|
|
Post by Admin on May 20, 2022 1:42:41 GMT
Aside: Sucking up to celebs...Scientology Tom!
|
|
|
|
Post by caseyanne on May 20, 2022 15:23:31 GMT
Ugh. I've always thought he was a creepy self-centered little man.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on May 20, 2022 23:17:34 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on May 20, 2022 23:18:06 GMT
Aside: Really, Camilla Tominey?
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on May 20, 2022 23:19:00 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by romilly on May 21, 2022 7:12:04 GMT
The public getting heartily sick of their opulent lifestyle, much on the taxpayers’ dime. More than ever now, with everyone having to tighten their belts and so many struggling to feed their families.
An article in the DM said that ‘the palaces were SECRETLY opening their doors to Ukrainian refugees’! A deluge of scathing comments saying ‘rubbish’, damage control, lies etc etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on May 21, 2022 17:19:25 GMT
Any bets that Tom Cruise has bee tasked to rope the BRF into Scientology? Tom is the only star they have left and now if the BRF were to get roped in, it would end up providing the organization with a huge coup and would enable the Scientologists to get an in with the power of the British government. The Windsors are so stupid they are easy pickings for that cult. Andrew would join for the protection and ability to prey on girls, Fergie would join for the money, William would join for the ability to bully/harass/mistreat people with even more impunity, and then Kate would join if they could provide her with a continuation of her marriage. Then there is the fact that the Scientologists are known for their way of dealing with anyone who messes with their membership and you have a shot at that way suiting the Windsor temperament just fine.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on May 21, 2022 17:22:53 GMT
Any bets that Tom Cruise has bee tasked to rope the BRF into Scientology? Tom is the only star they have left and now if the BRF were to get roped in, it would end up providing the organization with a huge coup and would enable the Scientologists to get an in with the power of the British government. The Windsors are so stupid they are easy pickings for that cult. Andrew would join for the protection and ability to prey on girls, Fergie would join for the money, William would join for the ability to bully/harass/mistreat people with even more impunity, and then Kate would join if they could provide her with a continuation of her marriage. Then there is the fact that the Scientologists are known for their way of dealing with anyone who messes with their membership and you have a shot at that way suiting the Windsor temperament just fine.
My thoughts, too!!!!!! Scientology is famous for destroying things that weren't theirs to ruin and destroy in the first place. I wouldn't wish that dangerous cult on anybody - scary people! |
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on May 21, 2022 20:05:53 GMT
^So royals have that in common. Second, the Windsors would LOVE to unleash Scientologists on monarchical critics, they can't even handle bad articles. So I can only say that it is likely that Tom Cruise will be making plenty of visits. Oddly, Tom Cruise was supposedly buddy buddy with Diana and I am certain that Diana was being manipulated into the cult. Diana made an ideal recruit and with her money, profile, and status, she would have been a full on trophy and that would explain Cruise's connection to the late princess.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on May 22, 2022 14:40:45 GMT
Aside: Cambridge priorities or Carole acting up? Either way, NOBODY CARES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by romilly on May 22, 2022 15:09:38 GMT
The public get heartily sick of the Cambs getting the first viewings, the best seats to any current event etc etc. Wimbledon almost here and we will have to put up with gurning open mouthed Kate in the Royal Box again with her silly affected clapping and hangers on.
Those close say she is allegedly paranoid that the public are going to love the Sussexes beautiful children in a way they don’t hers.
|
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on May 22, 2022 19:42:56 GMT
Another film premiere and it's not like either contributed and really shouldn't be there. Available for a party, but not an engagement or much of anything else. Irritating really. Kate in a frock using money that isn't hers (and should got to a shelter) and it is clear that neither WK are aware that Cruise could be roping them in for Scientology. If either joined, the politicians and diplomats would blow a gasket, a huge gasket.
|
|
|
|
Post by romilly on May 29, 2022 6:50:55 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on May 29, 2022 15:54:30 GMT
Kate needs to stop playing at being a suburban mommy and send them to a school where the kids can fit in. Why not either boarding school or perhaps somewhere nearer the palaces? Kate needs to go where she belongs, not where she wants to be.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on May 29, 2022 16:06:49 GMT
Kate needs to stop playing at being a suburban mommy and send them to a school where the kids can fit in. Why not either boarding school or perhaps somewhere nearer the palaces? Kate needs to go where she belongs, not where she wants to be.
