Home
U.K.
News
Sports
U.S. Showbiz
Australia
Femail
Health
Science
Money
Video
Travel
Shop
Search
Login | Join now
Desktop site
Comments (79)
We are no longer accepting comments on this article.
NewestOldestBest ratedWorst rated
The comments below have not been moderated
jackie, east yorkshire, United Kingdom, 3 years ago
Star child or whatever u call yourself, read all the comments before having a hissy fit!!
31
starchild84, london, United Kingdom, 3 years ago
You know whats funny? Meghan's supporters (sussexsquad) actually support Meghan's patronages. Whilst Kate's ''fans'' don't. And you know why? Because they are just meghan haters, looking to put someone on a pedestal in order to ignore how mediocre kate is. If this was Meghan's charity...i can only imagine the comments.
623
jackie, east yorkshire, United Kingdom, 3 years ago
Starchild84 I was replying to an earlier comment that I hated harry and Meghan!!!
52
jackie, east yorkshire, United Kingdom, 3 years ago
I dont hate harry and Meghan I just dont want to contribute towards their upkeep. Nobody should!!!
126
1 reply View all replies
Esther4Gd, Ohio, United States, 3 years ago
the kiss of death, thanks Middleton. this is when we need Megan to step in
1225
Trinette Mitchell, PORT SAINT JOHN, United States, 3 years ago
I think we all know at this point that it's possible for a patron of one of these Charities to raise money for them. Is inexcusable that a charity that is for children has to go bankrupt because it's Patron is too lazy to do what is necessary to help raise funding. There is no excuse for this!
1631
1 reply View all replies
pounds sterling, london, United Kingdom, 3 years ago
kate is no longer a middleton
1013
Lifeis2short, Leicester, United Kingdom, 3 years ago
People are poor because of the disgusting elite.
531
Relax85, Essex, United Kingdom, 3 years ago
I absolutely do not understand how Kate and even Harry and Meghan have copped the blame for this - the entire blame is down to government cuts to schools; if the schools cannot afford to pay for the services, the services are not used and no money is made. It has nothing to do with its patron, without the support of whom it would no doubt have closed sooner. So many charities involved with school aged children fold because head teachers don't have the budget for them.
1723
lilacrosebud, usa, United States, 3 years ago
So the "backers" are spending millions on travel and wardrobes, but nothing on their "charities"?
620
jackie, east yorkshire, United Kingdom, 3 years ago
People like me? Go and have a chat with yourself, this is not my doing. Harry and his crazy wife plotted their exit. Harry was clueless, meghan had it all planned out. She never wanted to be a part of the royal family. Good luck to them, let them stay in Canada, I dont care either way but the UK taxpayers are still contributing as is Canada to their security!!
3618
Talula Sharp, London, United Kingdom, 3 years ago
Yes, yes, you're a hate filled person and you hate Harry and Meghan, we get it. (eye-roll)
1423
jackie, east yorkshire, United Kingdom, 3 years ago
Lily10 I'm happy to contribute to the royal family as a taxpayer. Those 2 numpties left the royal family for a new life as they wanted their independence. That's what I dont want to pay for. The uk us still paying for them, hardly fair is it?? If I want to move away and be independent I cant expect others to take care of me can I?? DOH!!!
3120
Lily10, london, United Kingdom, 3 years ago
Those two left because of the constant negative propaganda from the media and people like you,Charles is paying for them,we are paying for security which THEY NEED for now,the queen is queen of the common wealth including Canada, they are royals regardless of where they go,and if you were in that position yes you would expect some tax to pay for security, you wouldn't expect to be a sitting target,just because some people are petty and spiteful while you begin to try to be independent, stop acting as if it makes a shred of difference to your pay packet...it doesent, and you know it.
2331
Talula Sharp, London, United Kingdom, 3 years ago
Oh Jackie, please, enough already. Yawn, you're making me sleepy with all of your hate filled diatribe. Give it a rest.
816
Mustafa Leak, Sin City, United Kingdom, 3 years ago
wonder how much the directors pay themselves along with their pensions, unlimited expense accounts and perks
1343
lalaloolooland, lalaland, United Kingdom, 3 years ago
It's all well and good wandering around "supporting" charities and causes but if there is no money there is no money
1543
lilacrosebud, usa, United States, 3 years ago
The RF has plenty of money to spend on themselves.
219
jackie, east yorkshire, United Kingdom, 3 years ago
Grow up!
177
beelady, uk, United Kingdom, 3 years ago
What happened to Camila Batmanghelidjh ? Is she going to get away with her charity scandal ?
627
Destine, Shreveport, 3 years ago
That's such a shame for the children.
449
jackie, east yorkshire, United Kingdom, 3 years ago
We are not easily guiled, we taxpayers who live in the UK are paying for harry and Meghan when we could be supporting worthier causes!
4853
3 replies View all replies
Polly333, Stirling, United Kingdom, 3 years ago
Well, that's a shock - said nobody, ever. Charities all over the country are keeping their heads down in case Kate decides to support them.
5842
red-one, sunderland, United Kingdom, 3 years ago
They would probably have closed sooner had she not been their Patron
2511
Tj All77, Up North, United Kingdom, 3 years ago
Such a shame Catherine is so focused on wearing expensive clothes, instead of using that money to help these organisations where she's their patron. Why can't she go to Primark and buy her clothes there and she should dip into her millions to help these charities. But she won't do it because she is such a mean spirited person.
6361
Lily10, london, United Kingdom, 3 years ago
If it was meghan she would be being told she should sell her 13 and a half thousand pounds worth of jewellery she wore to the baftas to personally support this charity if she cares so much, as I've said all along,let criticism be fair..
2541
red-one, sunderland, United Kingdom, 3 years ago
That would not save the chsrity it would probably not keep them for a week . You are clearly clueless as to the cost of running charities
189
Expat, Believe-land, United States, 3 years ago
So much for that royal patronage then.
1877
Lily10, london, United Kingdom, 3 years ago
Red one...I'm saying what would be said...not what is the truth.
56
More...
We are no longer accepting comments on this article.×