|
Post by Admin on Mar 26, 2023 4:05:20 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 26, 2023 4:07:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 26, 2023 4:08:13 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 26, 2023 4:09:19 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 26, 2023 4:16:38 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 26, 2023 4:17:53 GMT
Aside: But, but, BUT? No relation to Diana at all?
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 26, 2023 4:24:35 GMT
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Oct 30, 2023 20:33:07 GMT
I watched a documentary about Spencer House in London and I think Diana was stupid to not live there instead of investing her money in real estate. Imagine having a place like that and not spending all her time in London there. If I were at a place of that level, I would have lived in the London family pile and investing the cash into treasury bonds and ended up living well on the family money and family home in London. It's a complete lack of resourcefulness and a lot of idiots in that family refuse to see that if they did what the warrior class of that nation did, they would certainly be moving up a lot faster than through the bedroom. Winston Churchill initially had a knighthood, but after WWII he was offered the Dukedom of London and he refused. The Spencers refuse to really even try, and this is why the class system is increasingly discredited.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 31, 2023 1:30:01 GMT
I watched a documentary about Spencer House in London and I think Diana was stupid to not live there instead of investing her money in real estate. Imagine having a place like that and not spending all her time in London there. If I were at a place of that level, I would have lived in the London family pile and investing the cash into treasury bonds and ended up living well on the family money and family home in London. It's a complete lack of resourcefulness and a lot of idiots in that family refuse to see that if they did what the warrior class of that nation did, they would certainly be moving up a lot faster than through the bedroom. Winston Churchill initially had a knighthood, but after WWII he was offered the Dukedom of London and he refused. The Spencers refuse to really even try, and this is why the class system is increasingly discredited. They really don't appreciate what they have and little wonder that the so-called class system in the UK is failing. When I was in Germany, I went to a castle that was actually still a family home - when I visited the museum there (rooms that were open, portraits, exhibits, etc), the person that was working the reception/ticket counter was the actual princess of the house. I recognized her from online pictures. It must cost a lot to keep a residence that size going, but what a treat for that to be the family seat. I would live in a grand manor in a heartbeat, myself. Spencer House, while IN London and not surrounded by lush scenery, woods, and sheep, is right along Green Park, close to Clarence House and Buckingham Palace. Yes, it pales in comparison to a palace or "schloss", but I wouldn't turn my nose up at that, either. The Spencers are latter day recepients of royal favour and they seem to act like they are "royal-er" than any royal and don't need to continue to work at anything. Their dismissal of the present BRF after essentially being carried by them for CENTURIES, is a tad odd, IMHO. .
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Oct 31, 2023 3:19:41 GMT
I watched a documentary about Spencer House in London and I think Diana was stupid to not live there instead of investing her money in real estate. Imagine having a place like that and not spending all her time in London there. If I were at a place of that level, I would have lived in the London family pile and investing the cash into treasury bonds and ended up living well on the family money and family home in London. It's a complete lack of resourcefulness and a lot of idiots in that family refuse to see that if they did what the warrior class of that nation did, they would certainly be moving up a lot faster than through the bedroom. Winston Churchill initially had a knighthood, but after WWII he was offered the Dukedom of London and he refused. The Spencers refuse to really even try, and this is why the class system is increasingly discredited. They really don't appreciate what they have and little wonder that the so-called class system in the UK is failing. When I was in Germany, I went to a castle that was actually still a family home - when I visited the museum there (rooms that were open, portraits, exhibits, etc), the person that was working the reception/ticket counter was the actual princess of the house. I recognized her from online pictures. It must cost a lot to keep a residence that size going, but what a treat for that to be the family seat. I would live in a grand manor in a heartbeat, myself. Spencer House, while IN London and not surrounded by lush scenery, woods, and sheep, is right along Green Park, close to Clarence House and Buckingham Palace. Yes, it pales in comparison to a palace or "schloss", but I wouldn't turn my nose up at that, either. The Spencers are latter day recepients of royal favour and they seem to act like they are "royal-er" than