|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 6, 2023 18:54:00 GMT
I find it intriguing that Kate behaves as an equal with people who are wealthier and come from more prominent backgrounds. Who is Kate to egg anyone on to wear a Nazi uniform? Who is Kate to go to parties acting like she's there in her own right? Who is Kate to party all the time when she is in fact supposed to be working and looking after herself? I dislike people who like to walk in and get mixed up with people who are NOT her set. IF Kate knew about this, she had a lot of gall acting all pious after that mess broke out.
That they may have thought this was funny just shows what low class douchebags their set really is. I'm not impressed with the hypocritical British aristocracy - too many uncouth idiots with little sense and way too much smugness and insensitivity. Harry now realizes his mistakes but honestly, the others? Load of hypocritical pasty-faced dickwads, no doubt. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2023 19:17:17 GMT
|
|
sanka
Count/Countess
Posts: 295
|
Post by sanka on Jan 8, 2023 3:25:25 GMT
The latest stories are trying to make out that we have Saint Meghan. Despite the fact she broke the rules by accepting freebies and her veil was tailored for a Spencer tiara and then the Queen gave her a selection from the Royal collection.
Hmmm I hope Angela Kelly responds that would be a classic.
I don't believe the revised version of the tiara incident as it was clear she wanted the one Eugenie wore and if the veil was being tailored for a Spencer tiara why then get one from the Royal collection. MM is supposedly Diana 2.0....things don't add up.
However it is clear by the book that Harry has dug a deeper hole and has made a complete fool of himself. Can things get any worse for him??
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 8, 2023 3:48:17 GMT
The latest stories are trying to make out that we have Saint Meghan. Despite the fact she broke the rules by accepting freebies and her veil was tailored for a Spencer tiara and then the Queen gave her a selection from the Royal collection. Hmmm I hope Angela Kelly responds that would be a classic. I don't believe the revised version of the tiara incident as it was clear she wanted the one Eugenie wore and if the veil was being tailored for a Spencer tiara why then get one from the Royal collection. MM is supposedly Diana 2.0....things don't add up. However it is clear by the book that Harry has dug a deeper hole and has made a complete fool of himself. Can things get any worse for him?? Harry is dragging in a lot of innocent people into his grievances; THEY are not the problem and I'm sick at heart about what the Spencer boys are doing. Yes, both, but this leaking from Harry is deranged and strange. Yet, I hardly feel that all these anecdotes and explanations of what "really went on" are helping at all or what is really at the heart of his palpable rage and anger. There is also a time to use a huge filter and that is now. His confessions about the military/Taliban were just downright dangerous, and he potentially places a lot of people in harm's way. THAT is something that is beyond the pale, IMO. |
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Jan 8, 2023 7:22:22 GMT
The latest stories are trying to make out that we have Saint Meghan. Despite the fact she broke the rules by accepting freebies and her veil was tailored for a Spencer tiara and then the Queen gave her a selection from the Royal collection. Hmmm I hope Angela Kelly responds that would be a classic. I don't believe the revised version of the tiara incident as it was clear she wanted the one Eugenie wore and if the veil was being tailored for a Spencer tiara why then get one from the Royal collection. MM is supposedly Diana 2.0....things don't add up. However it is clear by the book that Harry has dug a deeper hole and has made a complete fool of himself. Can things get any worse for him??
Everyone in the BRF accepts freebies; especially suitcases full of cash, plus jewels, plus favors for families. After all, Kate was leeching the minute she got herself into William's bed and her family has been doing the same. I hope the revelations come out. I loathe nothing more than Karen Kate getting all this pious coverage.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 9, 2023 1:34:24 GMT
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11610559/Prince-Harry-barred-visa-risk-drugs-admission.htmlPrince Harry could be barred from the US and has put visa 'at risk' after his admission he has taken drugs
Prince Harry could be barred from the US after he admitted to taking drugs
He confessed to doing cocaine, smoking cannabis and taking mushrooms
Typical visa applicants would be denied over their history with illicit substances
By NATASHA ANDERSON FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 21:19 EST, 7 January 2023 | UPDATED: 16:56 EST, 8 January 2023Prince Harry could be barred from the US and has put visa 'at risk' after admitting about his illicit drug usage, immigration experts have warned.
The Duke of Sussex, 38, confessed to doing cocaine, smoking cannabis and taking hallucinogenic mushrooms in his upcoming memoir.