Why is the taxpayer on the hook for this? Better uses of taxpayer money. |
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on May 29, 2022 16:26:38 GMT
Kate needs to stop playing at being a suburban mommy and send them to a school where the kids can fit in. Why not either boarding school or perhaps somewhere nearer the palaces? Kate needs to go where she belongs, not where she wants to be.
Why is the taxpayer on the hook for this? Better uses of taxpayer money.
Heck if I know. I am sick of Kate having fun and playing at being a suburban mommy and while I encourage active involvement, this is a step too much. Kate needs to go and stay where her presence is not a disruption.
|
|
laura
Baron/Baroness
Posts: 99
|
Post by laura on May 29, 2022 16:54:37 GMT
Kate needs to stop playing at being a suburban mommy and send them to a school where the kids can fit in. Why not either boarding school or perhaps somewhere nearer the palaces? Kate needs to go where she belongs, not where she wants to be.
Why is the taxpayer on the hook for this? Better uses of taxpayer money. In all fairness as a British taxpayer I don't have a problem contributing to the security of high ranking royals and their immediate family. I would have a problem if anything happened to any of them. It would be awful to read the headline "Where was the security?" if something happened to George or Charlotte.
The problem comes when it's all the adult minor royals who somehow seem to need/want security. If TQ wants to pay for their safety then sobeit otherwise let them go without and so that money is not taken from more worthy causes.
|
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on May 29, 2022 16:57:27 GMT
Why is the taxpayer on the hook for this? Better uses of taxpayer money. In all fairness as a British taxpayer I don't have a problem contributing to the security of high ranking royals and their immediate family. I would have a problem if anything happened to any of them. It would be awful to read the headline "Where was the security?" if something happened to George or Charlotte.
The problem comes when it's all the adult minor royals who somehow seem to need/want security. If TQ wants to pay for their safety then sobeit otherwise let them go without and so that money is not taken from more worthy causes.
Thing is, that Kate needs to go where she fits in, not where her security is a disruption. Kate refuses to accept that at her position she should be where she fits in; if she isn't comfy in that set, she should have thought twice before going after William.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on May 29, 2022 17:06:16 GMT
Why is the taxpayer on the hook for this? Better uses of taxpayer money. In all fairness as a British taxpayer I don't have a problem contributing to the security of high ranking royals and their immediate family. I would have a problem if anything happened to any of them. It would be awful to read the headline "Where was the security?" if something happened to George or Charlotte.
The problem comes when it's all the adult minor royals who somehow seem to need/want security. If TQ wants to pay for their safety then sobeit otherwise let them go without and so that money is not taken from more worthy causes.
Well, not "minor" royals, but rather, true royal heirs (IMO anyways) and decisions can be made about their security. There are no open complaints at this time and haven't really been in the past, either. I'm thinking that both the Cambridges/Sussexes may want to overblow things a bit and make it all about their priorities - it's rather tiring, but I'm just fed up with them all. |
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Jun 2, 2022 1:40:42 GMT
Why is the taxpayer on the hook for this? Better uses of taxpayer money. In all fairness as a British taxpayer I don't have a problem contributing to the security of high ranking royals and their immediate family. I would have a problem if anything happened to any of them. It would be awful to read the headline "Where was the security?" if something happened to George or Charlotte.
The problem comes when it's all the adult minor royals who somehow seem to need/want security. If TQ wants to pay for their safety then sobeit otherwise let them go without and so that money is not taken from more worthy causes.
The royal kids need to be schooled with where they are not a disruption; palace grounds would be best and there could be a much better situation or at least a boarding school that is filled with kids who are children of VIP status types. Kate's preferences are just disruptive. There are other schools where security at that level is already embedded. She has that title and needs to go where she belongs, not where she wants to be. The kids aren't the same and Kate talking about moving to the Shires would be disruptive to the Shires. I am certain that there comes a point where she and other royals need to be put in their place (whether they like it or not).
|
|
tale BS.
Oct 20, 2024 18:30:58 GMT
Oct 20, 2024 18:30:58 GMT
#JamesMiddleton