|
|
Post by Guest on Dec 31, 2023 8:56:15 GMT
Remember when instead Kate and Will complained for decades she, and they, were the victims instead, and even brought a court case? When actually the press reported on and revealed they lied, dodging taxpayer-funded duties to vacation, she naked up top the rooftop public deck bent over by the front railing.
Similarly, the she made me cry! no, she made me cry! debacle feels it has been going on for close to a decade while both have claimed to be victims of conduct they themselves publicly, repeatedly have done in front of the entire world.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 31, 2023 15:25:44 GMT
Nothing happened at all after Will and Kate lied about leaving their duties early involving the disabled in sports competition by saying they were going to ready for a tour. The entire world knows instead she bent over stark naked by the front railing on the rooftop deck of the chateau in front of the public road a mile or less away, though the chateau was associated with them. They knew press and everyday people photograph them in public. It is also known that you can see someone is naked if they stand at the front railing of a rooftop deck of an elevated multi-story building, especially chateau associated with them, in full view of a public road, known for having pedestrians, passersby and cars, as it was. She did this in front of staff, whoever readies their food, royal protection officers, security/security cameras, whoever transports them and neighbors. No comment was made about that as if it happened all the time. It is an indication of narcissism that whoever made whoever cry instead exclaimed they were the victim and it is the other way around. Kate, Will and Meghan each seem like narcissists. It is also known that they are a German family, and they made up that their last name is Windsor. Literally, just made it up, after the Germans had been bombing the British during the World War. Also, it is known that I think it was Victoria and those in power with her knew opium was addictive and destructive to life and health and they deliberately for this reason sold it to the Chinese because China was wealthy and independent and did not there want to trade with Britain. This resulted in many deaths, China turning poor and vulnerable to attack by the Japanese in World War II then, after decades of poverty, death, war and suffering, turning to Communism. It is also known that Elizabeth rode her horse to show support of Epstein Andrew after that news came out and the family supported him after his appalling interview, which he said was a jolly success. This so-called monarchy should end, and all the taxpayer-funded houses and property they live in and taxpayer-funded carriages they ride in with taxpayer-funded footmen should be changed to museums. The entrance fees should fund research so all their lies and crimes can be revealed and assistance to all they damaged, caused the deaths of and stole from. These include all the jewels they stole as colonialists, which those countries have been requesting back for years, the Indians they beat and imprisoned as they did to Gandhi and fellow protesters, the Chinese they caused the death, extreme poverty, suffering and complete reversal of destiny of, the children that were trafficked, the Epstein victims, the taxpayers, conceivably Jacintha Saldana and her family, Uncle Gary's fresh young girl prostitutes, Jimmy Savile's victims, everyone whose intellectual property the Middletons infringed on, everyone the Middletons never paid, many others and conceivably more that are going to be revealed. Does anyone remember Epstein Andrew going on and on? Charles and Camilla could have arried before she married, since they both knew their antecedents had been lovers and already knew each other. They chose not to. Did you see Harry's expression and hear his voice as he referred to her as his "person"? That is not true either. Also, Kate Middleton did not have to wear a sheer shirt showing her entire bare chest down to her belly in a wide swath whike pretending on that rare occasion to work, as spouse of the future head of the Church if England. A major reason that countries hostile to the U.S. state as a cause is that they wage it against the influence of media and a culture they perceived as brazenly immor@l. This includes with regard to the Middle East. And even after what happened to China, which is now Communist, China prioritizes diligence, industriousness, hard work and education. Russia resists what it considers immor@l western values. Charles and Camilla paint a false picture of their adultery. Including all the extreme corruption, waste of taxpayer funds, abuse of those downtrodden taxpayers, by entitled fat cats and bureaucrats refusing to work, the deplorable state of customer service, constant lies, pervasive narcissism, disrespect, buggy bad bots that don't contribute to or help those paying for services by people rather instead spew untrue statements, corruption of factual news media outlets, multiple ongoing wars, child trafficking and inappropriateness toward/abuse of children, these are so-called role models for everything that is wrong and spiralling downward fast globally in society. Who wouldn't war in one respect or another against having these become heads of your country, role models for your children, heads of your church and heads and patrons of your charities? To think, the U.S. is allies with this mess of a nation. The Chinese and Russians would be far more valuable allies and I am certain that it would be better if we were allies with compatible governments and monarchial nations are not compatible with the United States system of government. Not with the leadership of China and Russia as it now stands - the level of corruption there is pretty ingrained and the leaders have to be called to account. Putin is a murderer and war criminal and China leadership is aligning themselves with him. Once the corrupt have been held to account, then maybe relations can improve, but until then, cannot see anything moving forward. Of course, the citizens of these nations are the ones paying the price. That said, let's go back to the topic at hand. |
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Jan 2, 2024 7:41:36 GMT
I had intended to post this here again though it is relevant too to Will's taxpayer-funded benefits and income for hardly working.