any royal and don't need to continue to work at anything. Their dismissal of the present BRF after essentially being carried by them for CENTURIES, is a tad odd, IMHO. . Royalty and aristocracy no longer stay in THEIR place; if I were a uni student, I would think that a royal is just wasting space and time and it is clear that they do not belong. William playing at getting career advice or playing at being poor ("I'm broke/poor" is a favorite quip of the well taken care of) would enrage me. If I were chatting with friends about skill sets and resume focus nothing would piss me off more than listening to a royal or aristocrat talk as if they have to worry about much of anything. Aristocrats are entering the workforce and staying there, but a lot of the London set seem to think that work is a joke. Second, I'm frustrated that royals insist on playing at being normal and just making things disruptive and antagonistic. If I had all that, I would not live at uni and I wouldn't even set foot on campus unless necessary. If Diana and her sisters lived at Spencer House and lived at Althorp in the countryside, it would have been better for them. There is NOTHING shabby or disadvantaged about Spencer House in London and second, they really need to know their own place, their own role.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 10, 2023 18:29:19 GMT
www.thedailybeast.com/princess-dianas-brother-accuses-bbc-of-fresh-cover-up-over-martin-bashirPrincess Diana’s Brother Accuses BBC of Fresh ‘Cover-Up’ Over Martin Bashir ‘LEGACY OF LOVE’ Earl Spencer suspects BBC “cooked up a story” to keep Bashir out of the firing line, Bryan Adams talks Diana, and Will and Kate and Charles and Camilla send their Christmas cards.
Tom Sykes Royalist Correspondent Tim Teeman Senior Editor And Writer Updated Dec. 10, 2023 12:11PM EST / Published Dec. 10, 2023 11:17AM EST Princess Diana’s brother has said he believes senior individuals at the BBC are conducting a fresh “cover up” at the corporation concerning who knew what in the wake of Martin Bashir’s controversial 1995 interview with the princess. In an interview with the BBC Radio 4 show Broadcasting House on Sunday, Earl Charles Spencer said he believed that the senior executives conspired with Bashir even after 2020.
Spencer was speaking after investigative journalist Andy Webb won a freedom of information battle to force the BBC to hand over 3,288 emails which could throw light on an alleged ongoing cover-up at the corporation concerning Bashir’s controversial interview.Nobody cares? This is what dim-wit Champagne Charlie thinks needs to be in the mainstream media NOW?
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Dec 10, 2023 18:34:22 GMT
www.thedailybeast.com/princess-dianas-brother-accuses-bbc-of-fresh-cover-up-over-martin-bashirPrincess Diana’s Brother Accuses BBC of Fresh ‘Cover-Up’ Over Martin Bashir ‘LEGACY OF LOVE’ Earl Spencer suspects BBC “cooked up a story” to keep Bashir out of the firing line, Bryan Adams talks Diana, and Will and Kate and Charles and Camilla send their Christmas cards. Tom Sykes Royalist Correspondent Tim Teeman Senior Editor And Writer Updated Dec. 10, 2023 12:11PM EST / Published Dec. 10, 2023 11:17AM EST Princess Diana’s brother has said he believes senior individuals at the BBC are conducting a fresh “cover up” at the corporation concerning who knew what in the wake of Martin Bashir’s controversial 1995 interview with the princess. In an interview with the BBC Radio 4 show Broadcasting House on Sunday, Earl Charles Spencer said he believed that the senior executives conspired with Bashir even after 2020.
Spencer was speaking after investigative journalist Andy Webb won a freedom of information battle to force the BBC to hand over 3,288 emails which could throw light on an alleged ongoing cover-up at the corporation concerning Bashir’s controversial interview.Nobody cares? This is what dim-wit Champagne Charlie thinks needs to be in the mainstream media NOW? Diana has been dead and people are still making excuses. Diana did Panorama and Andrew Morton and she ruined herself. She really did think that the public and press would be enough to control her husband and she was wrong. She gambled and she was wrong. Why can't the Spencers be graceful losers? Diana was on cahoots with the people at Panorama or it never would have happened.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 10, 2023 18:51:50 GMT
www.thedailybeast.com/princess-dianas-brother-accuses-bbc-of-fresh-cover-up-over-martin-bashirPrincess Diana’s Brother Accuses BBC of Fresh ‘Cover-Up’ Over Martin Bashir ‘LEGACY OF LOVE’ Earl Spencer suspects BBC “cooked up a story” to keep Bashir out of the firing line, Bryan Adams talks Diana, and Will and Kate and Charles and Camilla send their Christmas cards. Tom Sykes Royalist Correspondent Tim Teeman Senior Editor And Writer Updated Dec. 10, 2023 12:11PM EST / Published Dec. 10, 2023 11:17AM EST Princess Diana’s brother has said he believes senior individuals at the BBC are conducting a fresh “cover up” at the corporation concerning who knew what in the wake of Martin Bashir’s controversial 1995 interview with the princess. In an interview with the BBC Radio 4 show Broadcasting House on Sunday, Earl Charles Spencer said he believed that the senior executives conspired with Bashir even after 2020.
