Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2023 18:54:06 GMT
Royal Gossip The British Royal Family *Windsor* => Wedding of Prince William & Kate => Topic started by: Allegra on May 01, 2011, 02:47:47 am Title: Daniella Helayel of Issa feels snubbed by Kate? Post by: Allegra on May 01, 2011, 02:47:47 am ________________________________________ Link: www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1382237/Royal-wedding-Issa-designer-Daniella-Helayel-upset-Kate-chooses-Sarah-Burton--didnt-receive-invite.html________________________________________ Title: Re: Daniella Helayel of Issa feels snubbed by Kate? Post by: berlin on May 01, 2011, 02:52:33 am ________________________________________ I don't get it. If the Palace says she was invited then she should have gone. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Daniella Helayel of Issa feels snubbed by Kate? Post by: Kuei Fei on May 01, 2011, 09:29:  am ________________________________________ Consdiering the freebies, Kate should have ensured she was invited and should have probably had Issa do her gown or at least be involved. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Daniella Helayel of Issa feels snubbed by Kate? Post by: Ella on May 01, 2011, 10:20:46 am ________________________________________ ^ I agree. Issa made her, she should have repaid the favor. All her best dressed list mentions can be traced to Issa. It's the same pattern on pretty much every dress she makes, but it's a flattering cut for Kate. They give her more of a figure, unlike the Burton reception dress which seemed to give her super-molded pointy breast cups and needed a giant "Look at me!" for the waist. Niraj Tanna (the pap Carole has contacted in the past for her scrapbook and who has gotten all the important shots) also mentioned on Twitter that at one engagement, there was a police officer who seemed like he had been assigned to stop Tanna's shots. Sounds like Kate's kicking those who helped her to the curb already. Bad move. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Daniella Helayel of Issa feels snubbed by Kate? Post by: June on May 01, 2011, 10:21:06 am ________________________________________ No sympathy at all. bignono I don't know the truth, but if she is aggrieved, as she presents, that's what these people get for sucking up to celebrities, giving them freebies and making the average customer pay an obscene sum of money for their over-priced clothes, IMO. It's one of my peeves. It gives people like Kate an entitlement complex, so what did she expect?  I detest and loathe sycophancy, in case anyone hasn't noticed. :tehe: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Daniella Helayel of Issa feels snubbed by Kate? Post by: TAG Princess on May 01, 2011, 01:43:45 pm ________________________________________ Kate only wanted the free dresses for her and her sister, she is now a Duchess, she doesn't need Issa anymore. :thumbsdown: My guess is that Issa was never invited but as it looks really bad for Kate, the palace insists she was sent an invitation, but I really don't believe she was. :rolleyes: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Daniella Helayel of Issa feels snubbed by Kate? Post by: Lieblich on May 01, 2011, 03:33:09 pm ________________________________________ Be careful who you kick when climbing up the ladder; you'll meet them again on the way down. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Daniella Helayel of Issa feels snubbed by Kate? Post by: mousiekins on May 01, 2011, 06:29:29 pm ________________________________________ Precisely :  : ________________________________________ Title: Re: Daniella Helayel of Issa feels snubbed by Kate? Post by: Magnolia on May 02, 2011, 09:00:22 am ________________________________________ That family tends to use people and toss them out when they are not needed. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Daniella Helayel of Issa feels snubbed by Kate? Post by: Byechoc on May 02, 2011, 12:08:27 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: TAG Princess on May 01, 2011, 01:43:45 pm Kate only wanted the free dresses for her and her sister, she is now a Duchess, she doesn't need Issa anymore. :thumbsdown: My guess is that Issa was never invited but as it looks really bad for Kate, the palace insists she was sent an invitation, but I really don't believe she was. :rolleyes: I think you are right... we need to wait to see how many times she will dress Issa.. I believe now she will dress bristish designers... but she was to.. it will be bad for her don't do it! Maybe this is a move to get ride of Issa.. just like her mum did with her outfiths for her wedding,, but without all those scandal. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Daniella Helayel of Issa feels snubbed by Kate? Post by: Anne-Elliot on May 03, 2011, 03:23:29 pm ________________________________________ My how this child makes enemies. I'm sure that Issa has lots of dirt on WK, but Kugly doesn't seem to have the smarts to realise this. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Daniella Helayel of Issa feels snubbed by Kate? Post by: Kuei Fei on May 04, 2011, 01:40:29 am ________________________________________ After the first couple of months, she will only make press waves when she is exposed doing something she should not be doing. I can't imagien how hurt that designer must be, that Kate used her for freebies and now dropped her like she was nothing to her. I hope other designers take heed not to give her anything. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Daniella Helayel of Issa feels snubbed by Kate? Post by: Magnolia on May 04, 2011, 02:01:49 am ________________________________________ Now you know why the other major designers dissed her and wanted nothing to do with her even her mum acted horribly towards that designer who was making her outfit for the wedding. These people are users plain and simple. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Daniella Helayel of Issa feels snubbed by Kate? Post by: Kuei Fei on May 04, 2011, 02:12:11 am ________________________________________ Now I understand why Oldfield didn't make her dress or that others had nothing to do with her. I wonder if she will be discreetly turned away if she wants to shop at their stores. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Daniella Helayel of Issa feels snubbed by Kate? Post by: Ceridwen on May 04, 2011, 02:39:19 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Lieblich on May 01, 2011, 03:33:09 pm Be careful who you kick when climbing up the ladder; you'll meet them again on the way down. I couldn't agree with you more. On a positive note, I think Waity will get what's coming to her. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Daniella Helayel of Issa feels snubbed by Kate? Post by: Varya on May 04, 2011, 02:48:30 am ________________________________________ This is just disgraceful, like horrible mother like horrible daughters. So does anyone think that Sarah Burton only created Waity's wedding dress to get her name out there since it is rather recent that she became the creative designer of the house of Alexander McQueen. I doubt if Lee Alexander McQueen was still alive that he would have bothered with Waity, especially with how she treats the designers that she has previously shown favor. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Daniella Helayel of Issa feels snubbed by Kate? Post by: Magnolia on May 04, 2011, 03:03:31 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Kuei Fei on May 04, 2011, 02:12:11 am I wonder if she will be discreetly turned away if she wants to shop at their stores. No money is money but if they she wants them to make her a gown personally for a special event maybe it'll be a different story and they'll try to gently say they are busy.Designers will probably contact one another about how difficult that family is.I bet lazy and co won't ever play their antics with mega designers like a Valentino or Oscar De La Renta. Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC | Imprint |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2023 18:54:41 GMT
Royal Gossip The British Royal Family *Windsor* => Wedding of Prince William & Kate => Topic started by: Princess Alucard on May 01, 2011, 04:14:28 am ________________________________________ Title: William and Kate ask for Privacy Post by: Princess Alucard on May 01, 2011, 04:14:28 am ________________________________________ royalwedding.yahoo.com/news/william-kate-try-carve-private-time-211747527 (http://royalwedding.yahoo.com/news/william-kate-try-carve-private-time-211747527) no comment ... ________________________________________ Title: Re: William and Kate ask for Privacy Post by: Kuei Fei on May 01, 2011, 04:36:24 am ________________________________________ Quote Arbiter said that it will be relatively easy for the prince's staff, which has wide experience in security and logistics, to set up the honeymoon so the couple would not be disturbed. The honeymoon is expected to be briefer than that of William's parents, Prince Charles and Diana, who combined a two-week Mediterranean cruise with several extended breaks in Britain. How silly; Diana and Charles held receptions on the Britannia. More Charles and now Diana bashing. Quote This fight for privacy is crucial if they are to avoid being hounded like William's mother, the late Princess Diana, whose every move was tailed. Flogging Diana's dead corpse. This is so morbid and WRONG. It's time for them to start working, not sitting back and not doing their own load and taking a burden or so off of HM and Philip. Both are getting old and both need a break. She has her "HRH" now she has to earn it! ________________________________________ Title: Re: William and Kate ask for Privacy Post by: Magnolia on May 01, 2011, 05:07:46 am ________________________________________ The title alone yeah she would LOVE privacy and loves it. :laugh: ________________________________________ Title: Re: William and Kate ask for Privacy Post by: Kuei Fei on May 01, 2011, 05:18:31 am ________________________________________ She had better get to work and get used to it. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William and Kate ask for Privacy Post by: benign on May 01, 2011, 05:22:33 am ________________________________________ of course especially if her family and Will's friends tags along (just joking) :legs ________________________________________ Title: Re: William and Kate ask for Privacy Post by: Kuei Fei on May 01, 2011, 05:27:02 am ________________________________________ The press has been backing off since forever; it's time to pay the piper and start working off the payment of that wedding. She has to start...WORKING...and start doing something she's been waiting ten years to do, not just mooch off and live off of the military income. She has no back history of work that will excuse it and will ensure that people trust that she will do work in the future and then some privacy and time off is only after all, natural. She is now the business of the nation. I have to go bang my head against a pillow now. I would use a wall, but my brain means too much to me. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William and Kate ask for Privacy Post by: Ceridwen on May 01, 2011, 06:20:33 am ________________________________________ No chance in that KF. I heard that they (or @ least she) will take the first two years in a perpetual relaxation, prompting rumor that they're starting a family? I'm an L&D nurse and pregnancy isn't considered an illness and plenty of women are balancing career/work and family/pregnancy but on one hand, this is Kate we're talking about. She is allergic to work as well as horses. Who knows, if she's put out to pasture to work, she might develop an anaphylatic shock!!! :rolleyes: ________________________________________ Title: Re: William and Kate ask for Privacy Post by: Nighthawk on May 01, 2011, 08:32:19 am ________________________________________ what a shocker that this lazy couple would ask for this, what they want to screw off without the public critizing them for it fat chance ________________________________________ Title: Re: William and Kate ask for Privacy Post by: Kuei Fei on May 01, 2011, 08:53:01 am ________________________________________ After all these shocks, it's a wonder that I'm still optimistic. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William and Kate ask for Privacy Post by: June on May 01, 2011, 10:59:05 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Ceridwen on May 01, 2011, 06:20:33 am No chance in that KF. I heard that they (or @ least she) will take the first two years in a perpetual relaxation, prompting rumor that they're starting a family? I'm an L&D nurse and pregnancy isn't considered an illness and plenty of women are balancing career/work and family/pregnancy but on one hand, this is Kate we're talking about. She is allergic to work as well as horses. Who knows, if she's put out to pasture to work, she might develop an anaphylatic shock!!! :rolleyes: :BFF: :hug: :laugh: Ceri and I are on the same realistic plane. This woman will continue to do what she has always done: nothing, but will pretend she's working very hard. Wait and see. :thumbsdown: HM has given up. She'll just run away to stay sane, like she did this week-end. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William and Kate ask for Privacy Post by: windsor2 on May 01, 2011, 03:23:08 pm ________________________________________ The twit has to start paying back her supporter, namely the media. They'll want exclusives. ^ Agreed. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William and Kate ask for Privacy Post by: Kuei Fei on May 01, 2011, 06:07:04 pm ________________________________________ I don't think Kate realizes that she has to payback her press; if she's asking for privacy, she's basically welshing on her supporters. So if the press has nothing to report in regards to work, there will be a lot of grumbling. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William and Kate ask for Privacy Post by: Raisie on May 01, 2011, 06:34:42 pm ________________________________________ That is exactly KF,i don't know what the press would ask for Kate (of course will be not privacy).She is "HRH"Duchess because of them so she better gave them something in return. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William and Kate ask for Privacy Post by: Kuei Fei on May 01, 2011, 09:32:21 pm ________________________________________ Kate doesn't seem to understand that she owes a lot of people everything. She owes them for the freebies, the fawning press, the relentless bashing and pressuring of WIlliam, the relentless bashing of the RF on her behalf, the chronic almost slander of Chelsy and who knows who else (aristocracy) and if anyone owes the press, it's definately her. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William and Kate ask for Privacy Post by: Lanvin Pearls on May 01, 2011, 09:35:09 pm ________________________________________ All this "privacy" and "no work" stuff for two years ? Is somebody ill or something, physically or even mentally ? One has to wonder what is going on. It may be the fact that KM needs to regain nutrition/strength/health to reproduce ? Who knows ? Does anyone know where they will actually live ? Wales ? CH ? A BP apartment ? ________________________________________ Title: Re: William and Kate ask for Privacy Post by: Ceridwen on May 01, 2011, 09:40:55 pm ________________________________________ Not sure if this is true or not but I heard/read in one of the blogs that William wanted it this way - meaning, for Kate to lay low or @ be more like Camilla & not like his mother (despite his love/admiration of his mother), who was a "royal celebrity." Since it suited Kate's lazy nature, then it's an ideal situation for her. Kate can continue to do NOTHING while collect money from the taxpayers and enjoying royal lifestyle. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William and Kate ask for Privacy Post by: Kuei Fei on May 01, 2011, 09: :42 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: Lanvin Pearls on May 01, 2011, 09:35:09 pm All this "privacy" and "no work" stuff for two years ? Is somebody ill or something, physically or even mentally ? One has to wonder what is going on. It may be the fact that KM needs to regain nutrition/strength/health to reproduce ? Who knows ? Does anyone know where they will actually live ? What an idiot to marry her if she does hae an illness or some dysfunction. Then she will introduce it into the royal line (a brief scare with Diana's problems) and if she hasn't been taking care of herself, this is yet another warning sign. Idiots to give into her. If he'd married someone healthy in the first place, I am sure that they wouldn't have these problems! ________________________________________ Title: Re: William and Kate ask for Privacy Post by: Raisie on May 01, 2011, 09:47:21 pm ________________________________________ This marriage is the most strange "royal marriage" i ever heard :oooh: How down earth her bride is if she keep doing nothing but live of the people? :- ________________________________________ Title: Re: William and Kate ask for Privacy Post by: Lanvin Pearls on May 01, 2011, 09:52:36 pm ________________________________________ Ceridwen - I believe you are right about that. ^ And I recall, years ago, maybe 5 or 10 years ago, it was said that HM NEVER EVER wants another celebrity princess a la Princess Di ! ________________________________________ Title: Re: William and Kate ask for Privacy Post by: Ceridwen on May 01, 2011, 10:01:22 pm ________________________________________ Exactly Lavin Pearls. I don't think William is head over heals in love with Kate. He chose her for her lazy personality, aka Camilla Jr. He would not want a bride who will shine brighter than him. But what the RF doesn't realized is that too many thrashy in-laws in palace will not bode well in terms of the monarchy's survival. The people I think can only tolerate so much and in this day of harsh economic climate, people will always look for ways to blame on others for their misery and the royals with their lives lap in luxury, they will be obvious targets. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William and Kate ask for Privacy Post by: Raisie on May 01, 2011, 10:04:05 pm ________________________________________ I don't think Kate would love the idea,she loves be a celebrity. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William and Kate ask for Privacy Post by: Lanvin Pearls on May 02, 2011, 12:13:11 am ________________________________________ Raisie - ^ EXACTLY. That is what makes this perfect. K is not exactly getting ALL that she dreamed for. She will NOT be in every mag, on every cover, on every station, every single day. Good riddance. :thumbsup: ________________________________________ Title: Re: William and Kate ask for Privacy Post by: Kuei Fei on May 02, 2011, 12:15:31 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Raisie on May 01, 2011, 10:04:05 pm I don't think Kate would love the idea,she loves be a celebrity. When William FINALLY catches her calling the press, I am sure it will be the biggest wakeup call of his LIFE! Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC | Imprint |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2023 18:55:15 GMT
