|
|
Post by Admin on May 2, 2021 14:51:36 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Jun 27, 2021 22:47:50 GMT
I sincerely wonder WHY it is that the BRF is such a mess; there is always a scandal, always a drama, always a problem and it gets worse with each new generation. It's not like this is just one or two black sheep, but is in fact the entire family. Supposedly even Princess Anne is not happy in her marriage and wants out, but HM forbids it. Both princes are a disaster and it is clear that Charles is the only one who has his life together and wants to streamline everything.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 27, 2021 22:58:13 GMT
I sincerely wonder WHY it is that the BRF is such a mess; there is always a scandal, always a drama, always a problem and it gets worse with each new generation. It's not like this is just one or two black sheep, but is in fact the entire family. Supposedly even Princess Anne is not happy in her marriage and wants out, but HM forbids it. Both princes are a disaster and it is clear that Charles is the only one who has his life together and wants to streamline everything. And ironically, he's the one to blame when things get particularly bad. Harry was the scapegoat for Bill and Kate, but Charles is the kicking boy of the family. When you want to divert attention from yourself, blame Charles. |
|
|
|
Post by india on Jun 28, 2021 0:45:04 GMT
When you get down to it, the problem stems from the fact that HM is an extremely weak person who hates confrontation and controversy. She never takes the bull by its horns unless really forced to i.e. Diana's death when she refused to lower the flag and address the nation. She really is kind of stupid.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 28, 2021 1:04:08 GMT
When you get down to it, the problem stems from the fact that HM is an extremely weak person who hates confrontation and controversy. She never takes the bull by its horns unless really forced to i.e. Diana's death when she refused to lower the flag and address the nation. She really is kind of stupid. Diana didn't deserve flags to be lowered - and I don't feel she's stupid, but just unable to take a strong hand in anything. |
|
|
|
Post by india on Jun 28, 2021 1:07:22 GMT
The British public loved Diana. HM needed to make a move and she held back to her detriment.
|
|
|
|
Post by kueifei on Jun 28, 2021 5:50:03 GMT
The public loved Diana, but they never had to live with her. Tina Brown did admit in her book that Diana was loved by the public, but she was callous with those who lived closest to her. It's not like Diana was easy to live with and I sincerely think that HM refused to learn and grow from the realities that PR is not the best way to decide a royal consort and really the media would have less power if the royals did not insist on giving them that power. IF just for once, the BRF didn't take the media into consideration, I am sure they would all be better off. Thing is, that the media and public do not have to live with their favorites. It's not like media commentators had ot live with Diana's mood swings, or her bulimia, or her explosive temper tantrums. Members of the public did not put up with her trashing their reputations or making wild accusations at them. Charles did. William made the choice to listen to gossip columnists and article writers and took Kate back, despite the clear fact that he neither loved or respected her or even wanted her in his life anymore. I also think that if the BRF had a history of not hiding things or protecting their own at the expense of just making the necessary sacrifices like handing errant members to the police or just general consequences, they would not attract so many shady people.
|
|
|
|
Post by romilly on Jul 11, 2021 17:45:57 GMT
Well they have certainly attracted extremely shady people now with The Midds and Gary Goldmith. Pippa’s FIL accused of rape etc etc.
There is very little respect for the Monarchy now because if people like that worming their way in. Let’s hope all the sordid revelations due to come out do so soon
|
|
|
|
Post by wildhat on Aug 27, 2021 7:09:57 GMT
I think it might contain info that the Windosrs funded the Nazi party, That would blow the monarchy to smithereens.
Just checking in to say rumour has it (book and all) that Coco Chanel was a nazi spy and she got away scot free due to her british royal connections. Along with that, how there were such nazi sympathies in some membeers of the BRF. It would shatter the WWII narrative, the one that gives them clout to this day, that's for sure. |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 29, 2021 2:52:41 GMT
Source:alternaticity.boards.net/thread/43/royal-babies-means?page=3Prince William’s ‘Indian ancestry’
The story about Queen Charlotte’s alleged African ancestry has reminded me of a story that appeared in the press in June 2013, around a month before Prince George was born.
“Prince William's great-great-great-great-great grandmother was half-Indian
DNA testing has revealed that Prince William will become the first British monarch of Indian ancestry.
