Beckhams

Phill.i.p, Trowbridge, United Kingdom, 13 hours ago

If they are spending then someone else is receiving the money. In turn they will spend and so on. Many people will benefit

ReplyNew Comment
2923454Click to rate
27 of 34 repliesSee all replies


Tickner, London, United Kingdom, 10 hours ago

Absolutely agree. The social media users who are complaining about this clearly think no further than the ends of their noses. @ Lottie - so? Big busi9nesses employ people too. Contracts going to big business keep people n jobs too. And those people will spend their money at other businesses including small ones.

867Click to rate

RoxyPanna, London, United Kingdom, 10 hours ago

Yes other rich people. They only employ the best you know.

729Click to rate

Carol, London, 10 hours ago

But what example are they setting plastering their crass display on the cover of Vogue etc? They could've just m had a wedding for a measly $1M and given the additional $2.5M to Ukraine. Then others would have genuinely benefited

5332Click to rate

AchillesNZ, Auckland, New Zealand, 10 hours ago

There are vast numbers of people who want everyone to be as miserable as themselves. They will try to wrap it up in self righteous indignation citing this disaster or that but at the end of the day it is their own sad little lives they want everyone to emulate.

2062Click to rate

Luckyone, New York, United States, 10 hours ago

I've always viewed life like this, I learned it from Dolly Levi, sprinkle your money around so everyone can benefit

539Click to rate

TheDreamWeaver, Bath, United Kingdom, 10 hours ago

Who the hell believes the $3.5 million ceremony cost pretence?.........That's $11,666 per guest based on 300 guests..........They think we're all stupid.........Unfortunately, most are.

833Click to rate

pointofview, AnyTown, United States, 9 hours ago

We have no idea what charitable donations are already being made by the families. Everyone spends according to their own budgets.

960Click to rate

chloé, Paris, France, 9 hours ago

Exactly, it's THEIR money ! Trashing someone wedding who pay for it themselves is kinda useless when you give willingly your hard earned money to a useless royal family !

972Click to rate

Bee, Boston, United States, 9 hours ago

How much of these billions could be re-invested into businesses. It's not enough to create jobs for caterers etc on one day. The people who work every day to produce profits for these people should have a decent living wage that keeps up with inflation, a pension, healthcare etc. If you don't want high taxes and government spending then private industry leaders have a responsibility to trickle it down. Unfortunately greed and the need for super yachts, multiple mansions, and pride are prevailing. This girl has literally purchased herself an entirely new face on the backs of thousands of people who are struggling.

2917Click to rate

Katy1999, London , United Kingdom, 9 hours ago

Dream weaver, if that's your conclusion then maybe you ARE 'stupid', in your own words. There's the cost of security, marquees, table and chair hire, flooring, decoration, construction, florists, cleaners, wedding planning, the celebrant, photographer, videographer, hair, make up and outfits for the whole bridal party, car hire, putting up many, if not all, guests for the night, toilet hire, the orchestra/band/music, lighting, sound, cleaners, attendants, waiting staff etc. etc. Then per guest is the catering, copious bottles of champagne and alternatives, wedding favours (most likely goody bags) which would come to a fraction of the other things, not 11-12k per person. Maybe we'd pay far less for all of above but they'll be getting the best of the best, and though Vogue is covering the event we don't know how that 3.5 is split - maybe Vogue has covered half of that.

630Click to rate

Spacewalker, Manchester, United Kingdom, 8 hours ago

Such as over paid chefs and celebrity wedding planners.

610Click to rate

obrncth, New York, United States, 8 hours ago

AchillesNZ - don't be so hard on yourself.

21Click to rate

obrncth, New York, United States, 8 hours ago

Everyone spends according to their own budgets. That doesn't make this production any less obscene.

530Click to rate

Jamaica Jacksparrow, Somewhere in the City, United Kingdom, 8 hours ago

You won't see A listers getting married at a registry office and celebrating down the local chippie later.

424Click to rate

Jed G, London, United Kingdom, 8 hours ago

While David Beckham taking millions from cruel dictatorships,plus even more despicable taking 250,000 from UNCEF, to front a charity ( supposedly) campaign.

225Click to rate

katie, Birmingham, United Kingdom, 7 hours ago

Kate Winslet got married in a local church and then had a pub lunch in the village pub. She has got married again twice since but I dont think any of them have been big celebrity weddings.

935Click to rate

Old Soul, London, United Kingdom, 7 hours ago

So are rich people not allowed to have a wedding? This is normal for them. The other half is just bitter.

2950Click to rate

cezar.p, birmingham, United Kingdom, 6 hours ago

Get over it, pleb... Sunak's wife got 200 million richer in the pandemic.... Can't you just be happy for them billionaires?

914Click to rate

Pumpsred, Columbus, United States, 6 hours ago

Their money, their decision..."non ya"

25Click to rate

simo75, Birmingham, United Kingdom, 5 hours ago

Exactly. Should David Beckham mow his own lawn. No, it's better for the wider economy if he doesn't.

02Click to rate

normal guy, Midlands, United Kingdom, 5 hours ago

Oh thats okay then....

13Click to rate

Cidona51, Somewhere, Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba, 5 hours ago

True. If it wasn't spent on this wedding it would probably just be sitting in a bank account. At least this way it frees up some of the millions back into the economy.

114Click to rate

allgodsaredead, Valhalla, United Kingdom, 5 hours ago

Thank God he didn't do the Photography

022Click to rate

Iris Winterbottom, Brisbane, Australia, 5 hours ago

Yep. Distribution of wealth.

24Click to rate

joy, lincs, 4 hours ago

Or the wedding breakfast!

02Click to rate

Angelstarrae, Bournemouth, United Kingdom, 3 hours ago

Yes but 3.5 million for a wedding? Point is, money should be put to a good use like helping others maybe if in a privileged position not gross displays .. just a thought!

320Click to rate

Oreillia Hoover, Swan Hills , Canada, 2 hours ago

There were many people helped in regards to the spending for this wedding absolutely every services rendered were paid... At least the father isn't a politician...

They had better things to do.