Royal Gossip The British Royal Family *Windsor* => The Middletons => Topic started by: Allegra on May 01, 2011, 04:36:10 am ________________________________________ Title: Carole has the last laugh, according to DM Post by: Allegra on May 01, 2011, 04:36:10 am ________________________________________ Link: www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1382102/Royal-wedding-Kate-Middletons-mother-Carole-laugh-glorious-style.html?ITO=1490________________________________________ Title: Re: Carole has the last laugh, according to DM Post by: Kuei Fei on May 01, 2011, 04: :03 am ________________________________________ I hope she enjoys it, since it will not likely translate into anything more for her personally. I hope she taught Kate the importance of KEEPING William happy since after all, it's a long, long way for Kate to fall. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Carole has the last laugh, according to DM Post by: Raisie on May 01, 2011, 04:58: am ________________________________________ Quote Who could deny her a wry smile of satisfaction? She may be a social climber, her daughters may be called the ‘Wisteria sisters’ for their ability to climb and cling on so tenaciously, but the Middleton women on this day triumphed. Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1382102/Royal-wedding-Kate-Middletons-mother-Carole-laugh-glorious-style.html#ixzz1L4NCz1BVSo? the DM now is speaking with the truth that this wedding was not of love,well i think now the honeymoon will end pretty much sooner that i believed. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Carole has the last laugh, according to DM Post by: Kuei Fei on May 01, 2011, 05:17:51 am ________________________________________ At least the DM is being honest about it now. Mines to Palace is no small leap and they were quite ferocious; I hope William enjoys getting used. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Carole has the last laugh, according to DM Post by: Magnolia on May 01, 2011, 05:48:15 am ________________________________________ She smiled as her Lazy daughter walked down the aisle. Of course she did. :bored: Quote She has outsmarted them all Yeah with the help from the media and press, journalist and editors there would be no wedding now you freaks and you ALL know it! :thumbsdown: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Carole has the last laugh, according to DM Post by: Kuei Fei on May 01, 2011, 05:56:40 am ________________________________________ Yes, she successfully used the press and media as a weapon against the aristocracy who didn't want her demonic spud to marry William; good to see the admission of manipulation. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Carole has the last laugh, according to DM Post by: June on May 01, 2011, 10:56:53 am ________________________________________ No, they've only triumphed according to people with a warped sense of mor@lity, those who don't know what is real and important in life. Perhaps those who want to social-climb themselves, in fact. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Carole has the last laugh, according to DM Post by: kahena on May 01, 2011, 11:01:14 am ________________________________________ Not only the media support : the press and hacks are not THAT powerful, people can't be fooled ALL the the - i.e. the scathing readers comments against the Middz. The average didn't buy it mostly. No, there's more than the press rubbish and pushing : it was a manipulation at a huge scale. Too much money coming from nowhere. Pressure. Coercion. That will unfold one day. It always does. And that'll be the end of the monarchy. Unless someone fixes it before.... Carole "Bennett" Middz may have the last laugh... for now... ________________________________________ Title: Re: Carole has the last laugh, according to DM Post by: June on May 01, 2011, 03:35:25 pm ________________________________________ That's true; but I don't think the mainstream are impressed with the Midds' triumph anyway, as our Brit friends tell us. Otherwise, why else would the republican movements be so strong? Not everyone aspires to, or is impressed by privilege by birthright, a world of archaic fantasy, living in a gilded cage. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Carole has the last laugh, according to DM Post by: mousiekins on May 01, 2011, 05:54:51 pm ________________________________________ The Republicans have gone significantly up, now 1 in 4 wish for the UK to loose the Monarchy. This at a time when (if we go by history) it should be down. Before when there has been a Royal Wedding or a Jubilee numbers go down because we are all caught up in the glory of it all. During the Golden Jubilee the RF got a huge boost and if you asked most of the Public we would say " they make us so proud to be British " or " Isn't the Queen marvellous!" The Midds have helped to make our Monarchy a laughing stock around the world and have failed to bring more life to the Monarchy. Congratulations Press we know many of you are Republicans so well done you have achieved your goal. Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC | Imprint |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2023 18:55:58 GMT
Royal Gossip The British Royal Family *Windsor* => Wedding Discussions => Topic started by: Nighthawk on May 01, 2011, 08:46:42 am Title: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Nighthawk on May 01, 2011, 08:46:42 am ________________________________________ Royal wedding ratings are princely but nothing close to a TV record latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtracker/2011/04/royal-wedding-ratings-are-princely-but-nothing-close-to-a-tv-record-.html Quote The royal wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton, now Catherine the Duchess of Cambridge, may have been  -tale perfect, but the U.S. ratings weren't anything to wake the queen over. An average of 22.8 million total viewers tuned in to the nuptials from Westminster Abbey in London, which aired live Friday from approximately 3 a.m. to 4:15 a.m., according to the Nielsen Co. Eleven Stateside networks carried the event: ABC, CBS, NBC, Telemundo, Univision, BBC America, CNN, E!, Fox News Channel, MSNBC and TLC. That was a large audience for an early-morning news event, but it was by no means a record. By comparison, the funeral of Princess Diana, William's mother, which also took place during the early-morning hours in the U.S., was watched by 33.2 million in 1997. This year's Super Bowl, the most-watched TV event in history, was seen by 111 million total viewers. In fact, the William-Kate ratings were roughly comparable to those of a typical episode of this season's "American Idol." The July 1981 wedding of Prince William's parents, Prince Charles and Lady Diana, was seen by 14.2 million households, compared with 18.6 million households for Prince William and Kate Middleton (Nielsen does not have a total-viewer figure for the Charles-Diana wedding). However, the U.S. population is 35% larger than it was 30 years ago, which more than accounts for the discrepancy. Not everyone is just into WK and seeing her making her claim on the gold mine :rolleyes:  ________________________________________ Title: Re: Royal wedding ratings are princely but nothing close to a TV record Post by: Ella on May 01, 2011, 09:24:56 am ________________________________________ ^I know, I'm loving these ratings coming out. All the hype and absolutely nothing. 2 Billion my  Compared to past events, it was only the 8th most watched event in the UK, it got beat by Anne's wedding and an episode of Coronation Street! I think this is the beginning of the end, the big event they needed to revitalize the monarchy didn't happen on Friday, it'll only fade further from here on out. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Royal wedding ratings are princely but nothing close to a TV record Post by: Kuei Fei on May 01, 2011, 09:25:08 am ________________________________________ To be honest, I'm feeling pretty average about it. I'm not avid for details and it sounds like it was a disappointment. ________________________________________ Title: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: serene grace on May 02, 2011, 12:03:35 am ________________________________________ Quote William and Kate's Wedding Bombed! TV ratings for the William and Kate's fairytale royal nuptials were described as "mixed," even "lackluster." Read more: www.eonline.com/uberblog/b239549_william_kates_wedding_bombed.html#ixzz1L92Dn9Zn________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: mousiekins on May 02, 2011, 01:36:29 am ________________________________________ :laugh: :JOY: BBC beats ITV in ratings war (but Royal Wedding audience only just tops an episode of Only Fools And Horses) Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1382589/BBC-beats-ITV-ratings-war-Royal-Wedding-audience-just-tops-episode-Only-Fools-And-Horses.html#ixzz1L9T8QN3p________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: serene grace on May 02, 2011, 01:54:37 am ________________________________________ It was too hyped on too many channels IMO Here in the US, a lot of people felt force fed, It was way too much promotion.t imo People know they could wake up later, at anytime and find it later if they wanted to see it. :whistle: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Kuei Fei on May 02, 2011, 02:49:41 am ________________________________________ The other disadvantage is that this has nothing to do with the rest of the world. It's not like Kate is from the US or unusually accomplished or even has had a job worth talking about. She's a tabloid darling, which is like being a Hollywood darling here in the States; yes, she has coverage, but no more and no less than if George Clooney had finally decided to marry after so long to another woman like Kate. If George Clooney were marrying, he would receive the exact same amount of coverage and level of interest from the tabloids and media in general. Given how the media has degenerated over time, it's saddening. Secondly, since this mainly about Britain, there's no interest all that much from the Commonwealth since Kate isn't from one of those countries. Kate hasn't had anything to do with the Commonwealth countries and if they are going to the tropics, why would the rest of the Commonwealth be interested? ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Ella on May 02, 2011, 03:22:15 am ________________________________________ ^I agree that there was no way for people around the world to feel invested in this wedding. How many of us can relate to doing nothing but waiting for nearly a decade? Or only socializing with "important" people? But she wasn't a sheltered royal or aristocrat so it's more difficult to understand her lack of worldly experience. With Kate, we all know she's had the time and resources to expand her horizons, but didn't bother with any place she couldn't ski or sunbathe. There's just nothing there for women to either look up to or see in themselves. It's the same with actresses, the most successful aren't always the most beautiful, people prefer those they can relate to or admire. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Raisie on May 02, 2011, 03:30:57 am ________________________________________ Quote people prefer those they can relate to or admire. Then we are going to end in a bad world,i can see it already since the wedding happen we will see a complete line of gold diggers with no work. When Diana was alive many woman start be independent and were searching for love not titles nor money now we will see lazy woman marry an aristocrat or royal. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Kuei Fei on May 02, 2011, 04:29:52 am ________________________________________ And now aristos and royals are going ot be pressured to marry these scummy people, just you wait and see. William has just cut himself off from a crucial support system and let the gates wide open from which the aristos have to defend themselves. Now any harlot feels almost justifibly entitled to a nice man who works hard. This is the unforgivable part. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: windsor2 on May 02, 2011, 04:43:58 am ________________________________________ I'm really glad that the wedding bombed. The press are already starting with Piper and the banker she's seeing. The papers are saying that they're engaged, but not officially. ^agreed, KF. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Princess Alucard on May 02, 2011, 04:50:34 am ________________________________________ Osama Bin laden's death is bigger than kugly's moment ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Kuei Fei on May 02, 2011, 05:01:25 am ________________________________________ Is he dead? ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Princess Alucard on May 02, 2011, 05:06:27 am ________________________________________ Yea! :oooh: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Ella on May 02, 2011, 05:10:23 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Princess Alucard on May 02, 2011, 04:50:34 am Osama Bin laden's death is bigger than kugly's moment I'm so glad that will be the front page story instead of Waity's triumph. Pippa's been pushed off the top DM story, and I'm willing to bet most Americans will be talking about Bin Laden Monday instead of the wedding. Best timing ever. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Kuei Fei on May 02, 2011, 05:14:24 am ________________________________________ This is going to dominate the news for MONTHS!!!! ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Ella on May 02, 2011, 05:16:49 am ________________________________________ Waity or Bin Laden? Edit: I'm dumb, never mind, I get what you mean! ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Kuei Fei on May 02, 2011, 05:22:40 am ________________________________________ The death of Bin Laden Additional news will be about strategies, Iraq, the troops possibly coming home, the reality of the rest of the War on Terror, interveiws with the generals and of course, the disposal of the body. Then columnists will jabber/write endlessly about it and Obama will be all over the place claiming credit (nippy little twerp would take credit for the resurrection. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Ella on May 02, 2011, 05:32:19 am ________________________________________ ^ I know, I fail. :shy: I posted then was like: S***, of course she means Osama. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Raisie on May 02, 2011, 05:32:41 am ________________________________________ Yes,Bin Laden death is all over now. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Kezza on May 02, 2011, 05:45:50 am ________________________________________ I must admit music aside at the wedding it was lacklustre, I thought Edward & Sophie's wedding was better. Kate is dull, she is no Diana, and I think even Sophie had more going for her when she entered to church for her wedding than what Kate did. I think Harry when he gets married might have more going for it, because I do believe whoever Harry does marry will not be dull. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Kuei Fei on May 02, 2011, 05:58:54 am ________________________________________ Harry is considered hotter (not to me for some reason, he's not to my taste) and any wife of his would have to be well acclimatized to a life where she is on her own regularly or used to doing travel like many military wives. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: serene grace on May 02, 2011, 06:48:27 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Kuei Fei on May 02, 2011, 05:14:24 am This is going to dominate the news for MONTHS!!!! Yup, it is. This is the biggest news in the US, the people are in the streets of NYC and Washington, Philadelphia, cheering. It's all over the TV, this morning all the TV News will be dedicated to this news. Bin Laden, captured and killed, amazing news. People are gathering in front of the White House, right now, it's amazing!!!!! :thumbsup: Thank u to all the Troops from every nation who fought and continue to fight the war against terror. :thankyou: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Kuei Fei on May 02, 2011, 06:55:58 am ________________________________________ THIS IS SO FANTASTIC!!!! I AM SO HAPPY!!!! NOW THE TROOPS IN AFGHANISTAN MAY BE ABLE TO COME HOME!!!!!! ________________________________________ |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2023 18:56:13 GMT
Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Ceridwen on May 02, 2011, 06:59:34 am ________________________________________ Quote from: serene grace on May 02, 2011, 12:03:35 am Quote William and Kate's Wedding Bombed! TV ratings for the William and Kate's fairytale royal nuptials were described as "mixed," even "lackluster." Read more: www.eonline.com/uberblog/b239549_william_kates_wedding_bombed.html#ixzz1L92Dn9Zn:lips: :laugh: lols lmao ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Kuei Fei on May 02, 2011, 07:09:40 am ________________________________________ There was ntohing ot it. It was like a normal society wedding only with garden hats and tiaras. Then of course people arriving in buses, like some tacky Monty-Python version of a royal wedding. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: serene grace on May 02, 2011, 07:16:15 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Ceridwen on May 02, 2011, 06:59:34 am Quote from: serene grace on May 02, 2011, 12:03:35 am Quote William and Kate's Wedding Bombed! TV ratings for the William and Kate's fairytale royal nuptials were described as "mixed," even "lackluster." Read more: www.eonline.com/uberblog/b239549_william_kates_wedding_bombed.html#ixzz1L92Dn9Zn:lips: :laugh: lols lmao lols :think: I really think the press tried to push a very mediocre woman too much and people just are not fooled by the hype. She is really not special enough to make people in the Billion's want to wake up and tune in. :cookie: Her magazines in the US don't sell, now the tv ratings were less than the networks hoped for. :- I liked Pr,Edward and Sophie's wedding better too Kezza and I think Crown Pss Victoria's wedding was much more beautiful. Pr. William and Kate's wedding seemed just a bit too flat, after all the hyping by the press. imo :Kate: :William: I liked seeing the Royals gather though, that was nice and the Abbey looked nice, but I hated those trees. It was like what brides do in the suburbs, they bring trees into the banquet hall to liven the reception up....I found the trees a bit on the bad-taste side. Sorry. :unsure: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Yooper on May 02, 2011, 07:18:08 am ________________________________________ It was,to me, the most boring wedding I've ever witnessed. I think it helps if the couple are in love and that love is shared by all involved. Not this one. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Nighthawk on May 02, 2011, 07:23:48 am ________________________________________ I find it funny that this wedding didn't do as well as weekly shows :laugh: not everyone loves the royals especially WK and this IMO proves it :Kate: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Kuei Fei on May 02, 2011, 08:35:30 am ________________________________________ I can only think that it's because this is a tabloid sideshow, not a mainstream event as it was with Charles and Diana; Charles and Diana came from the same upper class establishment and never had anyhting to do with the tabloids, so the rest of the world felt they were part of the magic. On the other hand, Kate has been part of the fringe tabloid scene, simliar to entertainers and suchlike that there was nothing to this other than the conclusion of an at first comical, then pathetic ten year campaign (starting in university) to get a wedding ring. This is the heaven of the tabloids, but nothing else really. Kate until the engagement and wedding was never mentioned in the upper echelons and she has never been a solid member of the upper class. She's from a group of people that decent society would prefer not to know or associate with; not because of money, or a title, but her behavior. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Royal wedding ratings are princely but nothing close to a TV record Post by: Magnolia on May 02, 2011, 09:21:37 am ________________________________________ They are lying 2 bil nothing they keep mentioning that this wedding had a little more viewers than Charles and Diana.How can they even mention that knowing in 1981 there was what like 4 or5 channels and it still IMO won over this new wedding.Also 22 Mil is pretty low knowing they put it on all the channels purposely. tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2011/04/30/23-million-watch-royal-wedding-in-u-s/91090 (http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2011/04/30/23-million-watch-royal-wedding-in-u-s/91090) www.geeksaresexy.net/2011/04/28/royal-wedding-unites-the-world-in-mathematical-lunacy/ (http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2011/04/28/royal-wedding-unites-the-world-in-mathematical-lunacy/) ________________________________________ Title: Re: Royal wedding ratings are princely but nothing close to a TV record Post by: Kuei Fei on May 02, 2011, 09:31:22 am ________________________________________ I'm quite sure that it was a major letdown and a few networks didn't carry it. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Grace and Diana Fan on May 02, 2011, 02:25:55 pm ________________________________________ Why am I NOT surprised? This was, no doubt, the worst wedding the BRF has ever thrown. A complete waste of time, money, and energy. When you're more enchanted, and thrilled by Sophie and Edwards wedding, then something went wrong. The press hyped it up, and they never planned to live up to it to begin with. Why would or should billions of people wake up to see Kate? Just, why? :thumbsdown: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Royal wedding ratings are princely but nothing close to a TV record Post by: Grace and Diana Fan on May 02, 2011, 02:41:37 pm ________________________________________ You didn't miss a thing Kuei Fei. I was just about put to sleep, because of it. It was very dull, just like Kate! ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Kuei Fei on May 02, 2011, 03:16:10 pm ________________________________________ The press counted on the fact that Kate would carry the day, but she didn't. She instead has humiliated the tabloids and the tabs are giving her full marks and hype, but for how long will that last? ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Lieblich on May 02, 2011, 03:49:55 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: Kuei Fei on May 02, 2011, 03:16:10 pm The press counted on the fact that Kate would carry the day, but she didn't. She instead has humiliated the tabloids and the tabs are giving her full marks and hype, but for how long will that last? Not very long; there's quite a sarcastic undertone to a lot of reportage. As soon as there's some solid, stinky dirt on the Midds, the tabloids will turn. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Yooper on May 02, 2011, 04:01:28 pm ________________________________________ As much as I hate to say it, I think she's still the media darling over there and it's going to take a while for any kind of negativity surrounding her or her family. I hope I'm wrong. One stat came over the wire this morning that made a few people laugh. They're trying to bump up the ratings saying that people watched on-line, through youtube, etc., but the fact is 111M people watched the Super Bowl last January and they also watched on-line and through youtube. Geepers, American Idol gets those numbers every week. Tomorrow the figures come out, but I honestly don't think it will add up to much. I'm especially thrilled, on a much shallower level, that Time, Newsweek, the NYTimes would probably have had some coverage of the royal wedding but the news from Pakinstan will take Front Page. That's nice. All the major networks went through the roof last night re Bin Laden and I know we're still not out of the woods, but it pushed that lame wedding to the back page. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Ceridwen on May 02, 2011, 11:53:42 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: Kuei Fei on May 02, 2011, 03:16:10 pm The press counted on the fact that Kate would carry the day, but she didn't. She instead has humiliated the tabloids and the tabs are giving her full marks and hype, but for how long will that last? Definitely not long. :spooky: The press is trying & will probably continue to try in the hopes of making her the new Diana but once they realized that she's no Diana & never will be, then, all hell will break loose. :screaming: Kate & that social climbing family of hers will be rip to shreds & PW (as well as the rest of his staff) will have to be creative in preventing all press war against this mediocre woman. :a##: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Varya on May 03, 2011, 02:02:47 am ________________________________________ I didn't watch it, but I did see some of it later that evening, everyone looked so dour inside the church, they looked happier (Kugly and Wugly that is) after the wedding. It was boring, just like the bride and groom imo. This is not a defense of her AT ALL, but I think a large part of the reason that the wedding bombed (hehe) is because of all of the media coverage of the couple for years before hand saying it was "imminent"... then by the time the engagement actually took place people were already bored with them, there was no mystery and no anticipation (despite what the press wanted us to feel/think about the whole thing). At this point most people thought either 1 or both of these things: 1) About time, whatever! :wopedo: (to paraphrase/quote Prince Charles: "They've been practicing long enough!) 2) Wow yet another rich "royal" parasite getting an overly expensive wedding at the taxpayers expense. :thumbsdown: 3) and then there are those who were excited, I think people who remembered watching Diana's wedding and the memories they had so they expected it to be like Diana's, magical and exciting. I bet they were sort of let down, even if they did enjoy it at all. 4) Who cares? ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: royal_watcher05 on May 03, 2011, 04:26:43 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Grace and Diana Fan on May 02, 2011, 02:25:55 pm Why am I NOT surprised? This was, no doubt, the worst wedding the BRF has ever thrown. A complete waste of time, money, and energy. When you're more enchanted, and thrilled by Sophie and Edwards wedding, then something went wrong. The press hyped it up, and they never planned to live up to it to begin with. Why would or should billions of people wake up to see Kate? Just, why? :thumbsdown: :goodpost: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Kuei Fei on May 03, 2011, 06:40:01 am ________________________________________ There's just too much happening in the world these days for the wedding to take top priority. Before the wedding there was the Tsunami/earthquake in Jpana and I am sure that it grabbed more attention and now Bin Laden being captured. She's always inbetween major news, except when there's another scandal with her or her family. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Yooper on May 03, 2011, 06:51:30 am ________________________________________ My Special Edition of People arrived today with their wedding kissers all over and the mailman said, "Need extra toilet paper? This'll help." The USA realllllllllly hates them for some reason. Hmmm. Wonder why. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Varya on May 04, 2011, 02:31:31 am ________________________________________ Haha :laugh: That's hilarious! ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Ceridwen on May 04, 2011, 02:35:40 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Yooper on May 03, 2011, 06:51:30 am My Special Edition of People arrived today with their wedding kissers all over and the mailman said, "Need extra toilet paper? This'll help." The USA realllllllllly hates them for some reason. Hmmm. Wonder why. Oh that's funny. lols ________________________________________ |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2023 18:56:28 GMT
Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Kuei Fei on May 04, 2011, 02:39:25 am ________________________________________ Kate is already relegated to the tabloid sidebar now, now that Bin Laden is dead. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Ceridwen on May 04, 2011, 02:40:11 am ________________________________________ Yup, it's funny how that works!! lols ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Ella on May 04, 2011, 02:45:31 am ________________________________________ I'm eagerly awaiting Tabloid Cover Wednesday to see how much coverage they got. Globe's got a story that Kate can't get pregnant and we know about the Kate sex-tape story...I'm so interested to see what the other tabs did, and pretty surprised that Globe and Nat'l Enquirer didn't even give them a honeymoon week before starting. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: mousiekins on May 04, 2011, 03:14:24 am ________________________________________ They have been waiting for 8 years to get stuck in, why wait :bat: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Kuei Fei on May 04, 2011, 06:31:56 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Ella on May 04, 2011, 02:45:31 am I'm eagerly awaiting Tabloid Cover Wednesday to see how much coverage they got. Globe's got a story that Kate can't get pregnant and we know about the Kate sex-tape story...I'm so interested to see what the other tabs did, and pretty surprised that Globe and Nat'l Enquirer didn't even give them a honeymoon week before starting. I saw that too; if they can't have kids, the marriage will have to be annulled since it's Kate's DUTY to have a child. No child, no marriage; if the proper protocol had been followed, then I am sure that they would have found out beforehand and quietly canceled. It would be PR disaster, but the marriage would have to end and I am sure that it would end up being a disaster if he still stays married to someone who cannot have children. The direct succession has to be secured and this would end up being the dirty end of being royal. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: True Brit on May 04, 2011, 08:13: am ________________________________________ There will be all sorts of medical interventions if this is the case. I doubt they would just give up on her getting pregnant and there's IVF and all sorts of stuff. She must have fertility issues though just on the basis of her weight loss and sportiness alone both of these things interfere with fertility. Acne can also idnicate polycistic ovaries so again we'll have to wait and see. Mon dieu that's all I keep saying - let's wait and see. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Ella on May 04, 2011, 09:28:21 am ________________________________________ They'll just use IVF in that case and polycystic ovaries can also be managed, you just have to take things to balance out your hormones and it mostly clears up. Still, being unable to conceive naturally hasn't held the Windsors back in the past, the QM couldn't conceive naturally (supposedly), but that was also (supposedly) because of her husband having problems. I think Sophie also reportedly underwent IVF for her first. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Kuei Fei on May 04, 2011, 05:23:37 pm ________________________________________ I have a link here to discuss this here in the Kate Section: royalgossip.forumprofi.de/index.php/topic,2437.0.html ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Ella on May 04, 2011, 06:21:52 pm ________________________________________ This is great, here's Tabloid Cover Wednesday (from ONTD) ohnotheydidnt.livejournal.com/58965499.html Will and Kate couldn't even get a normal full cover the press week after their wedding! Except for special editions, they have no solo covers and on most, they're just a little thing on the sidebar! :thumbsup: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Kuei Fei on May 04, 2011, 06:26:09 pm ________________________________________ You're so right. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: True Brit on May 04, 2011, 07:21:23 pm ________________________________________ The Times (sorry paywall) said it went to 400 million via the internet. That does not mean to say 400 million actually watched it. They are trying to put a wedding spin on everything. Next - the clothing retail chain reported a boost in profits over the week but due to great weather and bank holidays as they have no wedding realted items to sell yet that hasn't stopped the media saying it was a wedding uplift. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Yooper on May 04, 2011, 07:50:47 pm ________________________________________ LA radio said "2B viewers is the real tale". ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Kuei Fei on May 04, 2011, 07:54:17 pm ________________________________________ The DM seems to be writing some fantastical things, even for a tabloid. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: serene grace on May 04, 2011, 10:30:24 pm ________________________________________ Quote it's unlikely that the number of people who tuned in worldwide hit the much-discussed target of 2 billion-tv guide. Close to 23 Million Americans Tune In to Royal Wedding www.tvguide.com/News/William-Kate-Wedding-Ratings-1032565.aspx23 Million viewers for 11networks, that really sucks! Sucks big time, that's a bomb. and it says close to 23 million, that means it didn't quite get 23million viewers in US. That sucks. :laugh: Even some of the network reporters were admitting it was a bust. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Ceridwen on May 04, 2011, 10:36:20 pm ________________________________________ I am glad that it SUCKED!! :spooky: :lips: lol  :loveshower: kisss lols :thumbsup: :laugh: :JOY: lmao :stars: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Yooper on May 04, 2011, 10:55:57 pm ________________________________________ ^^American Idol got over 38M last night somebody told me today and tonight even more is expected and that's just ONE tv program. We really are a silly nation sometimes, but smart enough not to tune into the dumb wedding, I guess, so that's a plus. $2B. What bloated egos. Me, too. I'm thrilled it sucked. :spooky: :spooky: :spooky: kisss :loveshower: :flower: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: June on May 06, 2011, 02:31:40 am ________________________________________ Made my week! Thanks serenegrace! :loveshower: kisss ________________________________________ Title: Re: Pr.William & Kate's Wedding Bombed!!! Post by: Magnolia on May 06, 2011, 03:19:31 am ________________________________________ Can someone inform the DM that they should really stop with the 2 bil watched farce alot of people are not fooled they know it didn't reach that. :bored: Pick a different number DM more believable. *yawns* Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC | Imprint |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2023 18:57:13 GMT
Royal Gossip The British Royal Family *Windsor* => Kate Middleton => Topic started by: mousiekins on May 19, 2011, 08:00:46 pm ________________________________________ Title: Kate's pole dancing lessons Post by: mousiekins on May 19, 2011, 08:00:46 pm ________________________________________ au.lifestyle.yahoo.com/new-idea/news/royal-watch/article/-/9201738/kate-middleton-to-take-up-pole-dancing/ guesses on the wedding this story reminds me of this one www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1270296/The-night-Kate-took-throne-dirty-dancing-queen.html________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate's pole dancing lessons Post by: Yooper on May 19, 2011, 08:09:19 pm ________________________________________ Kate puts the 'K' in klassy again. Now, think about it, even under the worst tabloid storm the BRF has ever taken, this sort of thing, to my knowledge was never discussed about Diana or even Fergie. Could be wrong; sometimes am, but this really shows what level of refinement people have of her. She, to me, is just plain trash. You can dress 'em up, but you can't take 'em anywhere. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate's pole dancing lessons Post by: Earl Grey on May 19, 2011, 09:37:32 pm ________________________________________ Oh yes she so demure, -tale like and perfect.....rolls eyes. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate's pole dancing lessons Post by: Kingdom Hearts on May 19, 2011, 09:40:27 pm ________________________________________ CINDERELLA??? I think NOT!! :ick: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate's pole dancing lessons Post by: Kuei Fei on May 19, 2011, 10:37:42 pm ________________________________________ I hope the British RF is proud of itself; they have a trashy future Consort and this is a total, TOTAL slap in the face to all decent women who might not have fat bank accounts enough to jet set around. This is also a slap in the face to upper class women to be branded harlots while they work hard and live independent and don't want to run around degrading themselves to get a man. Pity that women like that win out and I hope William ends up miserable in his marriage with Kate. HOW he will explain this to his kids is really beyond me. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate's pole dancing lessons Post by: Kingdom Hearts on May 19, 2011, 10:56:45 pm ________________________________________ You know what!! Im glade she is making a fool of herself because if someone witch i hope..say a actor or some sort does more charity and alot more then WK ever does,That will make her look so bad...And pprobly a divorce is in order one day? Maybe PW will find his cinderella and we (the people) will be all happy with her :AWW: I truely hope that changes are made BUT i dout it very much,she is a attention seeker and always will be. :James: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate's pole dancing lessons Post by: benign on May 19, 2011, 11: :21 pm ________________________________________ oh wells, WK will do anything to keep PW interested... ________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate's pole dancing lessons Post by: Yooper on May 20, 2011, 12:18:51 am ________________________________________ They can't have kids, KF. The cosmos can't be that cruel. This makes me angry. It's everything you said and more. When I think of them smirking at each other I could vomit. I DVR'd it and, trust me, they're not listening to any of the sacred vows. It's a performance! Aaaaaaaargh! ________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate's pole dancing lessons Post by: Kuei Fei on May 22, 2011, 04:58:17 am ________________________________________ Lets see: *Pole dancing *Pimp uncle *Lingerie modeling *Sex Orgy Best Friend *No Work + Possible sex tape = Big, BIG problem for the Palace and a horrific mother material. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate's pole dancing lessons Post by: Kingdom Hearts on May 22, 2011, 05:50:17 am ________________________________________ WAHAHAHAH!!! I like to move it move it, :poledance:..... :tehe: what else now??..I think the pregnancy thing was just a exscuse to throw everyone off i bet she will be pregnant... :ick: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate's pole dancing lessons Post by: Lady Artemis on May 22, 2011, 10:23:21 am ________________________________________ JUST HOW THE SAYING GOES "You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig."....Kate r u listening??? Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC | Imprint |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Aug 10, 2023 19:27:55 GMT
Royal Gossip The British Royal Family *Windsor* => Kate Middleton => Topic started by: mousiekins on May 19, 2011, 08:00:46 pm ________________________________________ Title: Kate's pole dancing lessons Post by: mousiekins on May 19, 2011, 08:00:46 pm ________________________________________ au.lifestyle.yahoo.com/new-idea/news/royal-watch/article/-/9201738/kate-middleton-to-take-up-pole-dancing/ guesses on the wedding this story reminds me of this one www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1270296/The-night-Kate-took-throne-dirty-dancing-queen.html________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate's pole dancing lessons Post by: Yooper on May 19, 2011, 08:09:19 pm ________________________________________ Kate puts the 'K' in klassy again. Now, think about it, even under the worst tabloid storm the BRF has ever taken, this sort of thing, to my knowledge was never discussed about Diana or even Fergie. Could be wrong; sometimes am, but this really shows what level of refinement people have of her. She, to me, is just plain trash. You can dress 'em up, but you can't take 'em anywhere. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate's pole dancing lessons Post by: Earl Grey on May 19, 2011, 09:37:32 pm ________________________________________ Oh yes she so demure, -tale like and perfect.....rolls eyes. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate's pole dancing lessons Post by: Kingdom Hearts on May 19, 2011, 09:40:27 pm ________________________________________ CINDERELLA??? I think NOT!! :ick: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate's pole dancing lessons Post by: Kuei Fei on May 19, 2011, 10:37:42 pm ________________________________________ I hope the British RF is proud of itself; they have a trashy future Consort and this is a total, TOTAL slap in the face to all decent women who might not have fat bank accounts enough to jet set around. This is also a slap in the face to upper class women to be branded harlots while they work hard and live independent and don't want to run around degrading themselves to get a man. Pity that women like that win out and I hope William ends up miserable in his marriage with Kate. HOW he will explain this to his kids is really beyond me. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate's pole dancing lessons Post by: Kingdom Hearts on May 19, 2011, 10:56:45 pm ________________________________________ You know what!! Im glade she is making a fool of herself because if someone witch i hope..say a actor or some sort does more charity and alot more then WK ever does,That will make her look so bad...And pprobly a divorce is in order one day? Maybe PW will find his cinderella and we (the people) will be all happy with her :AWW: I truely hope that changes are made BUT i dout it very much,she is a attention seeker and always will be. :James: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate's pole dancing lessons Post by: benign on May 19, 2011, 11: :21 pm ________________________________________ oh wells, WK will do anything to keep PW interested... ________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate's pole dancing lessons Post by: Yooper on May 20, 2011, 12:18:51 am ________________________________________ They can't have kids, KF. The cosmos can't be that cruel. This makes me angry. It's everything you said and more. When I think of them smirking at each other I could vomit. I DVR'd it and, trust me, they're not listening to any of the sacred vows. It's a performance! Aaaaaaaargh! ________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate's pole dancing lessons Post by: Kuei Fei on May 22, 2011, 04:58:17 am ________________________________________ Lets see: *Pole dancing *Pimp uncle *Lingerie modeling *Sex Orgy Best Friend *No Work + Possible sex tape = Big, BIG problem for the Palace and a horrific mother material. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate's pole dancing lessons Post by: Kingdom Hearts on May 22, 2011, 05:50:17 am ________________________________________ WAHAHAHAH!!! I like to move it move it, :poledance:..... :tehe: what else now??..I think the pregnancy thing was just a exscuse to throw everyone off i bet she will be pregnant... :ick: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate's pole dancing lessons Post by: Lady Artemis on May 22, 2011, 10:23:21 am ________________________________________ JUST HOW THE SAYING GOES "You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig."....Kate r u listening??? Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC | Imprint I think I am going to promote these on Twitter? What do people think? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2023 19:53:16 GMT
Royal Gossip The British Royal Family *Windsor* => Kate Middleton => Topic started by: Nighthawk on May 01, 2011, 08:51:48 am ________________________________________ Title: Kate Middleton's not the new Diana. Thank goodness Post by: Nighthawk on May 01, 2011, 08:51:48 am ________________________________________ Kate Middleton's not the new Diana. Thank goodness www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/may/01/royal-wedding-kate-middleton-masterchefQuote The reason is that Kate simply isn't the fizzing ball of naive vulnerability and jack-knifing contradictions that Diana was; just as she is not so infuriating, nor is she so endearing or interesting. Kate won't be throwing herself down the stairs for husbandly attention or moodily rollerblading through the castle corridors, sobbing to popular ballads. There will no mischievous posing at the Taj Mahal. Looking at pictures of the newly wed Diana, you think "bag of nerves". Looking at Kate, you think, here is a rather shrewd, calculating person – a businesswoman, for all her joblessness. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate Middleton's not the new Diana. Thank goodness Post by: Kuei Fei on May 01, 2011, 08:55:22 am ________________________________________ Quote Looking at Kate, you think, here is a rather shrewd, calculating person – a businesswoman, for all her joblessness. Well, she did after all spend her time selling herself. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate Middleton's not the new Diana. Thank goodness Post by: pyrenees on May 01, 2011, 02:29:49 pm ________________________________________ Satirical piece. It describes WK as not being human enough, of course she's pseudo-witch. Made me laugh at the calculating part. Mousie - how would you like pseudo-witch for a queen :king: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate Middleton's not the new Diana. Thank goodness Post by: June on May 01, 2011, 02:45:35 pm ________________________________________ If it weren't for these objective, real journalists, I think I would have gone insane by now. :oooh: They are the only ones who dare speak the truth in the face of mainstream media manipulation. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate Middleton's not the new Diana. Thank goodness Post by: Raisie on May 01, 2011, 08:52:57 pm ________________________________________ Quote The reason I'm not remotely excited about the royal wedding or, indeed, the royal marriage is that I have not invested in the couple. SO far that is my feeling,the ones who were excited about the wedding were the ones who invested on them: some tabloids,some selling souvenirs,hotels,etc. They invested so much money (not just since the engagement happen) but for a very LONG,LONG TIME AGO.That is why this wedding was so much push.In Diana's wedding only the BRF were the match makers,in this one were many the match makes except the BRF and the courtiers. Lucky us Kate is not Princess Diana but the feeling that the story will be repeat and that William will have a mistress,that is no doubt. ________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate Middleton's not the new Diana. Thank goodness Post by: Ceridwen on May 01, 2011, 10:15:38 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: Kuei Fei on May 01, 2011, 08:55:22 am Quote Looking at Kate, you think, here is a rather shrewd, calculating person – a businesswoman, for all her joblessness. Well, she did after all spend her time selling herself. Exactly - Kate knew how to market herself, making herself available to PW for 8 years, 24/7. For a modern man surrounded by a sea of career oriented women, that type of readiness can be seductive IMO. He snaps his fingers, she'll come running to him with a yes smile plastered on her face. :rolleyes: ________________________________________ Title: Re: Kate Middleton's not the new Diana. Thank goodness Post by: Kuei Fei on May 02, 2011, 12:14:49 am ________________________________________ It'll be great for him, but when thirty hits and he gets tired of someone who does not know how to beahve in the banquet hall, he will get tired of it very quickly. It's not like she's some young lady who just left a convent. This is someone who has reached nearly thirty and no job, nothing to teach her how to report for dinner, lunch, on time, early, etc. For all her faults, Diana was a kid when she married in and managed pretty well and did rise to the occasion. Wihle Diana's issues were serious, I am sure that Kate's are a lot mroe serious. If she can't even hold down a small job, there's something wrong there. Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC | Imprint |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2023 19:54:21 GMT
Why does it space so big like that ^ whenever I post any articles or this??