posted this here because my earlier posts were replies to other posts and this continues those and these and earlier here conversation about the nurse, Jacintha Saldana, her family, the radio DJs who are part of the media, the reporting on the naked rooftop bending, after Kate and Will lied, the court case against the press, and use and appearance of the children in the media, including for PR.
Harry stated the "Palace" in press statements is his really his family members despite the false motto.
Since the ABC journalist with the hot mic said she was coerced to suppress the Epstein Andrew story by coercion regarding denial of ABC access to Will and Kate's wedding, and Harry said his family's access to the press, especially for this type of positive press, is his family's obsession and lifeblood, it would appear only about 6 people had the power to do this coercion:
Elizabeth, Phillip, Charles, Camilla, Will and Kate
and if Will and Kate wished the opposite they could have communicated this.
Harry complained he and Meghan wanted taxpayer-funded security and that Will and Kate too only worked part-time though had it and even Epstein Andrew had security. He also complained that they wanted more power and influence over the press regarding planting and suppressing news, as these 6 have had.
Though Meghan said she was appalled at Epstein Andrew, they only complained about their own desire for more power over press advantageous to themselves and more taxpayer funding. Meghan also said she could have suppressed the story about her dad trying on wedding clothes. They used their power instead as described rather assisting any of the victims as Epstein continued for years instead of stating who suppressed the Epstein Andrew news. Neither did they state why Andrew still swans around instead of cooperating with US authorities as these authorities requested or why the Epstein list has never been disclosed while no reason for this has been given. They argued they should have the same taxpayer benefits at least as Epstein Andrew.
These are unelected. They are influencing the government despite their other motto.
Freedom of speech and the press are the pillars of democracy.
It also came out years ago that Elizabeth did influence the government leadership in regular meetings.
All of these topics should be reported on, but they are not.
Elizabeth showed support after the Epstein Andrew story by riding and the manner in which she rode her horse, it was reported.
Who of these likely 6 suppressed the Epstein Andrew story, why did not Will and Kate state otherwise to stop the coercion and who prevents all these news topics from being truthfully reported on, which they should be? These unelected, with no terms limits, should not have this power of the press ultimately given by the taxpayers and Commonwealth members that permit the monarchy in government and the monarchy as their worldwide representatives, symbols, cultural and media emblems.
PS The comment wasn't addressed to me though I was, prior, stating the people's stated reasons and the stated reasons of leadership though has not commented on that leadership's conduct. This is in reference to statements that these state they do not desire perceived immor@lity in Western media and culture to influence people there.
|
|
|
|
Post by W. on Jan 4, 2024 1:50:50 GMT
I read in a few earlier posts that some of you thought that this would be the end for William if this came out. I don’t argue that, I can’t see how the public would allow him to continue to be in line. But in general, I can’t really see anyone in line because the whole family deceived? Would this be the end of the British Monarchy?
Furthermore, for those of you who are quite well researched with the smaller monarchies (Sweden, Belgium, Denmark….) do you think that these Monarchies would be able to continue despite the British RF? Or, could this be a potential start for all European monarchies to vanish?