Typical applicants would be denied a visa over their history with illegal substances, but US authorities note entry into the country is granted on a 'case-by-case' basis.
In his new autobiography 'Spare', Harry revealed that he first took cocaine on a shooting weekend at age 17. He did a 'few more lines' on other occasions.
The one hard-partier also admitted to hallucinating during a celebrity-filled event in California and smoking cannabis after his first date with Meghan.
Most applicants with a history of drug use would be denied American visas, however immigration decisions are made on a 'case-by-case' basis, The Sunday Times reported.
US immigration rules state an individual's 'current and/or past actions, such as drug or criminal activities . . . may make the applicant ineligible for a visa'.
It is unclear what type of US visa Harry holds, but analysts speculate he either holds a spousal visa - sponsored by his American wife - or a O-1 visa which is given to people with 'extraordinary ability'.
If Harry holds an O-1 visa, which is often given to celebrities and athletes, it would have to be renewed after three years.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 9, 2023 1:41:10 GMT
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11610559/Prince-Harry-barred-visa-risk-drugs-admission.htmlSome comments: The comments below have not been moderated. SuzieBC, Columbus, United States, 13 minutes ago Please, we don't want him! ReplyNew Comment 03Click to rate billy..no..mates.., London, United Kingdom,  minutes ago He has privilege, it probably won't be too much of a problem for him. Money talks. ReplyNew Comment 05Click to rate maria212, London, United Kingdom, 51 minutes ago the fact he said he took the gas and air when Megs was in labour proves he hasn't changed,Its the same drug that kids are smoking out of baloons ReplyNew Comment 09Click to rate squared , Anywhere, United Kingdom, 1 hour ago Please don't send him back here!! ReplyNew Comment 07Click to rate A-birdie-flies, Thegarage, United States, 2 hours ago Please, under f j b? Right. H will totally be allowed to stay and likely get gov money to resettle to boot. ReplyNew Comment 011Click to rate Mack64, New York, United States, 2 hours ago Why should Harry be given deferential treatment, when others at the US Southern border continue to wait to enter the US. Harry offers no special skill set...he just married an American. I've known several US citizens who had to wait quite a long time for their spouses to get VISAs and enter the US. Harry wants to be like everyone else, then he should be treated like everyone else. He's nothing special ReplyNew Comment 027Click to rate KeriCaye, Santa Clarita, United States, 2 hours ago He wanted to feel safe, free and himself in the US? How? we have 24/7 people who live in their cars waiting for the famous to drive/walk etc for "$ shot" for articles, news, magazines. I thought he hated them for chasing his mom? Yet he moves to where the most are...Southern Ca. ReplyNew Comment 029Click to rate Queen of everything , roundOurWay, Norway, 3 hours ago He'll still get in ReplyNew Comment 116Click to rate MK, Preston, 4 hours ago tactical maneuver to get him away from his controlling wife. ReplyNew Comment 133Click to rate dcregold63, Deerfield, United States, 4 hours ago Good. We dont want him. ReplyNew Comment 245Click to rate Bellabloo, Belfast, United Kingdom, 4 hours ago Neither do we!! 036Click to rate Not now, Chester, United Kingdom, 4 hours ago We don't want him here ReplyNew Comment 150Click to rate Runawaychild, London, United Kingdom, 4 hours ago Thats a bunch of hog wash ReplyNew Comment 515Click to rate Memyselfandi85, Los Angeles, United States, 4 hours ago Please... the US is doing nothing about this. Biden doesn't care about who comes in the country. Just look at our southern border ReplyNew Comment 537Click to rate Scottzulu, Scotland, United Kingdom, 5 hours ago Can't have one rule for one and completely different one for everyone else. ReplyNew Comment 028Click to rate hp, UK, United Kingdom, 3 hours ago Bit rich coming from a Scot in light of curtains laws that have been passed! 35Click to rate moaningme, london, United Kingdom, 5 hours ago That would be so funny, but I fully expect it wont happen. ReplyNew Comment 130Click to rate Proud_1_CanadianMom, Cambridge, Canada, 2 hours ago It would be hilarious! What a laugh that would be. 02Click to rate hantsgirl, Thatplace, United Kingdom, 5 hours ago Please don't - he'll come back here if you do! ReplyNew Comment 136Click to rate Hypocritesussex, Los Angeles, United States, 5 hours ago Harry should be barred. Make him go home to UK and live next to William and Kate and look them in their face. Stop being a coward from afar. ReplyNew Comment 138Click to rate Rico Gerard, MIAMI, United States, 5 hours ago With the drug loving Democrats in power, he doesn't have to worry. I'd go even further, if he hadn't admitted to all of this, the