A clear genetic line has been drawn between the Duke of Cambridge and a half-Indian woman, potentially marking him as the first King whose bloodline is descended from the country.”
www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-2342035/DNA-tests-future-British-monarch-Prince-William-clear-genetic-line-India-Dianas-side.html
The connection is said to be on the Spencer side. It is remote and tenuous and there are no details given of the DNA tests.Could this have been damage limitation in advance, an attempt to explain Prince George’s brown eyes? Charles II is said to be the only king to have had brown eyes; they were inherited from his French mother.
Could this and the Queen Charlotte story be a pathetic attempt to elicit support for the royal family from certain groups by presenting them as ‘one of us’?
|
|
|
|
Post by romilly on Oct 12, 2021 11:39:28 GMT
That’s what has been reported in the foreign Press, a desperate and transparent attempt at damage limitation over the questionable deep chocolate brown eyes of George which geneticists say is an impossibility. Much about the alleged dying of his dark brown hair to blonde too.
|
|
|
|
Post by india on Oct 13, 2021 1:29:41 GMT
That’s what has been reported in the foreign Press, a desperate and transparent attempt at damage limitation over the questionable deep chocolate brown eyes of George which geneticists say is an impossibility. Much about the alleged dying of his dark brown hair to blonde too. And the continual bleaching of Charlotte's and Louis' hair too. |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 13, 2021 2:04:53 GMT
That’s what has been reported in the foreign Press, a desperate and transparent attempt at damage limitation over the questionable deep chocolate brown eyes of George which geneticists say is an impossibility. Much about the alleged dying of his dark brown hair to blonde too. And the continual bleaching of Charlotte's and Louis' hair too. Such obvious bleach jobs, too, and very swarthy looking, almost east-european robust features (and nothing wrong with those at all!!) but just not seen in the Windsors to date. Not a crime for a royal to have dark hair and darker eyes - but why try to change their natural looks into something grotesque? |
|
|
|
Post by india on Oct 13, 2021 5:35:14 GMT
When you are a slithering slit eyed Viper you will do anything to achieve your goal. Create and Abuse of children is nothing to Carole whose eye is on one thing and one thing alone: The Crown and all of the riches it holds.
|
|
|
|
Post by romilly on Oct 16, 2021 17:53:06 GMT
Many saying the viper will be getting a really nasty shock when Charles is king as those close allege that Charles and Camilla can see exactly what she is about. Before then next year’s promised books are said to be going to reveal much of what she is desperate to keep hidden.
|
|
|
|
Post by caseyanne on Oct 18, 2021 14:54:39 GMT
Oh I hope so!!
|
|
cheryl
Baron/Baroness
Posts: 66
|
Post by cheryl on Nov 22, 2021 3:58:15 GMT
William's sons look like he did as a child. Charlotte is definitely a Goldsmith. I don't think any of their children are having their hair dyed. Tina Brown met Diana only once and didn't actually know her. Diana's family knew her so did her best friend Rosa Monkton. Pippa is not member of the royal family.. and never will be. I haven't read such nonsense in a while.
|
|
cheryl
Baron/Baroness
Posts: 66
|
Post by cheryl on Nov 22, 2021 4:02:25 GMT
Just reading Lady Colin Campbell's book on Harry and Meghan. Lady CC devotes nearly a whole chapter to the s#rrog#cy theory. Interesting stuff One quote in particular caught my eye - she says how relieved BP/RF were that the press didn't run with the story as it was rife on the internet Direct quote - "Matters of sartorial taste aside, the real danger was what would happen of the wider public came to believe, as a vociferous section of the internet commentators and press did, that Meghan was faking a pregnancy. Because the Palace were alert to the danger, there were teams of people working behind the scenes to shut down some of the internet sites and shut up some of the more extreme commentators" How surprising !!!! lady colin has never met a single senior member of the RF, she never met Diana. She spouts gossip and rumours and is a con. I wouldn't trust that person as far as I could throw that person, such a jumped up snob. Brown eyes are more dominant than blue eyes. |
|
cheryl
Baron/Baroness
Posts: 66
|
Post by cheryl on Nov 22, 2021 4:12:15 GMT
Children can show recessive genes, Charles looks nothing like either parent. Neither does Andy. William looked like a very young Charles Spencer and looked a bit like a young Edward too. www.pinterest.ca/pin/308567011966591009/ |
|
|
|
Post by romilly on Nov 23, 2021 8:09:16 GMT
Gene specialists have said those deep chocolate eyes of George are impossible from 2 light eyes parents. Brown are dominant if one has blue and the other brown.
|
|
tale BS.
Oct 20, 2024 18:30:58 GMT
Oct 20, 2024 18:30:58 GMT
#JamesMiddleton