Spencer was speaking after investigative journalist Andy Webb won a freedom of information battle to force the BBC to hand over 3,288 emails which could throw light on an alleged ongoing cover-up at the corporation concerning Bashir’s controversial interview.Nobody cares? This is what dim-wit Champagne Charlie thinks needs to be in the mainstream media NOW? Diana has been dead and people are still making excuses. Diana did Panorama and Andrew Morton and she ruined herself. She really did think that the public and press would be enough to control her husband and she was wrong. She gambled and she was wrong. Why can't the Spencers be graceful losers? Diana was on cahoots with the people at Panorama or it never would have happened. Charlie must think that this is relevant. NOW? I'm sorry, but I am tired of idiots like him using whatever or whoever they can to bring notice to themselves and what are ONLY their own grievances. Diana was a grown woman - it's time for people to realize that she made calls and choices all her own, for good or for bad, and that's on HER. If anything the BBC has to tow the BRF line and are rather restricted what they can reveal. If there was any behind the scenes "conspiracy" or whatever, then prove it or shut up.
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Dec 10, 2023 19:33:28 GMT
Diana has been dead and people are still making excuses. Diana did Panorama and Andrew Morton and she ruined herself. She really did think that the public and press would be enough to control her husband and she was wrong. She gambled and she was wrong. Why can't the Spencers be graceful losers? Diana was on cahoots with the people at Panorama or it never would have happened. Charlie must think that this is relevant. NOW? I'm sorry, but I am tired of idiots like him using whatever or whoever they can to bring notice to themselves and what are ONLY their own grievances. Diana was a grown woman - it's time for people to realize that she made calls and choices all her own, for good or for bad, and that's on HER. If anything the BBC has to tow the BRF line and are rather restricted what they can reveal. If there was any behind the scenes "conspiracy" or whatever, then prove it or shut up. I think the really intriguing aspect is how Diana had multiple lovers (like Fergie), had affairs (like Fergie), enjoyed the luxury life to the full (like Fergie), but still managed to convince people that she was somehow purer. Diana really did believe that she had the right to leverage against the BRF despite the fact that she failed because the BRF uses the press but does not respect the press. Diana bought into pop feminist culture, despite the fact that she did not come from it and she never really benefited from it. Diana was a product of a way of life where everything she had and would always have come from men. Her male ancestors gave her a title and social standing and her husband gave her the title of Princess of Wales and the brother she had was an Earl and being the sister of and Earl provided her with more standing than ever. Then her two sons were unquestionably royal princes and that gave her even more standing. I sometimes wonder how long Diana would have lasted if she had in fact had to truly stand on her own two feet without establishment support and standing. One thing I find mystifying is how Diana changed a lot of things, and not for the better. She and her brother seem to regress with more privilege. After assuming the title of Earl, her brother should have been less of a lout and less irresponsible, but regrettably he became worse by many accounts and after her marriage, Diana was overburdened in lot of ways, but she would not take the helping hand she was given and make improvements. She could have developed her mind, did outreach to prominent wives to get Camilla out of her married life, and worked hard at developing her mental health. Diaan had no right to demand more than what she was already given by both God and Country and Family. Diana promoted a reverse of monarchical principles, mainly that the more privilege she had, the more coddling she demanded. Willaim and Harry are the same; neither wants to let go of their past and neither wants to take their resources and use them responsibly.
|
|