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 4, 2024 17:49:40 GMT
I read in a few earlier posts that some of you thought that this would be the end for William if this came out. I don’t argue that, I can’t see how the public would allow him to continue to be in line. But in general, I can’t really see anyone in line because the whole family deceived? Would this be the end of the British Monarchy? Furthermore, for those of you who are quite well researched with the smaller monarchies (Sweden, Belgium, Denmark….) do you think that these Monarchies would be able to continue despite the British RF? Or, could this be a potential start for all European monarchies to vanish? This is great! I wish to respond but will have to do so later. |
|
|
|
Post by W. on Jan 4, 2024 23:52:52 GMT
I look forward to your response! The more I think about it, the more I can’t see it but in the other hand, I’m not familiar with the government systems. I really don’t believe Harry and Meghan have kids (too many weird things surrounding this…) so certainly I don’t think he would be next in line (maybe it would be different if they didn’t do the “fake kids” storyline themselves they could have played professional victims and gained pity from the public as to WHY they had to leave but if they had “fake kids” then there’s no way out of that). Andrew certainly wouldn’t be next, the public wouldn’t allow it. I don’t think Beatrice and Eugenie would be interested - they have their own lives and why should they be responsible to pick up from this mess? Besides, they wouldn’t be prepared. What’s left? Concerning the other families….if the BRF goes down, why would the others stay? For example, apparently the Spanish royal family has lot’s of scandal? Why would the public allow them to stay? It’s not unheard of that royal families can be done overnight and lose power - Russian royal family and French royals come to mind. Public or government systems said enough! I read in a few earlier posts that some of you thought that this would be the end for William if this came out. I don’t argue that, I can’t see how the public would allow him to continue to be in line. But in general, I can’t really see anyone in line because the whole family deceived? Would this be the end of the British Monarchy? Furthermore, for those of you who are quite well researched with the smaller monarchies (Sweden, Belgium, Denmark….) do you think that these Monarchies would be able to continue despite the British RF? Or, could this be a potential start for all European monarchies to vanish? This is great! I wish to respond but will have to do so later. |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 7, 2024 18:50:01 GMT
I had intended to post this here again though it is relevant too to Will's taxpayer-funded benefits and income for hardly working. posted this here because my earlier posts were replies to other posts and this continues those and these and earlier here conversation about the nurse, Jacintha Saldana, her family, the radio DJs who are part of the media, the reporting on the naked rooftop bending, after Kate and Will lied, the court case against the press, and use and appearance of the children in the media, including for PR. Harry stated the "Palace" in press statements is his really his family members despite the false motto. Since the ABC journalist with the hot mic said she was coerced to suppress the Epstein Andrew story by coercion regarding denial of ABC access to Will and Kate's wedding, and Harry said his family's access to the press, especially for this type of positive press, is his family's obsession and lifeblood, it would appear only about 6 people had the power to do this coercion:
Elizabeth, Phillip, Charles, Camilla, Will and Kateand if Will and Kate wished the opposite they could have communicated this. Harry complained he and Meghan wanted taxpayer-funded security and that Will and Kate too only worked part-time though had it and even Epstein Andrew had security. He also complained that they wanted more power and influence over the press regarding planting and suppressing news, as these 6 have had.Though Meghan said she was appalled at Epstein Andrew, they only complained about their own desire for more power over press advantageous to themselves and more taxpayer funding. Meghan also said she could have suppressed the story about her dad trying on wedding clothes. They used their power instead as described rather assisting any of the victims as Epstein continued for years instead of stating who suppressed the Epstein Andrew news. Neither did they state why Andrew still swans around instead of cooperating with US authorities as these authorities requested or why the Epstein list has never been disclosed while no reason for this has been given. They argued they should have the same taxpayer benefits at least as Epstein Andrew. These are unelected. They are influencing the government despite their other motto.
Freedom of speech and the press are the pillars of democracy.It also came out years ago that Elizabeth did influence the government leadership in regular meetings. All of these topics should be reported on, but they are not. Elizabeth showed support after the Epstein Andrew story by riding and the manner in which she rode her horse, it was reported.