State of California might tell him to go for not conforming to their commonplace drug culture! He's safe, especially in California. ReplyNew Comment 119Click to rate NoneOfUsArePerfect, London, United Kingdom, 5 hours ago I shouldn't laugh as we don't want him back here but this would be so deserved if he were to be refused. The pair of them are so blinded with rage that they've no thought for anybody and certainly haven't even thought about the consequences of their actions. ReplyNew Comment 127Click to rate JT SLN, NYC, United States, 5 hours ago This is just wishful thinking. Theres one set of rules for celebrity elite and another set for the rest of us. It will never happen with our woke democrat administration ReplyNew Comment 119Click to rate MK, Preston, 4 hours ago except many celebrities have been banned from entering countries due to their criminal history.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 9, 2023 1:42:46 GMT
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11605843/Ex-Royal-Marine-says-Prince-Harrys-claims-killing-25-Taliban-kept-guys.html?ito=chromelessDM_0'Prince Harry has turned on his military family': Iraq war hero slams Duke over Taliban kill revelations - and says path he has chosen 'will end in misery in his pursuit of riches he does not need'
Veterans have blasted Prince Harry for talking about killing Taliban fighters
Duke writes in his memoir that he personally killed 25 fighters in Afghanistan
Iraq War hero Colonel Tim Collins said Harry had 'turned his back on military'
Ex-Army chief Col Kemp said troops don't regard targets as 'subhuman'
By JACK WRIGHT FOR MAILONLINE and MARK NICOL DEFENCE EDITOR FOR THE DAILY MAIL
PUBLISHED: 03:38 EST, 6 January 2023 | UPDATED: 05:17 EST, 8 January 2023Prince Harry was criticised by a string of military veterans today, including some of Britain's top commanders, after revealing he killed 25 Taliban fighters while serving as a helicopter pilot in Afghanistan.
Writing in his autobiography, Spare, the Duke of Sussex says he had neither pride nor regret about firing at the extremists - and admits that he thought of his targets not as 'people' but as 'chess pieces' that had been removed from the board.
In a strongly worded intervention, Colonel Tim Collins, known for a pre-battle speech he made in Iraq, said: 'Harry has now turned against the other family, the military, that once embraced him, having trashed his birth family'. Ex-Army chief Colonel Richard Kemp called Harry's comments 'ill-judged' and said soldiers are not trained to regard their targets as 'subhuman' - while former National Security Adviser Lord Darroch said he would have cautioned the Duke from disclosing his kill count.
Meanwhile, former Royal Marine commando Ben McBean suggested the Duke had broken an 'unwritten rule' with his revelation.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 9, 2023 1:45:57 GMT
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11605843/Ex-Royal-Marine-says-Prince-Harrys-claims-killing-25-Taliban-kept-guys.html?ito=chromelessDM_0 Clumsy, tasteless, and disappointing': Military leaders and heroes blast Harry's 'boast' of 'killing 25 Taliban soldiers' as if they were 'chess pieces' Major General Jonathan Shaw, previously an assistant chief of the Defence Staff and a former SAS commander said: 'Soldiers don't talk about killing for good reason. Harry's comments break an unwritten code. I suspect this is motivated by his PR people's drive for money.' Rear Admiral Chris Parry, retired Royal Navy officer said: 'Over 35 years of service myself, I've never heard anybody in the Armed Forces say what their score is. I think it's highly unusual and I think, if we're going to be kind, it must be the ghostwriter which has put these words into Harry's mouth. 'I'm afraid to say that it's clumsy, tasteless and doesn't afford respect to the people who have been killed. 25 is a suspiciously round number as far as I'm concerned and I just wonder if this is some of the hype associated with the book. 'I have to say I have real problems with the veracity of quite a lot of the other stuff I have heard and this may be no different. 'You don't have to itemise what you say you've done. I think there are enough descriptions of what life is like in combat, there's enough good people around to actually tell you what goes on. You don't have to get down to the individual deaths.' He added: 'What we're talking about here is somebody who has gone back on the video and reviewed what has actually happened, that's ok for professional debriefing purposes but I don't think it's ok to go out and advertise that fact in support of a book.' General Sir Richard Barrons - who served as Commander Joint Forces Command from April 2013 until his retirement in April 2016 - said: 'My view is that you don't talk about these things, these are things that happen on the battlefield - and there's no great advantage in saying anything public.' Major Chris Hunter, a decorated former army bomb disposal officer who served in Afghanistan, said: 'Very rarely will any soldier, sailor or airman, serving or a veteran, talk about numbers of kills. 