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2023 19:56:22 GMT
Royal Gossip The British Royal Family *Windsor* => The Middletons => Topic started by: Allegra on May 01, 2011, 07:12:16 pm ________________________________________ Title: The wedding costs Middletons at least 250k Post by: Allegra on May 01, 2011, 07:12:16 pm ________________________________________ Link: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1382325/Royal-Wedding-2011-Middletons-home-250k-poorer.htmlIs it possible that some of it was covered by the RF? Also, how on earth can PP be worth 30m? ________________________________________ Title: Re: The wedding costs Middletons at least 250k Post by: Raisie on May 01, 2011, 07:30: pm ________________________________________ I think that soon we will know,the press will try to found out.Maybe UG help a little bit,i mean not for nothing he went to the wedding. I don't believe that a company like them made so much money,as i said i've seen companies like them here and those kind of business only make you be middle class but no millionaire. ________________________________________ Title: Re: The wedding costs Middletons at least 250k Post by: Lauracrazygirl on May 01, 2011, 08:07:20 pm ________________________________________ Why did they waste money on the hotel?? Why didnt they just stay at the palace?? I mean the cost of their clothes and Kate's dress must have really burned a hole in their pocket. So why buy a hotel room for 85,000 a night. I don't understand. :oooh: :oooh: ________________________________________ Title: Re: The wedding costs Middletons at least 250k Post by: Nighthawk on May 01, 2011, 08:11:54 pm ________________________________________ had to look important IMO so why not do it all up it's not every day that one can push off their daughter to marry a prince ________________________________________ Title: Re: The wedding costs Middletons at least 250k Post by: windsor2 on May 01, 2011, 08:55:35 pm ________________________________________ I'm sure that Waity will get :William: to pay. I hope that Wills has the good sense to have the accountants ;pck down his money and only give Waity the bare minimum allowance. Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC | Imprint |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2023 19:57:03 GMT
Royal Gossip The British Royal Family *Windsor* => Prince William => Topic started by: Ella on May 02, 2011, 01: :04 am Title: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Ella on May 02, 2011, 01: :04 am ________________________________________ www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/royalwedding/3558220/-Prince-Williams-10-week-stint-in-Falklands-while-new-wife-Kate-waits-at-home.htmlHe's heading to the Falklands in about September (?) for ten weeks and Kate won't be allowed to go with him. Really inconvenient for the whole making heirs thing. It says he really wants to get enough hours for a combat role, which he can't have. I wonder if that's a factor in his willingness to have children? Once the line is secured with a heir, he might have more freedom in that sense. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William will head to Falklands in 4 mos. without Kate Post by: Lieblich on May 02, 2011, 01:45:28 am ________________________________________ Falklands should have happened in October, imo. :bored: ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: benign on May 02, 2011, 01:51:23 am ________________________________________ ^yup, PW should have been sent last year....As to Kate, shes used to it so she will be okey and probably be staying with her parents most of the time... ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Kuei Fei on May 02, 2011, 02:56:28 am ________________________________________ Either that or at the Palace, ending up as a chew toy for catty courtiers. I am getting the impression that William has no clue just what he's done with his life at the moment. He is carrying on as if he's just gotten back from a massive bash, not his own marriage. I guess he expects Kate to 'just get on with it' and then build her own life. I don't think that Kate will manage without William, since she is used to being shielded by him all the time. She won't be able to live with her family since she is a married woman now and she will have to live at Court or on base with him and do duties and spend time actually WORKING. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Raisie on May 02, 2011, 02:59:33 am ________________________________________ :tehe: i would like to see Kate alone with the courtiers while she is not with William for the 10 weeks :tease: ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Kuei Fei on May 02, 2011, 03:05:15 am ________________________________________ By September she will be so frazzled that I don't think the marriage will last. As it is, she will have to keep house while living on base and I don't see her with a hot meal ready when William comes home sweaty, tired, and irritable from work and after the tropical vacation, she will likely be required to show up at Court and start working a few engagements a week, instead of going home and living quietly with her parents, suing the press every few months. She'll have to adjust to their routines, their protocol, and their preferences and she won't be able to pull rank on any of them. Each household operates independently and she will be smothered by work and staff surrounding her. This summer she will have to get out and go out in the boiling heat and do a tour of Canada, whether she likes it or not and I am more than sure that she will get tired, but have to slog on. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Duchess Georgiana on May 02, 2011, 05:41:22 am ________________________________________ Not a good thing. Wasn't Prince Andrew who constantly left Fergie alone for extended periods of time due to his post in the marines? I believe it was one of the reasons for their marriage not working out (?). William should have gotten this out of the way before getting married. Maybe she will get pregnant right away so that he has an excuse not to go. :dontknow: ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Raisie on May 02, 2011, 05:47:21 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Duchess Georgiana on May 02, 2011, 05:41:22 am William should have done this before getting married Is not his fault that the Midds,Kate and the press push him for the wedding.So i am sorry to say but that is her fault, she should have done other things and not wait around and push William for the ring. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Kuei Fei on May 02, 2011, 05:57:29 am ________________________________________ It wasn't just livign alone, but that Fergie wanted to live a more glittering life, plus she slept with a lot of men, much like Edwina Mountbatten wanted. I can just see Kate taking William's credit card, leaping onto the Concorde, and maxing out the bank account in the New York shops. Then taking a limo to Trump Towers and partying with all the filthy rich climbers and the celebrities who will give her the kowtows she has been yearning for. Fergie also made social gaffe after social gaffe and did end up dressing horribly. A sparkly personality, but Kate is not as friendly as Fergie was and I don't see any good coming in this economy of her being left to her own devices. Kate's main interests are shopping, clubbing, and suing the press. I figure by September she will be eased into the luxe life aspect and will refuse to do her duties. If they live independently of the Court, I wager that she will be well into adultery by November. Kate will want to avoid the Court and I can only suppose that in time she will follow Fergie's footsteps in military wifery. Kate will get bored on base and she will get bored living in a small home outside of base and if she lives at Court, they will want to restrict her from going out and partying because of the economy and the press that will be ready to crucify her. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Duchess Georgiana on May 02, 2011, 05:58:27 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Raisie on May 02, 2011, 05:47:21 am Is not his fault that the Midds,Kate and the press push him for the wedding.So i am sorry to say but that is her fault, she should have done other things and not wait around and push William for the ring. You do have a point. She knew what she was getting herself into, that he has duties he cannot turn his back on. Despite the headline trying to make it sound like such a tragedy, I'm not feeling sorry for her one bit. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Kuei Fei on May 02, 2011, 06:29:29 am ________________________________________ I still can't blame William for this, no one was under the harrassment he has been under and any one of us woudl break like a china doll under all that. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: milagro on May 02, 2011, 07:06:24 am ________________________________________ I don't see how a ten weeks absence can destroy a marriage, and this marriage especially  Kate won't object at all since it'd give her a pretense to not stay at the base, she'll go to London to stay with her family "to ease the pain of separation with her beloved princely hubby", or something. Nor can I see Kate even so much as look at another man until an heir is born and her future secured. She's not impulsive, in fact she's proved she CAN wait tremendously ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Nighthawk on May 02, 2011, 07:27:08 am ________________________________________ huh still waiting WK for your prince to make time for you :legs :whistle: at least WK can handle being alone sitting there waiting she's been doing it for such a long time this should be a piece of Wedding cake for her :wed: ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Kuei Fei on May 02, 2011, 07:30:19 am ________________________________________ Think of it this way: When William goes off, she will leave the base and she will move to her Palace suite and spend her days shopping and her nights partying. This time around, she is going to have to answer for not working and she will get fried since she will likely not be doing a whole lot of duties. She is on the taxpayer dime now and her old habits are now actions she has to answer for. She no longer has privacy or a right to 'live her own life' and she is not going to have the excuse of youth or inexperience in the world. Even Diana got criticized for her shopping sprees, at first justified since she did have to have outfits to wear to engagements and she did have to create a trousseau. A reason she supposedly did not work before was because the Palace didn't want her to. Well, she's in now and she will have no excuse to not work. If she is not working full time by August, ten weeks of idleness is not going to wreck the marriage, but it WILL wreck the Palace's reputation and hers. No matter what the DM states, or tells people what to think, Kate has almost no room for error, if any. The ratings did not live up to the hype and one million people in London is not that much since I am sure the actual population is much larger. If Kate's family moves in and lives it up at the Palace, at public expense, there will be a lot of pissed of taxpayers who are struggling while she parties. Fun time is over for her now and she has no excuse not to work. She isn't nineteen, she is thirty in less than a year. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Lady Artemis on May 02, 2011, 09:02: am ________________________________________ I mean all these bad signs...all the bad omens following this couple and still she dosen't get it?? :angry: I don't feels sorry for her...sleazy ____ fill in the blank! Ughhh the only thing that keeps me happy is that all the hard work or stressed life she'll endure now that she is a member of the RF. Ahhhh I hope Princess Anne gives her a hard time!!! The more she waits...and make the press believe that she's hardworking saint :snob: The public will begin noticing her signs of aging and distress :KEZZA: I can imagine when she's 35 (uhhhh that pestering woman) she'll look like 45 and by that time I don't think that even Wills will take a second glance at her...she's turning into old Camilla!!!! :tired: ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Kezza on May 02, 2011, 09:06:42 am ________________________________________ I agree KF, its easier for William, because he is already a member of the firm. Plus if he isnt doing his Royal Duties he is doing his duties as a search and rescue pilot in Wales, Kate has nothing to fall back on, she has to do Royal duties. I also think if he isnt at the air base or away she might be better off staying close to her family, but I suspect the palace will want to watch her like a hawk, so she isnt doing the crazy stuff Fergie use to do. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Kuei Fei on May 02, 2011, 09:28:31 am ________________________________________ Quote I also think if he isnt at the air base or away she might be better off staying close to her family, but I suspect the palace will want to watch her like a hawk, so she isnt doing the crazy stuff Fergie use to do. The RF is her family now, not the Middletons. She's going to have to live with the Court when she isn't on base now; her family would only cause problems and I don't see her wanting to be around them anymore. I think she went after William to escape her family. She can't be with them anymore because she HAS TO reside at the Palace for security reasons too. Then there's the fact that her office and staff are located there and the Court will not uproot itself for Kate. I also think that the Palace won't interfere if she wants to shop and party since that way Kate can't accuse them of being so controlling that they are making her life a misery like they did with Diana, etc.... This September will be a test for Kate to see if she takes initiative and then starts doing her duties, or if she decides to party. I think she will fall back to partying instead of duties since it's such an ingrained habit. I also hope she wiggles around the floor like a worm and also uses her "ninja thighs' routine on men. It'll be Fergie a la deux and will likely give William more than enough reason to perhaps start building a reason to divorce her. William can't run her life for her and the Palace can only do so much, they can't drug her and control her like that. They can't FORCE her to live up to her responsibilities and if she does fail to do her job, I am more than sure that not one person will sympathize and the DM will end up with egg on their Kate worshiping face along with Nichols. If he goes without Kate and clears his head, he will then likely get reports about her antics from the Court and she won't be able to manipulate him by blaming the press; he will have an up-close undeniable realization that his wifey has been up to more than just charity. Fergie never changed after her marriage and party girls don't become housewives at the dorp of a hat. Same with tarts. They can't just change these self defeating patterns and Kate has been admittedly rescued, but not changed. She will continue to behave the same way because she herself has not had to change through her own efforts; an HRH isn't going to change her habits and at her age now they are pretty set, just as William's are. If her wedding reception couldn't even stay dignified, how on earth can she herself have a dignified time at a ball if she can't inspire dignified behavior in her own husband? ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: True Brit on May 02, 2011, 08:48:18 pm ________________________________________ This is just so bizarre. He kndew this Falklands posting was coming up so why not wait until after the tour for an engagement/wedding. Anglesey is really remote and windswept (despite attempts to paint it as a rural idyll) she will be crawling up the walls there with just the fortnightly meetings for the Officers' wives? Quite frankly I would be crawling up the walls in Anglesey and I don't crave designer shops and clubs. I really am interested to see how this will pan out. Is she being left alone so they can test her further. It's just bizarre - the whole bloody thing. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Kuei Fei on May 02, 2011, 09:00:08 pm ________________________________________ I really have no honest clue on any of it. I think William had a total brain fart and he is now going to realize just what he did with himself. None of this makes sense. ________________________________________ |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2023 19:57:19 GMT
Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Lanvin Pearls on May 02, 2011, 11:46:04 pm ________________________________________ Lady Artemis - LOL too funny but true ! True Brit - Very odd. True. KF - I cannot figure this out either. If Kug is pregnant soon, I hope she totally gives up the booze (and cigs). In fact, she needs to give up drinking altogether now, because if she drinks for the crucial first month even (unaware she is pregnant) it can effect the baby's brain development and other developments. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Kuei Fei on May 02, 2011, 11:53:15 pm ________________________________________ I think that if, interestingly, the longer William stays married to Kate, the worse Kate will look. The longer she's stayed with him as a girlfriend she looked worse, I think that since she is now expected to pay back, she is going to look worse and wrose and worse. As for living in Wales, it's a perspective of attitude, not circumstances. She's now living the reality of royal wifery. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Princess Alucard on May 02, 2011, 11:59:26 pm ________________________________________ Well if :William: is trying to test her why didn't he do a pre-nup incase things get bad? :interview: ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Kuei Fei on May 03, 2011, 12:01:00 am ________________________________________ So that way Palace isn't required to provide for her. A prenup would have likely taken better care of Kate than of William's assets and I am quite sure that with no prenup, William is less obligated to provide for her sicne there is no contract. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Ceridwen on May 03, 2011, 12:22:48 am ________________________________________ Quote from: benign on May 02, 2011, 01:51:23 am ^yup, PW should have been sent last year....As to Kate, shes used to it so she will be okey and probably be staying with her parents most of the time... back to her childhood bedroom? :bored: ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Kuei Fei on May 03, 2011, 12:49:00 am ________________________________________ She simply cannot do that! The taxpayers are paying for her and she has to live with the Court! ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: royal_watcher05 on May 03, 2011, 03:42:04 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Ceridwen on May 03, 2011, 12:22:48 am Quote from: benign on May 02, 2011, 01:51:23 am ^yup, PW should have been sent last year....As to Kate, shes used to it so she will be okey and probably be staying with her parents most of the time... back to her childhood bedroom? :bored: As a married women? :shy: Isnt that a little much? ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Kuei Fei on May 03, 2011, 04:46:21 am ________________________________________ This. Is. Kate. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Bella on May 03, 2011, 05:47:11 am ________________________________________ I wonder what kind of hissy-fit both William and Kate threw....Kate won't be alone..Looks like the Midd's really brainwashed him and can't live without them!! It appears that William has assured his new in-laws and "has made it plain, will not follow the usual royal pattern of being frozen out of the royal circle". www.thisismoney.co.uk/celebrity/article.html?in_article_id=530920&in_page_id=181________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Yooper on May 03, 2011, 06:09:20 am ________________________________________ If I remember correctly, and that is always a question, did the Middletons NOT mortgage their home a coupla times? This story of theirs changes everytime I read it. I am very, very suspicious and not because I don't like em. I don't even know them, but every time it's a different story. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Lady Artemis on May 03, 2011, 06:13:23 am ________________________________________ Lanvin Pearls I can imagine!! Will a child be all that takes for them to separate !! :bored: UGHHH I wonder!!! Wills should take the hint..he'll become like his aunt Margaret that lived a miserable life!!! Why Wills Why??? :angry: But mistakes are the best lessons one can take in order to grow and mature!!! If this is the lesson he's meant to take.. so be it!!! UGHHH but nooo I can imagine him already brainwashed if not subdued by sleazy pants!!! Isn't that after all what marriage is about??...Exchanging one traits with one another!! He looks up to the Middletons because he has no life (or family to say the least) of his own!! Past childhood traumas!! No smiley face can deny that!! :wellduh: Open your eyes Wills your about to get a rude awkening and if that dosn't help I have no sympathy for you or your family!! :snob: Poor children...ahhh I wonder if they'll inherit Kate's snobiness and immaturity!!! ALMIGHTY SAVE US!! :runforhills: ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Ceridwen on May 03, 2011, 07:36:16 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Kuei Fei on May 03, 2011, 04:46:21 am This. Is. Kate. :laugh: lols Exactly!! Boring, mediocre, plain and lazy waste of space Waity Katie!! :thumbsdown: Not much there..... :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Anne-Elliot on May 03, 2011, 04:00:21 pm ________________________________________ As I posted in a another thread - as an officer's wife, she will have duties/responsibilities that she will be expected to undertake. If she clears off to London for anything other than royal duties, I wouldn't want to be in her shoes when she returns to base & has to face the p****d off wives who've been reading in the tabloids about her boozing/clubbing in London. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: milagro on May 03, 2011, 04:07:16 pm ________________________________________ Considering they have their meetings on 2-monthly basis, they don't seem an awfully active lot. Not that Kate can cope with even this... ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Princess Alucard on May 03, 2011, 04:09:40 pm ________________________________________ I wonder if the wives will try to give her hell at first. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: SmartOne1 on May 04, 2011, 09:26:01 am ________________________________________ Quote from: Raisie on May 02, 2011, 05:47:21 am Quote from: Duchess Georgiana on May 02, 2011, 05:41:22 am William should have done this before getting married Is not his fault that the Midds,Kate and the press push him for the wedding.So i am sorry to say but that is her fault, she should have done other things and not wait around and push William for the ring. Kate and the Palace and the media may have pushed William for a wedding but William agreed to the marriage for whatever reasons. We don't know the reality of their lives. People post on here like they know what really goes on between Kate and William. Do you not think that there would be other women that would like to become William's wife. Do you think the future King of England could not get another women if he wanted? Granted, an independent career woman would not want the job. Heck I would never want the job. It is not the type of life I would ever want. However, Kate won the position in the end. They have known each other for 10 years. Surely they must have discussed everything by now. Why would he marry her now if he did not love her? He is still young. He could have walked away from Kate and easily found somebody else. People would have eventually gotten over the whole Kate thing. Again, maybe it would not be easy for him to get an independent thinking woman, but surely there would be enough candidates for him. I am the biggest cynic around but why would this man have to settle for anything after he saw what his parents went through? Doesn't make sense people. Maybe he does really love her. Could that be possible here? ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: True Brit on May 04, 2011, 09:37:43 am ________________________________________ A complex subject (and welcome to the forum). The short answer is possibly yes it is love - "whatever love means". ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: SmartOne1 on May 04, 2011, 10:15:45 am ________________________________________ Quote from: True Brit on May 04, 2011, 09:37:43 am A complex subject (and welcome to the forum). The short answer is possibly yes it is love - "whatever love means". Thanks. Anything could be going on there and we will never know for sure but surely William, if he is so inclined, could get many women. Even if the press would be negative if he broke up with Kate after so long, they would forget about it quickly and soon it would be "Kate who?" ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: True Brit on May 04, 2011, 10:48:18 am ________________________________________ I have often thought this too (that William could get any woman) but after reading and following it all my own conclusion (and many here are of the same opinion) is that after Diana most of the aristocratic girls just didn't want the hassle. And why should they - rich, well connected they would be "somebody" and in no need of having a leg up in social circles. Many of them also have careers and impressive outside interests and would not be prepared to compromise in order to accommodate the RF. Too many people think of the RF as being a glamorous, globe trotting lifestyle but that is where Diana came adrift. She became the superstar model whereas the RF need someone presentable but rather, well dull and low key. Good Royalty is like good Government it's needs to be effective but unspectacular. I also get the impression that, unike his brother, William is not much of a ladies man and he does still bear the mental scars of his mother's fate (not that Harry doesn't). You do get the picture that he is besotted with Kate but many people's critical concerns are that she is not so much in love with him but in love with the whole Royal fairytale thing. And never mind the attempts at reinvention those Middletons are ocean going social climbers and doing very well. I can only give my own concerns but from what we know and have seen of Kate she also wants the high life, to be admired and adored globally and the Palace is already trying to clamp down on public appearances etc. What happens next? Who knows all we can do is wait and see how it all turns out. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: June on May 04, 2011, 03:24:15 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: SmartOne1 on May 04, 2011, 09:26:01 am Quote from: Raisie on May 02, 2011, 05:47:21 am Quote from: Duchess Georgiana on May 02, 2011, 05:41:22 am William should have done this before getting married Is not his fault that the Midds,Kate and the press push him for the wedding.So i am sorry to say but that is her fault, she should have done other things and not wait around and push William for the ring. Kate and the Palace and the media may have pushed William for a wedding but William agreed to the marriage for whatever reasons. We don't know the reality of their lives. People post on here like they know what really goes on between Kate and William. Do you not think that there would be other women that would like to become William's wife. Do you think the future King of England could not get another women if he wanted? Granted, an independent career woman would not want the job. Heck I would never want the job. It is not the type of life I would ever want. However, Kate won the position in the end. They have known each other for 10 years. Surely they must have discussed everything by now. Why would he marry her now if he did not love her? He is still young. He could have walked away from Kate and easily found somebody else. People would have eventually gotten over the whole Kate thing. Again, maybe it would not be easy for him to get an independent thinking woman, but surely there would be enough candidates for him. I am the biggest cynic around but why would this man have to settle for anything after he saw what his parents went through? Doesn't make sense people. Maybe he does really love her. Could that be possible here? Speaking for myself: a) I don't agree that William ever had a wide net from which to find a woman to marry. He made it even narrower, by not bothering to look outside a very claustrophobic circle. b) I have never stated that I know exactly what goes on between Kate and Willliam - I'm not that arrogant, nor do I care so much. However, I assess the evidence, as I see it, at hand. Some facts are unassailable ie the fact that he took nearly a decade to marry her and his life will carry on as it did beforehand. c) No, I don't think he is "in love" with her at all. d) You are basing your opinion on the same loose information, as you believe others are. With respect, your opinion is not analytical, but full of assumptions (mainly by contradiction) and some bare facts that are common ground. That is fine, but my mind doesn't work that way - or I guess I wouldn't be here. :tehe: Welcome to the forum. :hello: ________________________________________ |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2023 19:57:37 GMT
Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate
Post by: Mada on May 04, 2011, 04:16:26 pm
________________________________________
Quote from: True Brit on May 04, 2011, 10:48:18 am
I have often thought this too (that William could get any woman) but after reading and following it all my own conclusion (and many here are of the same opinion) is that after Diana most of the aristocratic girls just didn't want the hassle. And why should they - rich, well connected they would be "somebody" and in no need of having a leg up in social circles.