Who of these likely 6 suppressed the Epstein Andrew story, why did not Will and Kate state otherwise to stop the coercion and who prevents all these news topics from being truthfully reported on, which they should be? These unelected, with no terms limits, should not have this power of the press ultimately given by the taxpayers and Commonwealth members that permit the monarchy in government and the monarchy as their worldwide representatives, symbols, cultural and media emblems. PS The comment wasn't addressed to me though I was, prior, stating the people's stated reasons and the stated reasons of leadership though has not commented on that leadership's conduct. This is in reference to statements that these state they do not desire perceived immor@lity in Western media and culture to influence people there.    The BRF seemingly wants to only benefit from the press; have them right postive, glowing accounts of them at all time, but refuses to see that the job of any GOOD, responsible and mor@l journalist is to investigate and review the TRUTH, no matter how damaging it can be for certain individuals. They want to control the narrative and of course, protect their errant and sometimes possible felonious family members. Queen Elizabeth allegedly gave her private calls to settle things and I wonder, just wonder ( pure speculation here) if there was some kind of tension/seperation between Philip and Elizabeth near the end of their marriage (not at the very end) for the reason that Elizabeth gave way and protected William, Andrew, Kate, etc, whilst Philip was a blunt, in your face, kind of man who was disgusted by it all? There HAD to be something else there. Elizabeth was a very passive woman; no leader, and Philip was certainly no push-over and NOT passive in any way, shape or form. Both knew the real deal with Andrew, Kate and William - I personally know people who had no compunction about writing the BRF about what they were allegedly getting away with. They were all duly informed. Imagine the dealings here if you will: A prominent royal figure with ties to/allowing a rumoured child-rapist/groomer into the royal orbit is being protected AT ALL COSTS, and those who have damaging information that concerns this figure get threatened with loss of press access (case of the ABC journalist) to events that are crucial/vital for their organizations to cover (access is their lifeblood) then little wonder that certain stories get allegedly swept under the carpet? This was a foreign entity being controlled and stifled, in a sense. Who should have that kind of power? Hpw many OTHER stories got swept away? We get sue happy idiot Prince William and his cr@tch-flashing disaster Wasty possibly get Grannie to make one of her famous calls with the Closer magazine/topless photos matter: abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/kate-middleton-topless-photo-royals-sue-french-magazine/story?id=17233736"Prince William and Kate Middleton have begun "legal proceedings for breach of privacy" against the magazine's publishers, the St. James Palace said in a statement Friday, after calling the publication of the photos "a grotesque and totally unjustifiable" invasion of the young couple's privacy."Prince Harry was onto something but was definitely wrong if he just wanted something/powers over the press/suppressing stories, etc/special security and other protections, just because William, Wasty and "Pedo" Andrew maybe have been granted that. NOBODY, had that right to censor free speech, be provided with wielding power/control over the press, or special protections from their own possible treasonous, abusive and/or even criminal behaviours. NOBODY. Yes, freedom of speech and the press is the defining pillar of a free, democratic society. We are nothing without FREE SPEECH. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech"Freedom of speech is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or a community to articulate their opinions and ideas without fear of retaliation, censorship, or legal sanction. The right to freedom of expression has been recognised as a human right in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and international human rights law by the United Nations. Many countries have constitutional law that protects free speech. Terms like free speech, freedom of speech, and freedom of expression are used interchangeably in political discourse. However, in a legal sense, the freedom of expression includes any activity of seeking, receiving, and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used." |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 7, 2024 19:42:39 GMT
I read in a few earlier posts that some of you thought that this would be the end for William if this came out. I don’t argue that, I can’t see how the public would allow him to continue to be in line. But in general, I can’t really see anyone in line because the whole family deceived? Would this be the end of the British Monarchy?Furthermore, for those of you who are quite well researched with the smaller monarchies (Sweden, Belgium, Denmark….) do you think that these Monarchies would be able to continue despite the British RF? Or, could this be a potential start for all European monarchies to vanish?   Thank you so much for writing this, W!  