'I think that, coupled with the fact it uses terms like chess pieces, dehumanises them, I think that could very, very easily cause some serious repercussions. 'Not just for his own security, but the wider security, to the Royal Family and actually to the servicemen and women on operations across the world at the moment. 'The comments are sad and very much a betrayal. Everyone in the Army swears an oath of allegiance to the monarch, he's betrayed his own family for money. It is just truly sad. I'm very, very disappointed.' Colonel Tim Collins, known for a pre-battle speech he made in Iraq, said: 'Amongst his assertions is a claim that he killed 25 people in Afghanistan. 'That's not how you behave in the Army; it's not how we think...' 'Harry has now turned against the other family, the military, that once embraced him, having trashed his birth family.' Former Royal Marine commando Ben McBean, a personal hero of Harry's, said: 'He's already got a big target on his back and maybe it's grown a bit more. But he's in America, he's got security... here in the UK they could think we can't get to Harry but we could go to his old barracks. ... you're always a target anyway, but I just think flaring things up and bringing numbers out doesn't really help'. He added: 'He's done all sorts of things. I posted a tweet yesterday saying shut up mate and just enjoy your life if you can now and get on with it. Because it's not nice when you see a good guy ... even though a lot of people give him grief now, what he has done for the country and charities is more than most... so it's a shame to see where he is.'
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 9, 2023 1:48:07 GMT
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11612849/Prince-Harrys-old-pals-break-silence-book-revelations-years-loyalty.htmlPrince Harry's old pals may break their silence over book revelations after years of loyalty
A source said the Prince was a 'broken man' but has 'driven away' some who care
The idea of Royals encouraging Harry to wear a Nazi outfit was called 'b******t'
Another said: 'Most people are absolutely disgusted at what Harry has done'
By REBECCA ENGLISH ROYAL EDITOR FOR THE DAILY MAIL
PUBLISHED: 17:49 EST, 8 January 2023 | UPDATED: 20:38 EST, 8 January 2023The comments below have not been moderated. Jdb123, Fairview, United States, moments ago It halos me keep calm and carryon knowing the Monarch has legal custody of all minor royals. ReplyNew Comment 01Click to rate Bev570, buckingham, United Kingdom, 7 minutes ago They need to release their stories ! ReplyNew Comment 010Click to rate null, United Kingdom, 7 minutes ago Harry will go down in History as a First Class Bitter and Twisted Drug induced Nincompoop!!!!! ReplyNew Comment 011Click to rate Elenaferrante, Paris, France, 11 minutes ago Plane crash. With H&M ReplyNew Comment 012Click to rate Elenaferrante, Paris, France, 11 minutes ago He is a joke ReplyNew Comment 017Click to rate shydiatlanta, Atlanta, United States, 12 minutes ago Harry if I were you I would fire your therapist. ReplyNew Comment 125Click to rate notfair, college town, United States, 18 minutes ago I said people will come out of the wood work to tell the real truth ReplyNew Comment 042Click to rate Susudio, vienna, Austria, 19 minutes ago if that marriage doesn't work which it won't, he has nothing, just two poor kids with no grandparents or aunts uncles ReplyNew Comment 147Click to rate Jdb123, Fairview, United States, 6 minutes ago The first thing he would do is head to his family. And they will take him back because of his children. It's good to know that the monarch has legal custody of all minor royals. 03Click to rate ClanceyFlood, Dallas, United States, 19 minutes ago I don't know if the Royal Family does Estate Planning, seems to me they'd quickly get around to removing Harry from the line of succession, he's #6. King Harry ... probably not a wise idea right this moment ... ReplyNew Comment 137Click to rate AvengingEagle, London, United Kingdom, 8 minutes ago I think he is actually number five, after Prince William's family. 03Click to rate Bev570, buckingham, United Kingdom, 5 minutes ago I am sure the divorce lawyers have been watching like vultures since the beginning of this relationship ! 00Click to rate Sophie, London, 20 minutes ago History won't view Harold Windsor kindly. ReplyNew Comment
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 9, 2023 13:59:58 GMT
www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1718080/king-charles-prince-harry-book-memoir-meghan-markle-royal-familyKing poised to punish Harry and Meghan with 'nuclear option' after 'outrageous' new claims
The Royal Family has so far remained silent on the bombshell claims made by Prince Harry in his upcoming book, Spare.
