. I am open for the theories.
The nurse's death was a tragedy as she did have health issues. But Kyle and Jackie O needed to take some responsibility to events based on their actions. Although they thought they would have been stopped mid call it should have never been made public without alerting the RPOs that there was an issue with security. (I certainly don't have much time for those 2 at all).
If Kate couldn't have any children at all then William would have already divorced her many years ago. I am not saying that Kate may have had assistance but I am not sure William has the smarts (the sons definitely take after Diana) to have something monumental covered up without it surfacing by now. There are the rumours and these threads with people who have some knowledge about what has happened. I am just amazed that it hasn't exploded prior to now and that there is no possibility of shutting up so many people involved in any conspiracy.
I have always thought of the Wales/Cambridge marriage as purely a business arrangement. William has interests elsewhere and Kate has to go along with the facade.
I am also sure if there is something about the children that Harry doesn't know the exact truth otherwise, it would have already been plastered around the media for MM to make excessive amounts of money.
With the Montecito duo and the alleged children, if there are children I think they may be Harry's but i think that may be the extent. I suspect MM used a pregnancy to get the engagement ring and wedding and that was because he had already dumped her and she wanted to get back to that scene. Will wait and see what happens with a Sussex separation and what comes out about those children.
Mary definitely did try to date someone famous during the Olympics. She just bagged the Prince. I did work with some people who were at university and they did not sing her praises based on interactions with her during her uni days.
|
|