I will certainly weigh in with my own points. There is no precedent for what William allegedly did (and we all have to use that term, alleged, because nothing is "proven" yet, eh?) - Apparent circumventing of the true blood Succession is and should be construed as pure treason. I have written before that it's possible that as many as 5 out of the Top 10 of the British Succession could be false heirs. I firmly believe, and I am not even close to being a "conspiracy theorist", that George, Charlotte and Louis have NO royal blood, so they along with their so-called father, Prince William, need to be kicked out of the Succession and have their titles stripped. Damaging for innocent children? Of course, but WHO put them in that position? William, Carole and Kate Middleton. They have to be held accountable for all the damage they and THEY ALONE caused the Crown, UK and Commonwealth. Period. I am a little less sure about the Sussex children - I really believe, though, that they ARE Harry's biological children, but on the fence whether Meghan is the biological mother of either. Meghan had the same wobbly jelly-belly, etc, etc, going with her alleged pregnancy with Archie as Surrokkkate did with all 3 "pregnancies" ie: bellies either unnaturally wobbly or deflated completely when they knelt or bent down, weird strap marks, bellies LARGER after birth that before, no linea nigra, wearing sheer, light-colourted linen dresses, high heels, and cover girl makeup/hair literally hours after "giving birth", and dresses sheer enough to see that there were no appropriate undergarments that women would surely need right after birth. Women who have had several pregnancies expressed to me the same sentiments, so I don't think it's just a matter of me wanting to see something that wasn't there. Lilibet may be Meghan's natural child, as she was looking especially puffy during the Oprah interview, but then again, it could also be from receiving hormone treatments to either produce an egg or help her body carry a donated embryo that was fertilized with Harry's contribution, too. The fact we even have to speculate about and question the births of both Cambridge/Sussex children doesn't bode well for the BM, does it? Who could even imagine we would be in this place? If Harry and Meghan lied, too, and Archie and Lilibet are just Harry's biological children, then Harry, by rights, needs to be stripped of his titles and so should his children. Let's think about the Top 10 of the British Succession - 50% of the heirs stripped of their rights because of the actions of heirs that are purposely betraying their King, the Crown, UK and Commonwealth. Gross betrayal, there. William and Harry would have zero mor@l rights to claim about "protection of the children", when they undermined the BM. (still, most likely William, but Harry may have followed suit because of, so still would be culpable) The extended family HAVE to know, in some way. Maybe that's part of the reason why the BRF never seems to have any real associations/gets invited to any "family" events on the continent. (That, and also could be a number of other things, like the BRF thinks they are "above" it all, and the supreme and only important royal family out there. I recently wrote these sentiments under another thread, I believe). ie: Where was "Prince" George at the Crown Prince of Denmark's recent 18th birthday "extravaganza"? Other young heirs of other families were. How come William and/or Kate never become godparents to any royal children? There is mention of and inclusion of members of the BRF at the locales where their extended family relations reside; I personally saw that on a recent trip I took. So, they ARE included in the family narrative/history, of course, but wonder if the King/Queen/current working members of the BRF have sadly discounted them and their own family history? (this is just my own personal experience/speculations now) The continental monarchies, or at least a few of them, have their own issues, but are at least open to changing with the times. They know they have to seriously downsize and keep with the sentiments and challenges experienced by their citizens, in order to survive. I think they will do so, as they are not grossly betraying their citizens. |
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Jan 7, 2024 19:51:23 GMT
I read in a few earlier posts that some of you thought that this would be the end for William if this came out. I don’t argue that, I can’t see how the public would allow him to continue to be in line. But in general, I can’t really see anyone in line because the whole family deceived? Would this be the end of the British Monarchy?Furthermore, for those of you who are quite well researched with the smaller monarchies (Sweden, Belgium, Denmark….) do you think that these Monarchies would be able to continue despite the British RF? Or, could this be a potential start for all European monarchies to vanish? Tank you so much for writing this, W! I will certainly weigh in with my own points. There is no precedent for what William allegedly did (and we all have to use that term, alleged, because nothing is "proven" yet, eh?) - Apparent circumventing of the true blood Succession is and should be construed as pure tr#ason. I have written before that it's possible that as many as 5 out of the Top 10 of the British Succession could be false heirs. I firmly believe, and I am not even close to being a "conspiracy theorist", that George, Charlotte and Louis have NO royal blood, so they along with their so-called father, Prince William, need to be kicked out of the Succession and have their titles stripped. Damaging for innocent children? Of course, but WHO put them in that position? William, Carole and Kate Middleton. They have to be held accountable for all the damage they and THEY ALONE caused the Crown, UK and Commonwealth. Period. I am a little less sure about the Sussex children - I really believe, though, that they ARE Harry's biological