By PAUL WITHERS, LAUREN WELCH
00:00, Sat, Jan 7, 2023 | UPDATED: 10:48, Sat, Jan 7, 2023King Charles III could punish Prince Harry and Meghan Markle with the "nuclear option" in response to the new "outrageous" claims made by the Duke of Sussex, a royal expert has warned. Harry's hotly anticipated book Spare was not due for official release until Tuesday, but mistakingly went on sale early in Spain and contains several new bombshell accusations against the Royal Family. One of the more sensational claims is Harry alleging his older brother Prince William physically assaulted him in 2019 during a heated argument over the duke's wife Meghan. He also alleges the Prince of Wales called the Duchess of Sussex "difficult", "rude" and "abrasive".
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 9, 2023 14:02:08 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 9, 2023 14:02:36 GMT
www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1718828/prince-harry-interview-spare-camilla-dxusHarry says Camilla is not an 'evil stepmother' but 'I had to draw a line' in new interview
Prince Harry has opened up about his relationship with Camilla, the Queen Consort, in a wide-ranging interview with "Good Morning America" co-anchor Michael Strahan.
By ADAM CHAPMAN
13:37, Mon, Jan 9, 2023 | UPDATED: 13:57, Mon, Jan 9, 2023
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 9, 2023 14:04:57 GMT
Aside: Of course she knew - and didn't do anything, Harry?
You just cannot select who you want to blame and who you wish to protect? Call out the truth and who was really ultimately responsible in your family?www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1718811/prince-harry-interview-queen-Elizabeth-ii-megxit-sad-good-morning-America-dxus
Harry claims 'sad' Queen 'knew what was going on' when he quit Royal life
The late Queen Elizabeth II was "sad" Prince Harry and Meghan Markle stepped down from royal duties, according to the Duke.
By DYLAN DONNELLY
13:07, Mon, Jan 9, 2023 | UPDATED: 13:17, Mon, Jan 9, 2023
January sales Sussexes enter new 'disaster zone' over Netflix & book backlash Firm braced for 'more Montecito explosions' after King snubs Sussexes This Is The Tip All Canadians Need To Know Soxy Disabilities and health conditions eligible for PIP worth over £600 Prince George comforts young Louis in heartwarming clip by Taboola Harry claims 'sad' Queen 'knew what was going on' when he quit Royal life The late Queen Elizabeth II was "sad" Prince Harry and Meghan Markle stepped down from royal duties, according to the Duke. By DYLAN DONNELLY 13:07, Mon, Jan 9, 2023 | UPDATED: 13:17, Mon, Jan 9, 2023 11 Prince Harry discusses family in teaser for ITV interview Enter your email address here SUBSCRIBE We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info Prince Harry has claimed Queen Elizabeth II was “sad” that he and Meghan Markle stepped down. In 2020, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex stepped down from their duties and moved to the US. After the monarch died in 2022, Harry and Meghan returned to the UK to pay tribute to the Queen. RELATED ARTICLES For the good of the country Harry MUST be banned from Coronation Prince Harry's memoir backfires as popularity plunges to new low When and where you can buy Spare, the new book by Prince Harry Prince Harry's book Spare Spare by Prince Harry will be released by publishers Penguin Random House on January 10, 2023. The tell-all memoir, which was ghostwritten by Pulitzer Prize winner J R Moehringer, promises to be packed full of explosive revelations and insight into the Royal Family - and there's even an audiobook read by the Duke of Sussex himself. You can buy your copy of Spare on Amazon. This article contains affiliate links, we may receive a commission on any sales we generate from it. Learn more Now, in his third interview promoting his memoir ‘Spare’, Harry said he believes the Queen was "sad" his situation had reached the point where he felt he had to leave the monarchy.
“My grandmother and I had a very good relationship. It was never a surprise to anybody, least of all her”, he said.
She knew what was going on, she knew how hard it was.
“She never said to me that she was angry, I think she was sad that it had got to that point.”
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 10, 2023 3:44:30 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 10, 2023 3:45:04 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 10, 2023 3:45:56 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 10, 2023 3:46:49 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2023 4:02:44 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 10, 2023 4:18:34 GMT
|
|
tale BS.
#JamesMiddleton