Many of them also have careers and impressive outside interests and would not be prepared to compromise in order to accommodate the RF. Too many people think of the RF as being a glamorous, globe trotting lifestyle but that is where Diana came adrift. She became the superstar model whereas the RF need someone presentable but rather, well dull and low key. Good Royalty is like good Government it's needs to be effective but unspectacular.
I also get the impression that, unike his brother, William is not much of a ladies man and he does still bear the mental scars of his mother's fate (not that Harry doesn't). You do get the picture that he is besotted with Kate but many people's critical concerns are that she is not so much in love with him but in love with the whole Royal fairytale thing. And never mind the attempts at reinvention those Middletons are ocean going social climbers and doing very well.
I can only give my own concerns but from what we know and have seen of Kate she also wants the high life, to be admired and adored globally and the Palace is already trying to clamp down on public appearances etc. What happens next? Who knows all we can do is wait and see how it all turns out.
Great Posts Ladies ! Really Like that one True Brit !!!! :thankyou:
:welcome2: Smartone1,
This is my own very personal opinion. PW has been seen with KM since university and already at that time she was considered "PW's future wife".
KM has played the media card very hard as soon as her relationship with PW has been publicly known.
And even though PW and KM broke up several times during their "courtship" and she was known as the on-off girlfriend - the press belittled it and focused people's mind on the fact she was the PUBLIC girlfriend preparing for the role of her life : becoming Princess William.
Now you have PW who was known to be quite unlucky in love and have been rejected by many women. Feeling insecure about himself and being pressured to make a decision both by the press, her public girlfriend family and his own family, marrying was apparently the easiest path to take, as in his family it seems to be a tradition to sacrifice one's well-being for the sake of PR.
The question is : what girl would have wanted to enter this mess now ?
Unless by a twist of fate, PW had met the love of his life and would have fall head over heels for her, I could not see him totally leaving behind the so-familiar Kate, who was already claimed by her family and considered by the press as " PW's official wife".
The guy was trapped since day one, by the pushy Kate and her family and the press, then you can add the keeping-up-the-appearance attitude and others occult dealings from the Windsors side and you have that Royal Farce.
When you let someone enter your life, lover or not, there are always some hidden dynamic into play. It's not easy to quit someone when you're just John Smith or Jane Doe, so imagine when you are a high profile individual with a so public relationship with a woman who made clear subconsciously to any other women that there was no way she would let her prey give her the slip. IMHO it's enough an explanation to understand why he got married to her.
Love is something very tangible even though there's no real word to describe what it is and when you see Love you don't waste time to wonder if it is there or not. :flower:
________________________________________
Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate
Post by: Raisie on May 04, 2011, 05:42:04 pm
________________________________________
Mada since the start it was a big mess and i agree with you he was push into marry Kate since day 1 by the press and the Midds.
Also no Aristocratic girl or decent woman would like to enter in William's life and all what the press would say about her (i have to be honest,no other press is as worse as the British about public figures,maybe they are not as bad as i think but regards Kate it was and still is) unless she is from UK but no foreign Aristocratic or Royal would love to end her reputation.
"is that after Diana most of the aristocratic girls just didn't want the hassle. And why should they - rich, well connected they would be "somebody" and in no need of having a leg up in social circles."
I don't want to sound awful or terrible but that is why after Diana many princes in Europe marry commoners (not for love but because aristocrats didn't want to end like her).Commoners now could put up with many things: Félipe and Fred cheating,the paps like in Kate's part and i don't doubt William's cheating.
I think Aristocrats prefer make their life on their own,they are already someone (no need for marry dear prince but because of their ancestors),they have money and respect.
There is only one way to know how William's life could be and that is just wait,maybe with a twist of fate,William meet an aristocrat woman that both fall in love and that would be a terrible lesson for many for be so pushy.
________________________________________
Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate
Post by: Kuei Fei on May 04, 2011, 06:25:31 pm
________________________________________
Quote
Also no Aristocratic girl or decent woman would like to enter in William's life and all what the press would say about her (i have to be honest,no other press is as worse as the British about public figures,maybe they are not as bad as i think but regards Kate it was and still is) unless she is from UK but no foreign Aristocratic or Royal would love to end her reputation.
That's the crux of the situation really.
Put frankly, I don't know why, but the British media, the tabloids in particular, seem unusually domineering and ruthless. In the US, the tabloids report stuff, they expose crimes and criminals, but they know where the lines are and don't cross them. When I hear about the papz going after Chelsy (when she was seventeen) and the constant bashing (and blatantly biased lies) of the aristos, I am utterly shocked at how there is no restraint. No woman who values her peace of mind would ever put her reputation, name, and suchlike on the line to be so viciously attacked. It's like the media there sees fit to decide who is and isn't royal material and now, go figure, the tabloids are crossing more lines by being so controlling to the point where the RF actually has to take a gutter press into consideration?
________________________________________
Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate
Post by: Ceridwen on May 04, 2011, 07:22:22 pm
________________________________________
Quote from: SmartOne1 on May 04, 2011, 09:26:01 am
Quote from: Raisie on May 02, 2011, 05:47:21 am
Quote from: Duchess Georgiana on May 02, 2011, 05:41:22 am
William should have done this before getting married
Is not his fault that the Midds,Kate and the press push him for the wedding.So i am sorry to say but that is her fault, she should have done other things and not wait around and push William for the ring.
Kate and the Palace and the media may have pushed William for a wedding but William agreed to the marriage for whatever reasons. We don't know the reality of their lives. People post on here like they know what really goes on between Kate and William. Do you not think that there would be other women that would like to become William's wife. Do you think the future King of England could not get another women if he wanted? Granted, an independent career woman would not want the job. Heck I would never want the job. It is not the type of life I would ever want. However, Kate won the position in the end. They have known each other for 10 years. Surely they must have discussed everything by now. Why would he marry her now if he did not love her? He is still young. He could have walked away from Kate and easily found somebody else. People would have eventually gotten over the whole Kate thing. Again, maybe it would not be easy for him to get an independent thinking woman, but surely there would be enough candidates for him. I am the biggest cynic around but why would this man have to settle for anything after he saw what his parents went through? Doesn't make sense people. Maybe he does really love her. Could that be possible here?
Good point SmartOne1 and :welcome1: to the forum. I hope you'll have fun posting here.
You are absolutely correct in that none of us here are an authority to what is going on inside the palace which is why, this is a place to be for us to gather and discuss them. I also agree that PW could have walked away and yet he didn't and chose her instead. There are lots of reasons why he did and it may not necessarily be for romantic reasons but for practical ones. Lots of couple marry after years of dating and chose to stay together knowing that they're not in-love anymore but feels that they owe it to their history together. Maybe PW loves Kate and maybe he doesn't. Maybe he loves her because he trusts her enough that no matter what happens in the future, she will stay right where she is at (@ his side). James Whitaker once said that PW cares about Kate but is not in love with her and that she will stay even if sometime in the future he will bring a third party in the marriage. She is not going to do a Diana and air her dirty linen in public (@ least for now but who knows, a woman can only take so much humiliation). And that particular sentiment was discussed and talked about by palace courtiers that it's not a matter of "if" but "when."
________________________________________
Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate
Post by: Kuei Fei on May 04, 2011, 07:47:35 pm
________________________________________
Quote
You are absolutely correct in that none of us here are an authority to what is going on inside the palace which is why, this is a place to be for us to gather and discuss them. I also agree that PW could have walked away and yet he didn't and chose her instead.
That is why gossip forums like this exist, so we can speculate! :thumbsup:
Quote
There are lots of reasons why he did and it may not necessarily be for romantic reasons but for practical ones.
Like what? Money? Titles? Connections? Jobs? Her own personal/professional accomplishments? Normal men are a lot more practical these days and know better than to marry someone who doesn't have it together in any respect that she has.
Quote
Lots of couple marry after years of dating and chose to stay together knowing that they're not in-love anymore but feels that they owe it to their history together.
I dated someone for five years and we had a lot of history; he was there for a lot of landmarks and I still broke up with him instead of marrying him (despite his constant pushing) and I don't see how on earth she is owed a ring because of it. She CHOSE to put her sorry life on hold and CHOSE to go about, gallivanting and throwing her life away. She went to a lot of things, but as a beck and call girl (like Pretty Woman) and such things don't translate well into real life.
I don't see her like a socialite or nice woman, but like Vivian from Pretty Woman (just with a different twist of perspective); despite being a hooker (I'm not calling Kate one), Vivian thought she deserved to be treated like a lady and that was after a week of high living and being treated well by a man who wanted a woman of convenience. William (like Edward) saw Kate not as someone with unresolved issues, but as someone who was some nice, funny eccentric who was purely through no fault of her own in bad circumstances.
The irony is, that like Kate, Vivian knew quite a bit about cars and could have used that to make a living, or worked in the club as a bartender, but chose not to. She waited around to be rescued. Kate could have gotten a degree in a posh gallery and made a fabulous living, but chose to hang around and be rescued. It's only a matter of time until Kate's issues pop up and then problems between her and William begin, you see if they don't.
________________________________________
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2023 19:57:54 GMT
Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Ceridwen on May 04, 2011, 07:51:50 pm ________________________________________ KF, I completely agree with you about Kate and I doubt I will ever change my mind about her. :thumbsup: "She CHOSE to put her sorry life on hold and CHOSE to go about, gallivanting and throwing her life away." :a##: That's exactly why no matter how the press spin her around or that how her supporters say otherwise, no one can deny that Kate (& her family) manipulated and wormed their way into Pr. William's life. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: mousiekins on May 04, 2011, 08:59:27 pm ________________________________________ It is a myth that Princes can pick and choose from a huge array of beautiful amazing women, or any women for that matter. They may have many girls that would like to have a one night stand but to actually date and or marry a Prince? No way. Especially after Diana not many intelligent women would want to make the sacrifices needed to be a Royal. He could have made it work with Arabella but he cheated on her and she dumped him because of his notorious (in his circle) wandering eye. He also cheated on Carly and started seeing Kate behind her back Isabella thought he was unnerving and made her feel uneasy. Why should these women have sacrificed their dignity and happiness to be with a man who does not really sound like a catch. We are in the 21st Century where wome are not told to 'think back and think of England' or being with a Royal is a duty and a way to be closer to God. William stayed with Kate because she does not mind him cheating or treating her like dirt, he found the only one in his small world who is willing to put up with him and sacrifice her respect for a title. It is not because they are in love, if he loved her he would not treat her with the contempt he does. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Kuei Fei on May 04, 2011, 09:13:41 pm ________________________________________ I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that the BRF can no longer just show up and cut ribbons anymore, they have to start being more self sufficient. They will be removed from the public purse next year, but this does not mean that they can just kick back and not give back. I'm sure that for the ten weeks he's gone the Court will put her to work whether she likes it or not. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Raisie on May 04, 2011, 09:15:20 pm ________________________________________ Maybe now that he has the only fool woman who can put up with his nasty things,those woman who didn't want him would like to have a one night stand and as rumours of Kate do not have kids any woman would like to have his children. Kate is only the woman who wanted a title no matter at what cost.She got it so she better no complain.So true mousie no smart woman would sacrifice themselves just to be royal (Kate did,she lost her reputation,her life,she spoke to many on the press to get that ring,etc) but no one knows if someone would like to be with William and be his love. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Ceridwen on May 04, 2011, 09:18:12 pm ________________________________________ Quote from: mousiekins on May 04, 2011, 08:59:27 pm William stayed with Kate because she does not mind him cheating or treating her like dirt, he found the only one in his small world who is willing to put up with him and sacrifice her respect for a title. It is not because they are in love, if he loved her he would not treat her with the contempt he does. Well said mousiekins :thumbsup: That's the BASIC reason why Pr. William picked her. We all could formulate the idea that he loves or not but the point is that Kate is willing to do anything in order to be a princess. Furthermore, her family is willing so long that they too can take the advantage of royal/aristo doors opening for them. Kate and her family are an opportunists !!! ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Kuei Fei on May 04, 2011, 09:21:56 pm ________________________________________ Kate had all the circumstances in her favor. She was British, she was a politically correct underdog, and she had the ability to skillfully make the press think that they were 'in' wtih the Midds that they would get something back from all of this. I mean, I don't see how it was any other way. When they were dating in university, she was already in the press, getting established. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: June on May 05, 2011, 06:05:57 am ________________________________________ ^ That's true. Plus, the Windsors are racist, so William really had his work cut out for him, finding a "suitable" English girl. Thanks Mousie. :hug: Ceri: yes, Kate played the "compliant" card to perfection. I recall reading a few years back that William was allegedly concerned he wouldn't find anyone willing to take the job on. Kate was his "fall back" girl. I'll always have what Kate can never have again: freedom to choose. Who would want this role in all seriousness? Not I. :KEZZA: Kate reached her Mt. Everest last Friday and from here on, it's all downhill. I really hope someone is taking care of her in Wales, because if she is cooped up in that farmhouse, she could go nutty. :KEZZA: Can she go walking down the street, or to a yoga class? Is that possible? I'm not sure. :think: All the castles, jewels, titles, money, lavish clothes, adulation and luxury in the world could not convince me to take on this role. And really, I do think Kate is going to feel embarrassed when William talks about work, and she can talk about what exactly? That's when I think things will turn sour in this marriage: it's not an equal partnership. Kate could do what she wanted before (press ban), within reason, but now that is not an option for her. It's not an enviable position at all. I hate to say "I told you so" but I predicted this. William wanted a compliant wife he could manipulate and be his domestic slave. I'm not sure about Kate's credentials, but that seems to be William's master plan. After years of waiting around, Kate will get frustrated, IMO - when the dust settles. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: mousiekins on May 05, 2011, 06:34:49 am ________________________________________ I have always wondered what William and Kate talk about. I have a suspicion it has always been one sided. Kate's Polo comment have us a look into their talks " I have to pay attention as we will talk about it in minute detail later " illuminating ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Yooper on May 05, 2011, 06:45:01 am ________________________________________ I wondered that too, Mousie. My bet is mostly about her. That should be fascinating in about 90 days. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: True Brit on May 05, 2011, 08:10:55 am ________________________________________ Excellent, thought provoking posts all of you. This forum is so good in that it will debate and explore issues and lift the tablecloth of PR spin to look what's underneath and nothing is as it seems. James Whittaker also said that Kate would do and say anything to get that ring. And people are saying what a good family the Middletons are? A comulsive/obsessive daughter who putes her whole life on hold just so she and her family can climb to the top of the tree. There is something desperately tragic about the entire situation in that nothing matters but status and wealth. Princess Anne was lip-read as saying "from rages to riches" and she has also said that Kate's none working status was "nice work if you can get it". And yes just what do they talk about? It must be so one sided. I can remember being at home when the kids were small and my days revolved around them (which was great) but I was always so acutely aware that I had no conversation, no experiences to share that did revolve around the home. It must be the same as she goes nowhere and does nothing so I suspect the talk is all about William. ________________________________________ Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate Post by: Kuei Fei on May 05, 2011, 08:47:55 am ________________________________________ I'm going ot go out on a limb a suggest that William didn't want someone to challenge him all day and night about things. He wanted someone to complement him and also someone he owuld not have to defend day in and day out from the media. Since the Windsors take the gutter tabloids seriously, the tabloids have had the ability to mess up the lives of the royals by adhering to unrealistic standards. I think William secretly wanted to marry a princess/aristo or a successful career woman, BUT the albatross is the media that demands he not just marry British, but a COMMONER and someone preferably as cheap as possible so the tabloids don't have to grovel. It's not about equality, but I think about someone who will make his public life easier. He did well in terms of PR, but he has married someone he would have respected automatically not someone who would have to 'challenge' him to earn his respect. It would already be there. I don't think the Windsors are racist (Prince Philip is proof of that since he wasn't born in Britain) and I think a glamorous princess from a foreign House would have been a HUGE draw worldwide, but the issue is that the tabloid press is running things for some reason and the tabloids are all about the short term instant fix and a good 'story.' The only problem with the Windsors, is their determination to worry about the press rather than personal accomplishment. I've said in the past, that if Prince Charles were born in any other country, as a Prince he would be considered ideal and his batty ideas a charming and adorable facet of his personality and if his domestic life was a mess, it's not something that would have been a factor in determining his suitability as King, but just a source of amusement for the people to laugh about. The issue is that British culture is no longer an ingrained, separate thing, but something that has been blurred into the fold of entertainment. William 'failed' because it was also the divorce issue as well; he was stigmatized because of the divorce of his parents and it's something that he hasn't been allowed to get over. He wasn't able to meet someoen who might have had the same broken home, but knew what it was like and knew better than to think that divorce is some automatic solution to marital issues and understands his desperate need for a safe, stable home. ________________________________________ |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2023 19:58:08 GMT
Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate
Post by: June on May 06, 2011, 02:52:07 am
________________________________________
TB and KF: good posts. :thumbsup:
KF: if it is fact that William didn't want anyone to 'challenge' him, and it appears correct, then that just shows how self-absorbed this man is. It speaks volumes, negatively about his character. bignono It says: everything is about ME, ME, ME. :rolleyes:
________________________________________
Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate
Post by: Kuei Fei on May 06, 2011, 02:58:18 am
________________________________________
Oh, no, I simply meant he didn't want any relationship that was demanding on him psychologically or emotionally. He grew up with it, so he shied away from women he thought might be unstable or constantly in one drama after another. Stupidly, he got dragged right back into it.
This is what happens when you don't get therapy for yourself or a family member if they go through domestic trauma.
________________________________________
Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate
Post by: June on May 06, 2011, 03:16:53 am
________________________________________
I know, but my interpretation is a little less charitable.
________________________________________
Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate
Post by: SmartOne1 on May 06, 2011, 09:53:41 am
________________________________________
Quote from: Mada on May 04, 2011, 04:16:26 pm
Quote from: True Brit on May 04, 2011, 10:48:18 am
I have often thought this too (that William could get any woman) but after reading and following it all my own conclusion (and many here are of the same opinion) is that after Diana most of the aristocratic girls just didn't want the hassle. And why should they - rich, well connected they would be "somebody" and in no need of having a leg up in social circles.
Many of them also have careers and impressive outside interests and would not be prepared to compromise in order to accommodate the RF. Too many people think of the RF as being a glamorous, globe trotting lifestyle but that is where Diana came adrift. She became the superstar model whereas the RF need someone presentable but rather, well dull and low key. Good Royalty is like good Government it's needs to be effective but unspectacular.
I also get the impression that, unike his brother, William is not much of a ladies man and he does still bear the mental scars of his mother's fate (not that Harry doesn't). You do get the picture that he is besotted with Kate but many people's critical concerns are that she is not so much in love with him but in love with the whole Royal fairytale thing. And never mind the attempts at reinvention those Middletons are ocean going social climbers and doing very well.
I can only give my own concerns but from what we know and have seen of Kate she also wants the high life, to be admired and adored globally and the Palace is already trying to clamp down on public appearances etc. What happens next? Who knows all we can do is wait and see how it all turns out.
Great Posts Ladies ! Really Like that one True Brit !!!! :thankyou:
:welcome2: Smartone1,
This is my own very personal opinion. PW has been seen with KM since university and already at that time she was considered "PW's future wife".
KM has played the media card very hard as soon as her relationship with PW has been publicly known.
And even though PW and KM broke up several times during their "courtship" and she was known as the on-off girlfriend - the press belittled it and focused people's mind on the fact she was the PUBLIC girlfriend preparing for the role of her life : becoming Princess William.
Now you have PW who was known to be quite unlucky in love and have been rejected by many women. Feeling insecure about himself and being pressured to make a decision both by the press, her public girlfriend family and his own family, marrying was apparently the easiest path to take, as in his family it seems to be a tradition to sacrifice one's well-being for the sake of PR.
The question is : what girl would have wanted to enter this mess now ?
Unless by a twist of fate, PW had met the love of his life and would have fall head over heels for her, I could not see him totally leaving behind the so-familiar Kate, who was already claimed by her family and considered by the press as " PW's official wife".
The guy was trapped since day one, by the pushy Kate and her family and the press, then you can add the keeping-up-the-appearance attitude and others occult dealings from the Windsors side and you have that Royal Farce.
When you let someone enter your life, lover or not, there are always some hidden dynamic into play. It's not easy to quit someone when you're just John Smith or Jane Doe, so imagine when you are a high profile individual with a so public relationship with a woman who made clear subconsciously to any other women that there was no way she would let her prey give her the slip. IMHO it's enough an explanation to understand why he got married to her.
Love is something very tangible even though there's no real word to describe what it is and when you see Love you don't waste time to wonder if it is there or not. :flower:
Thanks for the welcome ladies.
I am not so sure I agree with the not so easy to unload someobdy thing. This is the future King of England. He could have unloaded Kate many times and people would take his side in the end and Kate would be forgotten in a flash. Hell, lots of people go out with a boyfriend/girlfriend for years and then finally realize they are not the one and get out. No shame in it.
Look, I have no clue what is going on with Kate and William in reality. Maybe it is just an arrangement, who knows? I just think that PW has more options than any of us would know about. I think after what happened to his mother Diana he could have done just what he wanted and could have persuaded the Royal Family. They finally accepted Camilla after all for Charles.
________________________________________
Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate
Post by: June on May 06, 2011, 09:59:50 am
________________________________________
He has options, no doubt, but not options which suited his narcissistic, controlling nature. :June:
However, it has been reported that he had also received lots of knock-backs, Isabella Calthorpe being just one. Years ago, William himself allegedly stated that Kate was his "fall-back" girl, because he was terrified he would have to marry someone "suitable" just to fulfill the role. Now, that doesn't sound like a person who was inundated with offers from nice ladies he cared about, does it?
I agree that he could have ceased seeing Kate if he wished to so act. Though, this would not have come without a price. Perhaps he's too lazy and/or egotistical to have considered bearing the fallout, likely loneliness and lack of sex. That can be a powerful draw to stay in any relationship.
But that doesn't mean he is in love with her, either. People get married for all kinds of reasons, love being the most likely, but with royalty, the likelihood of it being true love diminishes dramatically.
Royals are not like you or I - no matter how much they pretend. I think that is where you and I differ: you are imputing upon William free choice that he does not hold. :flower:
________________________________________
Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate
Post by: SmartOne1 on May 06, 2011, 10:15:34 am
________________________________________
Quote from: Kuei Fei on May 06, 2011, 02:58:18 am
Oh, no, I simply meant he didn't want any relationship that was demanding on him psychologically or emotionally. He grew up with it, so he shied away from women he thought might be unstable or constantly in one drama after another. Stupidly, he got dragged right back into it.
This is what happens when you don't get therapy for yourself or a family member if they go through domestic trauma.
Coming from an unbroken home does not mean there is no domestic trauma. Just because somebody's parents are divorced does not mean they are a less suitable candidate for a relationship. There are plenty of together marriages that are miserable and the kids suffer because of it. Plus there are so many divorced families these days avoiding it is almost impossible.
________________________________________
Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate
Post by: June on May 06, 2011, 10:18:41 am
________________________________________
We're veering off-topic ... :whistle:
If William goes away without Kate for 10 weeks, as a newly-wed, then I really think this is a marriage of convenience. It's not like he has to go, or lose his job.
Wow, choosing to spend 10 weeks away from your wife, Wills? You must really, truly love her! :tehe: rofl lols :laugh:
________________________________________
Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate
Post by: Varya on May 07, 2011, 07:59:19 pm
________________________________________
Quote from: SmartOne1 on May 06, 2011, 10:15:34 am
Coming from an unbroken home does not mean there is no domestic trauma. Just because somebody's parents are divorced does not mean they are a less suitable candidate for a relationship. There are plenty of together marriages that are miserable and the kids suffer because of it. Plus there are so many divorced families these days avoiding it is almost impossible.
Completely agree!
So on topic... has anyone heard anything about what Kate is going to do during this time?
________________________________________
Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate
Post by: June on May 07, 2011, 08:02:23 pm
________________________________________
Run home to Berkshire and sleep in her old room with her teddy bear and police protection officer for company? :James: :oooh: :June:
________________________________________
Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate
Post by: Kuei Fei on May 07, 2011, 08:13:46 pm
________________________________________
I'm sure that William was slated for it years ago and didn't want to renege on his promise to follow through with his work.
If Kate doesn't work, she can always try out an eating disorder, spend money beyond her means, or stalk another woman's husband. Then there's the jet set types to play with and then of course, leaking ot the press about the meanie courtiers.
________________________________________
Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate
Post by: Raisie on May 07, 2011, 08:25:42 pm
________________________________________
She better don't do it,i have enough of Kate blame the courtiers for everything.She is the poor saint woman who don't do anything but always someone else (the royals,the courtiers or the people).
________________________________________
Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate
Post by: Yooper on May 07, 2011, 08:53:29 pm
________________________________________
I don't blame PW one bit and bet he'll do everything to move on with his own life and leave her behind whenever possible. Something tells me he's sorry he married her.
So, go for it and be proud. At least he's doing something for his country.
________________________________________
Title: Re: William to Falklands in Sept. without Kate
Post by: June on May 07, 2011, 09:04:40 pm
________________________________________
I get that feeling too, somehow. Just a hunch, nothing more ... but whilst she was grinning like a loon, he looked miserable. Then again, that is nothing new.
Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC | Imprint
|
|
|
|
Post by Gar on Jul 4, 2024 23:23:01 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 5, 2024 0:17:40 GMT
|
|
Kate won't object at all since it'd give her a pretense to not stay at the base, she'll go to London to stay with her family "to ease the pain of separation with her beloved princely hubby", or something.
#JamesMiddleton