children, but on the fence whether Meghan is the biological mother of either. Meghan had the same wobbly jelly-belly, etc, etc, going with her alleged pregnancy with Archie as Surrokkkate did with all 3 "pregnancies" ie: bellies either unnaturally wobbly or deflated completely when they knelt or bent down, weird strap marks, bellies LARGER after birth that before, no linea nigra, wearing sheer, light-colourted linen dresses, high heels, and cover girl makeup/hair literally hours after "giving birth", and dresses sheer enough to see that there were no appropriate undergarments that women would surely need right after birth. Women who have had several pregnancies expressed to me the same sentiments, so I don't think it's just a matter of me wanting to see something that wasn't there. Lilibet may be Meghan's natural child, as she was looking especially puffy during the Oprah interview, but then again, it could also be from receiving hormone treatments to either produce an egg or help her body carry a donated embryo that was fertilized with Harry's contribution, too. The fact we even have to speculate about and question the births of both Cambridge/Sussex children doesn't bode well for the BM, does it? Who could even imagine we would be in this place? If Harry and Meghan lied, too, and Archie and Lilibet are just Harry's biological children, then Harry, by rights, needs to be stripped of his titles and so should his children. Let's think about the Top 10 of the British Succession - 50% of the heirs stripped of their rights because of the actions of heirs that are purposely betraying their King, the Crown, UK and Commonwealth. Gross betrayal, there. William and Harry would have zero mor@l rights to claim about "protection of the children", when they undermined the BM. (still, most likely William, but Harry may have followed suit because of, so still would be culpable) The extended family HAVE to know, in some way. Maybe that's part of the reason why the BRF never seems to have any real associations/gets invited to any "family" events on the continent. (That, and also could be a number of other things, like the BRF thinks they are "above" it all, and the supreme and only important royal family out there. I recently wrote these sentiments under another thread, I believe). ie: Where was "Prince" George at the Crown Prince of Denmark's recent 18th birthday "extravaganza"? Other young heirs of other families were. How come William and/or Kate never become godparents to any royal children? There is mention of and inclusion of members of the BRF at the locales where their extended family relations reside; I personally saw that on a recent trip I took. So, they ARE included in the family narrative/history, of course, but wonder if the King/Queen/current working members of the BRF have sadly discounted them and their own family history? (this is just my own personal experience/speculations now) The continental monarchies, or at least a few of them, have their own issues, but are at least open to changing with the times. They know they have to seriously downsize and keep with the sentiments and challenges experienced by their citizens, in order to survive. I think they will do so, as they are not grossly betraying their citizens. I think Meg did give birth since her physiology has changed drastically since she gave birth, and she hasn't looked as slender faced as she used to be before Archie. If Kate did not give birth, it would be the final straw since that is her basic duty and she refused to do it. As for the Scandinavian monarchies, they are a mess and they are having problems slowing down jet setting and the crown princess of the Netherlands is in fact currently in Spain, not serving her nation. It is obvious to me that something odd is up and I wonder what it is. I hold the view that if treason has been committed, it will be the final straw and despite William's glowing press, he has contributed nothing to his nation. |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 31, 2024 1:34:50 GMT
Like Charlotte, looks like he has far-eastern ancestry.
|
|
|
|
Post by Leopard on Jan 31, 2024 2:16:38 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Guestington on Apr 7, 2024 17:54:03 GMT
Also, it is known that I think it was Victoria and those in power with her knew opium was addictive and destructive to life and health and they deliberately for this reason sold it to the Chinese because China was wealthy and independent and did not there want to trade with Britain. This resulted in many deaths, China turning poor and vulnerable to attack by the Japanese in World War II then, after decades of poverty, death, war and suffering, turning to Communism. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sassoon_familyen.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Sassoon_%26_Co. |
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Apr 7, 2024 20:05:30 GMT
When is the dumb press going to stop celebrating climbers? I wouldn't brag about pimping their eldest to a prince. I wouldn't brag about much of anything in regards to that way of 'moving up.' |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 4, 2024 18:42:21 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by india on Sept 4, 2024 18:51:08 GMT
NASTY LITTLE GOLDSMITH SPAWN |
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Nov 3, 2024 0:29:20 GMT
Charlotte is being raised like a typical pampered suburban brat with a title and the attitude to match. Worst part is, that she has no idea how unsafe her way of life is. The monarchies of the world will fall and so will the British Crown.
|
|
tale BS.
#JamesMiddleton